- 01 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Catalin Marinas 提交于
The handling of PCI domains (or PCI segments in ACPI speak) is usually a straightforward affair but its implementation is currently left to the architectural code, with pci_domain_nr(b) querying the value of the domain associated with bus b. This patch introduces CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC as an option that can be selected if an architecture wants a simple implementation where the value of the domain associated with a bus is stored in struct pci_bus. The architectures that select CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC will then have to implement pci_bus_assign_domain_nr() as a way of setting the domain number associated with a root bus. All child buses except the root bus will inherit the domain_nr value from their parent. Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com> [Renamed pci_set_domain_nr() to pci_bus_assign_domain_nr()] Signed-off-by: NLiviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-
- 20 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
This reverts commit 1820ffdc ("PCI: Make sure bus number resources stay within their parents bounds") because it breaks some systems with LSI Logic FC949ES Fibre Channel Adapters, apparently by exposing a defect in those adapters. Dirk tested a Tyan VX50 (B4985) with this device that worked like this prior to 1820ffdc: bus: [bus 00-7f] on node 0 link 1 ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain 0000 [bus 00-07]) pci 0000:00:0e.0: PCI bridge to [bus 0a] pci_bus 0000:0a: busn_res: can not insert [bus 0a] under [bus 00-07] (conflicts with (null) [bus 00-07]) pci 0000:0a:00.0: [1000:0646] type 00 class 0x0c0400 (FC adapter) Note that the root bridge [bus 00-07] aperture is wrong; this is a BIOS defect in the PCI0 _CRS method. But prior to 1820ffdc, we didn't enforce that aperture, and the FC adapter worked fine at 0a:00.0. After 1820ffdc, we notice that 00:0e.0's aperture is not contained in the root bridge's aperture, so we reconfigure it so it *is* contained: pci 0000:00:0e.0: bridge configuration invalid ([bus 0a-0a]), reconfiguring pci 0000:00:0e.0: PCI bridge to [bus 06-07] This effectively moves the FC device from 0a:00.0 to 07:00.0, which should be legal. But when we enumerate bus 06, the FC device doesn't respond, so we don't find anything. This is probably a defect in the FC device. Possible fixes (due to Yinghai): 1) Add a quirk to fix the _CRS information based on what amd_bus.c read from the hardware 2) Reset the FC device after we change its bus number 3) Revert 1820ffdc Fix 1 would be relatively easy, but it does sweep the LSI FC issue under the rug. We might want to reconfigure bus numbers in the future for some other reason, e.g., hotplug, and then we could trip over this again. For that reason, I like fix 2, but we don't know whether it actually works, and we don't have a patch for it yet. This revert is fix 3, which also sweeps the LSI FC issue under the rug. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84281Reported-by: NDirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net> Tested-by: NDirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.15+ CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
This reverts commit fc1b2531 ("PCI: Don't scan random busses in pci_scan_bridge()") because it breaks CardBus on some machines. David tested a Dell Latitude D505 that worked like this prior to fc1b2531: pci 0000:00:1e.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01] pci 0000:01:01.0: CardBus bridge to [bus 02-05] Note that the 01:01.0 CardBus bridge has a bus number aperture of [bus 02-05], but those buses are all outside the 00:1e.0 PCI bridge bus number aperture, so accesses to buses 02-05 never reach CardBus. This is later patched up by yenta_fixup_parent_bridge(), which changes the subordinate bus number of the 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: pci_bus 0000:01: Raising subordinate bus# of parent bus (#1) from #1 to #5 With fc1b2531, pci_scan_bridge() fails immediately when it notices that we can't allocate a valid secondary bus number for the CardBus bridge, and CardBus doesn't work at all: pci 0000:01:01.0: can't allocate child bus 01 from [bus 01] I'd prefer to fix this by integrating the yenta_fixup_parent_bridge() logic into pci_scan_bridge() so we fix the bus number apertures up front. But I don't think we can do that before v3.17, so I'm going to revert this to avoid the problem while we're working on the long-term fix. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83441 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1409303414-5196-1-git-send-email-david.henningsson@canonical.comReported-by: NDavid Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com> Tested-by: NDavid Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.15+
-
- 13 9月, 2014 8 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
There's not really a good way to determine whether firmware has already configured a device with _HPP/_HPX settings. On legacy systems, the BIOS has probably configured everything, but on UEFI systems it is not required to do so. Per the PCI Firmware Specification, rev 3.1, sec 3.5, if PCI_COMMAND_IO or PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY is set, we can assume firmware has set the corresponding BARs and maybe we can assume it has configured the rest of the device. And if a bridge has PCI_COMMAND_PARITY or PCI_COMMAND_SERR set, we can assume firmware has configured the bridge. But we can't tell much about devices without BARs. I think it should be safe to apply _HPP and _HPX settings anyway, even if firmware has already configured the device, so configure everything we find. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Linux manages MPS and MRRS settings to keep them consistent across the PCIe fabric. BIOS doesn't participate in this Linux management, so ignore that part of any _HPX settings it supplies. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
We currently apply _HPP settings only to: - non-bridge devices, and - PCI-to-PCI bridges i.e., we do not apply them to PCI-to-ISA bridges and the like. It has been that way since _HPP support was added by 40abb96c ("pciehp: Fix programming hotplug parameters"), but I don't think there's any reason to exclude these other bridges. Apply _HPP settings to hot-added PCI devices of any type. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Do not clear PCI_COMMAND_SERR or PCI_COMMAND_PARITY based on _HPP. The spec (ACPI rev 5.0, sec 6.2.7) says that when "Enable SERR" is set to 1, we should enable SERR in the command register. It says nothing about *disabling* SERR or PERR; in fact, the example in 6.2.7.1 says we should leave PERR alone unless "Enable PERR" is 1. For hot-added devices, this probably doesn't matter because they power up with these bits cleared. But in addition to hot-plugged devices, the spec allows the platform to use _HPP for "configuration of PCI devices not configured by the BIOS at system boot," and it may make a difference for devices present at boot. This change means that if BIOS enables SERR or PERR on a device, and it supplies _HPP or _HPX with the SERR or PERR bits *cleared*, we will now leave SERR or PERR reporting enabled on that device instead of disabling it as we previously did. See also 40abb96c ("pciehp: Fix programming hotplug parameters"), where this code was first added. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
The ACPI _HPP method was defined before PCIe existed, so its documentation only mentions PCI. The _HPX Type 0 setting record is essentially identical to _HPP, but the spec (ACPI rev 5.0, sec 6.2.8.1) says it should be applied to PCI, PCI-X, and PCIe devices, with settings being ignored if they are not applicable. Some platforms with both conventional PCI and PCIe devices provide only _HPP (not _HPX), so treat _HPP the same way as an _HPX Type 0 record and apply it to PCIe devices as well as PCI and PCI-X. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
All pci_configure_slot() uses have been removed, so remove the definition as well. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Some platforms can tell the OS how to configure PCI devices, e.g., how to set cache line size, error reporting enables, etc. ACPI defines _HPP and _HPX methods for this purpose. This configuration was previously done by some of the hotplug drivers using pci_configure_slot(). But not all hotplug drivers did this, and per the spec (ACPI rev 5.0, sec 6.2.7), we can also do it for "devices not configured by the BIOS at system boot." Move this configuration into the PCI core by adding pci_configure_device() and calling it from pci_device_add(), so we do this for all devices as we enumerate them. This is based on pci_configure_slot(), which is used by hotplug drivers. I omitted: - pcie_bus_configure_settings() because it configures MPS and MRRS, which requires global knowledge of the fabric and must be done later, and - configuration of subordinate devices; that will happen when we call pci_device_add() for those devices. Because pci_configure_slot() was only done by hotplug drivers, this initial version of pci_configure_device() only configures hot-added devices, ignoring anything added during boot. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Move pci_configure_slot() and related functions from drivers/pci/hotplug/pcihp_slot to drivers/pci/probe.c. This is to prepare for doing device configuration during the normal enumeration process instead of just after hot-add. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 09 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rajat Jain 提交于
Per PCIe r3.0, sec 2.3.2, an endpoint may respond to a Configuration Request with a Completion with Configuration Request Retry Status (CRS). This terminates the Configuration Request. When the CRS Software Visibility feature is disabled (as it is by default), a Root Complex must handle a CRS Completion by re-issuing the Configuration Request. This is invisible to software. From the CPU's point of view, an endpoint that always responds with CRS causes a hang because the Root Complex never supplies data to complete the CPU read. When CRS Software Visibility is enabled, a Root Complex that receives a CRS Completion for a read of the Vendor ID must return data of 0x0001. The Vendor ID of 0x0001 indicates to software that the endpoint is not ready. We now have more devices that require CRS Software Visibility. For example, a PLX 8713 NT bridge may respond with CRS until it has been configured via I2C, and the I2C configuration is completely independent of PCI enumeration. Enable CRS Software Visibility if it is supported. This allows a system with such a device to work (though the PCI core times out waiting for it to become ready, and we have to rescan the bus after it is ready). This essentially reverts ad7edfe0 ("[PCI] Do not enable CRS Software Visibility by default"). The failures that led to ad7edfe0 should be addressed by 89665a6a ("PCI: Check only the Vendor ID to identify Configuration Request Retry"). [bhelgaas: changelog] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20071029061532.5d10dfc6@snowcone Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712271023090.21557@woody.linux-foundation.orgSigned-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net> Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Rajat Jain 提交于
Per PCIe r3.0, sec 2.3.2, if a Root Complex - has Configuration Request Retry Status Software Visibility enabled, - issues a Configuration Read of both bytes of the Vendor ID, and - receives a Completion with Configuration Request Retry Status (CRS), it must complete the request to the host by fabricating data of 0x0001 for the Vendor ID and 0xff for any additional bytes in the request. Linux issues a single config read for the four bytes containing the Vendor ID and the Device ID. Previously we checked all four bytes for 0xffff0001 to identify CRS. However, it is only the Vendor ID that really indicates CRS, because it's sufficient to read only those two bytes. Checking the Device ID verifies spec compliance but doesn't add any information. Some Root Complexes appear to indicate CRS by returning 0x0001 for the Vendor ID along with the actual the Device ID. Previously we interpreted that as a valid Vendor/Device ID pair, although 0x0001 is reserved and cannot be a valid Vendor ID. [bhelgaas: changelog] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4729FC36.3040000@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net> Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ryan Desfosses 提交于
Merge quoted strings that are broken across lines into a single entity. The compiler merges them anyway, but checkpatch complains about it, and merging them makes it easier to grep for strings. No functional change. [bhelgaas: changelog, do the same for everything under drivers/pci] Signed-off-by: NRyan Desfosses <ryan@desfo.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Ryan Desfosses 提交于
Fix various whitespace errors. No functional change. [bhelgaas: fix other similar problems] Signed-off-by: NRyan Desfosses <ryan@desfo.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Ryan Desfosses 提交于
Move EXPORT_SYMBOL so it immediately follows the function or variable. No functional change. [bhelgaas: squash similar changes, fix hotplug, probe, rom, search, too] Signed-off-by: NRyan Desfosses <ryan@desfo.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Williamson 提交于
The driver_override field allows us to specify the driver for a device rather than relying on the driver to provide a positive match of the device. This shortcuts the existing process of looking up the vendor and device ID, adding them to the driver new_id, binding the device, then removing the ID, but it also provides a couple advantages. First, the above existing process allows the driver to bind to any device matching the new_id for the window where it's enabled. This is often not desired, such as the case of trying to bind a single device to a meta driver like pci-stub or vfio-pci. Using driver_override we can do this deterministically using: echo pci-stub > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/driver_override echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/driver/unbind echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers_probe Previously we could not invoke drivers_probe after adding a device to new_id for a driver as we get non-deterministic behavior whether the driver we intend or the standard driver will claim the device. Now it becomes a deterministic process, only the driver matching driver_override will probe the device. To return the device to the standard driver, we simply clear the driver_override and reprobe the device: echo > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/driver_override echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/driver/unbind echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers_probe Another advantage to this approach is that we can specify a driver override to force a specific binding or prevent any binding. For instance when an IOMMU group is exposed to userspace through VFIO we require that all devices within that group are owned by VFIO. However, devices can be hot-added into an IOMMU group, in which case we want to prevent the device from binding to any driver (override driver = "none") or perhaps have it automatically bind to vfio-pci. With driver_override it's a simple matter for this field to be set internally when the device is first discovered to prevent driver matches. Signed-off-by: NAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 28 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Williamson 提交于
When a PCI-to-PCIe bridge is stacked on a PCIe-to-PCI bridge, we can have PCIe endpoints masked by a conventional PCI bus. This makes the extended config space of the PCIe endpoint inaccessible. The PCIe-to-PCI bridge is supposed to handle any type 1 configuration transactions where the extended config offset bits are non-zero as an Unsupported Request rather than forward it to the secondary interface. As noted here, there are a couple known offenders to this rule. These bridges drop the extended offset bits, resulting in the conventional config space being aliased many times across the extended config space. For Intel NICs, this alias often seems to expose a bogus SR-IOV cap. Stacking bridges may seem like an uncommon scenario, but note that any conventional PCI slot in a modern PC is already the secondary interface of an onboard PCIe-to-PCI bridge. The user need only add a PCI-to-PCIe adapter and PCIe device to encounter this problem. Signed-off-by: NAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Use pci_is_bridge() to simplify code. No functional change. Requires: 326c1cda PCI: Rename pci_is_bridge() to pci_has_subordinate() Requires: 1c86438c PCI: Add new pci_is_bridge() interface Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 24 5月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
For a subtractive decode bridge, we previously added and printed all resources of the primary bus, even if they were not valid. In the example below, the bridge 00:1c.3 has no windows enabled, so there are no valid resources on bus 02. But since 02:00.0 is subtractive decode bridge, we add and print all those invalid resources, which don't really make sense: pci 0000:00:1c.3: PCI bridge to [bus 02-03] pci 0000:02:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 03] (subtractive decode) pci 0000:02:00.0: bridge window [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x0] (subtractive decode) Add and print the subtractively-decoded resources only if they are valid. There's an example in the dmesg log attached to the bugzilla below (but this patch doesn't fix the bug reported there). Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73141Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
If the console is a PCI device, and we try to print to it while its decoding is disabled, the system will hang. This particular printk hasn't caused a problem yet, but it could, so this fixes it. See also 0ff9514b ("PCI: Don't print anything while decoding is disabled"). Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
If a BAR is above 4GB and our dma_addr_t is too small, don't clear the BAR to zero: that doesn't disable the BAR, and it makes it more likely that the BAR will conflict with things if we turn on the memory enable bit (as we will at "out:" if the device was already enabled at the handoff). We should also print the BAR info and its original size so we can follow the process when we try to assign space to it. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
If dma_addr_t is too small to represent the BAR value, pcibios_bus_to_resource() will fail, so just remember the BAR size directly in the resource. The resource is already marked UNSET, so we know the address isn't valid anyway. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
We can only handle BARs above 4GB if dma_addr_t (not resource_size_t) is 64 bits wide. If we have a 64-bit resource_size_t and a 32-bit dma_addr_t, we can't deal with BARs above 4GB. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
We can only handle BARs larger than 4GB if both dma_addr_t and resource_size_t are 64 bits wide. If dma_addr_t is 32 bits, we can't represent all the bus addresses, and if resource_size_t is 32 bits, we can't represent all the CPU addresses. Previously we cleared res->flags (at "fail:") for resources that were too large. That means we think the BAR doesn't exist at all, which in turn means that we could enable the device even though we can't keep track of where the BAR is and we can't make sure it doesn't overlap something else. This preserves the type flags (MEM/IO) so we can keep from enabling the device. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 30 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
If "pcie_bus_config == PCIE_BUS_PERFORMANCE", we don't initialize "smpss", so we pass a pointer to garbage into pcie_bus_configure_set(), where we compute "mps" based on the garbage. We then pass the garbage "mps" to pcie_write_mps(), which ignores it in the PCIE_BUS_PERFORMANCE case. Coverity isn't smart enough to deduce that we ignore the garbage (it's a lot to expect from a human, too), so initialize "smpss" to a safe value in all cases. Found by Coverity (CID 146454). Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Some PCI functions used to be marked __devinit. When CONFIG_HOTPLUG was not set, these functions were discarded after boot. A few callers of these __devinit functions were marked __ref to indicate that they could safely call the __devinit functions even though the callers were not __devinit. But CONFIG_HOTPLUG and __devinit are now gone, and the need for the __ref annotations is also gone, so remove them. Relevant historical commits: 54b956b9 Remove __dev* markings from init.h a8e4b9c1 PCI: add generic pci_hp_add_bridge() 0ab2b57f PCI: fix section mismatch warning in pci_scan_child_bus 451124a7 PCI: fix 4x section mismatch warnings Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 20 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Make a note in dmesg when we overwrite legacy IDE BAR info. We previously logged something like this: pci 0000:00:1f.1: reg 0x10: [io 0x0000-0x0007] and then silently overwrote the resource. There's an example in the bugzilla below. This doesn't fix the bugzilla; it just makes what's going on more obvious. No functional change; merely adds some dev_info() calls. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48451Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 28 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
If we don't support 64-bit addresses, i.e., CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is not set, we can't deal with BARs above 4GB. In this case we already pretend the BAR contained zero; this patch also sets IORESOURCE_UNSET so we can try to reallocate it later. I don't think this is exactly correct: what we care about here are *bus* addresses, not CPU addresses, so the tests of sizeof(resource_size_t) probably should be on sizeof(dma_addr_t) instead. But this is what's been in -next, so we'll fix that later. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 12 2月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Noever 提交于
When assigning a new bus number in pci_scan_bridge we check whether max+1 is free by calling pci_find_bus. If it does already exist then we assume that we are rescanning and that this is the right bus to scan. This is fragile. If max+1 lies outside of bus->busn_res.end then we will rescan some random bus from somewhere else in the hierachy. This patch checks for this case and prints a warning. [bhelgaas: add parent/child bus number info to dev_warn()] Signed-off-by: NAndreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Andreas Noever 提交于
pci_scan_child_bus can (potentially) return a bus number higher than the subordinate value of the child bus. Possible reasons are that bus numbers are reserved for SR-IOV or for CardBus (SR-IOV is done without checks and the CardBus checks are sketchy at best). We clamp the returned value to the actual subordinate value and print a warning if too many bus numbers are reserved. [bhelgaas: whitespace] Signed-off-by: NAndreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Andreas Noever 提交于
The function has no effect. If pcibios_assign_all_busses() is not set then the function does nothing. If it is set then in pci_scan_bridge we are always in the branch where we assign the bus numbers ourselves and the subordinate values of all parent busses will be set to 0xff since that is what they inherited from their parent bus and ultimately from the root bus. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Noever 提交于
Right now we use 0xff for busn_res.end when probing and later reduce it to the value that is actually used. This does not work if a parent bridge has already a lower subordinate value. For example during hotplug of a new bridge below an already-configured bridge the following message is printed from pci_bus_insert_busn_res(): pci_bus 0000:06: busn_res: can not insert [bus 06-ff] under [bus 05-9b] (conflicts with (null) [bus 05-9b]) This patch clamps the bus range to that of the parent and also ensures that we do not exceed the parents range when assigning the final subordinate value. We also check that busses configured by the firmware fit into their parents bounds. [bhelgaas: reword dev_warn() and fix printk format warning] Signed-off-by: NAndreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Andreas Noever 提交于
If a conflict happens during insert_resource_conflict() and all conflicts fit within the newly inserted resource then they will become children of the new resource. This is almost certainly not what we want for bus numbers. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Andreas Noever 提交于
Right now the CardBus code in pci_scan_bridge() is executed during both passes. Since we always allocate the bus number ourselves it makes sense to put it into the second pass. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Andreas Noever 提交于
Initially when we encountered a bus that was already present we skipped it. Since 74710ded 'PCI: always scan child buses' we continue scanning in order to allow user triggered rescans of already existing busses. The old comment suggested that the reason for continuing the scan is a bug in the i450NX chipset. This is not the case. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Andreas Noever 提交于
This patch fixes two small issues: - If pci_add_new_bus() fails, max must not be incremented. Otherwise an incorrect value is returned from pci_scan_bridge(). - If the bus is already present, max must be incremented. I think that this case should only be hit if we trigger a manual rescan of a CardBus bridge. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 02 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Revert commit ef83b078 "PCI: Remove from bus_list and release resources in pci_release_dev()" that made some nasty race conditions become possible. For example, if a Thunderbolt link is unplugged and then replugged immediately, the pci_release_dev() resulting from the hot-remove code path may be racing with the hot-add code path which after that commit causes various kinds of breakage to happen (up to and including a hard crash of the whole system). Moreover, the problem that commit ef83b078 attempted to address cannot happen any more after commit 8a4c5c32 "PCI: Check parent kobject in pci_destroy_dev()", because pci_destroy_dev() will now return immediately if it has already been executed for the given device. Note, however, that the invocation of msi_remove_pci_irq_vectors() removed by commit ef83b078 from pci_free_resources() along with the other changes made by it is not added back because of subsequent code changes depending on that modification. Fixes: ef83b078 (PCI: Remove from bus_list and release resources in pci_release_dev()) Reported-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 1月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are multiple PCI device addition and removal code paths that may be run concurrently with the generic PCI bus rescan and device removal that can be triggered via sysfs. If that happens, it may lead to multiple different, potentially dangerous race conditions. The most straightforward way to address those problems is to run the code in question under the same lock that is used by the generic rescan/remove code in pci-sysfs.c. To prepare for those changes, move the definition of the global PCI remove/rescan lock to probe.c and provide global wrappers, pci_lock_rescan_remove() and pci_unlock_rescan_remove(), allowing drivers to manipulate that lock. Also provide pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked() for the callers of pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device() who only need to hold the rescan/remove lock around it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Using 'make namespacecheck' identify code which should be declared static. Checked for users in other driver/archs as well. Compile tested only. This stops exporting the following interfaces to modules: pci_target_state() pci_load_saved_state() [bhelgaas: retained pci_find_next_ext_capability() and pci_cfg_space_size()] Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-