- 05 2月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If SCTP-AUTH is enabled, received AUTH chunk with BAD shared key identifier will cause kernel panic. Test as following: step1: enabled /proc/sys/net/sctp/auth_enable step 2: connect to SCTP server with auth capable. Association is established between endpoints. Then send a AUTH chunk with a bad shareid, SCTP server will kernel panic after received that AUTH chunk. SCTP client SCTP server INIT ----------> (with auth capable) <---------- INIT-ACK (with auth capable) COOKIE-ECHO ----------> <---------- COOKIE-ACK AUTH ----------> AUTH chunk is like this: AUTH chunk Chunk type: AUTH (15) Chunk flags: 0x00 Chunk length: 28 Shared key identifier: 10 HMAC identifier: SHA-1 (1) HMAC: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 The assignment of NULL to key can safely be removed, since key_for_each (which is just list_for_each_entry under the covers does an initial assignment to key anyway). If the endpoint_shared_keys list is empty, or if the key_id being requested does not exist, the function as it currently stands returns the actuall list_head (in this case endpoint_shared_keys. Since that list_head isn't surrounded by an actuall data structure, the last iteration through list_for_each_entry will do a container_of on key, and we wind up returning a bogus pointer, instead of NULL, as we should. > Neil Horman wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:29:20PM +0900, Wei Yongjun wrote: >> >> FWIW, Ack from me. The assignment of NULL to key can safely be >> removed, since >> key_for_each (which is just list_for_each_entry under the covers does >> an initial >> assignment to key anyway). >> If the endpoint_shared_keys list is empty, or if the key_id being >> requested does >> not exist, the function as it currently stands returns the actuall >> list_head (in >> this case endpoint_shared_keys. Since that list_head isn't >> surrounded by an >> actuall data structure, the last iteration through >> list_for_each_entry will do a >> container_of on key, and we wind up returning a bogus pointer, >> instead of NULL, >> as we should. Wei's patch corrects that. >> >> Regards >> Neil >> >> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> >> > > Yep, the patch is correct. > > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> > > -vlad > Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If STCP is started while /proc/sys/net/sctp/auth_enable is set 0 and association is established between endpoints. Then if /proc/sys/net/sctp/auth_enable is set 1, a received AUTH chunk will cause kernel panic. Test as following: step 1: echo 0> /proc/sys/net/sctp/auth_enable step 2: SCTP client SCTP server INIT ---------> <--------- INIT-ACK COOKIE-ECHO ---------> <--------- COOKIE-ACK step 3: echo 1> /proc/sys/net/sctp/auth_enable step 4: SCTP client SCTP server AUTH -----------> Kernel Panic This patch fix this probleam to treat AUTH chunk as unknow chunk if peer has initialized with no auth capable. > Sorry for the delay. Was on vacation without net access. > > Wei Yongjun wrote: >> >> >> This patch fix this probleam to treat AUTH chunk as unknow chunk if >> peer has initialized with no auth capable. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> > > Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> > >> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Oliver Pinter 提交于
Signed-off-by: NOliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
-
- 01 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
This patch fix miss of check for report unrecognized HMAC Algorithm parameter. When AUTH is disabled, goto fall through path to report unrecognized parameter, else, just break Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 1月, 2008 20 次提交
-
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
Needed to propagate it down to the ip_route_output_flow. Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When parameter validation fails, there should be error causes that specify what type of failure we've encountered. If the causes are not there, we lacked memory to allocated them. Thus make that the default value for the error. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Reported by Andrew Morton. net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c: In function 'sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack': net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c:484: warning: 'error' may be used uninitialized in this function Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Daniel Lezcano 提交于
When a new address is added, we must check if the new address does not already exists. This patch makes this check to be aware of a network namespace, so the check will look if the address already exists for the specified network namespace. While the addresses are browsed, the addresses which do not belong to the namespace are discarded. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@bull.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
The patch extends the inet_addr_type and inet_dev_addr_type with the network namespace pointer. That allows to access the different tables relatively to the network namespace. The modification of the signature function is reported in all the callers of the inet_addr_type using the pointer to the well known init_net. Acked-by: NBenjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@bull.net> Acked-by: NDaniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
This patch includes many places, that only required replacing the ctl_table-s with appropriate ctl_paths and call register_sysctl_paths(). Nothing special was done with them. Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Hideo Aoki 提交于
This patch introduces new memory accounting functions for each network protocol. Most of them are renamed from memory accounting functions for stream protocols. At the same time, some stream memory accounting functions are removed since other functions do same thing. Renaming: sk_stream_free_skb() -> sk_wmem_free_skb() __sk_stream_mem_reclaim() -> __sk_mem_reclaim() sk_stream_mem_reclaim() -> sk_mem_reclaim() sk_stream_mem_schedule -> __sk_mem_schedule() sk_stream_pages() -> sk_mem_pages() sk_stream_rmem_schedule() -> sk_rmem_schedule() sk_stream_wmem_schedule() -> sk_wmem_schedule() sk_charge_skb() -> sk_mem_charge() Removeing sk_stream_rfree(): consolidates into sock_rfree() sk_stream_set_owner_r(): consolidates into skb_set_owner_r() sk_stream_mem_schedule() The following functions are added. sk_has_account(): check if the protocol supports accounting sk_mem_uncharge(): do the opposite of sk_mem_charge() In addition, to achieve consolidation, updating sk_wmem_queued is removed from sk_mem_charge(). Next, to consolidate memory accounting functions, this patch adds memory accounting calls to network core functions. Moreover, present memory accounting call is renamed to new accounting call. Finally we replace present memory accounting calls with new interface in TCP and SCTP. Signed-off-by: NTakahiro Yasui <tyasui@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NHideo Aoki <haoki@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The Security Considerations section of RFC 5061 has the following text: If an SCTP endpoint that supports this extension receives an INIT that indicates that the peer supports the ASCONF extension but does NOT support the [RFC4895] extension, the receiver of such an INIT MUST send an ABORT in response. Note that an implementation is allowed to silently discard such an INIT as an option as well, but under NO circumstance is an implementation allowed to proceed with the association setup by sending an INIT-ACK in response. An implementation that receives an INIT-ACK that indicates that the peer does not support the [RFC4895] extension MUST NOT send the COOKIE-ECHO to establish the association. Instead, the implementation MUST discard the INIT-ACK and report to the upper- layer user that an association cannot be established destroying the Transmission Control Block (TCB). Follow the recomendations. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
ADD-IP spec has a special case for processing ABORTs: F4) ... One special consideration is that ABORT Chunks arriving destined to the IP address being deleted MUST be ignored (see Section 5.3.1 for further details). Check if the address we received on is in the DEL state, and if so, ignore the ABORT. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The processing of the ASCONF chunks has changed a lot in the spec. New items are: 1. A list of ASCONF-ACK chunks is now cached 2. The source of the packet is used in response. 3. New handling for unexpect ASCONF chunks. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
C4) Both ASCONF and ASCONF-ACK Chunks MUST NOT be sent in any SCTP state except ESTABLISHED, SHUTDOWN-PENDING, SHUTDOWN-RECEIVED, and SHUTDOWN-SENT. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
ADD-IP draft section 5.2 specifies that if an association can not be found using the source and destination of the IP packet, then, if the packet contains ASCONF chunks, the Address Parameter TLV should be used to lookup an association. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The ADD-IP "Set Primary IP Address" parameter is allowed in the INIT/INIT-ACK exchange. Allow processing of this parameter during the INIT/INIT-ACK. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The Address Parameter in the parameter list of the ASCONF chunk may be a wildcard address. In this case special processing is required. For the 'add' case, the source IP of the packet is added. In the 'del' case, all addresses except the source IP of packet are removed. In the "mark primary" case, the source address is marked as primary. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Now that we support AUTH, discard unauthenticated ASCONF and ASCONF ACK chunks as mandated in the ADD-IP spec. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The crc32c library used an identical table and algorithm as SCTP. Switch to using the library instead of carrying our own table. Using crypto layer proved to have too much overhead compared to using the library directly. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
The sock_wake_async() performs a bit different actions depending on "how" argument. Unfortunately this argument ony has numerical magic values. I propose to give names to their constants to help people reading this function callers understand what's going on without looking into this function all the time. I suppose this is 2.6.25 material, but if it's not (or the naming seems poor/bad/awful), I can rework it against the current net-2.6 tree. Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
Many-many code in the kernel initialized the timer->function and timer->data together with calling init_timer(timer). There is already a helper for this. Use it for networking code. The patch is HUGE, but makes the code 130 lines shorter (98 insertions(+), 228 deletions(-)). Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 1月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Some recent changes completely removed accounting for the FORWARD_TSN parameter length in the INIT and INIT-ACK chunk. This is wrong and should be restored. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When processing an unexpected INIT chunk, we do not need to do any preservation of the old AUTH parameters. In fact, doing such preservations will nullify AUTH and allow connection stealing. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The even should be called SCTP_AUTHENTICATION_INDICATION. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 12月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 12月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
At the end of partial delivery, we may have complete messages sitting on the fragment queue. These messages are stuck there until a new fragment arrives. This can comletely stall a given association. When clearing partial delivery state, flush any complete messages from the fragment queue and send them on their way up. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 12月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
During accept/migrate the code attempts to copy the addresses from the parent endpoint to the new endpoint. However, if the parent was bound to a wildcard address, then we end up pointlessly copying all of the current addresses on the system. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP accept code tries to add a newliy created socket to a bind bucket without holding a lock. On a really busy system, that can causes slab corruptions. Add a lock around this code. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 11月, 2007 5 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP-AUTH requires selection of CRYPTO, HMAC and SHA1 since SHA1 is a MUST requirement for AUTH. We also support SHA256, but that's optional, so fix the code to treat it as such. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
In the case where no autheticated chunks were specified, we were still trying to verify that a given chunk needs authentication and doing so incorrectly. Add a check for parameter length to make sure we don't try to use an empty auth_chunks parameter to verify against. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Supported extensions parameter was not coded right and ended up over-writing memory or causing skb overflows. First, remove the FWD_TSN support from as it shouldn't be there and also fix the paramter encoding. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
There was a typo that cleared the HMACS parameters when no authenticated chunks were specified. We whould be clearing the chunks pointer instead of the hmacs. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Our treatment of Heartbeats is special in that the inital HB chunk counts against the error count for the association, where as for other chunks, only retransmissions or timeouts count against us. As a result, we had an off-by-1 situation with a number of Heartbeats we could send. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 20 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesper Juhl 提交于
In net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c::sctp_sf_abort_violation() we may leak the storage allocated for 'abort' by returning from the function without using or freeing it. This happens in case "sctp_auth_recv_cid(SCTP_CID_ABORT, asoc)" is true and we jump to the 'discard' label. Spotted by the Coverity checker. The simple fix is to simply move the creation of the "abort chunk" to after the possible jump to the 'discard' label. This way we don't even have to allocate the memory at all in the problem case. Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 10 11月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
When the code calls uncork, trigger a queue flush, even if the queue was not corked. Most callers that explicitely cork the queue will have additinal checks to see if they corked it. Callers who do not cork the queue expect packets to flow when they call uncork. The scneario that showcased this bug happend when we were not able to bundle DATA with outgoing COOKIE-ECHO. As a result the data just sat in the outqueue and did not get transmitted. The application expected a response, but nothing happened. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
There is a small bug when we process a FWD-TSN. We'll deliver anything upto the current next expected SSN. However, if the next expected is already in the queue, it will take another chunk to trigger its delivery. The fix is to simply check the current queued SSN is the next expected one. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-