- 29 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... especially since there's no way to get that sucker on the list fsnotify_fasync() works with - the only thing adding to it is fsnotify_fasync() itself and it's never called for fanotify files while they are opened. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 10 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 04 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and convert a bunch of SYSCALL_DEFINE ones to SYSCALL_DEFINE<n>, killing the boilerplate crap around them. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 23 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 18 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Cyrill Gorcunov 提交于
This allow us to print out fsnotify details such as watchee inode, device, mask and optionally a file handle. For inotify objects if kernel compiled with exportfs support the output will be | pos: 0 | flags: 02000000 | inotify wd:3 ino:9e7e sdev:800013 mask:800afce ignored_mask:0 fhandle-bytes:8 fhandle-type:1 f_handle:7e9e0000640d1b6d | inotify wd:2 ino:a111 sdev:800013 mask:800afce ignored_mask:0 fhandle-bytes:8 fhandle-type:1 f_handle:11a1000020542153 | inotify wd:1 ino:6b149 sdev:800013 mask:800afce ignored_mask:0 fhandle-bytes:8 fhandle-type:1 f_handle:49b1060023552153 If kernel compiled without exportfs support, the file handle won't be provided but inode and device only. | pos: 0 | flags: 02000000 | inotify wd:3 ino:9e7e sdev:800013 mask:800afce ignored_mask:0 | inotify wd:2 ino:a111 sdev:800013 mask:800afce ignored_mask:0 | inotify wd:1 ino:6b149 sdev:800013 mask:800afce ignored_mask:0 For fanotify the output is like | pos: 0 | flags: 04002 | fanotify flags:10 event-flags:0 | fanotify mnt_id:12 mask:3b ignored_mask:0 | fanotify ino:50205 sdev:800013 mask:3b ignored_mask:40000000 fhandle-bytes:8 fhandle-type:1 f_handle:05020500fb1d47e7 To minimize impact on general fsnotify code the new functionality is gathered in fs/notify/fdinfo.c file. Signed-off-by: NCyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Acked-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Helsley <matt.helsley@gmail.com> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@onelan.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 12月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
Boyd Yang reported a problem for the case that multiple threads of the same thread group are waiting for a reponse for a permission event. In this case it is possible that some of the threads are never woken up, even if the response for the event has been received (see http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131822913806350&w=2). The reason is that we are currently merging permission events if they belong to the same thread group. But we are not prepared to wake up more than one waiter for each event. We do wait_event(group->fanotify_data.access_waitq, event->response || atomic_read(&group->fanotify_data.bypass_perm)); and after that event->response = 0; which is the reason that even if we woke up all waiters for the same event some of them may see event->response being already set 0 again, then go back to sleep and block forever. With this patch we avoid that more than one thread is waiting for a response by not merging permission events for the same thread group any more. Reported-by: NBoyd Yang <boyd.yang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilipp@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify is supposed to support async signal notification when information is available on the inotify fd. This patch moves that support to generic fsnotify functions so it can be used by all notification mechanisms. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
In fsnotify_destroy_mark() dont get the group from the passed mark anymore, but pass the group itself as an additional parameter to the function. Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
fanotify: add an extra flag to mark_remove_from_mask that indicates wheather a mark should be destroyed This patch adds an extra flag to mark_remove_from_mask() to inform the caller if the mark should be destroyed. With this we dont destroy the mark implicitly in the function itself any more but let the caller handle it. Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
Currently in fsnotify_put_group() the ref count of a group is decremented and if it becomes 0 fsnotify_destroy_group() is called. Since a groups ref count is only at group creation set to 1 and never increased after that a call to fsnotify_put_group() always results in a call to fsnotify_destroy_group(). With this patch fsnotify_destroy_group() is called directly. Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 19 11月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Masanari Iida 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
If the FAN_Q_OVERFLOW bit set in event->mask, the fanotify event metadata will not contain a valid file descriptor, but copy_event_to_user() didn't check for that, and unconditionally does a fd_install() on the file descriptor. Which in turn will cause a BUG_ON() in __fd_install(). Introduced by commit 352e3b24 ("fanotify: sanitize failure exits in copy_event_to_user()") Mea culpa - missed that path ;-/ Reported-by: NAlex Shi <lkml.alex@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 09 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
Anders Blomdell noted in 2010 that Fanotify lost events and provided a test case. Eric Paris confirmed it was a bug and posted a fix to the list https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/linux.kernel/RrJfTfyW2BE but never applied it. Repeated attempts over time to actually get him to apply it have never had a reply from anyone who has raised it So apply it anyway Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: NAnders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@control.lth.se> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 9月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
* do copy_to_user() before prepare_for_access_response(); that kills the need in remove_access_response(). * don't do fd_install() until we are past the last possible failure exit. Don't use sys_close() on cleanup side - just put_unused_fd() and fput(). Less racy that way... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 23 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 04 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
-
- 01 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Justin P. Mattock 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJustin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 16 12月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
The fanotify_event_metadata now has a field which is supposed to indicate the length of the metadata portion of the event. Fill in that field as well. Based-in-part-on-patch-by: NAlexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 08 12月, 2010 6 次提交
-
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
We should not try to open a file descriptor for the overflow event since this will always fail. Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
If fanotify_init is unable to allocate a new fsnotify group it will return but will not drop its reference on the associated user struct. Drop that reference on error. Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
When fanotify_release() is called, there may still be processes waiting for access permission. Currently only processes for which an event has already been queued into the groups access list will be woken up. Processes for which no event has been queued will continue to sleep and thus cause a deadlock when fsnotify_put_group() is called. Furthermore there is a race allowing further processes to be waiting on the access wait queue after wake_up (if they arrive before clear_marks_by_group() is called). This patch corrects this by setting a flag to inform processes that the group is about to be destroyed and thus not to wait for access permission. [additional changelog from eparis] Lets think about the 4 relevant code paths from the PoV of the 'operator' 'listener' 'responder' and 'closer'. Where operator is the process doing an action (like open/read) which could require permission. Listener is the task (or in this case thread) slated with reading from the fanotify file descriptor. The 'responder' is the thread responsible for responding to access requests. 'Closer' is the thread attempting to close the fanotify file descriptor. The 'operator' is going to end up in: fanotify_handle_event() get_response_from_access() (THIS BLOCKS WAITING ON USERSPACE) The 'listener' interesting code path fanotify_read() copy_event_to_user() prepare_for_access_response() (THIS CREATES AN fanotify_response_event) The 'responder' code path: fanotify_write() process_access_response() (REMOVE A fanotify_response_event, SET RESPONSE, WAKE UP 'operator') The 'closer': fanotify_release() (SUPPOSED TO CLEAN UP THE REST OF THIS MESS) What we have today is that in the closer we remove all of the fanotify_response_events and set a bit so no more response events are ever created in prepare_for_access_response(). The bug is that we never wake all of the operators up and tell them to move along. You fix that in fanotify_get_response_from_access(). You also fix other operators which haven't gotten there yet. So I agree that's a good fix. [/additional changelog from eparis] [remove additional changes to minimize patch size] [move initialization so it was inside CONFIG_FANOTIFY_PERMISSION] Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
In mark_remove_from_mask() we destroy marks that have their event mask cleared. Thus we should not allow the creation of those marks in the first place. With this patch we check if the mask given from user is 0 in case of FAN_MARK_ADD. If so we return an error. Same for FAN_MARK_REMOVE since this does not have any effect. Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
If adding a mount or inode mark failed fanotify_free_mark() is called explicitly. But at this time the mark has already been put into the destroy list of the fsnotify_mark kernel thread. If the thread is too slow it will try to decrease the reference of a mark, that has already been freed by fanotify_free_mark(). (If its fast enough it will only decrease the marks ref counter from 2 to 1 - note that the counter has been increased to 2 in add_mark() - which has practically no effect.) This patch fixes the ref counting by not calling free_mark() explicitly, but decreasing the ref counter and rely on the fsnotify_mark thread to cleanup in case adding the mark has failed. Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
If no event was sent to userspace we cannot expect userspace to respond to permissions requests. Today such requests just hang forever. This patch will deny any permissions event which was unable to be sent to userspace. Reported-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 02 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Witten 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 31 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
In fanotify_read() return -ERESTARTSYS instead of -EINTR to make read() restartable across signals (BSD semantic). Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 29 10月, 2010 11 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c: In function 'fanotify_release': fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:375: warning: unused variable 'lre' fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:375: warning: unused variable 're' this is really ugly. Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
If fanotify sets a new bit in the ignored mask it will cause the generic fsnotify layer to recalculate the real mask. This is stupid since we didn't change that part. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fanotify has a very limited number of events it sends on directories. The usefulness of these events is yet to be seen and still we send them. This is particularly painful for mount marks where one might receive many of these useless events. As such this patch will drop events on IS_DIR() inodes unless they were explictly requested with FAN_ON_DIR. This means that a mark on a directory without FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD or FAN_ON_DIR is meaningless and will result in no events ever (although it will still be allowed since detecting it is hard) Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fanotify_should_send_event has a test to see if an object is a file or directory and does not send an event otherwise. The problem is that the test is actually checking if the object with a mark is a file or directory, not if the object the event happened on is a file or directory. We should check the latter. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fanotify currently has no limit on the number of listeners a given user can have open. This patch limits the total number of listeners per user to 128. This is the same as the inotify default limit. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
Some fanotify groups, especially those like AV scanners, will need to place lots of marks, particularly ignore marks. Since ignore marks do not pin inodes in cache and are cleared if the inode is removed from core (usually under memory pressure) we expose an interface for listeners, with CAP_SYS_ADMIN, to override the maximum number of marks and be allowed to set and 'unlimited' number of marks. Programs which make use of this feature will be able to OOM a machine. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
There is currently no limit on the number of marks a given fanotify group can have. Since fanotify is gated on CAP_SYS_ADMIN this was not seen as a serious DoS threat. This patch implements a default of 8192, the same as inotify to work towards removing the CAP_SYS_ADMIN gating and eliminating the default DoS'able status. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fanotify has a defualt max queue depth. This patch allows processes which explicitly request it to have an 'unlimited' queue depth. These processes need to be very careful to make sure they cannot fall far enough behind that they OOM the box. Thus this flag is gated on CAP_SYS_ADMIN. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
Currently fanotify has no maximum queue depth. Since fanotify is CAP_SYS_ADMIN only this does not pose a normal user DoS issue, but it certianly is possible that an fanotify listener which can't keep up could OOM the box. This patch implements a default 16k depth. This is the same default depth used by inotify, but given fanotify's better queue merging in many situations this queue will contain many additional useful events by comparison. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fanotify will clear ignore marks if a task changes the contents of an inode. The problem is with the races around when userspace finishes checking a file and when that result is actually attached to the inode. This race was described as such: Consider the following scenario with hostile processes A and B, and victim process C: 1. Process A opens new file for writing. File check request is generated. 2. File check is performed in userspace. Check result is "file has no malware". 3. The "permit" response is delivered to kernel space. 4. File ignored mark set. 5. Process A writes dummy bytes to the file. File ignored flags are cleared. 6. Process B opens the same file for reading. File check request is generated. 7. File check is performed in userspace. Check result is "file has no malware". 8. Process A writes malware bytes to the file. There is no cached response yet. 9. The "permit" response is delivered to kernel space and is cached in fanotify. 10. File ignored mark set. 11. Now any process C will be permitted to open the malware file. There is a race between steps 8 and 10 While fanotify makes no strong guarantees about systems with hostile processes there is no reason we cannot harden against this race. We do that by simply ignoring any ignore marks if the inode has open writers (aka i_writecount > 0). (We actually do not ignore ignore marks if the FAN_MARK_SURV_MODIFY flag is set) Reported-by: NVasily Novikov <vasily.novikov@kaspersky.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
The fanotify listeners needs to be able to specify what types of operations they are going to perform so they can be ordered appropriately between other listeners doing other types of operations. They need this to be able to make sure that things like hierarchichal storage managers will get access to inodes before processes which need the data. This patch defines 3 possible uses which groups must indicate in the fanotify_init() flags. FAN_CLASS_PRE_CONTENT FAN_CLASS_CONTENT FAN_CLASS_NOTIF Groups will receive notification in that order. The order between 2 groups in the same class is undeterministic. FAN_CLASS_PRE_CONTENT is intended to be used by listeners which need access to the inode before they are certain that the inode contains it's final data. A hierarchical storage manager should choose to use this class. FAN_CLASS_CONTENT is intended to be used by listeners which need access to the inode after it contains its intended contents. This would be the appropriate level for an AV solution or document control system. FAN_CLASS_NOTIF is intended for normal async notification about access, much the same as inotify and dnotify. Syncronous permissions events are not permitted at this class. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 15 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
All file_operations should get a .llseek operation so we can make nonseekable_open the default for future file operations without a .llseek pointer. The three cases that we can automatically detect are no_llseek, seq_lseek and default_llseek. For cases where we can we can automatically prove that the file offset is always ignored, we use noop_llseek, which maintains the current behavior of not returning an error from a seek. New drivers should normally not use noop_llseek but instead use no_llseek and call nonseekable_open at open time. Existing drivers can be converted to do the same when the maintainer knows for certain that no user code relies on calling seek on the device file. The generated code is often incorrectly indented and right now contains comments that clarify for each added line why a specific variant was chosen. In the version that gets submitted upstream, the comments will be gone and I will manually fix the indentation, because there does not seem to be a way to do that using coccinelle. Some amount of new code is currently sitting in linux-next that should get the same modifications, which I will do at the end of the merge window. Many thanks to Julia Lawall for helping me learn to write a semantic patch that does all this. ===== begin semantic patch ===== // This adds an llseek= method to all file operations, // as a preparation for making no_llseek the default. // // The rules are // - use no_llseek explicitly if we do nonseekable_open // - use seq_lseek for sequential files // - use default_llseek if we know we access f_pos // - use noop_llseek if we know we don't access f_pos, // but we still want to allow users to call lseek // @ open1 exists @ identifier nested_open; @@ nested_open(...) { <+... nonseekable_open(...) ...+> } @ open exists@ identifier open_f; identifier i, f; identifier open1.nested_open; @@ int open_f(struct inode *i, struct file *f) { <+... ( nonseekable_open(...) | nested_open(...) ) ...+> } @ read disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ read_no_fpos disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ write @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ write_no_fpos @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ fops0 @ identifier fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... }; @ has_llseek depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier llseek_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .llseek = llseek_f, ... }; @ has_read depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... }; @ has_write depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... }; @ has_open depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... }; // use no_llseek if we call nonseekable_open //////////////////////////////////////////// @ nonseekable1 depends on !has_llseek && has_open @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier nso ~= "nonseekable_open"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = nso, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* nonseekable */ }; @ nonseekable2 depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open.open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* open uses nonseekable */ }; // use seq_lseek for sequential files ///////////////////////////////////// @ seq depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier sr ~= "seq_read"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = sr, ... +.llseek = seq_lseek, /* we have seq_read */ }; // use default_llseek if there is a readdir /////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops1 depends on !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier readdir_e; @@ // any other fop is used that changes pos struct file_operations fops = { ... .readdir = readdir_e, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* readdir is present */ }; // use default_llseek if at least one of read/write touches f_pos ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops2 depends on !fops1 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read.read_f; @@ // read fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* read accesses f_pos */ }; @ fops3 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... + .llseek = default_llseek, /* write accesses f_pos */ }; // Use noop_llseek if neither read nor write accesses f_pos /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops4 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !fops3 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read and write both use no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_write && !has_read && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* write uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on !has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* no read or write fn */ }; ===== End semantic patch ===== Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
-