1. 13 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 25 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 06 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 24 10月, 2013 2 次提交
  5. 13 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  6. 15 6月, 2013 1 次提交
    • D
      xfs: fix implicit padding in directory and attr CRC formats · 5170711d
      Dave Chinner 提交于
      Michael L. Semon has been testing CRC patches on a 32 bit system and
      been seeing assert failures in the directory code from xfs/080.
      Thanks to Michael's heroic efforts with printk debugging, we found
      that the problem was that the last free space being left in the
      directory structure was too small to fit a unused tag structure and
      it was being corrupted and attempting to log a region out of bounds.
      Hence the assert failure looked something like:
      
      .....
      #5 calling xfs_dir2_data_log_unused() 36 32
      #1 4092 4095 4096
      #2 8182 8183 4096
      XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568
      
      Where #1 showed the first region of the dup being logged (i.e. the
      last 4 bytes of a directory buffer) and #2 shows the corrupt values
      being calculated from the length of the dup entry which overflowed
      the size of the buffer.
      
      It turns out that the problem was not in the logging code, nor in
      the freespace handling code. It is an initial condition bug that
      only shows up on 32 bit systems. When a new buffer is initialised,
      where's the freespace that is set up:
      
      [  172.316249] calling xfs_dir2_leaf_addname() from xfs_dir_createname()
      [  172.316346] #9 calling xfs_dir2_data_log_unused()
      [  172.316351] #1 calling xfs_trans_log_buf() 60 63 4096
      [  172.316353] #2 calling xfs_trans_log_buf() 4094 4095 4096
      
      Note the offset of the first region being logged? It's 60 bytes into
      the buffer. Once I saw that, I pretty much knew that the bug was
      going to be caused by this.
      
      Essentially, all direct entries are rounded to 8 bytes in length,
      and all entries start with an 8 byte alignment. This means that we
      can decode inplace as variables are naturally aligned. With the
      directory data supposedly starting on a 8 byte boundary, and all
      entries padded to 8 bytes, the minimum freespace in a directory
      block is supposed to be 8 bytes, which is large enough to fit a
      unused data entry structure (6 bytes in size). The fact we only have
      4 bytes of free space indicates a directory data block alignment
      problem.
      
      And what do you know - there's an implicit hole in the directory
      data block header for the CRC format, which means the header is 60
      byte on 32 bit intel systems and 64 bytes on 64 bit systems. Needs
      padding. And while looking at the structures, I found the same
      problem in the attr leaf header. Fix them both.
      
      Note that this only affects 32 bit systems with CRCs enabled.
      Everything else is just fine. Note that CRC enabled filesystems created
      before this fix on such systems will not be readable with this fix
      applied.
      Reported-by: NMichael L. Semon <mlsemon35@gmail.com>
      Debugged-by: NMichael L. Semon <mlsemon35@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      
      (cherry picked from commit 8a1fd295)
      5170711d
  7. 13 6月, 2013 1 次提交
    • D
      xfs: fix implicit padding in directory and attr CRC formats · 8a1fd295
      Dave Chinner 提交于
      Michael L. Semon has been testing CRC patches on a 32 bit system and
      been seeing assert failures in the directory code from xfs/080.
      Thanks to Michael's heroic efforts with printk debugging, we found
      that the problem was that the last free space being left in the
      directory structure was too small to fit a unused tag structure and
      it was being corrupted and attempting to log a region out of bounds.
      Hence the assert failure looked something like:
      
      .....
      #5 calling xfs_dir2_data_log_unused() 36 32
      #1 4092 4095 4096
      #2 8182 8183 4096
      XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568
      
      Where #1 showed the first region of the dup being logged (i.e. the
      last 4 bytes of a directory buffer) and #2 shows the corrupt values
      being calculated from the length of the dup entry which overflowed
      the size of the buffer.
      
      It turns out that the problem was not in the logging code, nor in
      the freespace handling code. It is an initial condition bug that
      only shows up on 32 bit systems. When a new buffer is initialised,
      where's the freespace that is set up:
      
      [  172.316249] calling xfs_dir2_leaf_addname() from xfs_dir_createname()
      [  172.316346] #9 calling xfs_dir2_data_log_unused()
      [  172.316351] #1 calling xfs_trans_log_buf() 60 63 4096
      [  172.316353] #2 calling xfs_trans_log_buf() 4094 4095 4096
      
      Note the offset of the first region being logged? It's 60 bytes into
      the buffer. Once I saw that, I pretty much knew that the bug was
      going to be caused by this.
      
      Essentially, all direct entries are rounded to 8 bytes in length,
      and all entries start with an 8 byte alignment. This means that we
      can decode inplace as variables are naturally aligned. With the
      directory data supposedly starting on a 8 byte boundary, and all
      entries padded to 8 bytes, the minimum freespace in a directory
      block is supposed to be 8 bytes, which is large enough to fit a
      unused data entry structure (6 bytes in size). The fact we only have
      4 bytes of free space indicates a directory data block alignment
      problem.
      
      And what do you know - there's an implicit hole in the directory
      data block header for the CRC format, which means the header is 60
      byte on 32 bit intel systems and 64 bytes on 64 bit systems. Needs
      padding. And while looking at the structures, I found the same
      problem in the attr leaf header. Fix them both.
      
      Note that this only affects 32 bit systems with CRCs enabled.
      Everything else is just fine. Note that CRC enabled filesystems created
      before this fix on such systems will not be readable with this fix
      applied.
      Reported-by: NMichael L. Semon <mlsemon35@gmail.com>
      Debugged-by: NMichael L. Semon <mlsemon35@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      8a1fd295
  8. 28 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 16 11月, 2012 4 次提交
    • D
      xfs: convert buffer verifiers to an ops structure. · 1813dd64
      Dave Chinner 提交于
      To separate the verifiers from iodone functions and associate read
      and write verifiers at the same time, introduce a buffer verifier
      operations structure to the xfs_buf.
      
      This avoids the need for assigning the write verifier, clearing the
      iodone function and re-running ioend processing in the read
      verifier, and gets rid of the nasty "b_pre_io" name for the write
      verifier function pointer. If we ever need to, it will also be
      easier to add further content specific callbacks to a buffer with an
      ops structure in place.
      
      We also avoid needing to export verifier functions, instead we
      can simply export the ops structures for those that are needed
      outside the function they are defined in.
      
      This patch also fixes a directory block readahead verifier issue
      it exposed.
      
      This patch also adds ops callbacks to the inode/alloc btree blocks
      initialised by growfs. These will need more work before they will
      work with CRCs.
      Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPhil White <pwhite@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      1813dd64
    • D
      xfs: add pre-write metadata buffer verifier callbacks · 612cfbfe
      Dave Chinner 提交于
      These verifiers are essentially the same code as the read verifiers,
      but do not require ioend processing. Hence factor the read verifier
      functions and add a new write verifier wrapper that is used as the
      callback.
      
      This is done as one large patch for all verifiers rather than one
      patch per verifier as the change is largely mechanical. This
      includes hooking up the write verifier via the read verifier
      function.
      
      Hooking up the write verifier for buffers obtained via
      xfs_trans_get_buf() will be done in a separate patch as that touches
      code in many different places rather than just the verifier
      functions.
      Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      612cfbfe
    • D
      xfs: add xfs_da_node verification · d9392a4b
      Dave Chinner 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPhil White <pwhite@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      d9392a4b
    • D
      xfs: factor and verify attr leaf reads · ad14c33a
      Dave Chinner 提交于
      Some reads are not converted yet because it isn't obvious ahead of
      time what the format of the block is going to be. Need to determine
      how to tell if the first block in the tree is a node or leaf format
      block. That will be done in later patches.
      Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPhil White <pwhite@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      ad14c33a
  10. 02 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 09 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  12. 13 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 28 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  14. 28 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 17 3月, 2006 4 次提交
  16. 12 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  17. 02 11月, 2005 4 次提交
  18. 21 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  19. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4