Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 4月, 2011 2 次提交
    • D
      perf, x86, nmi: Move LVT un-masking into irq handlers · 2bce5dac
      由 Don Zickus 提交于 
      It was noticed that P4 machines were generating double NMIs for
each perf event.  These extra NMIs lead to 'Dazed and confused'
messages on the screen.

I tracked this down to a P4 quirk that said the overflow bit had
to be cleared before re-enabling the apic LVT mask.  My first
attempt was to move the un-masking inside the perf nmi handler
from before the chipset NMI handler to after.

This broke Nehalem boxes that seem to like the unmasking before
the counters themselves are re-enabled.

In order to keep this change simple for 2.6.39, I decided to
just simply move the apic LVT un-masking to the beginning of all
the chipset NMI handlers, with the exception of Pentium4's to
fix the double NMI issue.

Later on we can move the un-masking to later in the handlers to
save a number of 'extra' NMIs on those particular chipsets.

I tested this change on a P4 machine, an AMD machine, a Nehalem
box, and a core2quad box.  'perf top' worked correctly along
with various other small 'perf record' runs.  Anything high
stress breaks all the machines but that is a different problem.

Thanks to various people for testing different versions of this
patch.
Reported-and-tested-by: NShaun Ruffell <sruffell@digium.com>
Signed-off-by: NDon Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1303900353-10242-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
      2bce5dac
    • I
      perf events, x86: Work around the Nehalem AAJ80 erratum · ec75a716
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      On Nehalem CPUs the retired branch-misses event can be completely bogus,
when there are no branch-misses occuring. When there are a lot of branch
misses then the count is pretty accurate. Still, this leaves us with an
event that over-counts a lot.

Detect this erratum and work it around by using BR_MISP_EXEC.ANY events.
These will also count speculated branches but still it's a lot more
precise in practice than the architectural event.
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-yyfg0bxo9jsqxd6a0ovfny27@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      ec75a716
  3. 26 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  5. 22 4月, 2011 4 次提交
    • P
      perf, x86: Update/fix Intel Nehalem cache events · f4929bd3
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Change the Nehalem cache events to use retired memory instruction counters
(similar to Westmere), this greatly improves the provided stats.

Using:

main ()
{
        int i;

        for (i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++) {
                asm("mov (%%rsp), %%rbx;"
                    "mov %%rbx, (%%rsp);" : : : "rbx");
        }
}

We find:

 $ perf stat --repeat 10 -e instructions:u -e l1-dcache-loads:u -e l1-dcache-stores:u ./loop_1b_loads+stores
  Performance counter stats for './loop_1b_loads+stores' (10 runs):
      4,000,081,056 instructions:u           #      0.000 IPC ( +-   0.000% )
      4,999,502,846 l1-dcache-loads:u          ( +-   0.008% )
      1,000,034,832 l1-dcache-stores:u         ( +-   0.000% )
         1.565184942  seconds time elapsed   ( +-   0.005% )

The 5b is surprising - we'd expect 1b:

 $ perf stat --repeat 10 -e instructions:u -e r10b:u -e l1-dcache-stores:u ./loop_1b_loads+stores
  Performance counter stats for './loop_1b_loads+stores' (10 runs):
      4,000,081,054 instructions:u           #      0.000 IPC ( +-   0.000% )
      1,000,021,961 r10b:u                     ( +-   0.000% )
      1,000,030,951 l1-dcache-stores:u         ( +-   0.000% )
         1.565055422  seconds time elapsed   ( +-   0.003% )

Which this patch thus fixes.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-q9rtru7b7840tws75xzboapv@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      f4929bd3
    • C
      perf, x86: P4 PMU - Don't forget to clear cpuc->active_mask on overflow · 1ea5a6af
      由 Cyrill Gorcunov 提交于 
      It's not enough to simply disable event on overflow the
cpuc->active_mask should be cleared as well otherwise counter
may stall in "active" even in real being already disabled (which
potentially may lead to the situation that user may not use this
counter further).

Don pointed out that:

 " I also noticed this patch fixed some unknown NMIs
   on a P4 when I stressed the box".
Tested-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NCyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NDon Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDon Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1303398203-2918-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      1ea5a6af
    • I
      x86, perf event: Turn off unstructured raw event access to offcore registers · b52c55c6
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      Andi Kleen pointed out that the Intel offcore support patches were merged
without user-space tool support to the functionality:

 |
 | The offcore_msr perf kernel code was merged into 2.6.39-rc*, but the
 | user space bits were not. This made it impossible to set the extra mask
 | and actually do the OFFCORE profiling
 |

Andi submitted a preliminary patch for user-space support, as an
extension to perf's raw event syntax:

 |
 | Some raw events -- like the Intel OFFCORE events -- support additional
 | parameters. These can be appended after a ':'.
 |
 | For example on a multi socket Intel Nehalem:
 |
 |    perf stat -e r1b7:20ff -a sleep 1
 |
 | Profile the OFFCORE_RESPONSE.ANY_REQUEST with event mask REMOTE_DRAM_0
 | that measures any access to DRAM on another socket.
 |

But this kind of usability is absolutely unacceptable - users should not
be expected to type in magic, CPU and model specific incantations to get
access to useful hardware functionality.

The proper solution is to expose useful offcore functionality via
generalized events - that way users do not have to care which specific
CPU model they are using, they can use the conceptual event and not some
model specific quirky hexa number.

We already have such generalization in place for CPU cache events,
and it's all very extensible.

"Offcore" events measure general DRAM access patters along various
parameters. They are particularly useful in NUMA systems.

We want to support them via generalized DRAM events: either as the
fourth level of cache (after the last-level cache), or as a separate
generalization category.

That way user-space support would be very obvious, memory access
profiling could be done via self-explanatory commands like:

  perf record -e dram ./myapp
  perf record -e dram-remote ./myapp

... to measure DRAM accesses or more expensive cross-node NUMA DRAM
accesses.

These generalized events would work on all CPUs and architectures that
have comparable PMU features.

( Note, these are just examples: actual implementation could have more
  sophistication and more parameter - as long as they center around
  similarly simple usecases. )

Now we do not want to revert *all* of the current offcore bits, as they
are still somewhat useful for generic last-level-cache events, implemented
in this commit:

  e994d7d2: perf: Fix LLC-* events on Intel Nehalem/Westmere

But we definitely do not yet want to expose the unstructured raw events
to user-space, until better generalization and usability is implemented
for these hardware event features.

( Note: after generalization has been implemented raw offcore events can be
  supported as well: there can always be an odd event that is marginally
  useful but not useful enough to generalize. DRAM profiling is definitely
  *not* such a category so generalization must be done first. )

Furthermore, PERF_TYPE_RAW access to these registers was not intended
to go upstream without proper support - it was a side-effect of the above
e994d7d2 commit, not mentioned in the changelog.

As v2.6.39 is nearing release we go for the simplest approach: disable
the PERF_TYPE_RAW offcore hack for now, before it escapes into a released
kernel and becomes an ABI.

Once proper structure is implemented for these hardware events and users
are offered usable solutions we can revisit this issue.
Reported-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1302658203-4239-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      b52c55c6
    • A
      perf: Support Xeon E7's via the Westmere PMU driver · b2508e82
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      There's a new model number public, 47, for Xeon E7 (aka Westmere EX).
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1303429715-10202-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      b2508e82
  7. 19 4月, 2011 2 次提交
  9. 16 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  11. 01 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 30 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • S
      x86, mtrr, pat: Fix one cpu getting out of sync during resume · 84ac7cdb
      由 Suresh Siddha 提交于 
      On laptops with core i5/i7, there were reports that after resume
graphics workloads were performing poorly on a specific AP, while
the other cpu's were ok. This was observed on a 32bit kernel
specifically.

Debug showed that the PAT init was not happening on that AP
during resume and hence it contributing to the poor workload
performance on that cpu.

On this system, resume flow looked like this:

1. BP starts the resume sequence and we reinit BP's MTRR's/PAT
   early on using mtrr_bp_restore()

2. Resume sequence brings all AP's online

3. Resume sequence now kicks off the MTRR reinit on all the AP's.

4. For some reason, between point 2 and 3, we moved from BP
   to one of the AP's. My guess is that printk() during resume
   sequence is contributing to this. We don't see similar
   behavior with the 64bit kernel but there is no guarantee that
   at this point the remaining resume sequence (after AP's bringup)
   has to happen on BP.

5. set_mtrr() was assuming that we are still on BP and skipped the
   MTRR/PAT init on that cpu (because of 1 above)

6. But we were on an AP and this led to not reprogramming PAT
   on this cpu leading to bad performance.

Fix this by doing unconditional mtrr_if->set_all() in set_mtrr()
during MTRR/PAT init. This might be unnecessary if we are still
running on BP. But it is of no harm and will guarantee that after
resume, all the cpu's will be in sync with respect to the
MTRR/PAT registers.
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <1301438292-28370-1-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: NEric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Tested-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org	[v2.6.32+]
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      84ac7cdb
  15. 25 3月, 2011 2 次提交
    • I
      perf, x86: Complain louder about BIOSen corrupting CPU/PMU state and continue · 45daae57
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      Eric Dumazet reported that hardware PMU events do not work on his
system, due to the BIOS corrupting PMU state:

    Performance Events: PEBS fmt0+, Core2 events, Broken BIOS detected, using software events only.
    [Firmware Bug]: the BIOS has corrupted hw-PMU resources (MSR 186 is 43003c)

Linus suggested that we continue in the face of such BIOS-induced CPU
state corruption:

   http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/24/608

Such BIOSes will have to be fixed - Linux developers rely on a working and
fully capable PMU and the BIOS interfering with the CPU's PMU state is simply
not acceptable.

So this patch changes perf to continue when it detects such BIOS
interaction, some hardware events may be unreliable due to the BIOS
writing and re-writing them - there's not much the kernel can do
about that but to detect the corruption and report it.
Reported-and-tested-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      45daae57
    • D
      perf, x86: P4 PMU - Read proper MSR register to catch unflagged overflows · 242214f9
      由 Don Zickus 提交于 
      The read of a proper MSR register was missed and instead of
counter the configration register was tested (it has
ARCH_P4_UNFLAGGED_BIT always cleared) leading to unknown NMI
hitting the system. As result the user may obtain "Dazed and
confused, but trying to continue" message. Fix it by reading a
proper MSR register.

When an NMI happens on a P4, the perf nmi handler checks the
configuration register to see if the overflow bit is set or not
before taking appropriate action.  Unfortunately, various P4
machines had a broken overflow bit, so a backup mechanism was
implemented.  This mechanism checked to see if the counter
rolled over or not.

A previous commit that implemented this backup mechanism was
broken. Instead of reading the counter register, it used the
configuration register to determine if the counter rolled over
or not. Reading that bit would give incorrect results.

This would lead to 'Dazed and confused' messages for the end
user when using the perf tool (or if the nmi watchdog is
running).

The fix is to read the counter register before determining if
the counter rolled over or not.
Signed-off-by: NDon Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NCyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <4D8BAB49.3080701@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      242214f9
  17. 24 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • R
      x86: Use syscore_ops instead of sysdev classes and sysdevs · f3c6ea1b
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Some subsystems in the x86 tree need to carry out suspend/resume and
shutdown operations with one CPU on-line and interrupts disabled and
they define sysdev classes and sysdevs or sysdev drivers for this
purpose.  This leads to unnecessarily complicated code and excessive
memory usage, so switch them to using struct syscore_ops objects for
this purpose instead.

Generally, there are three categories of subsystems that use
sysdevs for implementing PM operations: (1) subsystems whose
suspend/resume callbacks ignore their arguments entirely (the
majority), (2) subsystems whose suspend/resume callbacks use their
struct sys_device argument, but don't really need to do that,
because they can be implemented differently in an arguably simpler
way (io_apic.c), and (3) subsystems whose suspend/resume callbacks
use their struct sys_device argument, but the value of that argument
is always the same and could be ignored (microcode_core.c).  In all
of these cases the subsystems in question may be readily converted to
using struct syscore_ops objects for power management and shutdown.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      f3c6ea1b
  19. 22 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • H
      ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache · 885b976f
      由 Huang Ying 提交于 
      APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users
in mind.  For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1,
2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow,

reader 1		reader 2
1
			2
3
			4
-1
			-1

where -1 signals there is no more record ID.

Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no
chance to check record 1 and 3.  And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will
return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any
record even they are not cleared by anyone.

This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple
users.

To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and
implemented.  When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to
caller.  So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID
available.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      885b976f
  21. 20 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • S
      perf, x86: Fix Intel fixed counters base initialization · fc66c521
      由 Stephane Eranian 提交于 
      The following patch solves the problems introduced by Robert's
commit 41bf4989 and reported by Arun Sharma. This commit gets rid
of the base + index notation for reading and writing PMU msrs.

The problem is that for fixed counters, the new calculation for
the base did not take into account the fixed counter indexes,
thus all fixed counters were read/written from fixed counter 0.
Although all fixed counters share the same config MSR, they each
have their own counter register.

Without:

 $ task -e unhalted_core_cycles -e instructions_retired -e baclears noploop 1 noploop for 1 seconds

  242202299 unhalted_core_cycles (0.00% scaling, ena=1000790892, run=1000790892)
 2389685946 instructions_retired (0.00% scaling, ena=1000790892, run=1000790892)
      49473 baclears             (0.00% scaling, ena=1000790892, run=1000790892)

With:

 $ task -e unhalted_core_cycles -e instructions_retired -e baclears noploop 1 noploop for 1 seconds

 2392703238 unhalted_core_cycles (0.00% scaling, ena=1000840809, run=1000840809)
 2389793744 instructions_retired (0.00% scaling, ena=1000840809, run=1000840809)
      47863 baclears             (0.00% scaling, ena=1000840809, run=1000840809)
Signed-off-by: NStephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: ming.m.lin@intel.com
Cc: robert.richter@amd.com
Cc: asharma@fb.com
Cc: perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net
LKML-Reference: <20110319172005.GB4978@quad>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      fc66c521
  23. 18 3月, 2011 2 次提交
    • N
      x86, dumpstack: Correct stack dump info when frame pointer is available · e8e999cf
      由 Namhyung Kim 提交于 
      Current stack dump code scans entire stack and check each entry
contains a pointer to kernel code. If CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y it
could mark whether the pointer is valid or not based on value of
the frame pointer. Invalid entries could be preceded by '?' sign.

However this was not going to happen because scan start point
was always higher than the frame pointer so that they could not
meet.

Commit 9c0729dc ("x86: Eliminate bp argument from the stack
tracing routines") delayed bp acquisition point, so the bp was
read in lower frame, thus all of the entries were marked
invalid.

This patch fixes this by reverting above commit while retaining
stack_frame() helper as suggested by Frederic Weisbecker.

End result looks like below:

before:

 [    3.508329] Call Trace:
 [    3.508551]  [<ffffffff814f35c9>] ? panic+0x91/0x199
 [    3.508662]  [<ffffffff814f3739>] ? printk+0x68/0x6a
 [    3.508770]  [<ffffffff81a981b2>] ? mount_block_root+0x257/0x26e
 [    3.508876]  [<ffffffff81a9821f>] ? mount_root+0x56/0x5a
 [    3.508975]  [<ffffffff81a98393>] ? prepare_namespace+0x170/0x1a9
 [    3.509216]  [<ffffffff81a9772b>] ? kernel_init+0x1d2/0x1e2
 [    3.509335]  [<ffffffff81003894>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
 [    3.509442]  [<ffffffff814f6880>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
 [    3.509542]  [<ffffffff81a97559>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1e2
 [    3.509641]  [<ffffffff81003890>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10

after:

 [    3.522991] Call Trace:
 [    3.523351]  [<ffffffff814f35b9>] panic+0x91/0x199
 [    3.523468]  [<ffffffff814f3729>] ? printk+0x68/0x6a
 [    3.523576]  [<ffffffff81a981b2>] mount_block_root+0x257/0x26e
 [    3.523681]  [<ffffffff81a9821f>] mount_root+0x56/0x5a
 [    3.523780]  [<ffffffff81a98393>] prepare_namespace+0x170/0x1a9
 [    3.523885]  [<ffffffff81a9772b>] kernel_init+0x1d2/0x1e2
 [    3.523987]  [<ffffffff81003894>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
 [    3.524228]  [<ffffffff814f6880>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
 [    3.524345]  [<ffffffff81a97559>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1e2
 [    3.524445]  [<ffffffff81003890>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10

 -v5:
   * fix build breakage with oprofile

 -v4:
   * use 0 instead of regs->bp
   * separate out printk changes

 -v3:
   * apply comment from Frederic
   * add a couple of printk fixes
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Soren Sandmann <ssp@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
LKML-Reference: <1300416006-3163-1-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      e8e999cf
    • L
      x86: Fix common misspellings · 0d2eb44f
      由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于 
      They were generated by 'codespell' and then manually reviewed.
Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
Cc: trivial@kernel.org
LKML-Reference: <1300389856-1099-3-git-send-email-lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      0d2eb44f
  25. 17 3月, 2011 2 次提交
  27. 16 3月, 2011 3 次提交
  29. 10 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  31. 05 3月, 2011 2 次提交
  33. 04 3月, 2011 3 次提交
    • A
      perf: Fix LLC-* events on Intel Nehalem/Westmere · e994d7d2
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      On Intel Nehalem and Westmere CPUs the generic perf LLC-* events count the
L2 caches, not the real L3 LLC - this was inconsistent with behavior on
other CPUs.

Fixing this requires the use of the special OFFCORE_RESPONSE
events which need a separate mask register.

This has been implemented by the previous patch, now use this infrastructure
to set correct events for the LLC-* on Nehalem and Westmere.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1299119690-13991-3-git-send-email-ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      e994d7d2
    • A
      perf: Add support for supplementary event registers · a7e3ed1e
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      Change logs against Andi's original version:

- Extends perf_event_attr:config to config{,1,2} (Peter Zijlstra)
- Fixed a major event scheduling issue. There cannot be a ref++ on an
  event that has already done ref++ once and without calling
  put_constraint() in between. (Stephane Eranian)
- Use thread_cpumask for percore allocation. (Lin Ming)
- Use MSR names in the extra reg lists. (Lin Ming)
- Remove redundant "c = NULL" in intel_percore_constraints
- Fix comment of perf_event_attr::config1

Intel Nehalem/Westmere have a special OFFCORE_RESPONSE event
that can be used to monitor any offcore accesses from a core.
This is a very useful event for various tunings, and it's
also needed to implement the generic LLC-* events correctly.

Unfortunately this event requires programming a mask in a separate
register. And worse this separate register is per core, not per
CPU thread.

This patch:

- Teaches perf_events that OFFCORE_RESPONSE needs extra parameters.
  The extra parameters are passed by user space in the
  perf_event_attr::config1 field.

- Adds support to the Intel perf_event core to schedule per
  core resources. This adds fairly generic infrastructure that
  can be also used for other per core resources.
  The basic code has is patterned after the similar AMD northbridge
  constraints code.

Thanks to Stephane Eranian who pointed out some problems
in the original version and suggested improvements.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1299119690-13991-2-git-send-email-ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      a7e3ed1e
    • S
      perf_events: Update PEBS event constraints · 17e31629
      由 Stephane Eranian 提交于 
      This patch updates PEBS event constraints for Intel Atom, Nehalem, Westmere.

This patch also reorganizes the PEBS format/constraint detection code. It is
now based on processor model and not PEBS format. Two processors may use the
same PEBS format without have the same list of PEBS events.

In this second version, we simplified the initialization of the PEBS
constraints by leveraging the existing switch() statement in perf_event_intel.c.
We also renamed the constraint tables to be more consistent with regular
constraints.

In this 3rd version, we drop BR_INST_RETIRED.MISPRED from Intel Atom as it does
not seem to work. Use MISPREDICTED_BRANCH_RETIRED instead. Also add FP_ASSIST.*
o both Intel Nehalem and Westmere. I misssed those in the earlier patches.
Events were tested using libpfm4 perf_examples.
Signed-off-by: NStephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <4d6e6b02.815bdf0a.637b.07a7@mx.google.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      17e31629
  35. 02 3月, 2011 4 次提交
  37. 16 2月, 2011 6 次提交