- 21 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In the case where we hold a delegation stateid, use that in for inside SETATTR calls. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
According to RFC3530 we're supposed to cache the change attribute at the time the client receives a write delegation. If the inode is clean, a CB_GETATTR callback by the server to the client is supposed to return the cached change attribute. If, OTOH, the inode is dirty, the client should bump the cached change attribute by 1. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 05 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Delegations allow us to cache posix and BSD locks, however when the delegation is recalled, we need to "flush the cache" and send the cached LOCK requests to the server. This patch sets up the mechanism for doing so. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 19 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-