1. 09 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  2. 06 12月, 2016 6 次提交
  3. 30 11月, 2016 4 次提交
  4. 25 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 28 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 27 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 22 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  8. 25 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 26 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  10. 26 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  11. 13 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  12. 06 5月, 2016 5 次提交
  13. 03 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  14. 02 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 29 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  16. 28 4月, 2016 6 次提交
  17. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
      ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
      cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
      
      This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.
      
      We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
      PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
      PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
      especially on the border between fs and mm.
      
      Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
      breakage to be doable.
      
      Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
      not.
      
      The changes are pretty straight-forward:
      
       - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
      
       - page_cache_get() -> get_page();
      
       - page_cache_release() -> put_page();
      
      This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
      script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
      I've called spatch for them manually.
      
      The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
      PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
      
      There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
      fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
      will be addressed with the separate patch.
      
      virtual patch
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
      + PAGE_SHIFT
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
      + PAGE_SIZE
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_MASK
      + PAGE_MASK
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
      + PAGE_ALIGN(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_get(E)
      + get_page(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_release(E)
      + put_page(E)
      Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  18. 04 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 12 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  20. 02 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix extent_same allowing destination offset beyond i_size · f4dfe687
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      When using the same file as the source and destination for a dedup
      (extent_same ioctl) operation we were allowing it to dedup to a
      destination offset beyond the file's size, which doesn't make sense and
      it's not allowed for the case where the source and destination files are
      not the same file. This made de deduplication operation successful only
      when the source range corresponded to a hole, a prealloc extent or an
      extent with all bytes having a value of 0x00. This was also leaving a
      file hole (between i_size and destination offset) without the
      corresponding file extent items, which can be reproduced with the
      following steps for example:
      
        $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi
        $ mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi
      
        $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 304457 404990" /mnt/sdi/foobar
        wrote 404990/404990 bytes at offset 304457
        395 KiB, 99 ops; 0.0000 sec (31.150 MiB/sec and 7984.5149 ops/sec)
      
        $ /git/hub/duperemove/btrfs-extent-same 24576 /mnt/sdi/foobar 28672 /mnt/sdi/foobar 929792
        Deduping 2 total files
        (28672, 24576): /mnt/sdi/foobar
        (929792, 24576): /mnt/sdi/foobar
        1 files asked to be deduped
        i: 0, status: 0, bytes_deduped: 24576
        24576 total bytes deduped in this operation
      
        $ umount /mnt/sdi
        $ btrfsck /dev/sdi
        Checking filesystem on /dev/sdi
        UUID: 98c528aa-0833-427d-9403-b98032ffbf9d
        checking extents
        checking free space cache
        checking fs roots
        root 5 inode 257 errors 100, file extent discount
        Found file extent holes:
                start: 712704, len: 217088
        found 540673 bytes used err is 1
        total csum bytes: 400
        total tree bytes: 131072
        total fs tree bytes: 32768
        total extent tree bytes: 16384
        btree space waste bytes: 123675
        file data blocks allocated: 671744
          referenced 671744
        btrfs-progs v4.2.3
      
      So fix this by not allowing the destination to go beyond the file's size,
      just as we do for the same where the source and destination files are not
      the same.
      
      A test for xfstests follows.
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      f4dfe687