commit 5423f5ce5ca410b3646f355279e4e937d452e622 upstream.

A recent change moved the microcode loader hotplug callback into the early
startup phase which is running with interrupts disabled. It missed that
the callbacks invoke sysfs functions which might sleep causing nice 'might
sleep' splats with proper debugging enabled.

Split the callbacks and only load the microcode in the early startup phase
and move the sysfs handling back into the later threaded and preemptible
bringup phase where it was before.

Fixes: 78f4e932f776 ("x86/microcode, cpuhotplug: Add a microcode loader CPU hotplug callback")
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1906182228350.1766@nanos.tec.linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>

commit 78f4e932f7760d965fb1569025d1576ab77557c5 upstream.

Adric Blake reported the following warning during suspend-resume:

  Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
  x86: Booting SMP configuration:
  smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2
  unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x10f (tried to write 0x0000000000000000) \
   at rIP: 0xffffffff8d267924 (native_write_msr+0x4/0x20)
  Call Trace:
   intel_set_tfa
   intel_pmu_cpu_starting
   ? x86_pmu_dead_cpu
   x86_pmu_starting_cpu
   cpuhp_invoke_callback
   ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
   notify_cpu_starting
   start_secondary
   secondary_startup_64
  microcode: sig=0x806ea, pf=0x80, revision=0x96
  microcode: updated to revision 0xb4, date = 2019-04-01
  CPU1 is up

The MSR in question is MSR_TFA_RTM_FORCE_ABORT and that MSR is emulated
by microcode. The log above shows that the microcode loader callback
happens after the PMU restoration, leading to the conjecture that
because the microcode hasn't been updated yet, that MSR is not present
yet, leading to the #GP.

Add a microcode loader-specific hotplug vector which comes before
the PERF vectors and thus executes earlier and makes sure the MSR is
present.

Fixes: 400816f60c54 ("perf/x86/intel: Implement support for TSX Force Abort")
Reported-by: NAdric Blake <promarbler14@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203637Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 24613a04ad1c0588c10f4b5403ca60a73d164051 ]

Commit

  2613f36e ("x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is present")

added the new define UCODE_NEW to denote that an update should happen
only when newer microcode (than installed on the system) has been found.

But it missed adjusting that for the old /dev/cpu/microcode loading
interface. Fix it.

Fixes: 2613f36e ("x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is present")
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190405133010.24249-3-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 912139cfbfa6a2bc1da052314d2c29338dae1f6a ]

The load_microcode_amd() function searches for microcode patches and
attempts to apply a microcode patch if it is of different level than the
currently installed level.

While the processor won't actually load a level that is less than
what is already installed, the logic wrongly returns UCODE_NEW thus
signaling to its caller reload_store() that a late loading should be
attempted.

If the file-system contains an older microcode revision than what is
currently running, such a late microcode reload can result in these
misleading messages:

  x86/CPU: CPU features have changed after loading microcode, but might not take effect.
  x86/CPU: Please consider either early loading through initrd/built-in or a potential BIOS update.

These messages were issued on a system where SME/SEV are not
enabled by the BIOS (MSR C001_0010[23] = 0b) because during boot,
early_detect_mem_encrypt() is called and cleared the SME and SEV
features in this case.

However, after the wrong late load attempt, get_cpu_cap() is called and
reloads the SME and SEV feature bits, resulting in the messages.

Update the microcode level check to not attempt microcode loading if the
current level is greater than(!) and not only equal to the current patch
level.

 [ bp: massage commit message. ]

Fixes: 2613f36e ("x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is present")
Signed-off-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/154894518427.9406.8246222496874202773.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.netSigned-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>

Handle the case where microcode gets loaded on the BSP's hyperthread
sibling first and the boot_cpu_data's microcode revision doesn't get
updated because of early exit due to the siblings sharing a microcode
engine.

For that, simply write the updated revision on all CPUs unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: NFilippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: prarit@redhat.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1533050970-14385-1-git-send-email-sironi@amazon.de

When preparing an MCE record for logging, boot_cpu_data.microcode is used
to read out the microcode revision on the box.

However, on systems where late microcode update has happened, the microcode
revision output in a MCE log record is wrong because
boot_cpu_data.microcode is not updated when the microcode gets updated.

But, the microcode revision saved in boot_cpu_data's microcode member
should be kept up-to-date, regardless, for consistency.

Make it so.

Fixes: fa94d0c6 ("x86/MCE: Save microcode revision in machine check records")
Signed-off-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: sironi@amazon.de
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180731112739.32338-1-prarit@redhat.com

The kernel unnecessarily prevents late microcode loading when SMT is
disabled.  It should be safe to allow it if all the primary threads are
online.
Signed-off-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>

Free useless ucode_patch entry when it's replaced.

[ bp: Drop the memfree_patch() two-liner. ]
Signed-off-by: NZhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Srinivas REDDY Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/888102f0-fd22-459d-b090-a1bd8a00cb2b@default

__reload_late() is called from stop_machine context and thus cannot
acquire a non-raw spinlock on PREEMPT_RT.
Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180524154420.24455-1-swood@redhat.com

Vitezslav reported a case where the

  "Timeout during microcode update!"

panic would hit. After a deeper look, it turned out that his .config had
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU disabled which practically made save_mc_for_early() a
no-op.

When that happened, the discovered microcode patch wasn't saved into the
cache and the late loading path wouldn't find any.

This, then, lead to early exit from __reload_late() and thus CPUs waiting
until the timeout is reached, leading to the panic.

In hindsight, that function should have been written so it does not return
before the post-synchronization. Oh well, I know better now...

Fixes: bb8c13d6 ("x86/microcode: Fix CPU synchronization routine")
Reported-by: NVitezslav Samel <vitezslav@samel.cz>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NVitezslav Samel <vitezslav@samel.cz>
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180418081140.GA2439@pc11.op.pod.cz
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180421081930.15741-2-bp@alien8.de

save_mc_for_early() was a no-op on !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU but the
generic_load_microcode() path saves the microcode patches it has found into
the cache of patches which is used for late loading too. Regardless of
whether CPU hotplug is used or not.

Make the saving unconditional so that late loading can find the proper
patch.
Reported-by: NVitezslav Samel <vitezslav@samel.cz>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NVitezslav Samel <vitezslav@samel.cz>
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180418081140.GA2439@pc11.op.pod.cz
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180421081930.15741-1-bp@alien8.de

The file Documentation/x86/early-microcode.txt was renamed to
Documentation/x86/microcode.txt in 0e325875, but it was still
referenced by its old name in a three places:

* Documentation/x86/00-INDEX
* arch/x86/Kconfig
* arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c

This commit updates these references accordingly.

Fixes: 0e325875 ("x86/microcode: Document the three loading methods")
Signed-off-by: NJaak Ristioja <jaak@ristioja.ee>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

Emanuel reported an issue with a hang during microcode update because my
dumb idea to use one atomic synchronization variable for both rendezvous
- before and after update - was simply bollocks:

  microcode: microcode_reload_late: late_cpus: 4
  microcode: __reload_late: cpu 2 entered
  microcode: __reload_late: cpu 1 entered
  microcode: __reload_late: cpu 3 entered
  microcode: __reload_late: cpu 0 entered
  microcode: __reload_late: cpu 1 left
  microcode: Timeout while waiting for CPUs rendezvous, remaining: 1

CPU1 above would finish, leave and the others will still spin waiting for
it to join.

So do two synchronization atomics instead, which makes the code a lot more
straightforward.

Also, since the update is serialized and it also takes quite some time per
microcode engine, increase the exit timeout by the number of CPUs on the
system.

That's ok because the moment all CPUs are done, that timeout will be cut
short.

Furthermore, panic when some of the CPUs timeout when returning from a
microcode update: we can't allow a system with not all cores updated.

Also, as an optimization, do not do the exit sync if microcode wasn't
updated.
Reported-by: NEmanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NEmanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx@protonmail.com>
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Tested-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180314183615.17629-2-bp@alien8.de

Return UCODE_NEW from the scanning functions to denote that new microcode
was found and only then attempt the expensive synchronization dance.
Reported-by: NEmanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NEmanuel Czirai <xftroxgpx@protonmail.com>
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Tested-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180314183615.17629-1-bp@alien8.de

Original idea by Ashok, completely rewritten by Borislav.

Before you read any further: the early loading method is still the
preferred one and you should always do that. The following patch is
improving the late loading mechanism for long running jobs and cloud use
cases.

Gather all cores and serialize the microcode update on them by doing it
one-by-one to make the late update process as reliable as possible and
avoid potential issues caused by the microcode update.

[ Borislav: Rewrite completely. ]
Co-developed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-8-bp@alien8.de

... so that any newer version can land in the cache and can later be
fished out by the application functions. Do that before grabbing the
hotplug lock.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-7-bp@alien8.de

The cache might contain a newer patch - look in there first.

A follow-on change will make sure newest patches are loaded into the
cache of microcode patches.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-6-bp@alien8.de

Avoid loading microcode if any of the CPUs are offline, and issue a
warning. Having different microcode revisions on the system at any time
is outright dangerous.

[ Borislav: Massage changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-4-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-5-bp@alien8.de

Updating microcode is less error prone when caches have been flushed and
depending on what exactly the microcode is updating. For example, some
of the issues around certain Broadwell parts can be addressed by doing a
full cache flush.

[ Borislav: Massage it and use native_wbinvd() in both cases. ]
Signed-off-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-3-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-4-bp@alien8.de

After updating microcode on one of the threads of a core, the other
thread sibling automatically gets the update since the microcode
resources on a hyperthreaded core are shared between the two threads.

Check the microcode revision on the CPU before performing a microcode
update and thus save us the WRMSR 0x79 because it is a particularly
expensive operation.

[ Borislav: Massage changelog and coding style. ]
Signed-off-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-2-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-3-bp@alien8.de

It is a useless remnant from earlier times. Use the ucode_state enum
directly.

No functional change.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-2-bp@alien8.de

Add a callback function which the microcode loader calls when microcode
has been updated to a newer revision. Do the callback only when no error
was encountered during loading.
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180216112640.11554-3-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

... so that callers can know when microcode was updated and act
accordingly.
Tested-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NAshok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180216112640.11554-2-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Currently, x86_cache_size is of type int, which makes no sense as we
will never have a valid cache size equal or less than 0. So instead of
initializing this variable to -1, it can perfectly be initialized to 0
and use it as an unsigned variable instead.
Suggested-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1464429
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180213192208.GA26414@embeddedor.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

x86_mask is a confusing name which is hard to associate with the
processor's stepping.

Additionally, correct an indent issue in lib/cpu.c.
Signed-off-by: NJia Zhang <qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
[ Updated it to more recent kernels. ]
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1514771530-70829-1-git-send-email-qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Commit 24c25032 ("x86/microcode: Do not access the initrd after it has
been freed") fixed attempts to access initrd from the microcode loader
after it has been freed. However, a similar KASAN warning was reported
(stack trace edited):

  smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x11
  ==================================================================
  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in find_cpio_data+0x9b5/0xa50
  Read of size 1 at addr ffff880035ffd000 by task swapper/1/0

  CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.14.8-slack #7
  Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/A88X-PLUS, BIOS 3003 03/10/2016
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack
   print_address_description
   kasan_report
   ? find_cpio_data
   __asan_report_load1_noabort
   find_cpio_data
   find_microcode_in_initrd
   __load_ucode_amd
   load_ucode_amd_ap
      load_ucode_ap

After some investigation, it turned out that a merge was done using the
wrong side to resolve, leading to picking up the previous state, before
the 24c25032 fix. Therefore the Fixes tag below contains a merge
commit.

Revert the mismerge by catching the save_microcode_in_initrd_amd()
retval and thus letting the function exit with the last return statement
so that initrd_gone can be set to true.

Fixes: f26483ea ("Merge branch 'x86/urgent' into x86/microcode, to resolve conflicts")
Reported-by: <higuita@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198295
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180123104133.918-2-bp@alien8.de

Commit b94b7373 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with a
revision check") reduced the impact of erratum BDF90 for Broadwell model
79.

The impact can be reduced further by checking the size of the last level
cache portion per core.

Tony: "The erratum says the problem only occurs on the large-cache SKUs.
So we only need to avoid the update if we are on a big cache SKU that is
also running old microcode."

For more details, see erratum BDF90 in document #334165 (Intel Xeon
Processor E7-8800/4800 v4 Product Family Specification Update) from
September 2017.

Fixes: b94b7373 ("x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with a revision check")
Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1516321542-31161-1-git-send-email-zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com

Convert DEVICE_ATTR uses to DEVICE_ATTR_WO where possible.

Done with perl script:

$ git grep -w --name-only DEVICE_ATTR | \
  xargs perl -i -e 'local $/; while (<>) { s/\bDEVICE_ATTR\s*\(\s*(\w+)\s*,\s*\(?(?:\s*S_IWUSR\s*|\s*0200\s*)\)?\s*,\s*NULL\s*,\s*\s_store\s*\)/DEVICE_ATTR_WO(\1)/g; print;}'
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Instead of blacklisting all model 79 CPUs when attempting a late
microcode loading, limit that only to CPUs with microcode revisions <
0x0b000021 because only on those late loading may cause a system hang.

For such processors either:

a) a BIOS update which might contain a newer microcode revision

or

b) the early microcode loading method

should be considered.

Processors with revisions 0x0b000021 or higher will not experience such
hangs.

For more details, see erratum BDF90 in document #334165 (Intel Xeon
Processor E7-8800/4800 v4 Product Family Specification Update) from
September 2017.

[ bp: Heavily massage commit message and pr_* statements. ]

Fixes: 723f2828 ("x86/microcode/intel: Disable late loading on model 79")
Signed-off-by: NJia Zhang <qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.14
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1514772287-92959-1-git-send-email-qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com

Commit:

  ec400dde ("x86/microcode_intel_early.c: Early update ucode on Intel's CPU")

... grubbed into tlbflush internals without coherent explanation.

Since it says its a precaution and the SDM doesn't mention anything like
this, take it out back.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: aliguori@amazon.com
Cc: daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: hughd@google.com
Cc: keescook@google.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The size for the Microcode Patch Block (MPB) for an AMD family 17h
processor is 3200 bytes.  Add a #define for fam17h so that it does
not default to 2048 bytes and fail a microcode load/update.
Signed-off-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171130224640.15391.40247.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Blacklist Broadwell X model 79 for late loading due to an erratum.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171018111225.25635-1-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

On CPUs like AMD's Geode, for example, we shouldn't even try to load
microcode because they do not support the modern microcode loading
interface.

However, we do the family check *after* the other checks whether the
loader has been disabled on the command line or whether we're running in
a guest.

So move the family checks first in order to exit early if we're being
loaded on an unsupported family.
Reported-and-tested-by: NSven Glodowski <glodi1@arcor.de>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.11..
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061396
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171012112316.977-1-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Avoid potentially dereferencing a NULL pointer when saving a microcode
patch for early loading on the application processors.

While at it, drop the IS_ERR() checking in favor of simpler, NULL-ptr
checks which are sufficient and rename __alloc_microcode_buf() to
memdup_patch() to more precisely denote what it does.

No functionality change.
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170825100456.n236w3jebteokfd6@pd.tnic

attribute_groups are not supposed to change at runtime and none of the
groups is modified.

Mark the non-const structs as const.

[ tglx: Folded into one big patch ]
Signed-off-by: NArvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1500550238-15655-2-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com

verify_and_add_patch() allocates memory for a microcode patch and hands
it down to be added to the cache of patches. However, if the cache
already has the latest patch, the newly allocated one needs to be freed
before returning. Do that.

This issue has been found by kmemleak:

  unreferenced object 0xffff88010e780b40 (size 32):
    comm "bash", pid 860, jiffies 4294690939 (age 29.297s)
    backtrace:
       kmemleak_alloc
       kmem_cache_alloc_trace
       load_microcode_amd.isra.0
       request_microcode_amd
       reload_store
       dev_attr_store
       sysfs_kf_write
       kernfs_fop_write
       __vfs_write
       vfs_write
       SyS_write
       do_syscall_64
       return_from_SYSCALL_64
       0xffffffffffffffff

  (gdb) list *0xffffffff81050d60
  0xffffffff81050d60 is in load_microcode_amd
                (arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c:616).

which is this:

	patch = kzalloc(sizeof(*patch), GFP_KERNEL);
-->	if (!patch) {
		pr_err("Patch allocation failure.\n");
		return -EINVAL;
	}
Signed-off-by: NShu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com>
[ Rewrite commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: chuhu@redhat.com
Cc: liwang@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170724101228.17326-2-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The helper function __load_ucode_amd() and pointer intel_ucode_patch do
not need to be in global scope, so make them static.

Fixes those sparse warnings:
"symbol '__load_ucode_amd' was not declared. Should it be static?"
"symbol 'intel_ucode_patch' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170622095736.11937-1-colin.king@canonical.com

Normally, when the initrd is gone, we can't search it for microcode
blobs to apply anymore. For that we need to stash away the patch in our
own storage.

And save_microcode_in_initrd_intel() looks like the proper place to
do that from. So in order for early loading to work, invalidate the
intel_ucode_patch pointer to the patch *before* scanning the initrd one
last time.

If the scanning code finds a microcode patch, it will assign that
pointer again, this time with our own storage's address.

This way, early microcode application during resume-from-RAM works too,
even after the initrd is long gone.
Tested-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170614140626.4462-2-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Early during boot, the BSP finds the ramdisk's position from boot_params
but by the time the APs get to boot, the BSP has continued in the mean
time and has potentially managed to relocate that ramdisk.

And in that case, the APs need to find the ramdisk at its new position,
in *physical* memory as they're running before paging has been enabled.

Thus, get the updated physical location of the ramdisk which is in the
relocated_ramdisk variable.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170614140626.4462-1-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

During early boot, load_ucode_intel_ap() uses __load_ucode_intel()
to obtain a pointer to the relevant microcode patch (embedded in the
initrd), and stores this value in 'intel_ucode_patch' to speed up the
microcode patch application for subsequent CPUs.

On resuming from suspend-to-RAM, however, load_ucode_ap() calls
load_ucode_intel_ap() for each non-boot-CPU. By then the initramfs is
long gone so the pointer stored in 'intel_ucode_patch' no longer points to
a valid microcode patch.

Clear that pointer so that we effectively fall back to the CPU hotplug
notifier callbacks to update the microcode.
Signed-off-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
[ Edit and massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.10..
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170607095819.9754-1-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>