- 16 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Now that there is no locked version of the wait routine anymore, rename the _ prefixed version and make it use the new read API. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 7月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Get rid of the last usage of the locked mv88e6xxx_reg_read function with a new mv88e6xxx_port_read helper, useful later for chips with different port registers base address. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
The 6352 family of switches and compatibles provide a 8-bit address and 16-bit data access to an optional EEPROM. Newer chip such as the 6390 family slightly changed the access to 16-bit address and 8-bit data. This commit cleans up the EEPROM access code for 16-bit access and makes it easy to eventually introduce future support for 8-bit access. Here's a list of notable changes brought by this patch: - provide Global2 unlocked helpers for EEPROM commands - remove eeprom_mutex, only reg_lock is necessary for driver functions - eeprom_len is 0 for chip without EEPROM, so return it directly - the Running bit must be 0 before r/w, so wait for Busy *and* Running - remove now unused mv88e6xxx_wait and mv88e6xxx_reg_write - other than that, the logic (in _{get,set}_eeprom16) didn't change Chips with an 8-bit EEPROM access will require to implement the 8-suffixed variant of G2 helpers and the related flag: #define MV88E6XXX_FLAGS_EEPROM8 \ (MV88E6XXX_FLAG_G2_EEPROM_CMD | \ MV88E6XXX_FLAG_G2_EEPROM_ADDR) Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 7月, 2016 11 次提交
-
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Implement the DSA driver function to configure the bridge ageing time. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
All Marvell switch chips from (88E6060 to 88E6390) have a ATU Control register containing bits 11:4 to configure an ATU Age Time quotient. However the coefficient used to calculate the ATU Age Time vary with the models. E.g. 88E6060, 88E6352 and 88E6390 use respectively 16, 15 and 3.75 seconds. Add a age_time_coeff to the info structure to handle this and a Global 1 helper to set the default age time of 5 minutes in the setup code. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Add capability flags to describe the presence of Ingress Rate Limit unit registers and an helper function to clear it. In the meantime, fix a few harmless issues: - 6185 and 6095 don't have such registers (reserved) - the previous code didn't wait for the IRL operation to complete Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Add flags and helpers to describe the presence of Priority Override Table (POT) related registers and simplify the setup of Global 2. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Add flags to describe the presence of Cross-chip Port VLAN Table (PVT) related registers and simplify the setup of Global 2. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Switches such as 88E6185 as 3 Switch MAC registers in Global 1. Newer chips such as 88E6352 have freed these registers in favor of an indirect access in a Switch MAC/WoL/WoF register in Global 2. Explicit this difference with G1 and G2 helpers and flags. Also, note that this indirect access is a single-register which doesn't require to wait for the operation to complete (like Switch MAC, Trunk Mapping, etc.), in contrary to multi-registers indirect accesses with several operations and a busy bit. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Some switches provide a Rsvd2CPU mechanism used to choose which of the 16 reserved multicast destination addresses matching 01:80:c2:00:00:0x should be considered as MGMT and thus forwarded to the CPU port. Other switches extend this mechanism to also configure as MGMT the additional 16 reserved multicast addresses matching 01:80:c2:00:00:2x. This mechanism is exposed via two registers in Global 2, and an Rsvd2CPU enable bit in the management register. Newer chip (such as 88E6390) has replaced these registers with a new indirect MGMT mechanism in Global 1. The patch adds two MV88E6XXX_FLAG_G2_MGMT_EN_{0,2}X flags to describe the presence of these Global 2 registers. If 88E6390 support is added, a MV88E6XXX_FLAG_G1_MGMT_CTRL flag will be needed to setup Rsvd2CPU. Note: all switches still support in parallel the ATU Load operation with an MGMT Entry State to forward such frames in a less convenient way. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
The Trunk Mask and Trunk Mapping registers are two Global 2 indirect accesses to trunking configuration. Add helpers for these tables and simplify the Global 2 setup. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
The Device Mapping register is an indirect table access. Provide helpers to access this table and explicit the checking of the new DSA_RTABLE_NONE routing table value. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Separate the setup of Global 1 and Global 2 internal SMI devices and add a flag to describe the presence of this second registers set. Also rearrange the G1 setup in the registers order. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
All 88E6xxx Marvell switches (even the old not supported yet 88E6060) have at least an ATU, per-port STP states and VLAN map, to run basic switch functions such as Spanning Tree and port based VLANs. Get rid of the related MV88E6XXX_FLAG_{ATU,PORTSTATE,VLANTABLE} flags, as they are defaults to every chip. This enables STP on 6185 and removes many inconsistencies on others. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 25 6月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
With the upcoming support for cross-chip operations, it will be hard to distinguish portions of code supporting a single-chip or a switch fabric of interconnected chips. Make the code clearer now, by renaming the mv88e6xxx_priv_state chip structure to mv88e6xxx_chip. This patch brings no functional changes. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
With the upcoming support for cross-chip operations and other mv88e6xxx enhancements, new files will be added. Similarly to mlxsw or b53, move mv88e6xxx files into their own folder. In the meantime, update the MAINTAINERS entry to please checkpatch.pl, by replacing the invalid 88E6352 entry with 88E6XXX, maintained by Andrew and myself. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 6月, 2016 14 次提交
-
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
When the SMI address of the switch chip is zero, the chip assumes to be the only one on the SMI master bus and thus responds to all its known SMI devices addresses (port registers, Global2, etc.) When its SMI address is not zero, some chips (e.g. 88E6352) use an indirect access through two SMI Command and Data registers. Other models (e.g. 88E6060) using less than 16 internal SMI addresses always use a direct access. Add a capability flag to describe chips supporting the (indirect) Multi-chip Addressing Mode, and a low-level API to access the registers via SMI. Other accesses (like Ethernet management frames) may be added later. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
The switch ID is located at address 0x3 of every Port Registers bank. But not all Marvell switches have their Port Registers SMI Addresses starting at 0x10. 88E6060 starts at 0x8 and 88E6390 starts at 0x0. Add this data in the info structure and use it in the detection code. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
After allocating the chip structure, pass it a compatible info pointer. The compatible info structure will be used later to describe how to access the switch registers and where to read the switch ID. For the standard MDIO probe, get it from the device node data. For the legacy DSA driver probing, pass it the 88E6085 info. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Extract the common detection code which assigns the info structure to the chip given the read switch ID. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Add an helper function to isolate SMI specific assignments and checks. This function will later help choosing the different SMI accesses based of the compatible info. Since the chip structure is already allocated in the legacy probe, use the mv88e6xxx_reg_read access routine instead of __mv88e6xxx_reg_read. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Add an helper function to allocate the chip structure at the beginning of the probe functions. It will be used to initialize the SMI access. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
The chip smi_mutex mutex is used to protect the access to the internal switch registers, not only the Multi-chip Addressing Mode, as commented. Since we will isolate SMI-specific pieces of code, avoid the confusion now by renaming smi_mutex to reg_lock. No functional changes here. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
The mv88e6xxx_table array and the mv88e6xxx_lookup_info function are static, so remove the table and size arguments from the lookup function. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Use the optional variant to get the reset GPIO line, instead of checking for the -ENOENT error. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
The mixed assignments, allocations and registrations in the probe code make it hard to follow the logic and figure out what is DSA or chip specific. Extract the struct dsa_switch related code in a simple mv88e6xxx_register_switch helper function. For symmetry in the code, add a mv88e6xxx_unregister_switch function. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
The MDIO device probe and remove functions are respectively incrementing and decrementing the bus refcount themselves. Since these bus level actions are out of the device scope, remove them. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
In the MDIO probing function, dev is already assigned to &mdiodev->dev and np is already assigned to mdiodev->dev.of_node, so use them. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
The chip->ds and ds->slave_mii_bus assignments are common to both legacy and new MDIO probing and are already done in the later setup code. Remove the duplicated assignments from the MDIO probing code. Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
This patch fixes 5 style problems reported by checkpatch: WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 24) #492: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:492: + if (phydev->link) + reg |= PORT_PCS_CTRL_LINK_UP; CHECK: Logical continuations should be on the previous line #1318: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:1318: + oldstate == PORT_CONTROL_STATE_FORWARDING) + && (state == PORT_CONTROL_STATE_DISABLED || CHECK: multiple assignments should be avoided #1662: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:1662: + vlan->vid_begin = vlan->vid_end = next.vid; WARNING: line over 80 characters #2097: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:2097: + const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan, WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (16, 32) #2734: FILE: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:2734: + if (mv88e6xxx_6352_family(ps) || mv88e6xxx_6351_family(ps) || [...] + reg |= PORT_CONTROL_EGRESS_ADD_TAG; total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 2 checks, 3805 lines checked It also rebases and integrates changes sent by Ben Dooks [1]: The driver has a number of functions that are not exported or declared elsewhere, so make them static to avoid the following warnings from sparse: drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:113:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_reg_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:167:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_reg_write' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:231:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_set_addr' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:367:6: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_ppu_state_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3157:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_phy_page_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3169:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_phy_page_write' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3583:26: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_switch_driver' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:3621:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_probe' was not declared. Should it be static? [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/632708/Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 6月, 2016 8 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Lunn 提交于
The existing DSA binding has a number of limitations and problems. The main problem is that it cannot represent a switch as a linux device, hanging off some bus. It is limited to one CPU port. The DSA platform device is artificial, and does not really represent hardware. Implement a new binding which can be embedded into any type of node on a bus to represent one switch device, and its links to other switches. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Andrew Lunn 提交于
Have the switch driver register its own MDIO bus. This allows for an mdio property in the device tree, with child nodes for phys, which can be referenced via phandles, etc. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Andrew Lunn 提交于
The switch implements a generic MDIO bus, which could host more than PHYs. It is conventional to use _mdio_ or _mii_ in the function name, so rename them. Also postfix make the historically first read/write function with _direct, to help distinguish it from _indirect and _ppu. While touching these functions, remove some of the _ prefixes, which we are deprecating. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Andrew Lunn 提交于
The merged driver no longer offers the option to use DSA tagging. So remove the code to setup the switch to do DSA tagging and hard code the use of EDSA. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>y Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Andrew Lunn 提交于
The new binding will not have a chip data structure, it will place the routing directly into the switch structure. To enable backwards compatibility, copy the routing from the chip data into the switch structure. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Andrew Lunn 提交于
With a maximum of four switches, the size of the routing table is the same as the pointer to it. Removing it makes the code simpler. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Andrew Lunn 提交于
There are going to be more per-port members added to the switch structure. So add a port structure and move the netdev into it. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Lock debugging shows that there is a possible circular lock in the PPU work code. Switch the lock order of smi_mutex and ppu_mutex to fix this. Here's the full trace: [ 4.341325] ====================================================== [ 4.347519] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 4.353800] 4.6.0 #4 Not tainted [ 4.357039] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 4.363315] kworker/0:1/328 is trying to acquire lock: [ 4.368463] (&ps->smi_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<8049c758>] mv88e6xxx_reg_read+0x30/0x54 [ 4.376313] [ 4.376313] but task is already holding lock: [ 4.382160] (&ps->ppu_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<8049cac0>] mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work+0x28/0xd4 [ 4.390772] [ 4.390772] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 4.390772] [ 4.398963] [ 4.398963] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 4.406461] [ 4.406461] -> #1 (&ps->ppu_mutex){+.+...}: [ 4.410897] [<806d86bc>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x360 [ 4.416606] [<8049a800>] mv88e6xxx_ppu_access_get+0x28/0x100 [ 4.422906] [<8049b778>] mv88e6xxx_phy_read+0x90/0xdc [ 4.428599] [<806a4534>] dsa_slave_phy_read+0x3c/0x40 [ 4.434300] [<804943ec>] mdiobus_read+0x68/0x80 [ 4.439481] [<804939d4>] get_phy_device+0x58/0x1d8 [ 4.444914] [<80493ed0>] mdiobus_scan+0x24/0xf4 [ 4.450078] [<8049409c>] __mdiobus_register+0xfc/0x1ac [ 4.455857] [<806a40b0>] dsa_probe+0x860/0xca8 [ 4.460934] [<8043246c>] platform_drv_probe+0x5c/0xc0 [ 4.466627] [<804305a0>] driver_probe_device+0x118/0x450 [ 4.472589] [<80430b00>] __device_attach_driver+0xac/0x128 [ 4.478724] [<8042e350>] bus_for_each_drv+0x74/0xa8 [ 4.484235] [<804302d8>] __device_attach+0xc4/0x154 [ 4.489755] [<80430cec>] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x20 [ 4.495612] [<8042f620>] bus_probe_device+0x98/0xa0 [ 4.501123] [<8042fbd0>] deferred_probe_work_func+0x4c/0xd4 [ 4.507328] [<8013a794>] process_one_work+0x1a8/0x604 [ 4.513030] [<8013ac54>] worker_thread+0x64/0x528 [ 4.518367] [<801409e8>] kthread+0xec/0x100 [ 4.523201] [<80108f30>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24 [ 4.528462] [ 4.528462] -> #0 (&ps->smi_mutex){+.+.+.}: [ 4.532895] [<8015ad5c>] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1dc [ 4.538154] [<806d86bc>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x360 [ 4.543856] [<8049c758>] mv88e6xxx_reg_read+0x30/0x54 [ 4.549549] [<8049cad8>] mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work+0x40/0xd4 [ 4.556022] [<8013a794>] process_one_work+0x1a8/0x604 [ 4.561707] [<8013ac54>] worker_thread+0x64/0x528 [ 4.567053] [<801409e8>] kthread+0xec/0x100 [ 4.571878] [<80108f30>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24 [ 4.577139] [ 4.577139] other info that might help us debug this: [ 4.577139] [ 4.585159] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 4.585159] [ 4.591093] CPU0 CPU1 [ 4.595631] ---- ---- [ 4.600169] lock(&ps->ppu_mutex); [ 4.603693] lock(&ps->smi_mutex); [ 4.609742] lock(&ps->ppu_mutex); [ 4.615790] lock(&ps->smi_mutex); [ 4.619314] [ 4.619314] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 4.619314] [ 4.625256] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/328: [ 4.629537] #0: ("events"){.+.+..}, at: [<8013a704>] process_one_work+0x118/0x604 [ 4.637288] #1: ((&ps->ppu_work)){+.+...}, at: [<8013a704>] process_one_work+0x118/0x604 [ 4.645653] #2: (&ps->ppu_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<8049cac0>] mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work+0x28/0xd4 [ 4.654714] [ 4.654714] stack backtrace: [ 4.659098] CPU: 0 PID: 328 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.6.0 #4 [ 4.665286] Hardware name: Freescale Vybrid VF5xx/VF6xx (Device Tree) [ 4.671748] Workqueue: events mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work [ 4.677174] Backtrace: [ 4.679674] [<8010d354>] (dump_backtrace) from [<8010d5a0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) [ 4.687252] r6:80fb3c88 r5:80fb3c88 r4:80fb4728 r3:00000002 [ 4.693003] [<8010d580>] (show_stack) from [<803b45e8>] (dump_stack+0x24/0x28) [ 4.700246] [<803b45c4>] (dump_stack) from [<80157398>] (print_circular_bug+0x208/0x32c) [ 4.708361] [<80157190>] (print_circular_bug) from [<8015a630>] (__lock_acquire+0x185c/0x1b80) [ 4.716982] r10:9ec22a00 r9:00000060 r8:8164b6bc r7:00000040 r6:00000003 r5:8163a5b4 [ 4.724905] r4:00000003 r3:9ec22de8 [ 4.728537] [<80158dd4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<8015ad5c>] (lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1dc) [ 4.736378] r10:60000013 r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:9e5e9c50 r5:80e618e0 [ 4.744301] r4:00000000 [ 4.746879] [<8015aca8>] (lock_acquire) from [<806d86bc>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x360) [ 4.754976] r10:9e5e9c1c r9:80e616c4 r8:9f685ea0 r7:0000001b r6:9ec22a00 r5:8163a5b4 [ 4.762899] r4:9e5e9c1c [ 4.765477] [<806d8668>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<8049c758>] (mv88e6xxx_reg_read+0x30/0x54) [ 4.774008] r10:80e60c5b r9:80e616c4 r8:9f685ea0 r7:0000001b r6:00000004 r5:9e5e9c10 [ 4.781930] r4:9e5e9c1c [ 4.784507] [<8049c728>] (mv88e6xxx_reg_read) from [<8049cad8>] (mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work+0x40/0xd4) [ 4.793907] r7:9ffd5400 r6:9e5e9c68 r5:9e5e9cb0 r4:9e5e9c10 [ 4.799659] [<8049ca98>] (mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work) from [<8013a794>] (process_one_work+0x1a8/0x604) [ 4.809059] r9:80e616c4 r8:9f685ea0 r7:9ffd5400 r6:80e0a1c8 r5:9f5f2e80 r4:9e5e9cb0 [ 4.816910] [<8013a5ec>] (process_one_work) from [<8013ac54>] (worker_thread+0x64/0x528) [ 4.825010] r10:9f5f2e80 r9:00000008 r8:80e0dc80 r7:80e0a1fc r6:80e0a1c8 r5:9f5f2e98 [ 4.832933] r4:80e0a1c8 [ 4.835510] [<8013abf0>] (worker_thread) from [<801409e8>] (kthread+0xec/0x100) [ 4.842827] r10:00000000 r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:8013abf0 r6:9f5f2e80 r5:9ec15740 [ 4.850749] r4:00000000 [ 4.853327] [<801408fc>] (kthread) from [<80108f30>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24) [ 4.860557] r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:801408fc r4:9ec15740 Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vivien Didelot 提交于
Now that the bridge code defers the switchdev port state setting, there is no need to defer the port STP state change within the mv88e6xxx code. Thus get rid of the driver's bridge work code. This also fixes a race condition where the DSA layer assumes that the bridge code already set the unbridged port's STP state to Disabled before restoring the Forwarding state. As a consequence, this also fixes the FDB flush for the unbridged port which now correctly occurs during the Forwarding to Disabled transition. Fixes: 0bc05d58 ("switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred") Reported-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Lunn 提交于
A switch can export an attached EEPROM using the standard ethtool API. However the switch itself cannot determine the size of the EEPROM, and multiple sizes are allowed. Thus a device tree property is supported to indicate the length of the EEPROM. Parse this property during device probe, and implement a callback function to retrieve it. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-