- 05 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Add-IP feature allows users to delete an active transport. If that transport has chunks in flight, those chunks need to be moved to another transport or association may get into unrecoverable state. Reported-by: NRafael Laufer <rlaufer@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 14 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
RFC3758 Section 3.3.1. Sending Forward-TSN-Supported param in INIT Note that if the endpoint chooses NOT to include the parameter, then at no time during the life of the association can it send or process a FORWARD TSN. If peer does not support PR-SCTP capable, don't send FORWARD-TSN chunk to peer. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
The functions time_before or time_after are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Commit 62aeaff5 (sctp: Start T3-RTX timer when fast retransmitting lowest TSN) introduced a regression where it was possible to forcibly restart the sctp retransmit timer at the transmission of any new chunk. This resulted in much longer timeout times and sometimes hung sctp connections. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 10月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
sctp_chunks should be put on a diet. This is some of the low hanging fruit that we can strip out. Changes all the __s8/__u8 flags to bitfields. Saves 12 bytes per chunk. Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Chunks placed on the retransmit list are marked as inelegible for fast retrasnmission. Since missing indications determine when fast reransmission is done, there is not point in calling sctp_mark_missing() on the retransmit list since those chunks will not be marked. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
There is a possibility of walking the transport list twice during SACK processing when doing SFR-CACC algorithm. We can restructure the code to only do this once. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Frist small step in optimizing SACK processing. Do not call sctp_mark_missing() when there are no gaps reported and thus not missing chunks. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
sctp_outq_flush() can now become static. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Acked-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
RFC 4960, Section 11.4. Protection of Non-SCTP-Capable Hosts When an SCTP stack receives a packet containing multiple control or DATA chunks and the processing of the packet requires the sending of multiple chunks in response, the sender of the response chunk(s) MUST NOT send more than one packet. If bundling is supported, multiple response chunks that fit into a single packet MAY be bundled together into one single response packet. If bundling is not supported, then the sender MUST NOT send more than one response chunk and MUST discard all other responses. Note that this rule does NOT apply to a SACK chunk, since a SACK chunk is, in itself, a response to DATA and a SACK does not require a response of more DATA. We implement this by not servicing our outqueue until we reach the end of the packet. This enables maximum bundling. We also identify 'response' chunks and make sure that we only send 1 packet when sending such chunks. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 6月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When fast retransmit is triggered by a sack, we should flush the queue only once so that only 1 retransmit happens. Also, since we could potentially have non-fast-rtx chunks on the retransmit queue, we need make sure any chunks eligable for fast retransmit are sent first during fast retransmission. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Tested-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When we are trying to fast retransmit the lowest outstanding TSN, we need to restart the T3-RTX timer, so that subsequent timeouts will correctly tag all the packets necessary for retransmissions. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Tested-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gui Jianfeng 提交于
According to RFC4960 7.2.2, When all of the data transmitted by the sender has been acknowledged by the recerver, partial_bytes_acked is initialized to 0. This patch conforms to rfc requirement. Without this fix, cwnd might be error incremented. Signed-off-by: NGui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 4月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Robert P. J. Day 提交于
Replacing (almost) all invocations of list_for_each() with list_for_each_entry() tightens up the code and allows for the deletion of numerous list iterator variables that are no longer necessary. Signed-off-by: NRobert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Gui Jianfeng 提交于
When receiving an error length INIT-ACK during COOKIE-WAIT, a 0-vtag ABORT will be responsed. This action violates the protocol apparently. This patch achieves the following things. 1 If the INIT-ACK contains all the fixed parameters, use init-tag recorded from INIT-ACK as vtag. 2 If the INIT-ACK doesn't contain all the fixed parameters, just reflect its vtag. Signed-off-by: NGui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Harvey Harrison 提交于
__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__ Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
RFC 3873 specifies several MIB objects that can't be obtained by the current data set exported by /proc/sys/net/sctp/assoc. This patch adds the missing pieces of data that allow us to compute all the objects in the sctpAssocTable object. Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
In a few instances, we need to remove the chunk from the transmitted list prior to freeing it. This is because the free code doesn't do that any more and so we need to do it manually. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 05 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be "the reference implementation". First of all, "the refrence implementation" was the original implementation of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others. Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation', we don't really meet the requirements. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The processing of the ASCONF chunks has changed a lot in the spec. New items are: 1. A list of ASCONF-ACK chunks is now cached 2. The source of the packet is used in response. 3. New handling for unexpect ASCONF chunks. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When the code calls uncork, trigger a queue flush, even if the queue was not corked. Most callers that explicitely cork the queue will have additinal checks to see if they corked it. Callers who do not cork the queue expect packets to flow when they call uncork. The scneario that showcased this bug happend when we were not able to bundle DATA with outgoing COOKIE-ECHO. As a result the data just sat in the outqueue and did not get transmitted. The application expected a response, but nothing happened. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 08 11月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Commit d0ce9291 broke several retransmit cases including fast retransmit. The reason is that we should only delay by rto while doing retranmists as a result of a timeout. Retransmit as a result of path mtu discover, fast retransmit, or other evernts that should trigger immidiate retransmissions got broken. Also, since rto is doubled prior to marking of packets elegable for retransmission, we never marked correct chunks anyway. The fix is provide a reason for a given retransmission so that we can mark chunks appropriately and to save the old rto value to do comparisons against. All regressions tests passed with this code. Spotted by Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Just fix the bad format of the comment in outqueue.c. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When performing a retransmit, do not include the chunk if it was sent less then 1 rtt ago. The reason is that we may receive the SACK very soon and wouldn't retransmit. Suggested by Randy Stewart. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 26 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Spring cleaning time... There seems to be a lot of places in the network code that have extra bogus semicolons after conditionals. Most commonly is a bogus semicolon after: switch() { } Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The problem that this patch corrects happens when all of the following conditions are satisfisfied: 1. PR-SCTP is used and the timeout on the chunks is set below RTO.Max. 2. One of the paths on a multihomed associations is brought down. In this scenario, data will expire within the rto of the initial transmission and will never be retransmitted. However this data still fills the send buffer and is counted against the association as outstanding data. This causes any new data not to be sent and retransmission to not happen. The fix is to discount the abandoned data from the outstanding count and peers rwnd estimation. This allows new data to be sent and a retransmission timer restarted. Even though this new data will most likely expire within the rto, the timer still counts as a strike against the transport and forces the FORWARD-TSN chunk to be retransmitted as well. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 12月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sridhar Samudrala 提交于
Currently if the sender is sending small messages, it can cause a receiver to run out of receive buffer space even when the advertised receive window is still open and results in packet drops and retransmissions. Including a overhead while updating the sender's view of peer receive window will reduce the chances of receive buffer space overshooting the receive window. Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sridhar Samudrala 提交于
This patch adds more statistics info under /proc/net/sctp/snmp that should be useful for debugging. The additional events that are counted now include timer expirations, retransmits, packet and data chunk discards. The Data chunk discards include all the cases where a data chunk is discarded including high tsn, bad stream, dup tsn and the most useful one(out of receive buffer/rwnd). Also moved the SCTP MIB data structures from the generic include directories to include/sctp/sctp.h. Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sridhar Samudrala 提交于
This patch implements Path Initialization procedure as described in Sec 2.36 of RFC4460. Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 6月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 2月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP used to "fast retransmit" a TSN every time we hit the number of missing reports for the TSN. However the Implementers Guide specifies that we should only "fast retransmit" a given TSN once. Subsequent retransmits should be timeouts only. Also change the number of missing reports to 3 as per the latest IG(similar to TCP). Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 7月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Filz 提交于
Implements sctp_connectx() as defined in the SCTP sockets API draft by tunneling the request through a setsockopt(). Signed-off-by: NFrank Filz <ffilzlnx@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-