1. 12 1月, 2006 2 次提交
  2. 11 1月, 2006 2 次提交
  3. 07 12月, 2005 1 次提交
    • V
      [CPUFREQ] CPU frequency display in /proc/cpuinfo · 95235ca2
      Venkatesh Pallipadi 提交于
      What is the value shown in "cpu MHz" of /proc/cpuinfo when CPUs are capable of
      changing frequency?
      
      Today the answer is: It depends.
      On i386:
      SMP kernel - It is always the boot frequency
      UP kernel - Scales with the frequency change and shows that was last set.
      
      On x86_64:
      There is one single variable cpu_khz that gets written by all the CPUs. So,
      the frequency set by last CPU will be seen on /proc/cpuinfo of all the
      CPUs in the system. What you see also depends on whether you have constant_tsc
      capable CPU or not.
      
      On ia64:
      It is always boot time frequency of a particular CPU that gets displayed.
      
      The patch below changes this to:
      Show the last known frequency of the particular CPU, when cpufreq is present. If
      cpu doesnot support changing of frequency through cpufreq, then boot frequency
      will be shown. The patch affects i386, x86_64 and ia64 architectures.
      
      Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi<venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      95235ca2
  4. 15 11月, 2005 7 次提交
  5. 31 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  6. 04 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  7. 30 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  8. 18 9月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      x86-64/smp: fix random SIGSEGV issues · bc5e8fdf
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      They seem to have been due to AMD errata 63/122; the fix is to disable
      TLB flush filtering in SMP configurations.
      
      Confirmed to fix the problem by Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org>
      
      [ Let's see if we'll have a better fix eventually, this is the Q&D
        "let's get this fixed and out there" version ]
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      bc5e8fdf
  9. 13 9月, 2005 4 次提交
  10. 11 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  11. 08 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  12. 25 8月, 2005 1 次提交
  13. 07 8月, 2005 1 次提交
  14. 29 7月, 2005 2 次提交
  15. 08 7月, 2005 1 次提交
  16. 26 6月, 2005 2 次提交
  17. 24 6月, 2005 3 次提交
  18. 21 5月, 2005 1 次提交
  19. 17 5月, 2005 3 次提交
  20. 01 5月, 2005 2 次提交
  21. 17 4月, 2005 2 次提交
    • S
      [PATCH] x86, x86_64: dual core proc-cpuinfo and sibling-map fix · d31ddaa1
      Siddha, Suresh B 提交于
      - broken sibling_map setup in x86_64
      
      - grouping all the core and HT related cpuinfo fields.
        We are reasonably sure that adding new cpuinfo fields after "siblings" field,
        will not cause any app failure. Thats because today's /proc/cpuinfo
        format is completely different on x86, x86_64 and we haven't heard of any
        x86 app breakage because of this issue. Grouping these fields will 
        result in more or less common format on all architectures (ia64, x86 and 
        x86_64) and will cause less confusion.
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      d31ddaa1
    • A
      [PATCH] x86_64: Rename the extended cpuid level field · ebfcaa96
      Andi Kleen 提交于
      It was confusingly named.
      Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      DESC
      x86_64: Switch SMP bootup over to new CPU hotplug state machine
      EDESC
      From: "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
      
      This will allow hotplug CPU in the future and in general cleans up a lot of
      crufty code.  It also should plug some races that the old hackish way
      introduces.  Remove one old race workaround in NMI watchdog setup that is not
      needed anymore.
      
      I removed the old total sum of bogomips reporting code.  The brag value of
      BogoMips has been greatly devalued in the last years on the open market.
      
      Real CPU hotplug will need some more work, but the infrastructure for it is
      there now.
      
      One drawback: the new TSC sync algorithm is less accurate than before.  The
      old way of zeroing TSCs is too intrusive to do later.  Instead the TSC of the
      BP is duplicated now, which is less accurate.
      
      Cc: <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
      Cc: <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      ebfcaa96