1. 10 1月, 2013 5 次提交
    • B
      ACPICA: Resources: New interface, AcpiWalkResourceBuffer. · afb1bbee
      Bob Moore 提交于
      Implements a new interface for walking resource lists that it at
      a lower level than the existing AcpiWalkResources.  (Method is
      not executed.)
      Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      afb1bbee
    • B
      ACPICA: Update version to 20121114. · 1cd4e951
      Bob Moore 提交于
      Version 20121114.
      Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      1cd4e951
    • L
      ACPICA: Cleanup indentation to reduce differences between Linux and ACPICA. · 3e8214e5
      Lv Zheng 提交于
      This is a cosmetic patch only. Comparison of the resulting binary showed
      only line number differences.
      
      This patch does not affect the generation of the Linux binary.
      This patch decreases 210 lines of 20121018 divergence.diff.
      
      The ACPICA source codes uses a totally different indentation style from the
      Linux to be compatible with other users (operating systems or BIOS).
      
      Indentation differences are critical to the release automation. There are
      two causes related to the "indentation" that are affecting the release
      automation:
      1. The ACPICA -> Linux release process is:
           ACPICA source -- acpisrc - hierarchy - indent ->
           linuxized ACPICA source -- diff ->
           linuxized ACPICA patch (x) -- human intervention ->
           linuxized ACPICA patch (o)
           Where
             'x' means "cannot be directly applied to the Linux"
             'o' means "can be directly applied to the Linux"
         Different "indent" version or "indent" options used in the "indent"
         step will lead to different divergences.
         The version of "indent" used for the current release process is:
           GNU indent 2.2.11
         The options of "indent" used for the current release process is:
           -npro -kr -i8 -ts8 -sob -l80 -ss -ncs
      2. Manual indentation prettifying work in the Linux side will also harm the
         automatically generated linuxized ACPICA patches, making them impossible
         to apply directly.
      
      This patch fixes source code differences caused by the two causes so that
      the "human intervention" can be reduced in the future.
      Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      3e8214e5
    • L
      ACPICA: Cleanup source to reduce differences between Linux and ACPICA. · 739dcbb9
      Lv Zheng 提交于
      This is a cosmetic patch only. Comparison of the resulting binary showed
      only line number differences.
      
      This patch does not affect the generation of the Linux binary.
      This patch decreases 389 lines of 20121018 divergence.diff.
      
      This patch reduces source code diff caused by the simple code maintenance
      work:
      1. Deletion of the unused include files.
      2. Deletion of the deprecated codes blocks.
      3. Repositioning of the code blocks.
      4. Replacing the values with the well defined macros.
      5. Replacing the types with the equivalent types.
      Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      739dcbb9
    • L
      ACPICA: Cleanup updated comments. · 75c8044f
      Lv Zheng 提交于
      This is a cosmetic patch only. Comparison of the resulting binary showed
      only line number differences.
      
      This patch does not affect the generation of the Linux binary.
      This patch decreases 558 lines of 20121018 divergence.diff.
      
      This patch reduces the source code diff between Linux and ACPICA by
      cleaning the comments that already have been updated in ACPICA.
      
      There is no extra indentation done in this patch. Even the empty line
      deletions and insertions are also splitted into another cleanup patch so
      that this patch can be easily reviewed, and the binary differences can be
      held to a lowest level.
      Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      75c8044f
  2. 15 11月, 2012 4 次提交
  3. 03 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 21 9月, 2012 3 次提交
  5. 31 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      ACPI: delete _GTS/_BFS support · 3f6f49c7
      Len Brown 提交于
      _GTS and _BFS were added to the suspend/resume flow
      in the ACPI 2.0 specification.
      
      Linux dutifully implemented _GTS and _BFS.
      We discovered that it was rarely seen in systems
      in the field.  Further, some of those systems had
      AML so bogus that it could never work -- proof that
      no other operating system supports _GTS and _BFS.
      So we made _GTS and _BFS optional via modparam,
      and disabled them by default.
      
      But we've had to complicate some code to keep
      this support in the kernel, as these methods are defined
      to be evaluated very close to sleep entry and exit.
      Indeed, no other AML is ever evaluated with interrupts off.
      
      We have submitted a proposal for _GTS and _BFS
      to be officially removed from the ACPI specification
      on the next revision.  Here we remove it from Linux.
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      3f6f49c7
  6. 17 7月, 2012 4 次提交
  7. 14 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  8. 01 6月, 2012 2 次提交
  9. 30 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  10. 27 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      ACPICA: Sleep/Wake interfaces: optionally execute _GTS and _BFS · 8a73b17e
      Lin Ming 提交于
      Enhanced the sleep/wake interfaces to optionally execute the
      _GTS method (Going To Sleep), and the _BFS method (Back From
      Sleep).  Windows apparently does not execute these methods, and
      therefore these methods are often untested. It has been seen on
      some systems where the execution of these methods causes errors
      and also prevents the machine from entering S5. It is therefore
      suggested that host operating systems do not execute these methods
      by default. In the future, perhaps these methods can be optionally
      executed based on the age of the system and/or what is the newest
      version of Windows that the BIOS asks for via _OSI.
      Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      8a73b17e
  11. 22 3月, 2012 3 次提交
  12. 17 1月, 2012 7 次提交
  13. 13 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  14. 14 7月, 2011 3 次提交
  15. 10 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 23 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  17. 03 3月, 2011 1 次提交