1. 25 9月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      MODSIGN: Change from CMS to PKCS#7 signing if the openssl is too old · 283e8ba2
      David Howells 提交于
      The sign-file.c program actually uses CMS rather than PKCS#7 to sign a file
      since that allows the target X.509 certificate to be specified by
      subjectKeyId rather than by issuer + serialNumber.
      
      However, older versions of the OpenSSL crypto library (such as may be found
      in CentOS 5.11) don't support CMS.  Assume everything prior to
      OpenSSL-1.0.0 doesn't support CMS and switch to using PKCS#7 in that case.
      
      Further, the pre-1.0.0 OpenSSL only supports PKCS#7 signing with SHA1, so
      give an error from the sign-file script if the caller requests anything
      other than SHA1.
      
      The compiler gives the following error with an OpenSSL crypto library
      that's too old:
      
        HOSTCC  scripts/sign-file
      scripts/sign-file.c:23:25: fatal error: openssl/cms.h: No such file or directory
       #include <openssl/cms.h>
      Reported-by: NVinson Lee <vlee@twopensource.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
      283e8ba2
  2. 28 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  3. 30 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 10 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 09 9月, 2014 2 次提交
  6. 13 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 19 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 28 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 12 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 23 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  11. 12 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  12. 26 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 14 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 19 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 15 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  16. 29 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 30 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  18. 03 8月, 2007 1 次提交
  19. 30 11月, 2006 1 次提交
  20. 25 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  21. 27 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  22. 21 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  23. 09 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  24. 07 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  25. 29 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  26. 28 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  27. 28 7月, 2005 1 次提交
  28. 30 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  29. 28 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  30. 24 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  31. 01 5月, 2005 1 次提交
  32. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4