- 04 1月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
It was already non-TCP specific, will be used by DCCPv6. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Using sk->sk_protocol instead of IPPROTO_TCP. Will be used by DCCPv6 in the next changesets. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 12月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
[ Modified to match inet_create() bug fix by Herbert Xu -DaveM ] Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Based mostly upon a patch from Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> When initialization fails in inet6_init(), we should unregister the PF_INET6 socket ops. Also, check sock_register()'s return value for errors. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 8月, 2005 3 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Of this type, mostly: CHECK net/ipv6/netfilter.c net/ipv6/netfilter.c:96:12: warning: symbol 'ipv6_netfilter_init' was not declared. Should it be static? net/ipv6/netfilter.c:101:6: warning: symbol 'ipv6_netfilter_fini' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Harald Welte 提交于
The rerouting functionality is required by the core, therefore it has to be implemented by the core and not in individual queue handlers. Signed-off-by: NHarald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 7月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 4月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
A lot of places in there are including major.h for no reason whatsoever. Removed. And yes, it still builds. The history of that stuff is often amusing. E.g. for net/core/sock.c the story looks so, as far as I've been able to reconstruct it: we used to need major.h in net/socket.c circa 1.1.early. In 1.1.13 that need had disappeared, along with register_chrdev(SOCKET_MAJOR, "socket", &net_fops) in sock_init(). Include had not. When 1.2 -> 1.3 reorg of net/* had moved a lot of stuff from net/socket.c to net/core/sock.c, this crap had followed... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
A lot of places in there are including major.h for no reason whatsoever. Removed. And yes, it still builds. The history of that stuff is often amusing. E.g. for net/core/sock.c the story looks so, as far as I've been able to reconstruct it: we used to need major.h in net/socket.c circa 1.1.early. In 1.1.13 that need had disappeared, along with register_chrdev(SOCKET_MAJOR, "socket", &net_fops) in sock_init(). Include had not. When 1.2 -> 1.3 reorg of net/* had moved a lot of stuff from net/socket.c to net/core/sock.c, this crap had followed... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 25 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Please apply, SCTP/DCCP needs this when INET_REFCNT_DEBUG is set. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-