- 02 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Snitzer 提交于
Avoid dereferencing a NULL pointer if the number of feature arguments supplied is fewer than indicated. Signed-off-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Mikulas Patocka 提交于
This patch makes dm-snapshot flush disk cache when writing metadata for merging snapshot. Without cache flushing the disk may reorder metadata write and other data writes and there is a possibility of data corruption in case of power fault. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
-
- 28 7月, 2011 38 次提交
-
-
git://neil.brown.name/md由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
* 'for-linus' of git://neil.brown.name/md: (75 commits) md/raid10: handle further errors during fix_read_error better. md/raid10: Handle read errors during recovery better. md/raid10: simplify read error handling during recovery. md/raid10: record bad blocks due to write errors during resync/recovery. md/raid10: attempt to fix read errors during resync/check md/raid10: Handle write errors by updating badblock log. md/raid10: clear bad-block record when write succeeds. md/raid10: avoid writing to known bad blocks on known bad drives. md/raid10 record bad blocks as needed during recovery. md/raid10: avoid reading known bad blocks during resync/recovery. md/raid10 - avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 3 md/raid10: avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 2 md/raid10: avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 1 md/raid10: Split handle_read_error out from raid10d. md/raid10: simplify/reindent some loops. md/raid5: Clear bad blocks on successful write. md/raid5. Don't write to known bad block on doubtful devices. md/raid5: write errors should be recorded as bad blocks if possible. md/raid5: use bad-block log to improve handling of uncorrectable read errors. md/raid5: avoid reading from known bad blocks. ...
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6: sound: oss: rename local change_bits to avoid powerpc bitsops.h definition ALSA: hda - Fix duplicated DAC assignments for Realtek ALSA: asihpi - off by one in asihpi_hpi_ioctl() ALSA: hda - Fix Oops with Realtek quirks with NULL adc_nids ALSA: asihpi - bug fix pa use before init. ALSA: hda - Add support for vref-out based mute LED control on IDT codecs
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6 * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6: (54 commits) tpm_nsc: Fix bug when loading multiple TPM drivers tpm: Move tpm_tis_reenable_interrupts out of CONFIG_PNP block tpm: Fix compilation warning when CONFIG_PNP is not defined TOMOYO: Update kernel-doc. tpm: Fix a typo tpm_tis: Probing function for Intel iTPM bug tpm_tis: Fix the probing for interrupts tpm_tis: Delay ACPI S3 suspend while the TPM is busy tpm_tis: Re-enable interrupts upon (S3) resume tpm: Fix display of data in pubek sysfs entry tpm_tis: Add timeouts sysfs entry tpm: Adjust interface timeouts if they are too small tpm: Use interface timeouts returned from the TPM tpm_tis: Introduce durations sysfs entry tpm: Adjust the durations if they are too small tpm: Use durations returned from TPM TOMOYO: Enable conditional ACL. TOMOYO: Allow using argv[]/envp[] of execve() as conditions. TOMOYO: Allow using executable's realpath and symlink's target as conditions. TOMOYO: Allow using owner/group etc. of file objects as conditions. ... Fix up trivial conflict in security/tomoyo/realpath.c
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If we find more read/write errors we should record a bad block before failing the device. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Currently when we get a read error during recovery, we simply abort the recovery. Instead, repeat the read in page-sized blocks. On successful reads, write to the target. On read errors, record a bad block on the destination, and only if that fails do we abort the recovery. As we now retry reads we need to know where we read from. This was in bi_sector but that can be changed during a read attempt. So store the correct from_addr and to_addr in the r10_bio for later access. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown<neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If a read error is detected during recovery the code currently fails the read device. This isn't really necessary. recovery_request_write will signal a write error to end_sync_write and it will record a write error on the destination device which will record a bad block there or kick it from the array. So just remove this call to do md_error. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If we get a write error during resync/recovery don't fail the device but instead record a bad block. If that fails we can then fail the device. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
We already attempt to fix read errors found during normal IO and a 'repair' process. It is best to try to repair them at any time they are found, so move a test so that during sync and check a read error will be corrected by over-writing with good data. If both (all) devices have known bad blocks in the sync section we won't try to fix even though the bad blocks might not overlap. That should be considered later. Also if we hit a read error during recovery we don't try to fix it. It would only be possible to fix if there were at least three copies of data, which is not very common with RAID10. But it should still be considered later. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When we get a write error (in the data area, not in metadata), update the badblock log rather than failing the whole device. As the write may well be many blocks, we trying writing each block individually and only log the ones which fail. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If we succeed in writing to a block that was recorded as being bad, we clear the bad-block record. This requires some delayed handling as the bad-block-list update has to happen in process-context. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Writing to known bad blocks on drives that have seen a write error is asking for trouble. So try to avoid these blocks. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When recovering one or more devices, if all the good devices have bad blocks we should record a bad block on the device being rebuilt. If this fails, we need to abort the recovery. To ensure we don't think that we aborted later than we actually did, we need to move the check for MD_RECOVERY_INTR earlier in md_do_sync, in particular before mddev->curr_resync is updated. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
During resync/recovery limit the size of the request to avoid reading into a bad block that does not start at-or-before the current read address. Similarly if there is a bad block at this address, don't allow the current request to extend beyond the end of that bad block. Now that we don't ever read from known bad blocks, it is safe to allow devices with those blocks into the array. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When attempting to repair a read error, don't read from devices with a known bad block. As we are only reading PAGE_SIZE blocks, we don't try to narrow down to smaller regions in the hope that only part of this page is bad - it isn't worth the effort. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When redirecting a read error to a different device, we must again avoid bad blocks and possibly split the request. Spin_lock typo fixed thanks to Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
This patch just covers the basic read path: 1/ read_balance needs to check for badblocks, and return not only the chosen slot, but also how many good blocks are available there. 2/ read submission must be ready to issue multiple reads to different devices as different bad blocks on different devices could mean that a single large read cannot be served by any one device, but can still be served by the array. This requires keeping count of the number of outstanding requests per bio. This count is stored in 'bi_phys_segments' On read error we currently just fail the request if another target cannot handle the whole request. Next patch refines that a bit. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
raid10d() is too big and is about to get bigger, so split handle_read_error() out as a separate function. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When a loop ends with a large if, it can be neater to change the if to invert the condition and just 'continue'. Then the body of the if can be indented to a lower level. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
On a successful write to a known bad block, flag the sh so that raid5d can remove the known bad block from the list. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If a device has seen write errors, don't write to any known bad blocks on that device. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When a write error is detected, don't mark the device as failed immediately but rather record the fact for handle_stripe to deal with. Handle_stripe then attempts to record a bad block. Only if that fails does the device get marked as faulty. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If we get an uncorrectable read error - record a bad block rather than failing the device. And if these errors (which may be due to known bad blocks) cause recovery to be impossible, record a bad block on the recovering devices, or abort the recovery. As we might abort a recovery without failing a device we need to teach RAID5 about recovery_disabled handling. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
There are two times that we might read in raid5: 1/ when a read request fits within a chunk on a single working device. In this case, if there is any bad block in the range of the read, we simply fail the cache-bypass read and perform the read though the stripe cache. 2/ when reading into the stripe cache. In this case we mark as failed any device which has a bad block in that strip (1 page wide). Note that we will both avoid reading and avoid writing. This is correct (as we will never read from the block, there is no point writing), but not optimal (as writing could 'fix' the error) - that will be addressed later. If we have not seen any write errors on the device yet, we treat a bad block like a recent read error. This will encourage an attempt to fix the read error which will either generate a write error, or will ensure good data is stored there. We don't yet forget the bad block in that case. That comes later. Now that we honour bad blocks when reading we can allow devices with bad blocks into the array. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
raid1d is too big with several deep branches. So separate them out into their own functions. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If we cannot read a block from anywhere during recovery, there is now a better approach than just giving up. We can record a bad block on each device and keep going - being careful not to clear the bad block when a write succeeds as it might - it will be a write of incorrect data. We have now reached the state where - for raid1 - we only call md_error if md_set_badblocks has failed. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If we find a bad block while writing as part of resync/recovery we need to report that back to raid1d which must record the bad block, or fail the device. Similarly when fixing a read error, a further error should just record a bad block if possible rather than failing the device. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When we get a write error (in the data area, not in metadata), update the badblock log rather than failing the whole device. As the write may well be many blocks, we trying writing each block individually and only log the ones which fail. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When performing write-behind we allocate pages to store the data during write. Previously we just keep a list of pages. Now we keep a list of bi_vec which includes offset and size. This means that the r1bio has complete information to create a new bio which will be needed for retrying after write errors. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If we succeed in writing to a block that was recorded as being bad, we clear the bad-block record. This requires some delayed handling as the bad-block-list update has to happen in process-context. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If we have seen any write error on a drive, then don't write to any known-bad blocks on that drive. If necessary, we divide the write request up into pieces just like we do for reads, so each piece is either all written or all not written to any given drive. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
Previous patches in the bad block series extended behavior of rdev's 'state' interface but lacked documentation update. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
It is only safe to choose not to write to a bad block if that bad block is safely recorded in metadata - i.e. if it has been 'acknowledged'. If it hasn't we need to wait for the acknowledgement. We support that using rdev->blocked wait and md_wait_for_blocked_rdev by introducing a new device flag 'BlockedBadBlock'. This flag is only advisory. It is cleared whenever we acknowledge a bad block, so that a waiter can re-check the particular bad blocks that it is interested it. It should be set by a caller when they find they need to wait. This (set after test) is inherently racy, but as md_wait_for_blocked_rdev already has a timeout, losing the race will have minimal impact. When we clear "Blocked" was also clear "BlockedBadBlocks" incase it was set incorrectly (see above race). We also modify the way we manage 'Blocked' to fit better with the new handling of 'BlockedBadBlocks' and to make it consistent between externally managed and internally managed metadata. This requires that each raidXd loop checks if the metadata needs to be written and triggers a write (md_check_recovery) if needed. Otherwise a queued write request might cause raidXd to wait for the metadata to write, and only that thread can write it. Before writing metadata, we set FaultRecorded for all devices that are Faulty, then after writing the metadata we clear Blocked for any device for which the Fault was certainly Recorded. The 'faulty' device flag now appears in sysfs if the device is faulty *or* it has unacknowledged bad blocks. So user-space which does not understand bad blocks can continue to function correctly. User space which does, should not assume a device is faulty until it sees the 'faulty' flag, and then sees the list of unacknowledged bad blocks is empty. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If a device has ever seen a write error, we will want to handle known-bad-blocks differently. So create an appropriate state flag and export it via sysfs. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When performing resync/etc, keep the size of the request small enough that it doesn't overlap any known bad blocks. Devices with badblocks at the start of the request are completely excluded. If there is nowhere to read from due to bad blocks, record a bad block on each target device. Now that we never read from known-bad-blocks we can allow devices with known-bad-blocks into a RAID1. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Now that we have a bad block list, we should not read from those blocks. There are several main parts to this: 1/ read_balance needs to check for bad blocks, and return not only the chosen device, but also how many good blocks are available there. 2/ fix_read_error needs to avoid trying to read from bad blocks. 3/ read submission must be ready to issue multiple reads to different devices as different bad blocks on different devices could mean that a single large read cannot be served by any one device, but can still be served by the array. This requires keeping count of the number of outstanding requests per bio. This count is stored in 'bi_phys_segments' 4/ retrying a read needs to also be ready to submit a smaller read and queue another request for the rest. This does not yet handle bad blocks when reading to perform resync, recovery, or check. 'md_trim_bio' will also be used for RAID10, so put it in md.c and export it. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
v0.90 metadata cannot record bad blocks, so when loading metadata for such a device, set shift to -1. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Space must have been allocated when array was created. A feature flag is set when the badblock list is non-empty, to ensure old kernels don't load and trust the whole device. We only update the on-disk badblocklist when it has changed. If the badblocklist (or other metadata) is stored on a bad block, we don't cope very well. If metadata has no room for bad block, flag bad-blocks as disabled, and do the same for 0.90 metadata. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
As no personality understand bad block lists yet, we must reject any device that is known to contain bad blocks. As the personalities get taught, these tests can be removed. This only applies to raid1/raid5/raid10. For linear/raid0/multipath/faulty the whole concept of bad blocks doesn't mean anything so there is no point adding the checks. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-