1. 20 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 18 12月, 2013 6 次提交
  3. 14 12月, 2013 19 次提交
  4. 12 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 07 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  6. 06 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 29 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 16 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 15 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 14 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 08 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  12. 02 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 28 10月, 2013 4 次提交
    • D
      Revert "Merge branch 'bonding_monitor_locking'" · 1f2cd845
      David S. Miller 提交于
      This reverts commit 4d961a10, reversing
      changes made to a00f6fcc.
      
      Revert bond locking changes, they cause regressions and Veaceslav Falico
      doesn't like how the commit messages were done at all.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1f2cd845
    • D
      bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_3ad_state_machine_handler() · 5cc172c6
      dingtianhong 提交于
      The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
      protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
      1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
      to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
      2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
      3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
      bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
      so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
      Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5cc172c6
    • D
      bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_activebackup_arp_mon() · 80b9d236
      dingtianhong 提交于
      The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
      protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
      1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
      to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
      2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
      3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
      bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
      so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
      Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      80b9d236
    • D
      bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_loadbalance_arp_mon() · 7f1bb571
      dingtianhong 提交于
      The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
      protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
      1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
      to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
      2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
      3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
      bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
      so I remove the bond->lock and add the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
      Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7f1bb571