1. 04 8月, 2016 2 次提交
  2. 03 8月, 2016 2 次提交
  3. 02 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 01 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 20 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  6. 14 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  7. 07 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  8. 06 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 05 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  10. 04 7月, 2016 4 次提交
  11. 03 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  12. 02 7月, 2016 3 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Use HWS for seqno tracking everywhere · 1b7744e7
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      By using the same address for storing the HWS on every platform, we can
      remove the platform specific vfuncs and reduce the get-seqno routine to
      a single read of a cached memory location.
      
      v2: Fix semaphore_passed() to look at the signaling engine (not the
      waiter's)
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-8-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      1b7744e7
    • C
      drm/i915: Spin after waking up for an interrupt · f69a02c9
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      When waiting for an interrupt (waiting for the engine to complete some
      work), we know we are the only waiter to be woken on this engine. We also
      know when the GPU has nearly completed our request (or at least started
      processing it), so after being woken and we detect that the GPU is
      active and working on our request, allow us the bottom-half (the first
      waiter who wakes up to handle checking the seqno after the interrupt) to
      spin for a very short while to reduce client latencies.
      
      The impact is minimal, there was an improvement to the realtime-vs-many
      clients case, but exporting the function proves useful later. However,
      it is tempting to adjust irq_seqno_barrier to include the spin. The
      problem is first ensuring that the "start-of-request" seqno is coherent
      as we use that as our basis for judging when it is ok to spin. If we
      could, spinning there could dramatically shorten some sleeps, and allow
      us to make the barriers more conservative to handle missed seqno writes
      on more platforms (all gen7+ are known to have the occasional issue, at
      least).
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-7-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      f69a02c9
    • C
      drm/i915: Slaughter the thundering i915_wait_request herd · 688e6c72
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      One particularly stressful scenario consists of many independent tasks
      all competing for GPU time and waiting upon the results (e.g. realtime
      transcoding of many, many streams). One bottleneck in particular is that
      each client waits on its own results, but every client is woken up after
      every batchbuffer - hence the thunder of hooves as then every client must
      do its heavyweight dance to read a coherent seqno to see if it is the
      lucky one.
      
      Ideally, we only want one client to wake up after the interrupt and
      check its request for completion. Since the requests must retire in
      order, we can select the first client on the oldest request to be woken.
      Once that client has completed his wait, we can then wake up the
      next client and so on. However, all clients then incur latency as every
      process in the chain may be delayed for scheduling - this may also then
      cause some priority inversion. To reduce the latency, when a client
      is added or removed from the list, we scan the tree for completed
      seqno and wake up all the completed waiters in parallel.
      
      Using igt/benchmarks/gem_latency, we can demonstrate this effect. The
      benchmark measures the number of GPU cycles between completion of a
      batch and the client waking up from a call to wait-ioctl. With many
      concurrent waiters, with each on a different request, we observe that
      the wakeup latency before the patch scales nearly linearly with the
      number of waiters (before external factors kick in making the scaling much
      worse). After applying the patch, we can see that only the single waiter
      for the request is being woken up, providing a constant wakeup latency
      for every operation. However, the situation is not quite as rosy for
      many waiters on the same request, though to the best of my knowledge this
      is much less likely in practice. Here, we can observe that the
      concurrent waiters incur extra latency from being woken up by the
      solitary bottom-half, rather than directly by the interrupt. This
      appears to be scheduler induced (having discounted adverse effects from
      having a rbtree walk/erase in the wakeup path), each additional
      wake_up_process() costs approximately 1us on big core. Another effect of
      performing the secondary wakeups from the first bottom-half is the
      incurred delay this imposes on high priority threads - rather than
      immediately returning to userspace and leaving the interrupt handler to
      wake the others.
      
      To offset the delay incurred with additional waiters on a request, we
      could use a hybrid scheme that did a quick read in the interrupt handler
      and dequeued all the completed waiters (incurring the overhead in the
      interrupt handler, not the best plan either as we then incur GPU
      submission latency) but we would still have to wake up the bottom-half
      every time to do the heavyweight slow read. Or we could only kick the
      waiters on the seqno with the same priority as the current task (i.e. in
      the realtime waiter scenario, only it is woken up immediately by the
      interrupt and simply queues the next waiter before returning to userspace,
      minimising its delay at the expense of the chain, and also reducing
      contention on its scheduler runqueue). This is effective at avoid long
      pauses in the interrupt handler and at avoiding the extra latency in
      realtime/high-priority waiters.
      
      v2: Convert from a kworker per engine into a dedicated kthread for the
      bottom-half.
      v3: Rename request members and tweak comments.
      v4: Use a per-engine spinlock in the breadcrumbs bottom-half.
      v5: Fix race in locklessly checking waiter status and kicking the task on
      adding a new waiter.
      v6: Fix deciding when to force the timer to hide missing interrupts.
      v7: Move the bottom-half from the kthread to the first client process.
      v8: Reword a few comments
      v9: Break the busy loop when the interrupt is unmasked or has fired.
      v10: Comments, unnecessary churn, better debugging from Tvrtko
      v11: Wake all completed waiters on removing the current bottom-half to
      reduce the latency of waking up a herd of clients all waiting on the
      same request.
      v12: Rearrange missed-interrupt fault injection so that it works with
      igt/drv_missed_irq_hang
      v13: Rename intel_breadcrumb and friends to intel_wait in preparation
      for signal handling.
      v14: RCU commentary, assert_spin_locked
      v15: Hide BUG_ON behind the compiler; report on gem_latency findings.
      v16: Sort seqno-groups by priority so that first-waiter has the highest
      task priority (and so avoid priority inversion).
      v17: Add waiters to post-mortem GPU hang state.
      v18: Return early for a completed wait after acquiring the spinlock.
      Avoids adding ourselves to the tree if the is already complete, and
      skips the awkward question of why we don't do completion wakeups for
      waits earlier than or equal to ourselves.
      v19: Prepare for init_breadcrumbs to fail. Later patches may want to
      allocate during init, so be prepared to propagate back the error code.
      
      Testcase: igt/gem_concurrent_blit
      Testcase: igt/benchmarks/gem_latency
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: "Rogozhkin, Dmitry V" <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@intel.com>
      Cc: "Gong, Zhipeng" <zhipeng.gong@intel.com>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
      Cc: "Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> #v18
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      688e6c72
  13. 24 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  14. 21 6月, 2016 5 次提交
  15. 14 6月, 2016 3 次提交
  16. 01 6月, 2016 2 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Revert async unpin and nonblocking atomic commit · e42aeef1
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      This reverts the following patches:
      
      d55dbd06 drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips.
      15c86bdb drm/i915: Check for unpin correctness.
      95c2ccdc Reapply "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      a6747b73 drm/i915: Make unpin async.
      03f476e1 drm/i915: Prepare connectors for nonblocking checks.
      2099deff drm/i915: Pass atomic states to fbc update functions.
      ee7171af drm/i915: Remove reset_counter from intel_crtc.
      2ee004f7 drm/i915: Remove queue_flip pointer.
      b8d2afae drm/i915: Remove use_mmio_flip kernel parameter.
      8dd634d9 drm/i915: Remove cs based page flip support.
      143f73b3 drm/i915: Rework intel_crtc_page_flip to be almost atomic, v3.
      84fc494b drm/i915: Add the exclusive fence to plane_state.
      6885843a drm/i915: Convert flip_work to a list.
      aa420ddd drm/i915: Allow mmio updates on all platforms, v2.
      afee4d87 Revert "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      
      "drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips" should have been
      split up, misses a proper commit message and seems to cause issues in
      the legacy page_flip path as demonstrated by kms_flip.
      
      "drm/i915: Make unpin async" doesn't handle the unthrottled cursor
      updates correctly, leading to an apparent pin count leak. This is
      caught by the WARN_ON in i915_gem_object_do_pin which screams if we
      have more than DRM_I915_GEM_OBJECT_MAX_PIN_COUNT pins.
      
      Unfortuantely we can't just revert these two because this patch series
      came with a built-in bisect breakage in the form of temporarily
      removing the unthrottled cursor update hack for legacy cursor ioctl.
      Therefore there's no other option than to revert the entire pile :(
      
      There's one tiny conflict in intel_drv.h due to other patches, nothing
      serious.
      
      Normally I'd wait a bit longer with doing a maintainer revert, but
      since the minimal set of patches we need to revert (due to the bisect
      breakage) is so big, time is running out fast. And very soon
      (especially after a few attempts at fixing issues) it'll be really
      hard to revert things cleanly.
      
      Lessons learned:
      - Not a good idea to rush the review (done by someone fairly new to
        the area) and not make sure domain experts had a chance to read it.
      
      - Patches should be properly split up. I only looked at the two
        patches that should be reverted in detail, but both look like the
        mix up different things in one patch.
      
      - Patches really should have proper commit messages. Especially when
        doing more than one thing, and especially when touching critical and
        tricky core code.
      
      - Building a patch series and r-b stamping it when it has a built-in
        bisect breakage is not a good idea.
      
      - I also think we need to stop building up technical debt by
        postponing atomic igt testcases even longer. I think it's clear that
        there's enough corner cases in this beast that we really need to
        have the testcases _before_ the next step lands.
      
      (cherry picked from commit 5a21b665
      from drm-intel-next-queeud)
      
      Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
      e42aeef1
    • S
      drm/i915: Update GEN6_PMINTRMSK setup with GuC enabled · 1800ad25
      Sagar Arun Kamble 提交于
      On Loading, GuC sets PM interrupts routing (bit 31) and clears ARAT
      expired interrupt (bit 9). Host turbo also updates this register
      in RPS flows. This patch ensures bit 31 and bit 9 setup by GuC persists.
      ARAT timer interrupt is needed in GuC for various features. It also
      facilitates halting GuC and hence achieving RC6. PM interrupt routing
      will not impact RPS interrupt reception by host as GuC will redirect
      them.
      This patch fixes igt test pm_rc6_residency that was failing with guc
      load/submission enabled. Tested with SKL GuC v6.1 and BXT GuC v5.1 and v8.7.
      
      v2: i915_irq/i915_pm decoupling from intel_guc. (ChrisW)
      
      v3: restructuring the mask update and rebase w.r.t Ville's patch. (ChrisW)
      
      v4: Updating the pm_intr_keep during direct_interrupts_to_guc. (Sagar)
      
      Cc: Chris Harris <chris.harris@intel.com>
      Cc: Zhe Wang <zhe1.wang@intel.com>
      Cc: Deepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
      Cc: Satyanantha, Rama Gopal M <rama.gopal.m.satyanantha@intel.com>
      Cc: Akash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com>
      Testcase: igt/pm_rc6_residency
      Signed-off-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1464683307-19475-1-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com
      1800ad25
  17. 25 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Revert async unpin and nonblocking atomic commit · 5a21b665
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      This reverts the following patches:
      
      d55dbd06 drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips.
      15c86bdb drm/i915: Check for unpin correctness.
      95c2ccdc Reapply "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      a6747b73 drm/i915: Make unpin async.
      03f476e1 drm/i915: Prepare connectors for nonblocking checks.
      2099deff drm/i915: Pass atomic states to fbc update functions.
      ee7171af drm/i915: Remove reset_counter from intel_crtc.
      2ee004f7 drm/i915: Remove queue_flip pointer.
      b8d2afae drm/i915: Remove use_mmio_flip kernel parameter.
      8dd634d9 drm/i915: Remove cs based page flip support.
      143f73b3 drm/i915: Rework intel_crtc_page_flip to be almost atomic, v3.
      84fc494b drm/i915: Add the exclusive fence to plane_state.
      6885843a drm/i915: Convert flip_work to a list.
      aa420ddd drm/i915: Allow mmio updates on all platforms, v2.
      afee4d87 Revert "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      
      "drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips" should have been
      split up, misses a proper commit message and seems to cause issues in
      the legacy page_flip path as demonstrated by kms_flip.
      
      "drm/i915: Make unpin async" doesn't handle the unthrottled cursor
      updates correctly, leading to an apparent pin count leak. This is
      caught by the WARN_ON in i915_gem_object_do_pin which screams if we
      have more than DRM_I915_GEM_OBJECT_MAX_PIN_COUNT pins.
      
      Unfortuantely we can't just revert these two because this patch series
      came with a built-in bisect breakage in the form of temporarily
      removing the unthrottled cursor update hack for legacy cursor ioctl.
      Therefore there's no other option than to revert the entire pile :(
      
      There's one tiny conflict in intel_drv.h due to other patches, nothing
      serious.
      
      Normally I'd wait a bit longer with doing a maintainer revert, but
      since the minimal set of patches we need to revert (due to the bisect
      breakage) is so big, time is running out fast. And very soon
      (especially after a few attempts at fixing issues) it'll be really
      hard to revert things cleanly.
      
      Lessons learned:
      - Not a good idea to rush the review (done by someone fairly new to
        the area) and not make sure domain experts had a chance to read it.
      
      - Patches should be properly split up. I only looked at the two
        patches that should be reverted in detail, but both look like the
        mix up different things in one patch.
      
      - Patches really should have proper commit messages. Especially when
        doing more than one thing, and especially when touching critical and
        tricky core code.
      
      - Building a patch series and r-b stamping it when it has a built-in
        bisect breakage is not a good idea.
      
      - I also think we need to stop building up technical debt by
        postponing atomic igt testcases even longer. I think it's clear that
        there's enough corner cases in this beast that we really need to
        have the testcases _before_ the next step lands.
      
      Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
      5a21b665
  18. 24 5月, 2016 4 次提交
  19. 23 5月, 2016 1 次提交