Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 05 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 31 5月, 2014 2 次提交
  7. 17 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  9. 29 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • C
      x86, CMCI: Add proper detection of end of CMCI storms · 27f6c573
      由 Chen, Gong 提交于 
      When CMCI storm persists for a long time(at least beyond predefined
threshold. It's 30 seconds for now), we can watch CMCI storm is
detected immediately after it subsides.

...
Dec 10 22:04:29 kernel: CMCI storm detected: switching to poll mode
Dec 10 22:04:59 kernel: CMCI storm subsided: switching to interrupt mode
Dec 10 22:04:59 kernel: CMCI storm detected: switching to poll mode
Dec 10 22:05:29 kernel: CMCI storm subsided: switching to interrupt mode
...

The problem is that our logic that determines that the storm has
ended is incorrect. We announce the end, re-enable interrupts and
realize that the storm is still going on, so we switch back to
polling mode. Rinse, repeat.

When a storm happens we disable signaling of errors via CMCI and begin
polling machine check banks instead. If we find any logged errors,
then we need to set a per-cpu flag so that our per-cpu tests that
check whether the storm is ongoing will see that errors are still
being logged independently of whether mce_notify_irq() says that the
error has been fully processed.

cmci_clear() is not the right tool to disable a bank. It disables the
interrupt for the bank as desired, but it also clears the bit for
this bank in "mce_banks_owned" so we will skip the bank when polling
(so we fail to see that the storm continues because we stop looking).
New cmci_storm_disable_banks() just disables the interrupt while
allowing polling to continue.
Reported-by: NWilliam Dauchy <wdauchy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      27f6c573
  11. 20 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • S
      x86, mce: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration · 82a8f131
      由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于 
      Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:

	get_online_cpus();

	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
		init_cpu(cpu);

	register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

	put_online_cpus();

This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).

Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:

	cpu_notifier_register_begin();

	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
		init_cpu(cpu);

	/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
	__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

	cpu_notifier_register_done();

Fix the mce code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      82a8f131
  13. 12 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • B
      x86, mce: Fix mce_start_timer semantics · 4f75d841
      由 Borislav Petkov 提交于 
      So mce_start_timer() has a 'cpu' argument which is supposed to mean to
start a timer on that cpu. However, the code currently starts a timer on
the *current* cpu the function runs on and causes the sanity-check in
mce_timer_fn to fire:

	WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1286 mce_timer_fn

because it is running on the wrong cpu.

This was triggered by Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> by offlining
all the cpus in succession.

Then, we were fiddling with the CMCI storm settings when starting the
timer whereas there's no need for that - if there's storm happening
on this newly restarted cpu, we're going to be in normal CMCI mode
initially and then when the CMCI interrupt starts firing, we're going to
go to the polling mode with the timer real soon.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1387722156-5511-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com
      4f75d841
  15. 30 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      x86: delete __cpuinit usage from all x86 files · 148f9bb8
      由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于 
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.

After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.

Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.

This removes all the arch/x86 uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files.  x86 only had the one __CPUINIT used in assembly files,
and it wasn't paired off with a .previous or a __FINIT, so we can
delete it directly w/o any corresponding additional change there.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      148f9bb8
  19. 09 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • N
      mce: acpi/apei: Honour Firmware First for MCA banks listed in APEI HEST CMC · c3d1fb56
      由 Naveen N. Rao 提交于 
      The Corrected Machine Check structure (CMC) in HEST has a flag which can be
set by the firmware to indicate to the OS that it prefers to process the
corrected error events first. In this scenario, the OS is expected to not
monitor for corrected errors (through CMCI/polling). Instead, the firmware
notifies the OS on corrected error events through GHES.

Linux already has support for GHES. This patch adds support for parsing CMC
structure and to disable CMCI/polling if the firmware first flag is set.

Further, the list of machine check bank structures at the end of CMC is used
to determine which MCA banks function in FF mode, so that we continue to
monitor error events on the other banks.
Signed-off-by: NNaveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      c3d1fb56
  21. 26 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  23. 03 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • S
      x86/mce: Rework cmci_rediscover() to play well with CPU hotplug · 7a0c819d
      由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于 
      Dave Jones reports that offlining a CPU leads to this trace:

numa_remove_cpu cpu 1 node 0: mask now 0,2-3
smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
cpu-offline.sh/10591
caller is cmci_rediscover+0x6a/0xe0
Pid: 10591, comm: cpu-offline.sh Not tainted 3.9.0-rc3+ #2
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81333bbd>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xdd/0x100
 [<ffffffff8101edba>] cmci_rediscover+0x6a/0xe0
 [<ffffffff815f5b9f>] mce_cpu_callback+0x19d/0x1ae
 [<ffffffff8160ea66>] notifier_call_chain+0x66/0x150
 [<ffffffff8107ad7e>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
 [<ffffffff8104c2e3>] cpu_notify+0x23/0x50
 [<ffffffff8104c31e>] cpu_notify_nofail+0xe/0x20
 [<ffffffff815ef082>] _cpu_down+0x302/0x350
 [<ffffffff815ef106>] cpu_down+0x36/0x50
 [<ffffffff815f1c9d>] store_online+0x8d/0xd0
 [<ffffffff813edc48>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30
 [<ffffffff81226eeb>] sysfs_write_file+0xdb/0x150
 [<ffffffff811adfb2>] vfs_write+0xa2/0x170
 [<ffffffff811ae16c>] sys_write+0x4c/0xa0
 [<ffffffff81613019>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

However, a look at cmci_rediscover shows that it can be simplified quite
a bit, apart from solving the above issue. It invokes functions that
take spin locks with interrupts disabled, and hence it can run in atomic
context. Also, it is run in the CPU_POST_DEAD phase, so the dying CPU
is already dead and out of the cpu_online_mask. So take these points into
account and simplify the code, and thereby also fix the above issue.
Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      7a0c819d
  25. 21 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  27. 29 12月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: don't use [delayed_]work_pending() · 4d899be5
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending
before queueing, flushing or cancelling it.  Most uses are unnecessary
and quite a few of them are buggy.

Remove unnecessary pending tests from x86/mce.  Only compile tested.

v2: Local var work removed from mce_schedule_work() as suggested by
    Borislav.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
      4d899be5
  29. 26 10月, 2012 4 次提交
  31. 19 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  33. 28 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  35. 10 8月, 2012 1 次提交
    • C
      x86/mce: Add CMCI poll mode · 55babd8f
      由 Chen Gong 提交于 
      On Intel systems corrected machine check interrupts (CMCI) may be sent to
multiple logical processors; possibly to all processors on the affected
socket (SDM Volume 3B "15.5.1 CMCI Local APIC Interface").  This means
that a persistent error (such as a stuck bit in ECC memory) may cause
a storm of interrupts that greatly hinders or prevents forward progress
(probably on many processors).

To solve this we keep track of the rate at which each processor sees
CMCI. If we exceed a threshold, we disable CMCI delivery and switch to
polling the machine check banks. If the storm subsides (none of the
affected processors see any more errors for a complete poll interval) we
re-enable CMCI.

[Tony: Added console messages when storm begins/ends and increased storm
threshold from 5 to 15 so we have a few more logged entries before we
disable interrupts and start dropping reports]
Signed-off-by: NChen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NChen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      55babd8f
  37. 04 8月, 2012 2 次提交
  39. 26 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  41. 20 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  43. 12 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: Fix siginfo_t->si_addr value for non-recoverable memory faults · 6751ed65
      由 Tony Luck 提交于 
      In commit dad1743e ("x86/mce: Only restart instruction after machine
check recovery if it is safe") we fixed mce_notify_process() to force a
signal to the current process if it was not restartable (RIPV bit not
set in MCG_STATUS). But doing it here means that the process doesn't
get told the virtual address of the fault via siginfo_t->si_addr. This
would prevent application level recovery from the fault.

Make a new MF_MUST_KILL flag bit for memory_failure() et al. to use so
that we will provide the right information with the signal.
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org    # 3.4+
      6751ed65
  45. 06 6月, 2012 4 次提交
  47. 31 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  49. 24 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  51. 23 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  53. 15 5月, 2012 2 次提交
  55. 30 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  57. 20 4月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: Avoid reading every machine check bank register twice. · 95022b8c
      由 Tony Luck 提交于 
      Reading machine check bank registers is slow. There is a trend of
increasing the number of banks, and the number of cores. The main section
of do_machine_check() is a serialized section where each cpu in turn
checks every bank. Even on a little two socket SandyBridge-EP system
that multiplies out as:

	2 sockets * 8 cores * 2 hyperthreads * 20 banks = 640 MSRs

We already scan the banks in parallel in mce_no_way_out() to see if there
is a fatal error anywhere in the system. If we build a cache of VALID
bits during this scan, we can avoid uselessly re-reading banks that have
no data. Note that this cache is only a hint. If the valid bit is set in a
shared bank, all cpus that share that bank will see it during the parallel
scan, but the first to find it in the sequential scan will (usually) clear
the bank.
Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      95022b8c
  59. 07 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • S
      x86, mce: Fix rcu splat in drain_mce_log_buffer() · b11e3d78
      由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于 
      While booting, the following message is seen:

[   21.665087] ===============================
[   21.669439] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
[   21.673798] 3.2.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #2 Not tainted
[   21.681353] -------------------------------
[   21.685864] arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:194 suspicious rcu_dereference_index_check() usage!
[   21.695013]
[   21.695014] other info that might help us debug this:
[   21.695016]
[   21.703488]
[   21.703489] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[   21.710426] 3 locks held by modprobe/2139:
[   21.714754]  #0:  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<ffffffff8133afd3>] __driver_attach+0x53/0xa0
[   21.725020]  #1:
[   21.725323] ioatdma: Intel(R) QuickData Technology Driver 4.00
[   21.733206]  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<ffffffff8133afe1>] __driver_attach+0x61/0xa0
[   21.743015]  #2:  (i7core_edac_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa01cfa5f>] i7core_probe+0x1f/0x5c0 [i7core_edac]
[   21.753708]
[   21.753709] stack backtrace:
[   21.758429] Pid: 2139, comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.2.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #2
[   21.768253] Call Trace:
[   21.770838]  [<ffffffff810977cd>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xcd/0x100
[   21.777366]  [<ffffffff8101aa41>] drain_mcelog_buffer+0x191/0x1b0
[   21.783715]  [<ffffffff8101aa78>] mce_register_decode_chain+0x18/0x20
[   21.790430]  [<ffffffffa01cf8db>] i7core_register_mci+0x2fb/0x3e4 [i7core_edac]
[   21.798003]  [<ffffffffa01cfb14>] i7core_probe+0xd4/0x5c0 [i7core_edac]
[   21.804809]  [<ffffffff8129566b>] local_pci_probe+0x5b/0xe0
[   21.810631]  [<ffffffff812957c9>] __pci_device_probe+0xd9/0xe0
[   21.816650]  [<ffffffff813362e4>] ? get_device+0x14/0x20
[   21.822178]  [<ffffffff81296916>] pci_device_probe+0x36/0x60
[   21.828061]  [<ffffffff8133ac8a>] really_probe+0x7a/0x2b0
[   21.833676]  [<ffffffff8133af23>] driver_probe_device+0x63/0xc0
[   21.839868]  [<ffffffff8133b01b>] __driver_attach+0x9b/0xa0
[   21.845718]  [<ffffffff8133af80>] ? driver_probe_device+0xc0/0xc0
[   21.852027]  [<ffffffff81339168>] bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0x90
[   21.857876]  [<ffffffff8133aa3c>] driver_attach+0x1c/0x20
[   21.863462]  [<ffffffff8133a64d>] bus_add_driver+0x16d/0x2b0
[   21.869377]  [<ffffffff8133b6dc>] driver_register+0x7c/0x160
[   21.875220]  [<ffffffff81296bda>] __pci_register_driver+0x6a/0xf0
[   21.881494]  [<ffffffffa01fe000>] ? 0xffffffffa01fdfff
[   21.886846]  [<ffffffffa01fe047>] i7core_init+0x47/0x1000 [i7core_edac]
[   21.893737]  [<ffffffff810001ce>] do_one_initcall+0x3e/0x180
[   21.899670]  [<ffffffff810a9b95>] sys_init_module+0xc5/0x220
[   21.905542]  [<ffffffff8149bc39>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Fix this by using ACCESS_ONCE() instead of rcu_dereference_check_mce()
over mcelog.next. Since the access to each entry is controlled by the
->finished field, ACCESS_ONCE() should work just fine. An rcu_dereference
is unnecessary here.
Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
      b11e3d78
  61. 23 2月, 2012 1 次提交