1. 25 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  2. 24 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 05 9月, 2005 1 次提交
    • H
      [PATCH] swap: swap_lock replace list+device · 5d337b91
      Hugh Dickins 提交于
      The idea of a swap_device_lock per device, and a swap_list_lock over them all,
      is appealing; but in practice almost every holder of swap_device_lock must
      already hold swap_list_lock, which defeats the purpose of the split.
      
      The only exceptions have been swap_duplicate, valid_swaphandles and an
      untrodden path in try_to_unuse (plus a few places added in this series).
      valid_swaphandles doesn't show up high in profiles, but swap_duplicate does
      demand attention.  However, with the hold time in get_swap_pages so much
      reduced, I've not yet found a load and set of swap device priorities to show
      even swap_duplicate benefitting from the split.  Certainly the split is mere
      overhead in the common case of a single swap device.
      
      So, replace swap_list_lock and swap_device_lock by spinlock_t swap_lock
      (generally we seem to prefer an _ in the name, and not hide in a macro).
      
      If someone can show a regression in swap_duplicate, then probably we should
      add a hashlock for the swap_map entries alone (shorts being anatomic), so as
      to help the case of the single swap device too.
      Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      5d337b91
  4. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4