- 07 5月, 2013 40 次提交
-
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
ulist_add() may return -ENOMEM, fix missing check about return value. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
For created snapshots, the full root_item is copied from the source root and afterwards selectively modified. The current code forgets to clear the field received_uuid. The only problem is that it is confusing when you look at it with 'btrfs subv list', since for writable snapshots, the contents of the snapshot can be completely unrelated to the previously received snapshot. The receiver ignores such snapshots anyway because he also checks the field stransid in the root_item and that value used to be reset to zero for all created snapshots. This commit changes two things: - clear the received_uuid field for new writable snapshots. - don't clear the send/receive related information like the stransid for read-only snapshots (which makes them useable as a parent for the automatic selection of parents in the receive code). Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Dave reported a BUG_ON() that happened in end_page_writeback() after an abort. This happened because we unconditionally call end_page_writeback() in the endio case, which is right. However when we abort the transaction we will call end_page_writeback() on any writeback pages we find, which is wrong. We need to lock the page and wait on page writeback to complete if it is. There is nothing unsafe about this since we are discarding the transaction anyway. Thanks, Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
We need such a sanity check for wrong start when we defrag a file, otherwise, even with a wrong start that's larger than file size, we can end up changing not only inode's force compress flag but also FS's incompat flags. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Vincent 提交于
This fixes the following errors: fs/btrfs/reada.c: In function ‘btrfs_reada_wait’: fs/btrfs/reada.c:958:42: error: invalid operands to binary < (have ‘atomic_t’ and ‘int’) fs/btrfs/reada.c:961:41: error: invalid operands to binary < (have ‘atomic_t’ and ‘int’) Signed-off-by: NVincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@laposte.net> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
Argument 'trans' became unnecessary from setup_inline_extent_backref() that called btrfs_extend_item(). Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
Argument 'trans' is not used in btrfs_extend_item(). Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
If argument 'trans' is unnecessary in the function where fixup_low_keys() is called, 'trans' is deleted. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
Argument 'trans' is not used in fixup_low_keys(). So, remove it. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Step to reproduce: mkfs.btrfs <disk> mount <disk> <mnt> dd if=/dev/zero of=/<mnt>/data bs=1M count=10 sync btrfs quota enable <mnt> btrfs qgroup create 0/5 <mnt> btrfs qgroup limit 5M 0/5 <mnt> rm -f /<mnt>/data sync btrfs qgroup show <mnt> dd if=/dev/zero of=data bs=1M count=1 >From the perspective of users, qgroup's referenced or exclusive is negative,but user can not continue to write data! a workaround way is to cast u64 to s64 when doing qgroup reservation. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
If out of memory happens, we should return -ENOMEM directly to the caller rather than continue the work. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Nathaniel Yazdani 提交于
In the comment describing the sync_writers field of the btrfs_inode struct, "fsyncing" was misspelled "fsycing." Signed-off-by: NNathaniel Yazdani <n1ght.4nd.d4y@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When tree_mod_log_rewind decides to make a copy of the current tree buffer for its modifications, it subsequently freed the buffer before unlocking it. Obviously, those operations are required in reverse order. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
The tree mod log functions were accessing root->node->... directly, without use of btrfs_root_node() or explicit rcu locking. This could lead to an extent buffer reference being leaked and another reference being freed too early when preemtion was enabled. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Commit d9abbf1c changed tree mod log locking around ROOT_REPLACE operations. When a tree root is split, however, we were logging removal of all elements from the root node before logging removal of half of the elements for the split operation. This leads to a BUG_ON when rewinding. This commit removes the erroneous logging of removal of all elements. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The following case will make the incompat/compat flag of the super block be recovered. Task1 |Task2 flags = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(); | |flags = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(); flags |= new_flag1; | |flags |= new_flag2; btrfs_set_super_incompat_flags(flags); | |btrfs_set_super_incompat_flags(flags); the new_flag1 is recovered. In order to avoid this problem, we introduce a lock named super_lock into the btrfs_fs_info structure. If we want to update incompat/compat flags of the super block, we must hold it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The new mount option is set after parsing the remount arguments, so it is wrong that checking the autodefrag is close or not at btrfs_remount_prepare(). Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Walking backref tree and btrfs quota rely on ulist very much. This patch tries to use rb_tree to speed up search time. The original code always checks whether an element exists before adding a new element, however it costs O(n). I try to add a rb_tree in the ulist,this is only used to speed up search. I also do some measurements with quota enabled. fsstress -p 4 -n 10000 Without this path: real 0m51.058s 2m4.745s 1m28.222s 1m5.137s user 0m0.035s 0m0.041s 0m0.105s 0m0.100s sys 0m12.009s 0m11.246s 0m10.901s 0m10.999s 0m11.287s With this path: real 0m55.295s 0m50.960s 1m2.214s 0m48.273s user 0m0.053s 0m0.095s 0m0.135s 0m0.107s sys 0m7.766s 0m6.013s 0m6.319s 0m6.030s 0m6.532s After applying the patch,the execute time is down by ~42%.(11.287s->6.532s) Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
Two new flags are added to allow omitting the stream header and the end command for btrfs send streams. This is used in cases where you send multiple snapshots back-to-back in one stream. This used to be encoded like this (with 2 snapshots in this example): <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> + <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> + EOF The new format (if the two new flags are used) is this one: <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> Note that the currently existing receivers treat <end cmd> only as an indication that a new <stream header> is following. This means, you can just skip the sequence <end cmd> <stream header> without loosing compatibility. As long as an EOF is following, the currently existing receivers handle the new format (if the two new flags are used) exactly as the old one. So what is the benefit of this change? The goal is to be able to use a single stream (one TCP connection) to multiplex a request/response handshake plus Btrfs send streams, all in the same stream. In this case you cannot evaluate an EOF condition as an end of the Btrfs send stream. You need something else, and the <end cmd> is just perfect for this purpose. The summary is: The format change is driven by the need to send several Btrfs send streams over a single TCP connections, with the ability for a repeated request/response handshake in the middle. And this format change does not break any existing tool, it is completely compatible. You could compare the old behaviour of the Btrfs send stream to the one of ftp where you need a seperate request/response channel and newly opened data transfer channels for each file, while the new behaviour is more like http using a single stream for everything. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
__merge_refs() always return 0, it is unnecessary for the caller to check the return value. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
The only error return value of __add_prelim_ref() is -ENOMEM, just return errors rather than trigger BUG_ON(). Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Steps to reproduce: mkfs.btrfs <disk> mount <disk> <mnt> btrfs quota enable <mnt> btrfs sub create <mnt>/subv btrfs qgroup limit 10K <mnt>/subv btrfs quota disable <mnt>/subv It is wrong for qgroup to reserve when disabling quota, so just use tree_root to avoid edquot when disabling quota. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Step to reproduce: mkfs.btrfs <disk> mount <disk> <mnt> btrfs quota enable <mnt> btrfs qgroup limit 0/1 <mnt> dmesg If the relative qgroup dosen't exist, flag 'BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_ FLAG_INCONSISTENT' will be set, and print the noise message. This is wrong, we can just move find_qgroup_rb() before update_qgroup_limit_item().this dosen't change the logic of the function. But it can avoid unnecessary noise message and wrong set of flag. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
The original code forgot to check 'inherit', we should gurantee that all the qgroups in the struct 'inherit' exist. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Step to reproduce: mkfs.btrfs <disk> mount <disk> <mnt> btrfs quota enable <mnt> btrfs qgroup assign 0/1 1/1 <mnt> umount <mnt> btrfs-debug-tree <disk> | grep QGROUP If we want to add a qgroup relation, we should gurantee that 'src' and 'dst' exist, otherwise, such qgroup relation should not be allowed to create. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
We use mutex lock to protect all the user change operations. So when we are calling find_qgroup_rb() to check whether qgroup exists, we don't have to hold spin_lock. Besides, when enabling/disabling quota, it must be single thread when operations come here. spin lock must be firstly used to clear quota_root when disabling quota, while enabling quota, spin lock must be used to complete the last assign work. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
The original code has one spin_lock 'qgroup_lock' to protect quota configurations in memory. If we want to add a BTRFS_QGROUP_INFO_KEY, it will be added to Btree firstly, and then update configurations in memory,however, a race condition may happen between these operations. For example: ->add_qgroup_info_item() ->add_qgroup_rb() For the above case, del_qgroup_info_item() may happen just before add_qgroup_rb(). What's worse, when we want to add a qgroup relation: ->add_qgroup_relation_item() ->add_qgroup_relations() We don't have any checks whether 'src' and 'dst' exist before add_qgroup_relation_item(), a race condition can also happen for the above case. To avoid race condition and have all the necessary checks, we introduce a mutex lock 'qgroup_ioctl_lock', and we make all the user change operations protected by the mutex lock. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Creating the subvolume/snapshots(including root subvolume) qgroup auotomatically when enabling quota. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Zach Brown 提交于
__btrfs_unlink_inode() aborts its transaction when it sees errors after it removes the directory item. But it missed the case where btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log() returns an error. If this happens then the unlink appears to fail but the items have been removed without updating the directory size. The directory then has leaked bytes in i_size and can never be removed. Adding the missing transaction abort at least makes this failure consistent with the other failure cases. I noticed this while reading the code after someone on irc reported having a directory with i_size but no entries. I tested it by forcing btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log() to return -ENOMEM. Signed-off-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
This: # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb{1,2} ; wipefs -a /dev/sdb1; mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/test would lead to a blkdev open/close mismatch when the mount fails, and a permanently busy (opened O_EXCL) sdb2: # wipefs -a /dev/sdb2 wipefs: error: /dev/sdb2: probing initialization failed: Device or resource busy It's because btrfs_open_devices() may open some devices, fail on the last one, and return that failure stored in "ret." The mount then fails, but the caller then does not clean up the open devices. Chris assures me that: "btrfs_open_devices just means: go off and open every bdev you can from this uuid. It should return success if we opened any of them at all." So change the logic to ignore any open failures; just skip processing of that device. Later on it's decided whether we have enough devices to continue. Reported-by: NJan Safranek <jsafrane@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
It is very likely that there are several blocks in bio, it is very inefficient if we get their csums one by one. This patch improves this problem by getting the csums in batch. According to the result of the following test, the execute time of __btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() is down by ~28%(300us -> 217us). # dd if=<mnt>/file of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024 Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user sent me a btrfs-image of a file system that was panicing on mount during the log recovery. I had originally thought these problems were from a bug in the free space cache code, but that was just a symptom of the problem. The problem is if your application does something like this [prealloc][prealloc][prealloc] the internal extent maps will merge those all together into one extent map, even though on disk they are 3 separate extents. So if you go to write into one of these ranges the extent map will be right since we use the physical extent when doing the write, but when we log the extents they will use the wrong sizes for the remainder prealloc space. If this doesn't happen to trip up the free space cache (which it won't in a lot of cases) then you will get bogus entries in your extent tree which will screw stuff up later. The data and such will still work, but everything else is broken. This patch fixes this by not allowing extents that are on the modified list to be merged. This has the side effect that we are no longer adding everything to the modified list all the time, which means we now have to call btrfs_drop_extents every time we log an extent into the tree. So this allows me to drop all this speciality code I was using to get around calling btrfs_drop_extents. With this patch the testcase I've created no longer creates a bogus file system after replaying the log. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
When logging changed extents I was logging ram_bytes as the current length, which isn't correct, it's supposed to be the ram bytes of the original extent. This is for compression where even if we split the extent we need to know the ram bytes so when we uncompress the extent we know how big it will be. This was still working out right with compression for some reason but I think we were getting lucky. It was definitely off for prealloc which is why I noticed it, btrfsck was complaining about it. With this patch btrfsck no longer complains after a log replay. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Dave was hitting a lockdep warning because we're now properly taking the ordered operations mutex in the ordered wait stuff. This is because some cases we will have a trans handle when we are flushing delalloc space, but we can't wait on ordered extents because we could potentially deadlock, so fix this by not doing the wait if we have a trans handle. Thanks Reported-and-tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I noticed that we will add a block group to the space info before we add it to the block group cache rb tree, so we could potentially allocate from the block group before it's able to be searched for. I don't think this is too much of a problem, the race window is microscopic, but just in case move the tree insertion to above the space info linking. This makes it easier to adjust the error handling as well, so we can remove a couple of BUG_ON(ret)'s and have real error handling setup for these scenarios. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
If btrfs_find_all_roots() fails, 'roots' has been freed or 'roots' fails to allocate. We don't need to free it outside btrfs_find_all_roots() again.Fix it. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
The reason that BUG_ON() happens in these places is just because of ENOMEM. We try ro return ENOMEM rather than trigger BUG_ON(), the caller will abort the transaction thus avoiding the kernel panic. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported a panic while running a balance. What was happening was he was relocating a block, which added the reference to the relocation tree. Then relocation would walk through the relocation tree and drop that reference and free that block, and then it would walk down a snapshot which referenced the same block and add another ref to the block. The problem is this was all happening in the same transaction, so the parent block was free'ed up when we drop our reference which was immediately available for allocation, and then it was used _again_ to add a reference for the same block from a different snapshot. This resulted in something like this in the delayed ref tree add ref to 90234880, parent=2067398656, ref_root 1766, level 1 del ref to 90234880, parent=2067398656, ref_root 18446744073709551608, level 1 add ref to 90234880, parent=2067398656, ref_root 1767, level 1 as you can see the ref_root's don't match, because when we inc the ref we use the header owner, which is the original tree the block belonged to, instead of the data reloc tree. Then when we remove the extent we use the reloc tree objectid. But none of this matters, since it is a shared reference which means only the parent matters. When the delayed ref stuff runs it adds all the increments first, and then does all the drops, to make sure that we don't delete the ref if we net a positive ref count. But tree blocks aren't allowed to have multiple refs from the same block, so this panics when it tries to add the second ref. We need the add and the drop to cancel each other out in memory so we only do the final add. So to fix this we need to adjust how the delayed refs are added to the tree. Only the ref_root matters when it is a normal backref, and only the parent matters when it is a shared backref. So make our decision based on what ref type we have. This allows us to keep the ref_root in memory in case anybody wants to use it for something else, and it allows the delayed refs to be merged properly so we don't end up with this panic. With this patch the users image no longer panics on mount, and it has a clean fsck after a normal mount/umount cycle. Thanks, Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NRoman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-