- 01 10月, 2012 30 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Salter 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Mark Salter 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
current_pt_regs() here is simply __frame Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
The tricky part here is that task_pt_regs() on m68k works *only* for process inside do_signal(). However, we need something much simpler - pt_regs of a process inside do_signal() may be at different offsets from the stack bottom, depending on the way we'd entered the kernel, but for a task inside sys_execve() it *is* at constant offset. Moreover, for a kernel thread about to become a userland process the same location is also fine - setting sp to that will leave the kernel stack pointer at the very bottom of the kernel stack when we finally switch to userland. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Greg Ungerer 提交于
The stack frame "format" field needs to be explicitly set on thread creation on ColdFire. For a normal long word aligned user stack pointer the frame format is 0x4. We were doing this for non-MMU ColdFire, but not for the case with MMU enabled. So fix it so we always do it if targeting ColdFire. The old code happend to rely on the stack frame format being inhereted from the process calling exec. Furture changes means that may not always work, so we really do want to set it explicitly. Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
the only non-obvious part is that current_pt_regs() is really needed here - task_pt_regs() is NULL for kernel threads; it's OK for ptrace uses (the thing task_pt_regs() is intended for), but not for us. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and get rid of in-kernel syscalls in kernel_thread() Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
same situation as with alpha and arm - only massage needed Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and don't bother with syscall return path in case of kernel threads. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
32bit wrapper is lost on that; 64bit one is *not*, since we need to arrange for full pt_regs on stack when we call sys_execve() and we need to load callee-saved ones from there afterwards. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
get rid of sys_execve() wrapper, while we are at it Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... no need to read current_thread_info()->task only to feed it to task_thread_page() immediately afterwards. Moreover, not using current_thread_info() at all ends up with better assembler - we need a location very close to the top of kernel stack page and it's actually better to do or with 0x1fff, followed be subtracting a small constant than and with ~0x1fff, followed by adding a large one. Both & and | would be a couple of insns (mvn lsr/mvn lsl for |, a pair of bic for &), but the following addition would cost a pair of add while the subtraction ends up as a single sub. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Let architectures select GENERIC_KERNEL_THREAD and have their copy_thread() treat NULL regs as "it came from kernel_thread(), sp argument contains the function new thread will be calling and stack_size - the argument for that function". Switching the architectures begins shortly... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 20 9月, 2012 8 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
we only use that to tell copy_thread() done by syscall from that done by kernel_thread(). However, it's easier to do simply by checking PF_KTHREAD in thread flags. Merge sys_clone() guts for 32bit and 64bit, while we are at it... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... rather than duplicating that in sigframe setup code (and doing that inconsistently, at that) Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... assuming it's needed to be done at all Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
most of the architectures don't and there's not a single caller outside of core kernel. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME will work in precisely the same way; all that is achieved by TIF_IRET is appearing that there's some work to be done, so we end up on the iret exit path. Just use NOTIFY_RESUME. And for execve() do that in 32bit start_thread(), not sys_execve() itself. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 18 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
As Al notes, we missed a TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME check which caused any handlers without TIF_SIGPENDING also set to skip the notification: Looks like while it is in the relevant masks *and* checked in do_notify_resume() both on 32bit and 64bit variants since commit ab99c733 ("sh: Make syscall tracer use tracehook notifiers, add TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME.") they are actually *not* reached without simulataneous SIGPENDING, since the actual glue in the callers had not been updated back then and still checks for _TIF_SIGPENDING alone when deciding whether to hit do_notify_resume() or not. Reported-by: NNobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NNobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
- 11 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fabio Estevam 提交于
SSI block has two types of clock: ipg: bus clock, the clock needed for accessing registers. per: peripheral clock, the clock needed for generating the bit rate. Currently SSI driver only supports slave mode and only need to handle the ipg clock, because the peripheral clock comes from the master codec. Only register the ipg clock and do not register the peripheral clock for ssi. Signed-off-by: NFabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> Tested-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-