Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 21 1月, 2009 2 次提交
    • P
      dma-coherent: Restore dma_alloc_from_coherent() large alloc fall back policy. · 0609697e
      由 Paul Mundt 提交于 
      When doing large allocations (larger than the per-device coherent area)
the generic memory allocators are silently fallen back on regardless of
consideration for the per-device constraints.

In the DMA_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE case falling back on generic memory is not
an option, as it tends not to be addressable by the DMA hardware in
question. This issue showed up with the 8139too breakage on the
Dreamcast, where non-addressable buffers were silently allocated due to
the size mismatch calculation -- while it should have simply errored out
upon being unable to satisfy the allocation with the given device
constraints.

This restores fall back behaviour to what it was before the oversized
request change caused multiple regressions.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
      0609697e
    • A
      dma-coherent: per-device coherent area is in pages, not bytes. · cdf57cab
      由 Adrian McMenamin 提交于 
      Commit 58c6d3df ("dma-coherent: catch
oversized requests to dma_alloc_from_coherent()") attempted to add a
sanity check to bail out on allocations larger than the coherent area.

Unfortunately when this was implemented, the fact the coherent area
is tracked in pages rather than bytes was overlooked, which subsequently
broke every single dma_alloc_from_coherent() user, forcing the allocation
silently through generic memory instead.

Signed-off-by: Adrian McMenamin <adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
      cdf57cab
  5. 20 1月, 2009 2 次提交
  7. 19 1月, 2009 2 次提交
    • P
      hrtimers: fix inconsistent lock state on resume in hres_timers_resume · 1d4a7f1c
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Andrey Borzenkov reported this lockdep assert:

> [17854.688347] =================================
> [17854.688347] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> [17854.688347] 2.6.29-rc2-1avb #1
> [17854.688347] ---------------------------------
> [17854.688347] inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
> [17854.688347] pm-suspend/18240 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
> [17854.688347]  (&cpu_base->lock){++..}, at: [<c0136fcc>] retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347] {in-hardirq-W} state was registered at:
> [17854.688347]   [<c01443cd>] __lock_acquire+0x79d/0x1930
> [17854.688347]   [<c01455bc>] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x80
> [17854.688347]   [<c03092e5>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x70
> [17854.688347]   [<c0136e61>] hrtimer_run_queues+0x31/0x140
> [17854.688347]   [<c0128d98>] run_local_timers+0x8/0x20
> [17854.688347]   [<c0128dd3>] update_process_times+0x23/0x60
> [17854.688347]   [<c013e274>] tick_periodic+0x24/0x80
> [17854.688347]   [<c013e2e2>] tick_handle_periodic+0x12/0x70
> [17854.688347]   [<c0104e24>] timer_interrupt+0x14/0x20
> [17854.688347]   [<c01607b9>] handle_IRQ_event+0x29/0x60
> [17854.688347]   [<c0161c59>] handle_level_irq+0x69/0xe0
> [17854.688347]   [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> [17854.688347] irq event stamp: 55771
> [17854.688347] hardirqs last  enabled at (55771): [<c0309125>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
> [17854.688347] hardirqs last disabled at (55770): [<c0309419>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x19/0x80
> [17854.688347] softirqs last  enabled at (54836): [<c0124f54>] __do_softirq+0xc4/0x110
> [17854.688347] softirqs last disabled at (54831): [<c01049ae>] do_softirq+0x8e/0xe0
> [17854.688347]
> [17854.688347] other info that might help us debug this:
> [17854.688347] 3 locks held by pm-suspend/18240:
> [17854.688347]  #0:  (&buffer->mutex){--..}, at: [<c01dd4c5>] sysfs_write_file+0x25/0x100
> [17854.688347]  #1:  (pm_mutex){--..}, at: [<c015056f>] enter_state+0x4f/0x140
> [17854.688347]  #2:  (dpm_list_mtx){--..}, at: [<c027880f>] device_pm_lock+0xf/0x20
> [17854.688347]
> [17854.688347] stack backtrace:
> [17854.688347] Pid: 18240, comm: pm-suspend Not tainted 2.6.29-rc2-1avb #1
> [17854.688347] Call Trace:
> [17854.688347]  [<c0306248>] ? printk+0x18/0x20
> [17854.688347]  [<c0141fac>] print_usage_bug+0x16c/0x1d0
> [17854.688347]  [<c0142bcf>] mark_lock+0x8bf/0xc90
> [17854.688347]  [<c0106b8f>] ? pit_next_event+0x2f/0x40
> [17854.688347]  [<c01441b0>] __lock_acquire+0x580/0x1930
> [17854.688347]  [<c030916d>] ? _spin_unlock+0x1d/0x20
> [17854.688347]  [<c0106b8f>] ? pit_next_event+0x2f/0x40
> [17854.688347]  [<c013dd38>] ? clockevents_program_event+0x98/0x160
> [17854.688347]  [<c0142fe8>] ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0x90
> [17854.688347]  [<c0309125>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
> [17854.688347]  [<c0143229>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x139/0x190
> [17854.688347]  [<c014328b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
> [17854.688347]  [<c01455bc>] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x80
> [17854.688347]  [<c0136fcc>] ? retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347]  [<c03092e5>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x70
> [17854.688347]  [<c0136fcc>] ? retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347]  [<c0136fcc>] retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347]  [<c013711a>] hres_timers_resume+0xa/0x10
> [17854.688347]  [<c013aa8e>] timekeeping_resume+0xee/0x150
> [17854.688347]  [<c0273384>] __sysdev_resume+0x14/0x50
> [17854.688347]  [<c0273407>] sysdev_resume+0x47/0x80
> [17854.688347]  [<c02791ab>] device_power_up+0xb/0x20
> [17854.688347]  [<c015043f>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xcf/0x150
> [17854.688347]  [<c0150c2f>] ? freeze_processes+0x3f/0x90
> [17854.688347]  [<c0150614>] enter_state+0xf4/0x140
> [17854.688347]  [<c01506dd>] state_store+0x7d/0xc0
> [17854.688347]  [<c0150660>] ? state_store+0x0/0xc0
> [17854.688347]  [<c0202da4>] kobj_attr_store+0x24/0x30
> [17854.688347]  [<c01dd53c>] sysfs_write_file+0x9c/0x100
> [17854.688347]  [<c019916c>] vfs_write+0x9c/0x160
> [17854.688347]  [<c0103494>] ? restore_nocheck_notrace+0x0/0xe
> [17854.688347]  [<c01dd4a0>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0x100
> [17854.688347]  [<c01992ed>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
> [17854.688347]  [<c0103371>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31

Andrey's analysis:

> timekeeping_resume() is called via class ->resume
> method; and according to comments in sysdev_resume() and
> device_power_up(), they are called with interrupts disabled.
>
> Looking at suspend_enter, irqs *are* disabled at this point.
>
> So it actually looks like something (may be some driver)
> unconditionally enabled irqs in resume path.

Add a debug check to test this theory. If it triggers then it
triggers because the resume code calls it with irqs enabled,
which is a no-no not just for timekeeping_resume(), but also
bad for a number of other resume handlers.
Reported-by: NAndrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      1d4a7f1c
    • J
      relay: fix lock imbalance in relay_late_setup_files · b786c6a9
      由 Jiri Slaby 提交于 
      One fail path in relay_late_setup_files() omits
mutex_unlock(&relay_channels_mutex);
Add it.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      b786c6a9
  9. 17 1月, 2009 2 次提交
  11. 16 1月, 2009 4 次提交
  13. 15 1月, 2009 6 次提交
  15. 14 1月, 2009 21 次提交