Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 30 4月, 2008 4 次提交
  3. 17 4月, 2008 9 次提交
  5. 29 4月, 2008 1 次提交
    • E
      ext4: reduce mballoc stack usage with noinline_for_stack · 4ddfef7b
      由 Eric Sandeen 提交于 
      mballoc.c is a whole lot of static functions, which gcc seems to
really like to inline.

With the changes below, on x86, I can at least get from:

432 ext4_mb_new_blocks
240 ext4_mb_free_blocks
208 ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations
188 ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
164 ext4_mb_init_cache
152 ext4_mb_release_inode_pa
136 ext4_mb_seq_history_show
...

to

220 ext4_mb_free_blocks
188 ext4_mb_seq_groups_show
176 ext4_mb_regular_allocator
164 ext4_mb_init_cache
156 ext4_mb_new_blocks
152 ext4_mb_release_inode_pa
136 ext4_mb_seq_history_show
124 ext4_mb_release_group_pa
...

which still has some big functions in there, but not 432 bytes!
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      4ddfef7b
  7. 30 4月, 2008 2 次提交
  9. 29 4月, 2008 4 次提交
  11. 17 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 29 4月, 2008 2 次提交
  15. 17 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 30 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 17 4月, 2008 1 次提交
    • H
      ext4: fdatasync should skip metadata writeout when overwriting · 53c550e9
      由 Hisashi Hifumi 提交于 
      Currently fdatasync is identical to fsync in ext3.

I think fdatasync should skip journal flush in data=ordered and
data=writeback mode when it overwrites to already-instantiated blocks on
HDD.  When I_DIRTY_DATASYNC flag is not set, fdatasync should skip journal
writeout because this indicates only atime or/and mtime updates.

Following patch is the same approach of ext2's fsync code(ext2_sync_file).

I did a performance test using the sysbench.

#sysbench --num-threads=128 --max-requests=50000 --test=fileio --file-total-size=128G
--file-test-mode=rndwr --file-fsync-mode=fdatasync run

The result on ext3 was:

	-2.6.24
	Operations performed:  0 Read, 50080 Write, 59600 Other = 109680 Total
	Read 0b  Written 782.5Mb  Total transferred 782.5Mb  (12.116Mb/sec)
	  775.45 Requests/sec executed

	Test execution summary:
	    total time:                          64.5814s
	    total number of events:              50080
	    total time taken by event execution: 3713.9836
	    per-request statistics:
	         min:                            0.0000s
	         avg:                            0.0742s
	         max:                            0.9375s
	         approx.  95 percentile:         0.2901s

	Threads fairness:
	    events (avg/stddev):           391.2500/23.26
	    execution time (avg/stddev):   29.0155/1.99

	-2.6.24-patched
	Operations performed:  0 Read, 50009 Write, 61596 Other = 111605 Total
	Read 0b  Written 781.39Mb  Total transferred 781.39Mb  (16.419Mb/sec)
	1050.83 Requests/sec executed

	Test execution summary:
	    total time:                          47.5900s
	    total number of events:              50009
	    total time taken by event execution: 2934.5768
	    per-request statistics:
 	         min:                            0.0000s
	         avg:                            0.0587s
 	         max:                            0.8938s
	         approx.  95 percentile:         0.1993s

	Threads fairness:
	    events (avg/stddev):           390.6953/22.64
	    execution time (avg/stddev):   22.9264/1.17

Filesystem I/O throughput was improved.

Signed-off-by :Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      53c550e9
  21. 30 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 29 4月, 2008 2 次提交
  25. 28 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  27. 22 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  29. 19 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  31. 16 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  33. 26 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  35. 23 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  37. 26 2月, 2008 3 次提交
  39. 16 2月, 2008 2 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Don't use ext4_dec_count() if not needed · 825f1481
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      The ext4_dec_count() function is only needed when dropping the i_nlink
count on inodes which are (or which could be) directories.  If we
*know* that the inode in question can't possibly be a directory, use
drop_nlink or clear_nlink() if we know i_nlink is 1.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      825f1481
    • V
      ext4: modify block allocation algorithm for the last group · 74d3487f
      由 Valerie Clement 提交于 
      When a directory inode is allocated in the last group and the last group
contains less than s_blocks_per_group blocks, the initial block allocated
for the directory is not always allocated in the same group as the
directory inode, but in one of the first groups of the filesystem (group 1
for example).
Depending on the current process's pid, ext4_find_near() and 
ext4_ext_find_goal() can return a block number greater than the maximum
blocks count in the filesystem and in that case the block will be not
allocated in the same group as the inode.

The following patch fixes the problem.

Should the modification also be done in ext2/3 code?
Signed-off-by: NValerie Clement <valerie.clement@bull.net>
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      74d3487f