- 23 2月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Descriptor block header is initialized in several places. Factor out the common code into jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer(). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records() takes journal pointer and write_op, although journal can be obtained from the passed transaction and write_op is always WRITE_SYNC. Remove these superfluous arguments. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 05 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junxiao Bi 提交于
introduced jbd2_write_access_granted() to improve write|undo_access speed, but missed to check the status of b_committed_data which caused a kernel panic on ocfs2. [ 6538.405938] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 6538.406686] kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:2400! [ 6538.406686] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 6538.406686] Modules linked in: ocfs2 nfsd lockd grace nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc autofs4 ocfs2_dlmfs ocfs2_stack_o2cb ocfs2_dlm ocfs2_nodemanager ocfs2_stackglue configfs sd_mod sg ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables be2iscsi iscsi_boot_sysfs bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 cxgb3i libcxgbi cxgb3 mdio ib_iser rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core ib_addr ipv6 iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ppdev xen_kbdfront xen_netfront xen_fbfront parport_pc parport pcspkr i2c_piix4 acpi_cpufreq ext4 jbd2 mbcache xen_blkfront floppy pata_acpi ata_generic ata_piix cirrus ttm drm_kms_helper drm fb_sys_fops sysimgblt sysfillrect i2c_core syscopyarea dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod [ 6538.406686] CPU: 1 PID: 16265 Comm: mmap_truncate Not tainted 4.3.0 #1 [ 6538.406686] Hardware name: Xen HVM domU, BIOS 4.3.1OVM 05/14/2014 [ 6538.406686] task: ffff88007c2bab00 ti: ffff880075b78000 task.ti: ffff880075b78000 [ 6538.406686] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa06a286b>] [<ffffffffa06a286b>] ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits+0x23b/0x250 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] RSP: 0018:ffff880075b7b7f8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 6538.406686] RAX: ffff8800760c5b40 RBX: ffff88006c06a000 RCX: ffffffffa06e6df0 [ 6538.406686] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88007a6f6ea0 RDI: ffff88007a760430 [ 6538.406686] RBP: ffff880075b7b878 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 6538.406686] R10: ffffffffa06769be R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 6538.406686] R13: ffffffffa06a1750 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88007a6f6ea0 [ 6538.406686] FS: 00007f17fde30720(0000) GS:ffff88007f040000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 6538.406686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 6538.406686] CR2: 0000000000601730 CR3: 000000007aea0000 CR4: 00000000000406e0 [ 6538.406686] Stack: [ 6538.406686] ffff88007c2bb5b0 ffff880075b7b8e0 ffff88007a7604b0 ffff88006c640800 [ 6538.406686] ffff88007a7604b0 ffff880075d77390 0000000075b7b878 ffffffffa06a309d [ 6538.406686] ffff880075d752d8 ffff880075b7b990 ffff880075b7b898 0000000000000000 [ 6538.406686] Call Trace: [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a309d>] ? ocfs2_read_group_descriptor+0x6d/0xa0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a3654>] _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0xe4/0x320 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a1750>] ? ocfs2_put_slot+0xf0/0xf0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a397e>] _ocfs2_free_clusters+0xee/0x210 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a1750>] ? ocfs2_put_slot+0xf0/0xf0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a1750>] ? ocfs2_put_slot+0xf0/0xf0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa0682d50>] ? ocfs2_extend_trans+0x50/0x1a0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a3ad5>] ocfs2_free_clusters+0x15/0x20 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa065072c>] ocfs2_replay_truncate_records+0xfc/0x290 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06843ac>] ? ocfs2_start_trans+0xec/0x1d0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa0654600>] __ocfs2_flush_truncate_log+0x140/0x2d0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa0654394>] ? ocfs2_reserve_blocks_for_rec_trunc.clone.0+0x44/0x170 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa065acd4>] ocfs2_remove_btree_range+0x374/0x630 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa017486b>] ? jbd2_journal_stop+0x25b/0x470 [jbd2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa065d5b5>] ocfs2_commit_truncate+0x305/0x670 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa0683430>] ? ocfs2_journal_access_eb+0x20/0x20 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa067adb7>] ocfs2_truncate_file+0x297/0x380 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa01759e4>] ? jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate+0x64/0xc0 [jbd2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa067c7a2>] ocfs2_setattr+0x572/0x860 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff810e4a3f>] ? current_fs_time+0x3f/0x50 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff812124b7>] notify_change+0x1d7/0x340 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff8121abf9>] ? generic_getxattr+0x79/0x80 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff811f5876>] do_truncate+0x66/0x90 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff81120e30>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xb0/0x110 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff811f5bb3>] do_sys_ftruncate.clone.0+0xf3/0x120 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff811f5bee>] SyS_ftruncate+0xe/0x10 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff816aa2ae>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71 [ 6538.406686] Code: 28 48 81 ee b0 04 00 00 48 8b 92 50 fb ff ff 48 8b 80 b0 03 00 00 48 39 90 88 00 00 00 0f 84 30 fe ff ff 0f 0b eb fe 0f 0b eb fe <0f> 0b 0f 1f 00 eb fb 66 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 [ 6538.406686] RIP [<ffffffffa06a286b>] ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits+0x23b/0x250 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] RSP <ffff880075b7b7f8> [ 6538.691128] ---[ end trace 31cd7011d6770d7e ]--- [ 6538.694492] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [ 6538.695484] Kernel Offset: disabled Fixes: de92c8ca("jbd2: speedup jbd2_journal_get_[write|undo]_access()") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJunxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 25 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Ted and Namjae have reported that truncated pages don't get timely reclaimed after being truncated in data=journal mode. The following test triggers the issue easily: for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { pwrite(fd, buf, 1024*1024, 0); fsync(fd); fsync(fd); ftruncate(fd, 0); } The reason is that journal_unmap_buffer() finds that truncated buffers are not journalled (jh->b_transaction == NULL), they are part of checkpoint list of a transaction (jh->b_cp_transaction != NULL) and have been already written out (!buffer_dirty(bh)). We clean such buffers but we leave them in the checkpoint list. Since checkpoint transaction holds a reference to the journal head, these buffers cannot be released until the checkpoint transaction is cleaned up. And at that point we don't call release_buffer_page() anymore so pages detached from mapping are lingering in the system waiting for reclaim to find them and free them. Fix the problem by removing buffers from transaction checkpoint lists when journal_unmap_buffer() finds out they don't have to be there anymore. Reported-and-tested-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Fixes: de1b7941Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 07 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd __GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold spinlocks or are in interrupts. They are expected to be high priority and have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred to as the "atomic reserve". __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve". Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options were available. Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic reserves. This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic, cannot sleep and have no alternative. High priority users continue to use __GFP_HIGH. __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and are willing to enter direct reclaim. __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim. __GFP_WAIT is redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake kswapd for background reclaim. This patch then converts a number of sites o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag. o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress. o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to flag manipulations. o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons. In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH. The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL. They may now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. It's almost certainly harmless if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd. Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 19 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daeho Jeong 提交于
If a EXT4 filesystem utilizes JBD2 journaling and an error occurs, the journaling will be aborted first and the error number will be recorded into JBD2 superblock and, finally, the system will enter into the panic state in "errors=panic" option. But, in the rare case, this sequence is little twisted like the below figure and it will happen that the system enters into panic state, which means the system reset in mobile environment, before completion of recording an error in the journal superblock. In this case, e2fsck cannot recognize that the filesystem failure occurred in the previous run and the corruption wouldn't be fixed. Task A Task B ext4_handle_error() -> jbd2_journal_abort() -> __journal_abort_soft() -> __jbd2_journal_abort_hard() | -> journal->j_flags |= JBD2_ABORT; | | __ext4_abort() | -> jbd2_journal_abort() | | -> __journal_abort_soft() | | -> if (journal->j_flags & JBD2_ABORT) | | return; | -> panic() | -> jbd2_journal_update_sb_errno() Tested-by: NHobin Woo <hobin.woo@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 18 10月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Unlike comments and expectation of callers journal_clean_one_cp_list() returned 1 not only if it freed the transaction but also if it freed some buffers in the transaction. That could make __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() skip processing t_checkpoint_io_list and continue with processing the next transaction. This is mostly a cosmetic issue since the only result is we can sometimes free less memory than we could. But it's still worth fixing. Fix journal_clean_one_cp_list() to return 1 only if the transaction was really freed. Fixes: 50849db3Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Create separate predicate functions to test/set/clear feature flags, thereby replacing the wordy old macros. Furthermore, clean out the places where we open-coded feature tests. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Instead of overloading EIO for CRC errors and corrupt structures, return the same error codes that XFS returns for the same issues. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 15 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Change the journal's checksum functions to gate on whether or not the crc32c driver is loaded, and gate the loading on the superblock bits. This prevents a journal crash if someone loads a journal in no-csum mode and then randomizes the superblock, thus flipping on the feature bits. Tested-By: NNikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> Reported-by: NNikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently there is no limitation on number of reserved credits we can ask for. If we ask for more reserved credits than 1/2 of maximum transaction size, or if total number of credits exceeds the maximum transaction size per operation (which is currently only possible with the former) we will spin forever in start_this_handle(). Fix this by adding this limitation at the start of start_this_handle(). This patch also removes the credit limitation 1/2 of maximum transaction size, since we really only want to limit the number of reserved credits. There is not much point to limit the credits if there is still space in the journal. This accidentally also fixes the online resize, where due to the limitation of the journal credits we're unable to grow file systems with 1k block size and size between 16M and 32M. It has been partially fixed by 2c869b26, but not entirely. Thanks Jan Kara for helping me getting the correct fix. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 29 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Commit 6f6a6fda "jbd2: fix ocfs2 corrupt when updating journal superblock fails" changed jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() to return EIO when the journal is aborted. That makes logic in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() bail out which is fine, except that jbd2_journal_destroy() expects jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() to always make a progress in cleaning the journal. Without it jbd2_journal_destroy() just loops in an infinite loop. Fix jbd2_journal_destroy() to cleanup journal checkpoint lists of jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() fails with error. Reported-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Tested-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Fixes: 6f6a6fdaSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daeho Jeong 提交于
When an error condition is detected, an error status should be recorded into superblocks of EXT4 or JBD2. However, the write request is submitted now without REQ_FUA flag, even in "barrier=1" mode, which is followed by panic() function in "errors=panic" mode. On mobile devices which make whole system reset as soon as kernel panic occurs, this write request containing an error flag will disappear just from storage cache without written to the physical cells. Therefore, when next start, even forever, the error flag cannot be shown in both superblocks, and e2fsck cannot fix the filesystem problems automatically, unless e2fsck is executed in force checking mode. [ Changed use test_opt(sb, BARRIER) of checking the journal flags -- TYT ] Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
It is often the case that we mark buffer as having dirty metadata when the buffer is already in that state (frequent for bitmaps, inode table blocks, superblock). Thus it is unnecessary to contend on grabbing journal head reference and bh_state lock. Avoid that by checking whether any modification to the buffer is needed before grabbing any locks or references. [ Note: this is a fixed version of commit 2143c196, which was reverted in ebeaa8dd due to a false positive triggering of an assertion check. -- Ted ] Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 28 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This reverts commit 2143c196. This commit seems to be the cause of the following jbd2 assertion failure: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1325! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: bnep bluetooth fuse ip6t_rpfilter ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv6 ... CPU: 7 PID: 5509 Comm: gcc Not tainted 4.1.0-10944-g2a298679 #1 Hardware name: /DH87RL, BIOS RLH8710H.86A.0327.2014.0924.1645 09/24/2014 task: ffff8803bf866040 ti: ffff880308528000 task.ti: ffff880308528000 RIP: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x237/0x290 Call Trace: __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0x43/0x1f0 ext4_handle_dirty_dirent_node+0xde/0x160 ? jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x36/0x50 ext4_delete_entry+0x112/0x160 ? __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x52/0xb0 ext4_unlink+0xfa/0x260 vfs_unlink+0xec/0x190 do_unlinkat+0x24a/0x270 SyS_unlink+0x11/0x20 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a ---[ end trace ae033ebde8d080b4 ]--- which is not easily reproducible (I've seen it just once, and then Ted was able to reproduce it once). Revert it while Ted and Jan try to figure out what is wrong. Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rasmus Villemoes 提交于
In one case, we eliminate a local variable; in the other a strlen() call and some .text. Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 21 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
It is often the case that we mark buffer as having dirty metadata when the buffer is already in that state (frequent for bitmaps, inode table blocks, superblock). Thus it is unnecessary to contend on grabbing journal head reference and bh_state lock. Avoid that by checking whether any modification to the buffer is needed before grabbing any locks or references. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 6月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
insert_revoke_hash does an open coded endless allocation loop if journal_oom_retry is true. It doesn't implement any allocation fallback strategy between the retries, though. The memory allocator doesn't know about the never fail requirement so it cannot potentially help to move on with the allocation (e.g. use memory reserves). Get rid of the retry loop and use __GFP_NOFAIL instead. We will lose the debugging message but I am not sure it is anyhow helpful. Do the same for journal_alloc_journal_head which is doing a similar thing. Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
If updating journal superblock fails after journal data has been flushed, the error is omitted and this will mislead the caller as a normal case. In ocfs2, the checkpoint will be treated successfully and the other node can get the lock to update. Since the sb_start is still pointing to the old log block, it will rewrite the journal data during journal recovery by the other node. Thus the new updates will be overwritten and ocfs2 corrupts. So in above case we have to return the error, and ocfs2_commit_cache will take care of the error and prevent the other node to do update first. And only after recovering journal it can do the new updates. The issue discussion mail can be found at: https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2015-June/010856.html http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/48841 [ Fixed bug in patch which allowed a non-negative error return from jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() to leak out of jbd2_fjournal_flush(); this was causing xfstests ext4/306 to fail. -- Ted ] Reported-by: NYiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Tested-by: NYiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 15 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() can be invoked by jbd2__journal_start() So allocations should be done with GFP_NOFS [Full stack trace snipped from 3.10-rh7] [<ffffffff815c4bd4>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [<ffffffff8105dba1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x61/0x80 [<ffffffff8105dcca>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [<ffffffff815c2142>] slab_pre_alloc_hook.isra.31.part.32+0x15/0x17 [<ffffffff8119c045>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x55/0x210 [<ffffffff811477f5>] ? mempool_alloc_slab+0x15/0x20 [<ffffffff811477f5>] mempool_alloc_slab+0x15/0x20 [<ffffffff81147939>] mempool_alloc+0x69/0x170 [<ffffffff815cb69e>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0xe/0x20 [<ffffffff8109160d>] ? finish_task_switch+0x5d/0x150 [<ffffffff811f1a8e>] bio_alloc_bioset+0x1be/0x2e0 [<ffffffff8127ee49>] blkdev_issue_flush+0x99/0x120 [<ffffffffa019a733>] jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail+0x93/0xa0 [jbd2] -->GFP_KERNEL [<ffffffffa019aca1>] jbd2_log_do_checkpoint+0x221/0x4a0 [jbd2] [<ffffffffa019afc7>] __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0xa7/0x1e0 [jbd2] [<ffffffffa01952d8>] start_this_handle+0x2d8/0x550 [jbd2] [<ffffffff811b02a9>] ? __memcg_kmem_put_cache+0x29/0x30 [<ffffffff8119c120>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x130/0x210 [<ffffffffa019573a>] jbd2__journal_start+0xba/0x190 [jbd2] [<ffffffff811532ce>] ? lru_cache_add+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffffa01c9549>] ? ext4_da_write_begin+0xf9/0x330 [ext4] [<ffffffffa01f2c77>] __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x77/0x160 [ext4] [<ffffffffa01c9549>] ext4_da_write_begin+0xf9/0x330 [ext4] [<ffffffff811446ec>] generic_file_buffered_write_iter+0x10c/0x270 [<ffffffff81146918>] __generic_file_write_iter+0x178/0x390 [<ffffffff81146c6b>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x8b/0xb0 [<ffffffff81146ced>] generic_file_aio_write+0x5d/0xc0 [<ffffffffa01bf289>] ext4_file_write+0xa9/0x450 [ext4] [<ffffffff811c31d9>] ? pipe_read+0x379/0x4f0 [<ffffffff811b93f0>] do_sync_write+0x90/0xe0 [<ffffffff811b9b6d>] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1e0 [<ffffffff811ba5b8>] SyS_write+0x58/0xb0 [<ffffffff815d4799>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 09 6月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
jbd2_journal_get_write_access() and jbd2_journal_get_create_access() are frequently called for buffers that are already part of the running transaction - most frequently it is the case for bitmaps, inode table blocks, and superblock. Since in such cases we have nothing to do, it is unfortunate we still grab reference to journal head, lock the bh, lock bh_state only to find out there's nothing to do. Improving this is a bit subtle though since until we find out journal head is attached to the running transaction, it can disappear from under us because checkpointing / commit decided it's no longer needed. We deal with this by protecting journal_head slab with RCU. We still have to be careful about journal head being freed & reallocated within slab and about exposing journal head in consistent state (in particular b_modified and b_frozen_data must be in correct state before we allow user to touch the buffer). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Check for the simple case of unjournaled buffer first, handle it and bail out. This allows us to remove one if and unindent the difficult case by one tab. The result is easier to read. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We were acquiring bh_state_lock when allocation of buffer failed in do_get_write_access() only to be able to jump to a label that releases the lock and does all other checks that don't make sense for this error path. Just jump into the right label instead. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
needs_copy is set only in one place in do_get_write_access(), just move the frozen buffer copying into that place and factor it out to a separate function to make do_get_write_access() slightly more readable. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 08 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
This basically reverts 47def826 (jbd2: Remove __GFP_NOFAIL from jbd2 layer). The deprecation of __GFP_NOFAIL was a bad choice because it led to open coding the endless loop around the allocator rather than removing the dependency on the non failing allocation. So the deprecation was a clear failure and the reality tells us that __GFP_NOFAIL is not even close to go away. It is still true that __GFP_NOFAIL allocations are generally discouraged and new uses should be evaluated and an alternative (pre-allocations or reservations) should be considered but it doesn't make any sense to lie the allocator about the requirements. Allocator can take steps to help making a progress if it knows the requirements. Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
-
- 15 5月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
The journal revoke block recovery code does not check r_count for sanity, which means that an evil value of r_count could result in the kernel reading off the end of the revoke table and into whatever garbage lies beyond. This could crash the kernel, so fix that. However, in testing this fix, I discovered that the code to write out the revoke tables also was not correctly checking to see if the block was full -- the current offset check is fine so long as the revoke table space size is a multiple of the record size, but this is not true when either journal_csum_v[23] are set. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently when journal restart fails, we'll have the h_transaction of the handle set to NULL to indicate that the handle has been effectively aborted. We handle this situation quietly in the jbd2_journal_stop() and just free the handle and exit because everything else has been done before we attempted (and failed) to restart the journal. Unfortunately there are a number of problems with that approach introduced with commit 41a5b913 "jbd2: invalidate handle if jbd2_journal_restart() fails" First of all in ext4 jbd2_journal_stop() will be called through __ext4_journal_stop() where we would try to get a hold of the superblock by dereferencing h_transaction which in this case would lead to NULL pointer dereference and crash. In addition we're going to free the handle regardless of the refcount which is bad as well, because others up the call chain will still reference the handle so we might potentially reference already freed memory. Moreover it's expected that we'll get aborted handle as well as detached handle in some of the journalling function as the error propagates up the stack, so it's unnecessary to call WARN_ON every time we get detached handle. And finally we might leak some memory by forgetting to free reserved handle in jbd2_journal_stop() in the case where handle was detached from the transaction (h_transaction is NULL). Fix the NULL pointer dereference in __ext4_journal_stop() by just calling jbd2_journal_stop() quietly as suggested by Jan Kara. Also fix the potential memory leak in jbd2_journal_stop() and use proper handle refcounting before we attempt to free it to avoid use-after-free issues. And finally remove all WARN_ON(!transaction) from the code so that we do not get random traces when something goes wrong because when journal restart fails we will get to some of those functions. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 20 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
We should complain in dmesg when journal recovery fails on account of the descriptor block being corrupt, so that the diagnostic data can be recovered. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 02 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
When we're enabling journal features, we cannot use the predicate jbd2_journal_has_csum_v2or3() because we haven't yet set the sb feature flag fields! Moreover, we just finished loading the shash driver, so the test is unnecessary; calculate the seed always. Without this patch, we fail to initialize the checksum seed the first time we turn on journal_checksum, which means that all journal blocks written during that first mount are corrupt. Transactions written after the second mount will be fine, since the feature flag will be set in the journal superblock. xfstests generic/{034,321,322} are the regression tests. (This is important for 3.18.) Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.coM> Reported-by: NEric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The old hash function didn't work well for 64-bit block numbers, and used undefined (negative) shift right behavior. Use the generic 64-bit hash function instead. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reported-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>
-
- 18 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
__jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() returns number of buffers it freed but noone was using the value so just stop doing that. This also allows for simplifying the calling convention for journal_clean_once_cp_list(). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Yuanhan has reported that when he is running fsync(2) heavy workload creating new files over ramdisk, significant amount of time is spent in __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() trying to clean old transactions (but they cannot be cleaned up because flusher hasn't yet checkpointed those buffers). The workload can be generated by: fs_mark -d /fs/ram0/1 -D 2 -N 2560 -n 1000000 -L 1 -S 1 -s 4096 Reduce the amount of scanning by stopping to scan the transaction list once we find a transaction that cannot be checkpointed. Note that this way of cleaning is still enough to keep freeing space in the journal after fully checkpointed transactions. Reported-and-tested-by: NYuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 17 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
If EIO happens after we have dropped j_state_lock, we won't notice that the journal has been aborted. So it is reasonable to move this check after we have grabbed the j_checkpoint_mutex and re-grabbed the j_state_lock. This patch helps to prevent false positive complain after EIO. #DMESG: __jbd2_log_wait_for_space: needed 8448 blocks and only had 8386 space available __jbd2_log_wait_for_space: no way to get more journal space in ram1-8 ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 15 PID: 6739 at fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c:168 __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x188/0x200() Modules linked in: brd iTCO_wdt lpc_ich mfd_core igb ptp dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod CPU: 15 PID: 6739 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 3.17.0-rc2-00429-g684de574 #139 Hardware name: Intel Corporation W2600CR/W2600CR, BIOS SE5C600.86B.99.99.x028.061320111235 06/13/2011 00000000000000a8 ffff88077aaab878 ffffffff815c1a8c 00000000000000a8 0000000000000000 ffff88077aaab8b8 ffffffff8106ce8c ffff88077aaab898 ffff8807c57e6000 ffff8807c57e6028 0000000000002100 ffff8807c57e62f0 Call Trace: [<ffffffff815c1a8c>] dump_stack+0x51/0x6d [<ffffffff8106ce8c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [<ffffffff8106ceda>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [<ffffffff812419f8>] __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x188/0x200 [<ffffffff8123be9a>] start_this_handle+0x4da/0x7b0 [<ffffffff810990e5>] ? local_clock+0x25/0x30 [<ffffffff810aba87>] ? lockdep_init_map+0xe7/0x180 [<ffffffff8123c5bc>] jbd2__journal_start+0xdc/0x1d0 [<ffffffff811f2414>] ? __ext4_new_inode+0x7f4/0x1330 [<ffffffff81222a38>] __ext4_journal_start_sb+0xf8/0x110 [<ffffffff811f2414>] __ext4_new_inode+0x7f4/0x1330 [<ffffffff810ac359>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x29/0x190 [<ffffffff812025bb>] ext4_create+0x8b/0x150 [<ffffffff8117fe3b>] vfs_create+0x7b/0xb0 [<ffffffff8118097b>] do_last+0x7db/0xcf0 [<ffffffff8117e31d>] ? inode_permission+0x4d/0x50 [<ffffffff811845d2>] path_openat+0x242/0x590 [<ffffffff81191a76>] ? __alloc_fd+0x36/0x140 [<ffffffff81184a6a>] do_filp_open+0x4a/0xb0 [<ffffffff81191b61>] ? __alloc_fd+0x121/0x140 [<ffffffff81172f20>] do_sys_open+0x170/0x220 [<ffffffff8117300e>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20 [<ffffffff811715d6>] SyS_creat+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff815c7e12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b ---[ end trace cd71c831f82059db ]--- Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Free the buffer head if the journal descriptor block fails checksum verification. This is the jbd2 port of the e2fsprogs patch "e2fsck: free bh on csum verify error in do_one_pass". Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 11 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Clear all three journal checksum feature flags before turning on whichever journal checksum options we want. Rearrange the error checking so that newer flags get complained about first. Reported-by: NTR Reardon <thomas_reardon@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 9月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Gioh Kim 提交于
Sicne the jbd/jbd2 superblock is not released until the file system is unmounted, allocate the buffer cache from the non-moveable area to allow page migration and CMA allocations to more easily succeed. Signed-off-by: NGioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When we discover written out buffer in transaction checkpoint list we don't have to recheck validity of a transaction. Either this is the last buffer in a transaction - and then we are done - or this isn't and then we can just take another buffer from the checkpoint list without dropping j_list_lock. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint() doesn't require an elevated b_count; indeed, until the jh structure gets released by the call to jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(), the bh's b_count is elevated by virtue of the existence of the jh structure. Suggested-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-