- 10 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Communications with a hardware vendor confirm that the expected behaviour on systems that set the FADT ASPM disable bit but which still grant full PCIe control is for the OS to leave any BIOS configuration intact and refuse to touch the ASPM bits. This mimics the behaviour of Windows. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@coreos.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 05 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Enable support of IOAPIC hotplug by: 1) reintroducing ACPI based IOAPIC driver 2) enhance pci_root driver to hook hotplug events The ACPI IOAPIC driver is always enabled if all of ACPI, PCI and IOAPIC are enabled. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414387308-27148-19-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
struct acpi_resource_address and struct acpi_resource_extended_address64 share substracts just at different offsets. To unify the parsing functions, OSPMs like Linux need a new ACPI_ADDRESS64_ATTRIBUTE as their substructs, so they can extract the shared data. This patch also synchronizes the structure changes to the Linux kernel. The usages are searched by matching the following keywords: 1. acpi_resource_address 2. acpi_resource_extended_address 3. ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS 4. ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_ADDRESS And we found and fixed the usages in the following files: arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-ext.c arch/ia64/pci/pci.c arch/x86/pci/acpi.c arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c drivers/xen/xen-acpi-memhotplug.c drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c drivers/acpi/pci_root.c drivers/acpi/resource.c drivers/char/hpet.c drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c Build tests are passed with defconfig/allnoconfig/allyesconfig and defconfig+CONFIG_ACPI=n. Original-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Original-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 18 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Finally enhance pci_root driver to support DMAR device hotplug when hot-plugging PCI host bridges. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
-
- 25 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Apple hardware queries _OSI("Darwin") in order to determine whether the system is running OS X, and changes firmware behaviour based on the answer. The most obvious difference in behaviour is that Thunderbolt hardware is forcibly powered down unless the system is running OS X. The obvious solution would be to simply add Darwin to the list of supported _OSI strings, but this causes problems. Recent Apple hardware includes two separate methods for checking _OSI strings. The first will check whether Darwin is supported, and if so will exit. The second will check whether Darwin is supported, but will then continue to check for further operating systems. If a further operating system is found then later firmware code will assume that the OS is not OS X. This results in the unfortunate situation where the Thunderbolt controller is available at boot time but remains powered down after suspend. The easiest way to handle this is to special-case it in the Linux-specific OSI handling code. If we see Darwin, we should answer true and then disable all other _OSI vendor strings. The next problem is that the Apple PCI _OSC method has the following code: if (LEqual (0x01, OSDW ())) if (LAnd (LEqual (Arg0, GUID), NEXP) (do stuff) else (fail) NEXP is a value in high memory and is presumably under the control of the firmware. No methods sets it. The methods that are called in the "do stuff" path are dummies. Unless there's some additional firmware call in early boot, there's no way for this call to succeed - and even if it does, it doesn't do anything. The easiest way to handle this is simply to ignore it. We know which flags would be set, so just set them by hand if the platform is running in Darwin mode. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com> [andreas.noever@gmail.com: merged two patches, do not touch ACPICA] Signed-off-by: NAndreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since ACPI wakeup GPEs are going to be enabled during system suspend as well as for runtime wakeup by a subsequent patch and the same notify handlers will be used in both cases, rework the ACPI device wakeup notification framework so that the part specific to physical devices is always run asynchronously from the PM workqueue. This prevents runtime resume callbacks for those devices from being run during system suspend and resume which may not be appropriate, among other things. Also make ACPI device wakeup notification handling a bit more robust agaist subsequent removal of ACPI device objects, whould that ever happen, and create a wakeup source object for each ACPI device configured for wakeup so that wakeup notifications for those devices can wake up the system from the "freeze" sleep state. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 19 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hanjun Guo 提交于
We already have a macro for PREFIX of "ACPI: " in drivers/acpi/internal.h, so remove the duplicate ones in ACPI drivers when internal.h is included. Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since the only existing caller of acpiphp_check_host_bridge(), which is acpi_pci_root_scan_dependent(), already has a struct acpi_device pointer needed to obtain the ACPIPHP context, it doesn't make sense to execute acpi_bus_get_device() on its handle in acpiphp_handle_to_bridge() just in order to get that pointer back. For this reason, modify acpiphp_check_host_bridge() to take a struct acpi_device pointer as its argument and rearrange the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Multiple race conditions are possible between the addition and removal of PCI devices during ACPI PCI host bridge hotplug and the generic PCI bus rescan and device removal that can be triggered via sysfs. To avoid those race conditions make the ACPI PCI host bridge addition and removal code use global PCI rescan-remove locking. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h> inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 11月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Rework the common ACPI device hotplug code so that it is suitable for PCI host bridge hotplug and switch the PCI host bridge scan handler to using the common hotplug code. This allows quite a few lines of code that are not necessary any more to be dropped from the PCI host bridge scan handler and removes arbitrary differences in behavior between PCI host bridge hotplug and ACPI-based hotplug of other components, like CPUs and memory. Also acpi_device_hotplug() can be static now. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify the common ACPI device hotplug code to always queue up the same function, acpi_device_hotplug(), using acpi_hotplug_execute() and make the PCI host bridge hotplug code use that function too for device hot removal. This allows some code duplication to be reduced and a race condition where the relevant ACPI handle may become invalid between the notification handler and the function queued up by it via acpi_hotplug_execute() to be avoided. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify the ACPI namespace scanning code to register a struct acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device, processor and so on, even if the device represented by that namespace node is reported to be not present and not functional by _STA. There are multiple reasons to do that. First of all, it avoids quite a lot of overhead when struct acpi_device objects are deleted every time acpi_bus_trim() is run and then added again by a subsequent acpi_bus_scan() for the same scope, although the namespace objects they correspond to stay in memory all the time (which always is the case on a vast majority of systems). Second, it will allow user space to see that there are namespace nodes representing devices that are not present at the moment and may be added to the system. It will also allow user space to evaluate _SUN for those nodes to check what physical slots the "missing" devices may be put into and it will make sense to add a sysfs attribute for _STA evaluation after this change (that will be useful for thermal management on some systems). Next, it will help to consolidate the ACPI hotplug handling among subsystems by making it possible to store hotplug-related information in struct acpi_device objects in a standard common way. Finally, it will help to avoid a race condition related to the deletion of ACPI namespace nodes. Namely, namespace nodes may be deleted as a result of a table unload triggered by _EJ0 or _DCK. If a hotplug notification for one of those nodes is triggered right before the deletion and it executes a hotplug callback via acpi_hotplug_execute(), the ACPI handle passed to that callback may be stale when the callback actually runs. One way to work around that is to always pass struct acpi_device pointers to hotplug callbacks after doing a get_device() on the objects in question which eliminates the use-after-free possibility (the ACPI handles in those objects are invalidated by acpi_scan_drop_device(), so they will trigger ACPICA errors on attempts to use them). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 20 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
The PCI host bridge scan handler installs its own notify handler, handle_hotplug_event_root(), by itself. Nevertheless, the ACPI hotplug framework also installs the common notify handler, acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), for PCI root bridges. This causes acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to call _OST method with unsupported error as hotplug.enabled is not set. To address this issue, introduce hotplug.ignore flag, which indicates that the scan handler installs its own notify handler by itself. The ACPI hotplug framework does not install the common notify handler when this flag is set. Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> [rjw: Changed the name of the new flag] Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 19 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If a PCI host bridge cannot be enumerated due to an error in pci_acpi_scan_root(), its ACPI device object's driver_data field has to be cleared by acpi_pci_root_add() before freeing the object pointed to by that field, or some later acpi_pci_find_root() checks that should fail may succeed and cause quite a bit of confusion to ensue. Fix acpi_pci_root_add() to clear device->driver_data before returning an error code as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 08 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are two different interfaces for queuing up work items on the ACPI hotplug workqueue, alloc_acpi_hp_work() used by PCI and PCI host bridge hotplug code and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() used by the common ACPI hotplug code and docking stations. They both are somewhat cumbersome to use and work slightly differently. The users of alloc_acpi_hp_work() have to submit a work function that will extract the necessary data items from a struct acpi_hp_work object allocated by alloc_acpi_hp_work() and then will free that object, while it would be more straightforward to simply use a work function with one more argument and let the interface take care of the execution details. The users of acpi_os_hotplug_execute() also have to deal with the fact that it takes only one argument in addition to the work function pointer, although acpi_os_execute_deferred() actually takes care of the allocation and freeing of memory, so it would have been able to pass more arguments to the work function if it hadn't been constrained by the connection with acpi_os_execute(). Moreover, while alloc_acpi_hp_work() makes GFP_KERNEL memory allocations, which is correct, because hotplug work items are always queued up from process context, acpi_os_hotplug_execute() uses GFP_ATOMIC, as that is needed by acpi_os_execute(). Also, acpi_os_execute_deferred() queued up by it waits for the ACPI event workqueues to flush before executing the work function, whereas alloc_acpi_hp_work() can't do anything similar. That leads to somewhat arbitrary differences in behavior between various ACPI hotplug code paths and has to be straightened up. For this reason, replace both alloc_acpi_hp_work() and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() with a single interface, acpi_hotplug_execute(), combining their behavior and being more friendly to its users than any of the two. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since _handle_hotplug_event_root() is run from the ACPI hotplug workqueue, it doesn't need to queue up a work item to eject a PCI host bridge on the same workqueue. Instead, it can just carry out the eject by calling acpi_bus_device_eject() directly, so make that happen. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Notice that handle_root_bridge_removal() is the only user of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), so it doesn't have to be exported any more and can be made internal to the ACPI core. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Simplify handle_root_bridge_removal() and acpi_eject_store() by getting rid of struct acpi_eject_event and passing device objects directly to async routines executed via acpi_os_hotplug_execute(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
It is required to do get_device() on the struct acpi_device in question before passing it to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() through acpi_os_hotplug_execute(), because acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() calls acpi_scan_hot_remove() that does put_device() on that object. The ACPI PCI root removal routine, handle_root_bridge_removal(), doesn't do that, which may lead to premature freeing of the device object or to executing put_device() on an object that has been freed already. Fix this problem by making handle_root_bridge_removal() use get_device() as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
-
- 24 9月, 2013 10 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
This updates _OSC-related messages to be more human-readable. We now always show the features we declare support for (this was previously invisible) as well as the features we are granted control of. Typical changes: -acpi PNP0A08:00: Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x1d) -acpi PNP0A08:00: ACPI _OSC control (0x1d) granted +acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS supports [ExtendedConfig ASPM ClockPM Segments MSI] +acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS now controls [PCIeHotplug PME AER PCIeCapability] Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Test the services we support (extended config space, ASPM, MSI) separately so we can give a better message. Previously we said "Unable to request _OSC control..."; now we'll say "we support %#02x but %#02x are required". Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Test "pcie_ports_disabled" separately so we can give a better message. Previously we said "Unable to request _OSC control..."; now we'll say "PCIe port services disabled; not requesting _OSC control". "pcie_ports_disabled" is true when CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS=n or we boot with "pcie_ports=compat". Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
If the _OSC support notification fails, we will never request control (because "support == OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT", which doesn't include all the features in ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT), so we can return early to simplify the code. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Previously, we ran _OSC once to tell the platform that we support PCI Segment Groups, then we ran it again if we supported any additional features (ASPM, MSI, or extended config space). I don't think it's necessary to run it twice, since we can easily build the complete mask of features we support before running _OSC the first time. We run _OSC again later when requesting control of PCIe features; that's unaffected by this change. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Previously we used "flags" for both: - the bitmask of features we support (segments, ASPM, MSI, etc.), and - the bitmask of features we want to control (native hotplug, AER, etc.) To reduce confusion, this patch splits this into two variables: "support" is the bitmask of features we support, and "control" is the bitmask of features we want to control. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
This doesn't change any of the _OSC code; it just moves it out into a new function so it doesn't clutter acpi_pci_root_add() so much. This also enables future simplifications. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
There's no need to check whether _OSC exists here; we eventually call acpi_evaluate_object(..., "_OSC", ...), and that will fail gracefully if _OSC doesn't exist. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Make PCI Host Bridge _OSC #defines more consistent. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
OSC_QUERY_TYPE isn't a "type"; it's an index into the _OSC Capabilities Buffer of DWORDs. Rename OSC_QUERY_TYPE, OSC_SUPPORT_TYPE, and OSC_CONTROL_TYPE to OSC_QUERY_DWORD, etc., to make this clear. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
This fixes the problem of acpiphp claiming slots that should be managed by pciehp, which may keep ExpressCard slots from working. The acpiphp driver claims PCIe slots unless the BIOS has granted us control of PCIe native hotplug via _OSC. Prior to v3.10, the acpiphp .add method (add_bridge()) was always called *after* we had requested native hotplug control with _OSC. But after 3b63aaa7 ("PCI: acpiphp: Do not use ACPI PCI subdriver mechanism"), which appeared in v3.10, acpiphp initialization is done during the bus scan via the pcibios_add_bus() hook, and this happens *before* we request native hotplug control. Therefore, acpiphp doesn't know yet whether the BIOS will grant control, and it claims slots that we should be handling with native hotplug. This patch requests native hotplug control earlier, so we know whether the BIOS granted it to us before we initialize acpiphp. To avoid reintroducing the ASPM issue fixed by b8178f13 ('Revert "PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control before scanning PCI root bus"'), we run _OSC earlier but defer the actual ASPM calls until after the bus scan is complete. Tested successfully by myself. [bhelgaas: changelog, mark for stable] Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60736Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.10+ CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 26 7月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
When hot-adding an ACPI host bridge, use pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources() instead of pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(). The former is more aggressive and will release and reassign existing resources if necessary. This is safe at hot-add time because no drivers are bound to devices below the new host bridge yet. [bhelgaas: changelog, split __init changes out for reviewability] Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
We currently enable PCI bridges after scanning a bus and assigning resources. This is often done in arch code. This patch changes this so we don't enable a bridge until necessary, i.e., until we enable a PCI device behind the bridge. We do this in the generic pci_enable_device() path, so this also removes the arch-specific code to enable bridges. [bhelgaas: changelog] Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Use dev_printk(), acpi_handle_print(), and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c. [bhelgaas: fold in dev_printk() changes, use dev_printk() in handle_root_bridge_insertion()] Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Now the global list acpi_pci_roots pci_root.c is useless, remove it. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
[bhelgaas: split out from acpi_handle_printk() changes] Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
[bhelgaas: split out from acpi_pci_roots removal] Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
When a PCI host bridge device receives a Bus Check notification, we must re-enumerate starting with the bridge to discover changes (devices that have been added or removed). Prior to 668192b6 ("PCI: acpiphp: Move host bridge hotplug to pci_root.c"), this happened in _handle_hotplug_event_bridge(). After that commit, _handle_hotplug_event_bridge() is not installed for host bridges, and the host bridge notify handler, _handle_hotplug_event_root() did not re-enumerate. This patch adds re-enumeration to _handle_hotplug_event_root(). This fixes cases where we don't notice the addition or removal of PCI devices, e.g., the PCI-to-USB ExpressCard in the bugzilla below. [bhelgaas: changelog, references] Reference: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAAh6nkmbKR3HTqm5ommevsBwhL_u0N8Rk7Wsms_LfP=nBgKNew@mail.gmail.com Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57961Reported-by: NGavin Guo <tuffkidtt@gmail.com> Tested-by: NGavin Guo <tuffkidtt@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.9+
-
- 16 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
We should check the acpi_resource_to_address64() return value, which also removes the need to validate the resource type beforehand. No functional change. Found by Coverity (CID 113815). Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Myron Stowe 提交于
Both sub-drivers of the "PCI Root Bridge ("pci_bridge")" driver, "acpiphp" and "pci_slot", have been converted to hook directly into the PCI core. With the conversions there are no remaining usages of the 'struct acpi_pci_driver' list based infrastructure. This patch removes it. Signed-off-by: NMyron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-