1. 20 8月, 2008 2 次提交
    • M
      ext4: journal credits reservation fixes for DIO, fallocate · f3bd1f3f
      Mingming Cao 提交于
      DIO and fallocate credit calculation is different than writepage, as
      they do start a new journal right for each call to ext4_get_blocks_wrap().
      This patch uses the helper function in DIO and fallocate case, passing
      a flag indicating that the modified data are contigous thus could account
      less indirect/index blocks.
      
      This patch also fixed the journal credit reservation for direct I/O
      (DIO).  Previously the estimated credits for DIO only was calculated for
      non-extent files, which was not enough if the file is extent-based.
      
      Also fixed was fallocate double-counting credits for modifying the the
      superblock.
      Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      f3bd1f3f
    • M
      ext4: journal credits calulation cleanup and fix for non-extent writepage · a02908f1
      Mingming Cao 提交于
      When considering how many journal credits are needed for modifying a
      chunk of data, we need to account for the super block, inode block,
      quota blocks and xattr block, indirect/index blocks, also, group bitmap
      and group descriptor blocks for new allocation (including data and
      indirect/index blocks). There are many places in ext4 do the calculation
      on their own and often missed one or two meta blocks, and often they
      assume single block allocation, and did not considering the multile
      chunk of allocation case.
      
      This patch is trying to cleanup current journal credit code, provides
      some common helper funtion to calculate the journal credits, to be used
      for writepage, writepages, DIO, fallocate, migration, defrag, and for
      both nonextent and extent files.
      
      This patch modified the writepage/write_begin credit caculation for
      nonextent files, to use the new helper function. It also fixed the
      problem that writepage on nonextent files did not consider the case
      blocksize <pagesize, thus could possibelly need multiple block
      allocation in a single transaction.
      Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      a02908f1
  2. 18 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 12 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • M
      ext4: delayed allocation i_blocks fix for stat · 3e3398a0
      Mingming Cao 提交于
      Right now i_blocks is not getting updated until the blocks are actually
      allocaed on disk.  This means with delayed allocation, right after files
      are copied, "ls -sF" shoes the file as taking 0 blocks on disk.  "du"
      also shows the files taking zero space, which is highly confusing to the
      user.
      
      Since delayed allocation already keeps track of per-inode total
      number of blocks that are subject to delayed allocation, this patch fix
      this by using that to adjust the value returned by stat(2). When real
      block allocation is done, the i_blocks will get updated. Since the
      reserved blocks for delayed allocation will be decreased, this will be
      keep value returned by stat(2) consistent.
      Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      3e3398a0
  4. 15 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • M
      ext4: delayed allocation ENOSPC handling · d2a17637
      Mingming Cao 提交于
      This patch does block reservation for delayed
      allocation, to avoid ENOSPC later at page flush time.
      
      Blocks(data and metadata) are reserved at da_write_begin()
      time, the freeblocks counter is updated by then, and the number of
      reserved blocks is store in per inode counter.
              
      At the writepage time, the unused reserved meta blocks are returned
      back. At unlink/truncate time, reserved blocks are properly released.
      
      Updated fix from  Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      to fix the oldallocator block reservation accounting with delalloc, added
      lock to guard the counters and also fix the reservation for meta blocks.
      Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      d2a17637
  5. 12 7月, 2008 8 次提交
  6. 14 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 12 7月, 2008 2 次提交
  8. 30 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  9. 29 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  10. 30 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  11. 29 4月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      ext4: Fix race between migration and mmap write · 267e4db9
      Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
      Fail migrate if we allocated new blocks via mmap write.
      
      If we write to holes in the file via mmap, we end up allocating
      new blocks. This block allocation happens without taking inode->i_mutex.
      Since migrate is protected by i_mutex and migrate expects that no
      new blocks get allocated during migrate, fail migrate if new blocks
      get allocated.
      
      We can't take inode->i_mutex in the mmap write path because that
      would result in a locking order violation between i_mutex and mmap_sem.
      Also adding a separate rw_sempahore for protection is really high overhead
      for a rare operation such as migrate.
      Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      267e4db9
  12. 10 2月, 2008 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Add new "development flag" to the ext4 filesystem · 469108ff
      Theodore Tso 提交于
      This flag is simply a generic "this is a crash/burn test filesystem"
      marker.  If it is set, then filesystem code which is "in development"
      will be allowed to mount the filesystem.  Filesystem code which is not
      considered ready for prime-time will check for this flag, and if it is
      not set, it will refuse to touch the filesystem.
      
      As we start rolling ext4 out to distro's like Fedora, et. al, this makes
      it less likely that a user might accidentally start using ext4 on a
      production filesystem; a bad thing, since that will essentially make it
      be unfsckable until e2fsprogs catches up.
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>
      Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
      469108ff
  13. 08 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  14. 29 1月, 2008 18 次提交