Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 12 2月, 2013 3 次提交
  3. 11 2月, 2013 5 次提交
  5. 09 2月, 2013 5 次提交
  7. 08 2月, 2013 3 次提交
  9. 07 2月, 2013 11 次提交
  11. 06 2月, 2013 7 次提交
  13. 05 2月, 2013 6 次提交
    • D
      ipcomp: Mark as netns_ok. · 27000929
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      This module is namespace aware, netns_ok was just disabled by default
for sanity.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      27000929
    • J
      mcast: do not check 'rv' twice in a row · 56db1c5f
      由 Jean Sacren 提交于 
      With the loop, don't check 'rv' twice in a row. Without the loop, 'rv'
doesn't even need to be checked.

Make the comment more grammar-friendly.
Signed-off-by: NJean Sacren <sakiwit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      56db1c5f
    • Y
      net: remove redundant check for timer pending state before del_timer · 25cc4ae9
      由 Ying Xue 提交于 
      As in del_timer() there has already placed a timer_pending() function
to check whether the timer to be deleted is pending or not, it's
unnecessary to check timer pending state again before del_timer() is
called.
Signed-off-by: NYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      25cc4ae9
    • D
      sctp: sctp_close: fix release of bindings for deferred call_rcu's · 8c98653f
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      It seems due to RCU usage, i.e. within SCTP's address binding list,
a, say, ``behavioral change'' was introduced which does actually
not conform to the RFC anymore. In particular consider the following
(fictional) scenario to demonstrate this:

  do:
    Two SOCK_SEQPACKET-style sockets are opened (S1, S2)
    S1 is bound to 127.0.0.1, port 1024 [server]
    S2 is bound to 127.0.0.1, port 1025 [client]
    listen(2) is invoked on S1
    From S2 we call one sendmsg(2) with msg.msg_name and
       msg.msg_namelen parameters set to the server's
       address
    S1, S2 are closed
    goto do

The first pass of this loop passes successful, while the second round
fails during binding of S1 (address still in use). What is happening?
In the first round, the initial handshake is being done, and, at the
time close(2) is called on S1, a non-graceful shutdown is performed via
ABORT since in S1's receive queue an unprocessed packet is present,
thus stating an error condition. This can be considered as a correct
behavior.

During close also all bound addresses are freed, thus nothing *must*
be active anymore. In reference to RFC2960:

  After checking the Verification Tag, the receiving endpoint shall
  remove the association from its record, and shall report the
  termination to its upper layer. (9.1 Abort of an Association)

Also, no half-open states are supported, thus after an ungraceful
shutdown, we leave nothing behind. However, this seems not to be
happening though. In a real-world scenario, this is exactly where
it breaks the lksctp-tools functional test suite, *for instance*:

  ./test_sockopt
  test_sockopt.c  1 PASS : getsockopt(SCTP_STATUS) on a socket with no assoc
  test_sockopt.c  2 PASS : getsockopt(SCTP_STATUS)
  test_sockopt.c  3 PASS : getsockopt(SCTP_STATUS) with invalid associd
  test_sockopt.c  4 PASS : getsockopt(SCTP_STATUS) with NULL associd
  test_sockopt.c  5 BROK : bind: Address already in use

The underlying problem is that sctp_endpoint_destroy() hasn't been
triggered yet while the next bind attempt is being done. It will be
triggered eventually (but too late) by sctp_transport_destroy_rcu()
after one RCU grace period:

  sctp_transport_destroy()
    sctp_transport_destroy_rcu() ----.
      sctp_association_put() [*]  <--+--> sctp_packet_free()
        sctp_association_destroy()          [...]
          sctp_endpoint_put()                 skb->destructor
            sctp_endpoint_destroy()             sctp_wfree()
              sctp_bind_addr_free()               sctp_association_put() [*]

Thus, we move out the condition with sctp_association_put() as well as
the sctp_packet_free() invocation and the issue can be solved. We also
better free the SCTP chunks first before putting the ref of the association.

With this patch, the example above (which simulates a similar scenario
as in the implementation of this test case) and therefore also the test
suite run successfully through. Tested by myself.

Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8c98653f
    • G
      netns: bridge: allow unprivileged users add/delete mdb entry · e4d343ea
      由 Gao feng 提交于 
      since the mdb table is belong to bridge device,and the
bridge device can only be seen in one netns.
So it's safe to allow unprivileged user which is the
creator of userns and netns to modify the mdb table.
Signed-off-by: NGao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e4d343ea
    • G
      netns: ebtable: allow unprivileged users to operate ebtables · bb12b8b2
      由 Gao feng 提交于 
      ebt_table is a private resource of netns, operating ebtables
in one netns will not affect other netns, we can allow the
creator user of userns and netns to change the ebtables.
Signed-off-by: NGao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bb12b8b2