- 30 11月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: Disentangle connection helpers from RPC-over-RDMA reply decoding functions. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Micro-optimization: Most of the time, calls to ro_unmap_safe are expensive no-ops. Call only when there is work to do. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 20 9月, 2016 12 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The Version One default inline threshold is still 1KB. But allow testing with thresholds up to 64KB. This maximum is somewhat arbitrary. There's no fundamental architectural limit I'm aware of, but it's good to keep the size of Receive buffers reasonable. Now that Send can use a s/g list, a Send buffer is only as large as each RPC requires. Receive buffers are always the size of the inline threshold, however. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
An RPC Call message that is sent inline but that has a data payload (ie, one or more items in rq_snd_buf's page list) must be "pulled up:" - call_allocate has to reserve enough RPC Call buffer space to accommodate the data payload - call_transmit has to memcopy the rq_snd_buf's page list and tail into its head iovec before it is sent As the inline threshold is increased beyond its current 1KB default, however, this means data payloads of more than a few KB are copied by the host CPU. For example, if the inline threshold is increased just to 4KB, then NFS WRITE requests up to 4KB would involve a memcpy of the NFS WRITE's payload data into the RPC Call buffer. This is an undesirable amount of participation by the host CPU. The inline threshold may be much larger than 4KB in the future, after negotiation with a peer server. Instead of copying the components of rq_snd_buf into its head iovec, construct a gather list of these components, and send them all in place. The same approach is already used in the Linux server's RPC-over-RDMA reply path. This mechanism also eliminates the need for rpcrdma_tail_pullup, which is used to manage the XDR pad and trailing inline content when a Read list is present. This requires that the pages in rq_snd_buf's page list be DMA-mapped during marshaling, and unmapped when a data-bearing RPC is completed. This is slightly less efficient for very small I/O payloads, but significantly more efficient as data payload size and inline threshold increase past a kilobyte. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Have frwr's ro_unmap_sync recognize an invalidated rkey that appears as part of a Receive completion. Local invalidation can be skipped for that rkey. Use an out-of-band signaling mechanism to indicate to the server that the client is prepared to receive RDMA Send With Invalidate. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up. The "ia" argument is no longer used. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The use of DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL is discouraged by DMA-API.txt. Fortunately, xprtrdma now knows which direction I/O is going as soon as it allocates each regbuf. The RPC Call and Reply buffers are no longer the same regbuf. They can each be labeled correctly now. The RPC Reply buffer is never part of either a Send or Receive WR, but it can be part of Reply chunk, which is mapped and registered via ->ro_map . So it is not DMA mapped when it is allocated (DMA_NONE), to avoid a double- mapping. Since Receive buffers are no longer DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL and their contents are never modified by the host CPU, DMA-API-HOWTO.txt suggests that a DMA sync before posting each buffer should be unnecessary. (See my_card_interrupt_handler). Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Commit 94931746 ("xprtrdma: Limit number of RDMA segments in RPC-over-RDMA headers") capped the number of chunks that may appear in RPC-over-RDMA headers. The maximum header size can be estimated and fixed to avoid allocating buffer space that is never used. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
RPC-over-RDMA needs to separate its RPC call and reply buffers. o When an RPC Call is sent, rq_snd_buf is DMA mapped for an RDMA Send operation using DMA_TO_DEVICE o If the client expects a large RPC reply, it DMA maps rq_rcv_buf as part of a Reply chunk using DMA_FROM_DEVICE The two mappings are for data movement in opposite directions. DMA-API.txt suggests that if these mappings share a DMA cacheline, bad things can happen. This could occur in the final bytes of rq_snd_buf and the first bytes of rq_rcv_buf if the two buffers happen to share a DMA cacheline. On x86_64 the cacheline size is typically 8 bytes, and RPC call messages are usually much smaller than the send buffer, so this hasn't been a noticeable problem. But the DMA cacheline size can be larger on other platforms. Also, often rq_rcv_buf starts most of the way into a page, thus an additional RDMA segment is needed to map and register the end of that buffer. Try to avoid that scenario to reduce the cost of registering and invalidating Reply chunks. Instead of carrying a single regbuf that covers both rq_snd_buf and rq_rcv_buf, each struct rpcrdma_req now carries one regbuf for rq_snd_buf and one regbuf for rq_rcv_buf. Some incidental changes worth noting: - To clear out some spaghetti, refactor xprt_rdma_allocate. - The value stored in rg_size is the same as the value stored in the iov.length field, so eliminate rg_size Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Currently there's a hidden and indirect mechanism for finding the rpcrdma_req that goes with an rpc_rqst. It depends on getting from the rq_buffer pointer in struct rpc_rqst to the struct rpcrdma_regbuf that controls that buffer, and then to the struct rpcrdma_req it goes with. This was done back in the day to avoid the need to add a per-rqst pointer or to alter the buf_free API when support for RPC-over-RDMA was introduced. I'm about to change the way regbuf's work to support larger inline thresholds. Now is a good time to replace this indirect mechanism with something that is more straightforward. I guess this should be considered a clean up. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
For xprtrdma, the RPC Call and Reply buffers are involved in real I/O operations. To start with, the DMA direction of the I/O for a Call is opposite that of a Reply. In the current arrangement, the Reply buffer address is on a four-byte alignment just past the call buffer. Would be friendlier on some platforms if that was at a DMA cache alignment instead. Because the current arrangement allocates a single memory region which contains both buffers, the RPC Reply buffer often contains a page boundary in it when the Call buffer is large enough (which is frequent). It would be a little nicer for setting up DMA operations (and possible registration of the Reply buffer) if the two buffers were separated, well-aligned, and contained as few page boundaries as possible. Now, I could just pad out the single memory region used for the pair of buffers. But frequently that would mean a lot of unused space to ensure the Reply buffer did not have a page boundary. Add a separate pointer to rpc_rqst that points right to the RPC Reply buffer. This makes no difference to xprtsock, but it will help xprtrdma in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
xprtrdma needs to allocate the Call and Reply buffers separately. TBH, the reliance on using a single buffer for the pair of XDR buffers is transport implementation-specific. Instead of passing just the rq_buffer into the buf_free method, pass the task structure and let buf_free take care of freeing both XDR buffers at once. There's a micro-optimization here. In the common case, both xprt_release and the transport's buf_free method were checking if rq_buffer was NULL. Now the check is done only once per RPC. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
xprtrdma needs to allocate the Call and Reply buffers separately. TBH, the reliance on using a single buffer for the pair of XDR buffers is transport implementation-specific. Transports that want to allocate separate Call and Reply buffers will ignore the "size" argument anyway. Don't bother passing it. The buf_alloc method can't return two pointers. Instead, make the method's return value an error code, and set the rq_buffer pointer in the method itself. This gives call_allocate an opportunity to terminate an RPC instead of looping forever when a permanent problem occurs. If a request is just bogus, or the transport is in a state where it can't allocate resources for any request, there needs to be a way to kill the RPC right there and not loop. This immediately fixes a rare problem in the backchannel send path, which loops if the server happens to send a CB request whose call+reply size is larger than a page (which it shouldn't do yet). One more issue: looks like xprt_inject_disconnect was incorrectly placed in the failure path in call_allocate. It needs to be in the success path, as it is for other call-sites. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: r_xprt is already available everywhere these macros are invoked, so just dereference that directly. RPCRDMA_INLINE_PAD_VALUE is no longer used, so it can simply be removed. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 12 7月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Instead of placing registered MWs sparsely into the rl_segments array, place these MWs on a per-req list. ro_unmap_{sync,safe} can then simply pull those MWs off the list instead of walking through the array. This change significantly reduces the size of struct rpcrdma_req by removing nsegs and rl_mw from every array element. As an additional clean-up, chunk co-ordinates are returned in the "*mw" output argument so they are no longer needed in every array element. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Frequent MR list exhaustion can impact I/O throughput, so enough MRs are always created during transport set-up to prevent running out. This means more MRs are created than most workloads need. Commit 94f58c58 ("xprtrdma: Allow Read list and Reply chunk simultaneously") introduced support for sending two chunk lists per RPC, which consumes more MRs per RPC. Instead of trying to provision more MRs, introduce a mechanism for allocating MRs on demand. A few MRs are allocated during transport set-up to kick things off. This significantly reduces the average number of MRs per transport while allowing the MR count to grow for workloads or devices that need more MRs. FRWR with mlx4 allocated almost 400 MRs per transport before this patch. Now it starts with 32. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Commit c93c6223 ("xprtrdma: Disconnect on registration failure") added a disconnect for some RPC marshaling failures. This is needed only in a handful of cases, but it was triggering for simple stuff like temporary resource shortages. Try to straighten this out. Fix up the lower layers so they don't return -ENOMEM or other error codes that the RPC client's FSM doesn't explicitly recognize. Also fix up the places in the send_request path that do want a disconnect. For example, when ib_post_send or ib_post_recv fail, this is a sign that there is a send or receive queue resource miscalculation. That should be rare, and is a sign of a software bug. But xprtrdma can recover: disconnect to reset the transport and start over. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
I found that commit ead3f26e ("xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_safe memreg method"), which introduces ro_unmap_safe, never wired up the FMR recovery worker. The FMR and FRWR recovery work queues both do the same thing. Instead of setting up separate individual work queues for this, schedule a delayed worker to deal with them, since recovering MRs is not performance-critical. Fixes: ead3f26e ("xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_safe memreg method") Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
There needs to be a safe method of releasing registered memory resources when an RPC terminates. Safe can mean a number of things: + Doesn't have to sleep + Doesn't rely on having a QP in RTS ro_unmap_safe will be that safe method. It can be used in cases where synchronous memory invalidation can deadlock, or needs to have an active QP. The important case is fencing an RPC's memory regions after it is signaled (^C) and before it exits. If this is not done, there is a window where the server can write an RPC reply into memory that the client has released and re-used for some other purpose. Note that this is a full solution for FRWR, but FMR and physical still have some gaps where a particularly bad server can wreak some havoc on the client. These gaps are not made worse by this patch and are expected to be exceptionally rare and timing-based. They are noted in documenting comments. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Currently the sysctls that allow setting the inline threshold allow any value to be set. Small values only make the transport run slower. The default 1KB setting is as low as is reasonable. And the logic that decides how to divide a Send buffer between RPC-over-RDMA header and RPC message assumes (but does not check) that the lower bound is not crazy (say, 57 bytes). Send and receive buffers share a page with some control information. Values larger than about 3KB can't be supported, currently. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
RPC-over-RDMA transports have a limit on how large a backward direction (backchannel) RPC message can be. Ensure that the NFSv4.x CREATE_SESSION operation advertises this limit to servers. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 20 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
To support the server-side of an NFSv4.1 backchannel on RDMA connections, add a transport class that enables backward direction messages on an existing forward channel connection. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Acked-by: NBruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: NDoug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
-
- 19 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Preserve any rpcrdma_req that is attached to rpc_rqst's allocated for the backchannel. Otherwise, after all the pre-allocated backchannel req's are consumed, incoming backward calls start writing on freed memory. Somehow this hunk got lost. Fixes: f531a5db ('xprtrdma: Pre-allocate backward rpc_rqst') Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 03 11月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Forechannel transports get their own "bc_up" method to create an endpoint for the backchannel service. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> [Anna Schumaker: Add forward declaration of struct net to xprt.h] Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
xprtrdma's backward direction send and receive buffers are the same size as the forechannel's inline threshold, and must be pre- registered. The consumer has no control over which receive buffer the adapter chooses to catch an incoming backwards-direction call. Any receive buffer can be used for either a forward reply or a backward call. Thus both types of RPC message must all be the same size. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> Tested-By: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The reply tasklet is fast, but it's single threaded. After reply traffic saturates a single CPU, there's no more reply processing capacity. Replace the tasklet with a workqueue to spread reply handling across all CPUs. This also moves RPC/RDMA reply handling out of the soft IRQ context and into a context that allows sleeps. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> Tested-By: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
After adding a swapfile on an NFS/RDMA mount and removing the normal swap partition, I was able to push the NFS client well into swap without any issue. I forgot to swapoff the NFS file before rebooting. This pinned the NFS mount and the IB core and provider, causing shutdown to hang. I think this is expected and safe behavior. Probably shutdown scripts should "swapoff -a" before unmounting any filesystems. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> Tested-By: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 28 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steve Wise 提交于
Otherwise a FRMR completion can cause a touch-after-free crash. In xprt_rdma_destroy(), call rpcrdma_buffer_destroy() only after calling rpcrdma_ep_destroy(). In rpcrdma_ep_destroy(), disconnect the cm_id first which should flush the qp, then drain the cqs, then destroy the qp, and finally destroy the cqs. Signed-off-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Tested-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 06 8月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
RDMA_NOMSG type calls are less efficient than RDMA_MSG. Count NOMSG calls so administrators can tell if they happen to be used more than expected. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
checkpatch.pl complained about the seq_printf() format string split across lines and the use of %Lu. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
In particular, recognize when an IPv6 connection is bound. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 13 6月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
After a transport disconnect, FRMRs can be left in an undetermined state. In particular, the MR's rkey is no good. Currently, FRMRs are fixed up by the transport connect worker, but that can race with ->ro_unmap if an RPC happens to exit while the transport connect worker is running. A better way of dealing with broken FRMRs is to detect them before they are re-used by ->ro_map. Such FRMRs are either already invalid or are owned by the sending RPC, and thus no race with ->ro_unmap is possible. Introduce a mechanism for handing broken FRMRs to a workqueue to be reset in a context that is appropriate for allocating resources (ie. an ib_alloc_fast_reg_mr() API call). This mechanism is not yet used, but will be in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Reviewed-By: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Tested-By: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Reviewed-by: NDoug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
A posted rpcrdma_rep never has rr_func set to anything but rpcrdma_reply_handler. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-By: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Reviewed-by: NDoug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: Instead of carrying a pointer to the buffer pool and the rpc_xprt, carry a pointer to the controlling rpcrdma_xprt. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> Tested-By: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Reviewed-by: NDoug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
It has been exceptionally useful to exercise the logic that handles local immediate errors and RDMA connection loss. To enable developers to test this regularly and repeatably, add logic to simulate connection loss every so often. Fault injection is disabled by default. It is enabled with $ sudo echo xxx > /sys/kernel/debug/sunrpc/inject_fault/disconnect where "xxx" is a large positive number of transport method calls before a disconnect. A value of several thousand is usually a good number that allows reasonable forward progress while still causing a lot of connection drops. These hooks are disabled when SUNRPC_DEBUG is turned off. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
RDMA xprts don't have a sock_xprt, but an rdma_xprt, so the xs_swapper_enable/disable functions will likely oops when fed an RDMA xprt. Turn these functions into rpc_xprt_ops so that that doesn't occur. For now the RDMA versions are no-ops that just return -EINVAL on an attempt to swapon. Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Reviewed-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 05 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Bi-directional RPC support means code in svcrdma.ko invokes a bit of code in xprtrdma.ko, and vice versa. To avoid loader/linker loops, merge the server and client side modules together into a single module. When backchannel capabilities are added, the combined module will register all needed transport capabilities so that Upper Layer consumers automatically have everything needed to create a bi-directional transport connection. Module aliases are added for backwards compatibility with user space, which still may expect svcrdma.ko or xprtrdma.ko to be present. This commit reverts commit 2e8c12e1 ("xprtrdma: add separate Kconfig options for NFSoRDMA client and server support") and provides a single CONFIG option for enabling the new module. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 31 3月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
There is very little common processing among the different external memory deregistration functions. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NDevesh Sharma <Devesh.Sharma@Emulex.Com> Tested-by: NMeghana Cheripady <Meghana.Cheripady@Emulex.Com> Tested-by: NVeeresh U. Kokatnur <veereshuk@chelsio.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The max_payload computation is generalized to ensure that the payload maximum is the lesser of RPC_MAX_DATA_SEGS and the number of data segments that can be transmitted in an inline buffer. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NDevesh Sharma <Devesh.Sharma@Emulex.Com> Tested-by: NMeghana Cheripady <Meghana.Cheripady@Emulex.Com> Tested-by: NVeeresh U. Kokatnur <veereshuk@chelsio.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Commit 6ab59945 ("xprtrdma: Update rkeys after transport reconnect" added logic in the ->send_request path to update the chunk list when an RPC/RDMA request is retransmitted. Note that rpc_xdr_encode() resets and re-encodes the entire RPC send buffer for each retransmit of an RPC. The RPC send buffer is not preserved from the previous transmission of an RPC. Revert 6ab59945, and instead, just force each request to be fully marshaled every time through ->send_request. This should preserve the fix from 6ab59945, while also performing pullup during retransmits. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Acked-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NDevesh Sharma <Devesh.Sharma@Emulex.Com> Tested-by: NMeghana Cheripady <Meghana.Cheripady@Emulex.Com> Tested-by: NVeeresh U. Kokatnur <veereshuk@chelsio.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-