- 02 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michio Honda 提交于
This patch fixes the problem that the original code cannot delete the remote address where the corresponding transport is currently directed, even when the ASCONF is sent from the other address (this situation happens when the single-homed sender transmits ASCONF with ADD and DEL.) Signed-off-by: NMichio Honda <micchie@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Acked-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If the peer restart the asoc, we should not only fail any unsent/unacked data, but also stop the T3-rtx, SACK, T4-rto timers, and teardown ASCONF queues. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If an ASCONF chunk is outstanding, then the following ASCONF chunk will be queued for later transmission. But when we free the asoc, we forget to free the ASCONF queue at the same time, this will cause memory leak. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Rosenberg 提交于
The %pK format specifier is designed to hide exposed kernel pointers, specifically via /proc interfaces. Exposing these pointers provides an easy target for kernel write vulnerabilities, since they reveal the locations of writable structures containing easily triggerable function pointers. The behavior of %pK depends on the kptr_restrict sysctl. If kptr_restrict is set to 0, no deviation from the standard %p behavior occurs. If kptr_restrict is set to 1, the default, if the current user (intended to be a reader via seq_printf(), etc.) does not have CAP_SYSLOG (currently in the LSM tree), kernel pointers using %pK are printed as 0's. If kptr_restrict is set to 2, kernel pointers using %pK are printed as 0's regardless of privileges. Replacing with 0's was chosen over the default "(null)", which cannot be parsed by userland %p, which expects "(nil)". The supporting code for kptr_restrict and %pK are currently in the -mm tree. This patch converts users of %p in net/ to %pK. Cases of printing pointers to the syslog are not covered, since this would eliminate useful information for postmortem debugging and the reading of the syslog is already optionally protected by the dmesg_restrict sysctl. Signed-off-by: NDan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@infradead.org> Cc: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Commit c182f90b ("SCTP: fix race between sctp_bind_addr_free() and sctp_bind_addr_conflict()") and commit 1231f0ba ("net,rcu: convert call_rcu(sctp_local_addr_free) to kfree_rcu()"), happening in different trees, introduced a build failure. Simply make the SCTP race fix use kfree_rcu() too. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jacek Luczak 提交于
During the sctp_close() call, we do not use rcu primitives to destroy the address list attached to the endpoint. At the same time, we do the removal of addresses from this list before attempting to remove the socket from the port hash As a result, it is possible for another process to find the socket in the port hash that is in the process of being closed. It then proceeds to traverse the address list to find the conflict, only to have that address list suddenly disappear without rcu() critical section. Fix issue by closing address list removal inside RCU critical section. Race can result in a kernel crash with general protection fault or kernel NULL pointer dereference: kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa02f3dde>] [<ffffffffa02f3dde>] sctp_bind_addr_conflict+0x64/0x82 [sctp] kernel: Call Trace: kernel: [<ffffffffa02f415f>] ? sctp_get_port_local+0x17b/0x2a3 [sctp] kernel: [<ffffffffa02f3d45>] ? sctp_bind_addr_match+0x33/0x68 [sctp] kernel: [<ffffffffa02f4416>] ? sctp_do_bind+0xd3/0x141 [sctp] kernel: [<ffffffffa02f5030>] ? sctp_bindx_add+0x4d/0x8e [sctp] kernel: [<ffffffffa02f5183>] ? sctp_setsockopt_bindx+0x112/0x4a4 [sctp] kernel: [<ffffffff81089e82>] ? generic_file_aio_write+0x7f/0x9b kernel: [<ffffffffa02f763e>] ? sctp_setsockopt+0x14f/0xfee [sctp] kernel: [<ffffffff810c11fb>] ? do_sync_write+0xab/0xeb kernel: [<ffffffff810e82ab>] ? fsnotify+0x239/0x282 kernel: [<ffffffff810c2462>] ? alloc_file+0x18/0xb1 kernel: [<ffffffff8134a0b1>] ? compat_sys_setsockopt+0x1a5/0x1d9 kernel: [<ffffffff8134aaf1>] ? compat_sys_socketcall+0x143/0x1a4 kernel: [<ffffffff810467dc>] ? sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x32 Signed-off-by: NJacek Luczak <luczak.jacek@gmail.com> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 5月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
It's already known non-null above. Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
This variable only needs initialization when cmsgs.info is NULL. Use memset to ensure padding is also zeroed so kernel doesn't leak any data. Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Flow key is available, so fetch it from there. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 5月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
I messed things up when I converted over to the transport flow, I passed the ipv4 address value instead of it's address. Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Now we can pick it out of the transport's flow key. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
This allows us to acquire the exact route keying information from the protocol, however that might be managed. It handles all of the possibilities, from the simplest case of storing the key in inet->cork.fl to the more complex setup SCTP has where individual transports determine the flow. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Several future simplifications are possible now because of this. For example, the sctp_addr unions can simply refer directly to the flowi information. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
The rcu callback sctp_local_addr_free() just calls a kfree(), so we use kfree_rcu() instead of the call_rcu(sctp_local_addr_free). Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
- 04 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Instead of rt->rt_{src,dst} Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 28 4月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Change the call to take the transport parameter and set the cached 'dst' appropriately inside the get_dst() function calls. This will allow us in the future to clean up source address storage as well. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
There is no point in passing a destination address to a get_saddr() call. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP never called xfrm_output after it's v6 route lookups so that never really worked with ipsec. Additioanlly, we never passed port nubmers and protocol in the flowi, so any port based policies were never applied as well. Now that we can fixed ipv6 routing lookup code, using ip6_dst_lookup_flow() and pass port numbers. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The ipv6 routing lookup does give us a source address, but instead of filling it into the dst, it's stored in the flowi. We can use that instead of going through the entire source address selection again. Also the useless ->dst_saddr member of sctp_pf is removed. And sctp_v6_dst_saddr() is removed, instead by introduce sctp_v6_to_addr(), which can be reused to cleanup some dup code. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Weixing Shi 提交于
In the below test case, using the source address routing, sctp can not work. Node-A 1)ifconfig eth0 inet6 add 2001:1::1/64 2)ip -6 rule add from 2001:1::1 table 100 pref 100 3)ip -6 route add 2001:2::1 dev eth0 table 100 4)sctp_darn -H 2001:1::1 -P 250 -l & Node-B 1)ifconfig eth0 inet6 add 2001:2::1/64 2)ip -6 rule add from 2001:2::1 table 100 pref 100 3)ip -6 route add 2001:1::1 dev eth0 table 100 4)sctp_darn -H 2001:2::1 -P 250 -h 2001:1::1 -p 250 -s root cause: Node-A and Node-B use the source address routing, and at begining, source address will be NULL,sctp will search the routing table by the destination address, because using the source address routing table, and the result dst_entry will be NULL. solution: walk through the bind address list to get the source address and then lookup the routing table again to get the correct dst_entry. Signed-off-by: NWeixing Shi <Weixing.Shi@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
These changes were incorrectly fixed by codespell. They were now manually corrected. Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
-
- 23 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Add const qualifiers to structs iphdr, ipv6hdr and in6_addr pointers where possible, to make code intention more obvious. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 4月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
This patch implement event notification SCTP_SENDER_DRY_EVENT. SCTP Socket API Extensions: 6.1.9. SCTP_SENDER_DRY_EVENT When the SCTP stack has no more user data to send or retransmit, this notification is given to the user. Also, at the time when a user app subscribes to this event, if there is no data to be sent or retransmit, the stack will immediately send up this notification. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
This patch change the auth event type name to SCTP_AUTHENTICATION_EVENT, which is based on API extension compliance. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
This patch Implement socket option SCTP_GET_ASSOC_ID_LIST. SCTP Socket API Extension: 8.2.6. Get the Current Identifiers of Associations (SCTP_GET_ASSOC_ID_LIST) This option gets the current list of SCTP association identifiers of the SCTP associations handled by a one-to-many style socket. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 4月, 2011 15 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If there is still data waiting to retransmit and remain in retransmit queue, while doing the next retransmit, if the chunk is abandoned, we should move it to abandoned list. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Make heartbeat information in sctp_make_heartbeat() instead of make it in sctp_sf_heartbeat() directly for common using. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
SCTP does not check whether the source address of COOKIE-ECHO chunk is the original address of INIT chunk or part of the any address parameters saved in COOKIE in CLOSED state. So even if the COOKIE-ECHO chunk is from any address but with correct COOKIE, the COOKIE-ECHO chunk still be accepted. If the COOKIE is not from a valid address, the assoc should not be established. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Shan Wei 提交于
Changed the order of processing SHUTDOWN ACK and COOKIE ACK refer to section 8.4:Handle "Out of the Blue" Packets. SHUTDOWN ACK chunk should be processed before processing "Stale Cookie" ERROR or a COOKIE ACK. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NShan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The sctp_endpoint_lookup_assoc() function uses a port hash to lookup the association and then checks to see if any of them are on the current endpoint. However, if the current endpoint is not bound, there can't be any associations on it, thus we can bail early. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP does not SCTP_STATE_EMPTY and we can never be in that state. Remove useless code. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Shan Wei 提交于
RFC4960, section 3.3.7 said: If an endpoint receives an ABORT with a format error or no TCB is found, it MUST silently discard it. When an endpoint receives ABORT that parameter value is invalid, drop it. Signed-off-by: NShan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Shan Wei 提交于
When an endpoint receives ERROR that parameter value is invalid, send an ABORT to peer with a Protocol Violation error code. Signed-off-by: NShan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When processing an ACK for ADD_IP parameter, we only release the routes on non-active transports. This can cause a wrong source address to be used. We can release the routes and cause new route lookups and source address selection so that new addresses can be used as source. Additionally, we don't need to lookup routes for all transports at the same time. We can let the transmit code path update the cached route when the transport actually sends something. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
We allow 0 port when adding new addresses. It only makes sence to allow 0 port when removing addresses. When removing the currently bound port will be used when the port in the address is set to 0. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When we have have to remove a transport due to ASCONF, we move the data to a new active path. This can trigger CACC algorithm to not mark that data as missing when SACKs arrive. This is because the transport passed to the CACC algorithm is the one this data is sitting on, not the one it was sent on (that one may be gone). So, by sending the original transport (even if it's NULL), we may start marking data as missing. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Shan Wei 提交于
Use common function to simply code. Signed-off-by: NShan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Shan Wei 提交于
Remove SCTP_CMD_TRANSMIT command as it never be used. Signed-off-by: NShan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Shan Wei 提交于
The 'p' member of struct sctp_paramhdr is common part for IPv4 addr parameter and IPv6 addr parameter in union sctp_addr_param. For addr-related code, use specified addr parameter. Otherwise, use common header to access type/length member. Signed-off-by: NShan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Shan Wei 提交于
Update the comment about sctp_sf_violation_paramlen() to be more precise. Signed-off-by: NShan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-