An object class method is formatted using a pagelist which contains
the class name, the method name, and the data concatenated into an
osd request's outbound data.

Currently when a class op is initialized in osd_req_op_cls_init(),
the lengths of and pointers to these three items are recorded.
Later, when the op is getting formatted into the request message, a
new pagelist is created and that is when these items get copied into
the pagelist.

This patch makes it so the pagelist to hold these items is created
when the op is initialized instead.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

An osd request now holds all of its source op structures, and every
place that initializes one of these is in fact initializing one
of the entries in the the osd request's array.

So rather than supplying the address of the op to initialize, have
caller specify the osd request and an indication of which op it
would like to initialize.  This better hides the details the
op structure (and faciltates moving the data pointers they use).

Since osd_req_op_init() is a common routine, and it's not used
outside the osd client code, give it static scope.  Also make
it return the address of the specified op (so all the other
init routines don't have to repeat that code).
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

An extent type osd operation currently implies that there will
be corresponding data supplied in the data portion of the request
(for write) or response (for read) message.  Similarly, an osd class
method operation implies a data item will be supplied to receive
the response data from the operation.

Add a ceph_osd_data pointer to each of those structures, and assign
it to point to eithre the incoming or the outgoing data structure in
the osd message.  The data is not always available when an op is
initially set up, so add two new functions to allow setting them
after the op has been initialized.

Begin to make use of the data item pointer available in the osd
operation rather than the request data in or out structure in
places where it's convenient.  Add some assertions to verify
pointers are always set the way they're expected to be.

This is a sort of stepping stone toward really moving the data
into the osd request ops, to allow for some validation before
making that jump.

This is the first in a series of patches that resolve:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

There are fields "indata" and "indata_len" defined the ceph osd
request op structure.  The "in" part is with from the point of view
of the osd server, but is a little confusing here on the client
side.  Change their names to use "request" instead of "in" to
indicate that it defines data provided with the request (as opposed
the data returned in the response).

Rename the local variable in osd_req_encode_op() to match.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

An osd request keeps a pointer to the osd operations (ops) array
that it builds in its request message.

In order to allow each op in the array to have its own distinct
data, we will need to keep track of each op's data, and that
information does not go over the wire.

As long as we're tracking the data we might as well just track the
entire (source) op definition for each of the ops.  And if we're
doing that, we'll have no more need to keep a pointer to the
wire-encoded version.

This patch makes the array of source ops be kept with the osd
request structure, and uses that instead of the version encoded in
the message in places where that was previously used.  The array
will be embedded in the request structure, and the maximum number of
ops we ever actually use is currently 2.  So reduce CEPH_OSD_MAX_OP
to 2 to reduce the size of the structure.

The result of doing this sort of ripples back up, and as a result
various function parameters and local variables become unnecessary.

Make r_num_ops be unsigned, and move the definition of struct
ceph_osd_req_op earlier to ensure it's defined where needed.

It does not yet add per-op data, that's coming soon.

This resolves:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4656Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

Define and use functions that encapsulate the initializion of a
ceph_osd_data structure.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

Hold off building the osd request message in ceph_writepages_start()
until just before it will be submitted to the osd client for
execution.

We'll still create the request and allocate the page pointer array
after we learn we have at least one page to write.  A local variable
will be used to keep track of the allocated array of pages.  Wait
until just before submitting the request for assigning that page
array pointer to the request message.

Create ands use a new function osd_req_op_extent_update() whose
purpose is to serve this one spot where the length value supplied
when an osd request's op was initially formatted might need to get
changed (reduced, never increased) before submitting the request.

Previously, ceph_writepages_start() assigned the message header's
data length because of this update.  That's no longer necessary,
because ceph_osdc_build_request() will recalculate the right
value to use based on the content of the ops in the request.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

This patch moves the call to ceph_osdc_build_request() out of
ceph_osdc_new_request() and into its caller.

This is in order to defer formatting osd operation information into
the request message until just before request is started.

The only unusual (ab)user of ceph_osdc_build_request() is
ceph_writepages_start(), where the final length of write request may
change (downward) based on the current inode size or the oldest
snapshot context with dirty data for the inode.

The remaining callers don't change anything in the request after has
been built.

This means the ops array is now supplied by the caller.  It also
means there is no need to pass the mtime to ceph_osdc_new_request()
(it gets provided to ceph_osdc_build_request()).  And rather than
passing a do_sync flag, have the number of ops in the ops array
supplied imply adding a second STARTSYNC operation after the READ or
WRITE requested.

This and some of the patches that follow are related to having the
messenger (only) be responsible for filling the content of the
message header, as described here:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4589Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

When assigning a bio pointer to an osd request, we don't have an
efficient way of knowing the total length bytes in the bio list.
That information is available at the point it's set up by the rbd
code, so record it with the osd data when it's set.

This and the next patch are related to maintaining the length of a
message's data independent of the message header, as described here:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4589Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

A field in an osd request keeps track of whether a connection is
currently filling the request's reply message.  This patch gets rid
of that field.

An osd request includes two messages--a request and a reply--and
they're both associated with the connection that existed to its
the target osd at the time the request was created.

An osd request can be dropped early, even when it's in flight.
And at that time both messages are released.  It's possible the
reply message has been supplied to its connection to receive
an incoming response message at the time the osd request gets
dropped.  So ceph_osdc_release_request() revokes that message
from the connection before releasing it so things get cleaned up
properly.

Previously this may have caused a problem, because the connection
that a message was associated with might have gone away before the
revoke request.  And to avoid any problems using that connection,
the osd client held a reference to it when it supplies its response
message.

However since this commit:
    38941f80 libceph: have messages point to their connection
all messages hold a reference to the connection they are associated
with whenever the connection is actively operating on the message
(i.e. while the message is queued to send or sending, and when it
data is being received into it).  And if a message has no connection
associated with it, ceph_msg_revoke_incoming() won't do anything
when asked to revoke it.

As a result, there is no need to keep an additional reference to the
connection associated with a message when we hand the message to the
messenger when it calls our alloc_msg() method to receive something.
If the connection *were* operating on it, it would have its own
reference, and if not, there's no work to be done when we need to
revoke it.

So get rid of the osd request's r_con_filling_msg field.

This resolves:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4647Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

The rbd code has a function that allocates and populates a
ceph_osd_req_op structure (the in-core version of an osd request
operation).  When reviewed, Josh suggested two things: that the
big varargs function might be better split into type-specific
functions; and that this functionality really belongs in the osd
client rather than rbd.

This patch implements both of Josh's suggestions.  It breaks
up the rbd function into separate functions and defines them
in the osd client module as exported interfaces.  Unlike the
rbd version, however, the functions don't allocate an osd_req_op
structure; they are provided the address of one and that is
initialized instead.

The rbd function has been eliminated and calls to it have been
replaced by calls to the new routines.  The rbd code now now use a
stack (struct) variable to hold the op rather than allocating and
freeing it each time.

For now only the capabilities used by rbd are implemented.
Implementing all the other osd op types, and making the rest of the
code use it will be done separately, in the next few patches.

Note that only the extent, cls, and watch portions of the
ceph_osd_req_op structure are currently used.  Delete the others
(xattr, pgls, and snap) from its definition so nobody thinks it's
actually implemented or needed.  We can add it back again later
if needed, when we know it's been tested.

This (and a few follow-on patches) resolves:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3861Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

The osd trail is a pagelist, used only for a CALL osd operation
to hold the class and method names, along with any input data for
the call.

It is only currently used by the rbd client, and when it's used it
is the only bit of outbound data in the osd request.  Since we
already support (non-trail) pagelist data in a message, we can
just save this outbound CALL data in the "normal" pagelist rather
than the trail, and get rid of the trail entirely.

The existing pagelist support depends on the pagelist being
dynamically allocated, and ownership of it is passed to the
messenger once it's been attached to a message.  (That is to say,
the messenger releases and frees the pagelist when it's done with
it).  That means we need to dynamically allocate the pagelist also.

Note that we simply assert that the allocation of a pagelist
structure succeeds.  Appending to a pagelist might require a dynamic
allocation, so we're already assuming we won't run into trouble
doing so (we're just ignore any failures--and that should be fixed
at some point).

This resolves:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4407Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

Add support for recording a ceph pagelist as data associated with an
osd request.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

The length of outgoing data in an osd request is dependent on the
osd ops that are embedded in that request.  Each op is encoded into
a request message using osd_req_encode_op(), so that should be used
to determine the amount of outgoing data implied by the op as it
is encoded.

Have osd_req_encode_op() return the number of bytes of outgoing data
implied by the op being encoded, and accumulate and use that in
ceph_osdc_build_request().

As a result, ceph_osdc_build_request() no longer requires its "len"
parameter, so get rid of it.

Using the sum of the op lengths rather than the length provided is
a valid change because:
    - The only callers of osd ceph_osdc_build_request() are
      rbd and the osd client (in ceph_osdc_new_request() on
      behalf of the file system).
    - When rbd calls it, the length provided is only non-zero for
      write requests, and in that case the single op has the
      same length value as what was passed here.
    - When called from ceph_osdc_new_request(), (it's not all that
      easy to see, but) the length passed is also always the same
      as the extent length encoded in its (single) write op if
      present.

This resolves:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4406Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

Record the byte count for an osd request rather than the page count.
The number of pages can always be derived from the byte count (and
alignment/offset) but the reverse is not true.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

An osd request defines information about where data to be read
should be placed as well as where data to write comes from.
Currently these are represented by common fields.

Keep information about data for writing separate from data to be
read by splitting these into data_in and data_out fields.

This is the key patch in this whole series, in that it actually
identifies which osd requests generate outgoing data and which
generate incoming data.  It's less obvious (currently) that an osd
CALL op generates both outgoing and incoming data; that's the focus
of some upcoming work.

This resolves:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4127Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

An osd request uses either pages or a bio list for its data.  Use a
union to record information about the two, and add a data type
tag to select between them.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

Pull the fields in an osd request structure that define the data for
the request out into a separate structure.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

Currently ceph_osdc_new_request() assigns an osd request's
r_num_pages and r_alignment fields.  The only thing it does
after that is call ceph_osdc_build_request(), and that doesn't
need those fields to be assigned.

Move the assignment of those fields out of ceph_osdc_new_request()
and into its caller.  As a result, the page_align parameter is no
longer used, so get rid of it.

Note that in ceph_sync_write(), the value for req->r_num_pages had
already been calculated earlier (as num_pages, and fortunately
it was computed the same way).  So don't bother recomputing it,
but because it's not needed earlier, move that calculation after the
call to ceph_osdc_new_request().  Hold off making the assignment to
r_alignment, doing it instead r_pages and r_num_pages are
getting set.

Similarly, in start_read(), nr_pages already holds the number of
pages in the array (and is calculated the same way), so there's no
need to recompute it.  Move the assignment of the page alignment
down with the others there as well.

This and the next few patches are preparation work for:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4127Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

Two of the fields defining osd operations are defined using (char *)
while the data they represent are really untyped, not character
strings.  Change them to have type (void *).
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

An osd request marked to linger will be re-submitted in the event
a connection to the target osd gets dropped.  Currently, if there
is a callback function associated with a request it will be called
each time a request is submitted--which for lingering requests can
be more than once.

Change it so a request--including lingering ones--will get completed
(from the perspective of the user of the osd client) exactly once.

This resolves:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3967Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

Use the new version of the encoding for osd requests and replies.  In the
process, update the way we are tracking request ops and reply lengths and
results in the struct ceph_osd_request.  Update the rbd and fs/ceph users
appropriately.

The main changes are:
 - we keep pointers into the request memory for fields we need to update
   each time the request is sent out over the wire
 - we keep information about the result in an array in the request struct
   where the users can easily get at it.
Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>

Instead of using the old ceph_object_layout struct, update our internal
ceph_calc_object_layout method to use the ceph_pg type.  This allows us to
pass the full 32-bit precision of the pgid.seed to the callers.  It also
allows some callers to avoid reaching into the request structures for the
struct ceph_object_layout fields.
Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>

Always decode data into our cpu-native ceph_pg type that has the correct
field widths.  Limit any remaining uses of ceph_pg_v1 to dealing with the
legacy protocol.
Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>

Rename the old version this type to distinguish it from the new version.
Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>

There are no actual users of ceph_osdc_wait_event().  This would
have been one-shot events, but we no longer support those so just
get rid of this function.

Since this leaves nothing else that waits for the completion of an
event, we can get rid of the completion in a struct ceph_osd_event.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

There is only one caller of ceph_osdc_create_event(), and it
provides 0 as its "one_shot" argument.  Get rid of that argument and
just use 0 in its place.

Replace the code in handle_watch_notify() that executes if one_shot
is nonzero in the event with a BUG_ON() call.

While modifying "osd_client.c", give handle_watch_notify() static
scope.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

There is no caller of ceph_calc_raw_layout() outside of libceph, so
there's no need to export from the module.

Furthermore, there is only one caller, in calc_layout(), and it
is not much more than a simple wrapper for that function.

So get rid of ceph_calc_raw_layout() and embed it instead within
calc_layout().

While touching "osd_client.c", get rid of the unnecessary forward
declaration of __send_request().
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

The "num_reply" parameter to ceph_osdc_new_request() is never
used inside that function, so get rid of it.

Note that ceph_sync_write() passes 2 for that argument, while all
other callers pass 1.  It doesn't matter, but perhaps someone should
verify this doesn't indicate a problem.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

There is only one caller of ceph_osdc_writepages(), and it always
passes 0 as its "flags" argument.  Get rid of that argument and
replace its use in ceph_osdc_writepages() with 0.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

There is only one caller of ceph_osdc_writepages(), and it always
passes 0 as its "dosync" argument.  Get rid of that argument and
replace its use in ceph_osdc_writepages() with 0.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

There is only one caller of ceph_osdc_writepages(), and it always
passes the value true as its "nofail" argument.  Get rid of that
argument and replace its use in ceph_osdc_writepages() with the
constant value true.

This and a number of cleanup patches that follow resolve:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4126Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

The layout of struct ceph_osd_req_op leaves lots of holes.
Rearranging things a little for better field alignment
reduces the size by a third.

This resolves:
    http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4163Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

The flags field of struct ceph_osd_req_op is never used, so just get
rid of it.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

Both ceph_osdc_alloc_request() and ceph_osdc_build_request() are
provided an array of ceph osd request operations.  Rather than just
passing the number of operations in the array, the caller is
required append an additional zeroed operation structure to signal
the end of the array.

All callers know the number of operations at the time these
functions are called, so drop the silly zero entry and supply that
number directly.  As a result, get_num_ops() is no longer needed.
This also means that ceph_osdc_alloc_request() never uses its ops
argument, so that can be dropped.

Also rbd_create_rw_ops() no longer needs to add one to reserve room
for the additional op.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

Only one of the two callers of ceph_osdc_alloc_request() provides
page or bio data for its payload.  And essentially all that function
was doing with those arguments was assigning them to fields in the
osd request structure.

Simplify ceph_osdc_alloc_request() by having the caller take care of
making those assignments
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

The only thing ceph_osdc_alloc_request() really does with the
flags value it is passed is assign it to the newly-created
osd request structure.  Do that in the caller instead.

Both callers subsequently call ceph_osdc_build_request(), so have
that function (instead of ceph_osdc_alloc_request()) issue a warning
if a request comes through with neither the read nor write flags set.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

The osdc parameter to ceph_calc_raw_layout() is not used, so get rid
of it.  Consequently, the corresponding parameter in calc_layout()
becomes unused, so get rid of that as well.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

A snapshot id must be provided to ceph_calc_raw_layout() even though
it is not needed at all for calculating the layout.

Where the snapshot id *is* needed is when building the request
message for an osd operation.

Drop the snapid parameter from ceph_calc_raw_layout() and pass
that value instead in ceph_osdc_build_request().
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>

The len argument to ceph_osdc_build_request() is set up to be
passed by address, but that function never updates its value
so there's no need to do this.  Tighten up the interface by
passing the length directly.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>