Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 08 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 06 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 19 10月, 2009 2 次提交
  9. 15 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 13 10月, 2009 1 次提交
    • N
      net: Generalize socket rx gap / receive queue overflow cmsg · 3b885787
      由 Neil Horman 提交于 
      Create a new socket level option to report number of queue overflows

Recently I augmented the AF_PACKET protocol to report the number of frames lost
on the socket receive queue between any two enqueued frames.  This value was
exported via a SOL_PACKET level cmsg.  AFter I completed that work it was
requested that this feature be generalized so that any datagram oriented socket
could make use of this option.  As such I've created this patch, It creates a
new SOL_SOCKET level option called SO_RXQ_OVFL, which when enabled exports a
SOL_SOCKET level cmsg that reports the nubmer of times the sk_receive_queue
overflowed between any two given frames.  It also augments the AF_PACKET
protocol to take advantage of this new feature (as it previously did not touch
sk->sk_drops, which this patch uses to record the overflow count).  Tested
successfully by me.

Notes:

1) Unlike my previous patch, this patch simply records the sk_drops value, which
is not a number of drops between packets, but rather a total number of drops.
Deltas must be computed in user space.

2) While this patch currently works with datagram oriented protocols, it will
also be accepted by non-datagram oriented protocols. I'm not sure if thats
agreeable to everyone, but my argument in favor of doing so is that, for those
protocols which aren't applicable to this option, sk_drops will always be zero,
and reporting no drops on a receive queue that isn't used for those
non-participating protocols seems reasonable to me.  This also saves us having
to code in a per-protocol opt in mechanism.

3) This applies cleanly to net-next assuming that commit
97775007 (my af packet cmsg patch) is reverted
Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3b885787
  13. 01 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 03 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • E
      ip: Report qdisc packet drops · 6ce9e7b5
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      Christoph Lameter pointed out that packet drops at qdisc level where not
accounted in SNMP counters. Only if application sets IP_RECVERR, drops
are reported to user (-ENOBUFS errors) and SNMP counters updated.

IP_RECVERR is used to enable extended reliable error message passing,
but these are not needed to update system wide SNMP stats.

This patch changes things a bit to allow SNMP counters to be updated,
regardless of IP_RECVERR being set or not on the socket.

Example after an UDP tx flood
# netstat -s 
...
IP:
    1487048 outgoing packets dropped
...
Udp:
...
    SndbufErrors: 1487048


send() syscalls, do however still return an OK status, to not
break applications.

Note : send() manual page explicitly says for -ENOBUFS error :

 "The output queue for a network interface was full.
  This generally indicates that the interface has stopped sending,
  but may be caused by transient congestion.
  (Normally, this does not occur in Linux. Packets are just silently
  dropped when a device queue overflows.) "

This is not true for IP_RECVERR enabled sockets : a send() syscall
that hit a qdisc drop returns an ENOBUFS error.

Many thanks to Christoph, David, and last but not least, Alexey !
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6ce9e7b5
  17. 14 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 23 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 18 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 03 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  25. 27 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  27. 26 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  29. 09 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  31. 30 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  33. 19 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  35. 18 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • E
      udp: sk_drops handling · cb61cb9b
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      In commits 33c732c3 ([IPV4]: Add raw
drops counter) and a92aa318 ([IPV6]:
Add raw drops counter), Wang Chen added raw drops counter for
/proc/net/raw & /proc/net/raw6

This patch adds this capability to UDP sockets too (/proc/net/udp &
/proc/net/udp6).

This means that 'RcvbufErrors' errors found in /proc/net/snmp can be also
be examined for each udp socket.

# grep Udp: /proc/net/snmp
Udp: InDatagrams NoPorts InErrors OutDatagrams RcvbufErrors SndbufErrors
Udp: 23971006 75 899420 16390693 146348 0

# cat /proc/net/udp
 sl  local_address rem_address   st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt  ---
uid  timeout inode ref pointer drops
 75: 00000000:02CB 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000  ---
  0        0 2358 2 ffff81082a538c80 0
111: 00000000:006F 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000  ---
  0        0 2286 2 ffff81042dd35c80 146348

In this example, only port 111 (0x006F) was flooded by messages that
user program could not read fast enough. 146348 messages were lost.
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      cb61cb9b
  37. 15 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  39. 13 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      ipv6: Fix duplicate initialization of rawv6_prot.destroy · f23d60de
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      In changeset 22dd4850
("raw: Raw socket leak.") code was added so that we
flush pending frames on raw sockets to avoid leaks.

The ipv4 part was fine, but the ipv6 part was not
done correctly.  Unlike the ipv4 side, the ipv6 code
already has a .destroy method for rawv6_prot.

So now there were two assignments to this member, and
what the compiler does is use the last one, effectively
making the ipv6 parts of that changeset a NOP.

Fix this by removing the:

	.destroy	   = inet6_destroy_sock,

line, and adding an inet6_destroy_sock() call to the
end of raw6_destroy().

Noticed by Al Viro.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
      f23d60de
  41. 12 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  43. 05 6月, 2008 2 次提交
  45. 13 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  47. 25 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  49. 14 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  51. 12 4月, 2008 2 次提交
  53. 05 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  55. 02 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  57. 29 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  59. 26 3月, 2008 3 次提交
  61. 25 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  63. 23 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  65. 18 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  67. 01 2月, 2008 2 次提交