- 28 8月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
memblock_memory_size() will return memory size in memblock.memory.region. memblock_free_memory_size() will return free memory size in memblock.memory.region. So We can get exact reseved size in specified range. Set the size right after initmem_init(), because later bootmem API will get area above 16M. (except some fallback). Later after we remove the bootmem, We could call that just before paging_init(). Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
and some functions in e820.c that are not used anymore Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
1. replace find_e820_area with memblock_find_in_range 2. replace reserve_early with memblock_x86_reserve_range 3. replace free_early with memblock_x86_free_range. 4. NO_BOOTMEM will switch to use memblock too. 5. use _e820, _early wrap in the patch, in following patch, will replace them all 6. because memblock_x86_free_range support partial free, we can remove some special care 7. Need to make sure that memblock_find_in_range() is called after memblock_x86_fill() so adjust some calling later in setup.c::setup_arch() -- corruption_check and mptable_update -v2: Move reserve_brk() early Before fill_memblock_area, to avoid overlap between brk and memblock_find_in_range() that could happen We have more then 128 RAM entry in E820 tables, and memblock_x86_fill() could use memblock_find_in_range() to find a new place for memblock.memory.region array. and We don't need to use extend_brk() after fill_memblock_area() So move reserve_brk() early before fill_memblock_area(). -v3: Move find_smp_config early To make sure memblock_find_in_range not find wrong place, if BIOS doesn't put mptable in right place. -v4: Treat RESERVED_KERN as RAM in memblock.memory. and they are already in memblock.reserved already.. use __NOT_KEEP_MEMBLOCK to make sure memblock related code could be freed later. -v5: Generic version __memblock_find_in_range() is going from high to low, and for 32bit active_region for 32bit does include high pages need to replace the limit with memblock.default_alloc_limit, aka get_max_mapped() -v6: Use current_limit instead -v7: check with MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1L -v8: Set memblock_can_resize early to handle EFI with more RAM entries -v9: update after kmemleak changes in mainline Suggested-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Suggested-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Suggested-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Saving platform non-volatile state may be required for suspend to RAM as well as hibernation. Move it to more generic code. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Tested-by: NMaxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 01 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Rusty found on lguest with trim_bios_range, max_pfn is not right anymore, and looks e820_remove_range does not work right. [ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: [ 0.000000] LGUEST: 0000000000000000 - 0000000004000000 (usable) [ 0.000000] Notice: NX (Execute Disable) protection missing in CPU or disabled in BIOS! [ 0.000000] DMI not present or invalid. [ 0.000000] last_pfn = 0x3fa0 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000 [ 0.000000] init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-0000000003fa0000 root cause is: the e820_remove_range doesn't handle the all covered case. e820_remove_range(BIOS_START, BIOS_END - BIOS_START, ...) produces a bogus range as a result. Make it match e820_update_range() by handling that case too. Reported-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Tested-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> LKML-Reference: <4BB18E55.6090903@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 17 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
This makes the range reservation feature available to other architectures. -v2: add get_max_mapped, max_pfn_mapped only defined in x86... to fix PPC compiling -v3: according to hpa, add CONFIG_HAVE_EARLY_RES -v4: fix typo about EARLY_RES in config Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <4B7B5723.4070009@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 13 2月, 2010 5 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
... so we can move early_res up. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-27-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Makes early_res.c more clean, so later could move it to /kernel. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-23-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
... to make e820.c smaller. -v2: fix 32bit compiling with MAX_DMA32_PFN Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-21-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
So prepare to make one more clean of early_res.c. -v2: don't need to reserve first page in early_res because we already mark that in e820 as reserved already. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-20-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Finally we can use early_res to replace bootmem for x86_64 now. Still can use CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM to enable it or not. -v2: fix 32bit compiling about MAX_DMA32_PFN -v3: folded bug fix from LKML message below Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <4B747239.4070907@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Use early_res_count to track the num, and use find_e820 to get a new buffer, then copy from the old to the new one. Also, clear early_res to prevent later invalid usage. -v2 _check_and_double_early_res should take new start Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-14-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
To prepare allocate early res array from fine_e820_area. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-13-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
So we can check that early in the bootlog. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-11-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 02 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
In preparation for moving to the generic page_is_ram(), make explicit what we expect to be reserved and not reserved. Tested-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <20100122033004.335813103@intel.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 05 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
fix for error that is introduced by | x86: Use find_e820() instead of hard coded trampoline address it should end with PAGE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <1261525263-13763-2-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 17 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Due to recent changes wakeup and mptable, we run out of early reservations on 32-bit NUMA. Thus, adjust the available number. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <4B22D754.2020706@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 11 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Jens found the following crash/regression: [ 0.000000] found SMP MP-table at [ffff8800000fdd80] fdd80 [ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Overlapping early reservations 12-f011 MP-table mpc to 0-fff BIOS data page and [ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Overlapping early reservations 12-f011 MP-table mpc to 6000-7fff TRAMPOLINE and bisected it to b24c2a92 ("x86: Move find_smp_config() earlier and avoid bootmem usage"). It turns out the BIOS is using the first 64k for mptable, without reserving it. So try to find good range for the real-mode trampoline instead of hard coding it, in case some bios tries to use that range for sth. Reported-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Tested-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> LKML-Reference: <4B21630A.6000308@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 12 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
As reported in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 on some system when acpi are enabled, acpi clears some BAR for some devices without reason, and kernel will need to allocate devices for them. It then apparently hits some undocumented resource conflict, resulting in non-working devices. Try to increase alignment to get more safe range for unassigned devices. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Beulich 提交于
Since alloc_bootmem() will never return inaccessible (via virtual addressing) memory anyway, using the ..._low() variant only makes sense when the physical address range of the allocated memory must fulfill further constraints, espacially since on 64-bits (or more generally in all cases where the pools the two variants allocate from are than the full available range. Probably the use in alloc_tce_table() could also be eliminated (based on code inspection of pci-calgary_64.c), but that seems too risky given I know nothing about that hardware and have no way to test it. Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
memory_setup is overridden by x86_quirks and by paravirts with weak functions and quirks. Unify the whole mess and make it an unconditional x86_init_ops function which defaults to the standard function and can be overridden by the early platform code. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 26 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Cyrill Gorcunov 提交于
Better to be paranoid against unpredicted nr_map modifications. Signed-off-by: NCyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> LKML-Reference: <20090824175551.146070377@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 09 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Commit 5fd29d6c ("printk: clean up handling of log-levels and newlines") changed printk semantics. printk lines with multiple KERN_<level> prefixes are no longer emitted as before the patch. <level> is now included in the output on each additional use. Remove all uses of multiple KERN_<level>s in formats. Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 03 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
fix hang with HIGHMEM_64G and 32bit resource. According to hpa and Linus, use (resource_size_t)-1 to fend off big ranges. Analyzed by hpa Reported-and-tested-by: NMikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 5月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Now that the e820 code explicitly reserves 'potentially dangerous' free physical memory address space to protect ACPI stolen RAM, there's no need for the rounding quirk in the PCI allocator anymore. Also, this quirk was open-ended iteration that could end up reserving a lot of free space and potentially breaking drivers - such as the one reported by Yannick Roehlly <yannick.roehlly@free.fr> where there's a PCI device with a large memory resource. So remove it. [ Impact: make more of the PCI hole available for assigning pci devices ] Reported-by: NYannick Roehlly <yannick.roehlly@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <4A01A7C8.5090701@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
The point is to take all RAM resources we have, and _after_ we've added all the resources we've seen in the E820 tree, we then _also_ try to add fake reserved entries for any "round up to X" at the end of the RAM resources. [ Impact: improve PCI mem-resource allocation robustness, protect "stolen RAM" ] Reported-by: NYannick Roehlly <yannick.roehlly@free.fr> Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: yannick.roehlly@free.fr LKML-Reference: <4A01A784.2050407@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 08 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Beulich 提交于
If the first non-reserved (sub-)range doesn't fit the size requested, an endless loop will be entered. If a range returned from find_e820_area_size() turns out insufficient in size, the range must be skipped before calling the function again. [ Impact: fixes boot hang on some platforms ] Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jaswinder Singh Rajput 提交于
Impact: cleanup This fixed various signedness issues in setup.c and e820.c: arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness) arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53: expected int *pnr_map arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53: got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness) arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53: expected int *pnr_map arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53: got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness) arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54: expected int *pnr_map arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54: got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness) arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53: expected int *pnr_map arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53: got unsigned int [toplevel] *<noident> Signed-off-by: NJaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
-
- 15 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Impact: help debug e820 bugs Try to print out more info, to catch wrong call parameters. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <49BCB557.3030000@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 14 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Impact: enhance e820 code to handle more cases Try to handle new range which could be covered by one entry. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: jbeulich@novell.com LKML-Reference: <49B9F0C1.10402@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 13 3月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Impact: fix left range size on head | commit 5c0e6f03 | x86: fix code paths used by update_mptable | Impact: fix crashes under Xen due to unrobust e820 code fixes one e820 bug, but introduces another bug. Need to update size for left range at first in case it is header. also add __e820_add_region take more parameter. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: jbeulich@novell.com LKML-Reference: <49B9E286.502@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Jan Beulich 提交于
Impact: fix crashes under Xen due to unrobust e820 code find_e820_area_size() must return a properly distinguishable and out-of-bounds value when it fails, and -1UL does not meet that criteria on i386/PAE. Additionally, callers of the function must check against that value. early_reserve_e820() should be prepared for the region found to be outside of the addressable range on 32-bits. e820_update_range_map() should not blindly update e820, but should do all it work on the map it got a pointer passed for (which in 50% of the cases is &e820_saved). It must also not call e820_add_region(), as that again acts on e820 unconditionally. The issues were found when trying to make this option work in our Xen kernel (i.e. where some of the silent assumptions made in the code would not hold). Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> LKML-Reference: <49B9171B.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 25 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Impact: cleanup one 32-bit system reports: BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000001c000000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 00000000ffff0000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) DMI 2.0 present. last_pfn = 0x1c000 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000 kernel direct mapping tables up to 1c000000 @ 7000-c000 .. RAMDISK: 1bc69000 - 1bfef4fa .. 0MB HIGHMEM available. 448MB LOWMEM available. mapped low ram: 0 - 1c000000 low ram: 00000000 - 1c000000 bootmap 00002000 - 00005800 (9 early reservations) ==> bootmem [0000000000 - 001c000000] #0 [0000000000 - 0000001000] BIOS data page ==> [0000000000 - 0000001000] #1 [0000001000 - 0000002000] EX TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000001000 - 0000002000] #2 [0000006000 - 0000007000] TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000006000 - 0000007000] #3 [0000400000 - 00009ed14c] TEXT DATA BSS ==> [0000400000 - 00009ed14c] #4 [001bc69000 - 001bfef4fa] RAMDISK ==> [001bc69000 - 001bfef4fa] #5 [00009ee000 - 00009f2000] INIT_PG_TABLE ==> [00009ee000 - 00009f2000] #6 [000009f400 - 0000100000] BIOS reserved ==> [000009f400 - 0000100000] #7 [0000007000 - 0000007000] PGTABLE #8 [0000002000 - 0000006000] BOOTMAP ==> [0000002000 - 0000006000] Notice the strange blank PGTABLE entry. The reason is init_pg_table is big enough, and zero range is called with init_memory_mapping/reserve_early(). So try to check the range in reserve_early() v2: fix the reversed compare Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au Cc: ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 19 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce new initcall for marking the ACPI NVS memory at startup, so that it can be saved/restored during hibernation/resume. Based on a patch by Zhang Rui. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 08 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Impact: fix trampoline sizing bug, save space While debugging a suspend-to-RAM related issue it occured to me that if the trampoline code had grown past 4 KB, we would have been allocating too little memory for it, since the 4 KB size of the trampoline is hardcoded into arch/x86/kernel/e820.c . Change that by making the kernel compute the trampoline size and allocate as much memory as necessary. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 02 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This makes the late e820 resources use 'insert_resource_expand_to_fit()' instead of doing a 'reserve_region_with_split()', and also avoids marking them as IORESOURCE_BUSY. This results in us being perfectly happy to use pre-existing PCI resources even if they were marked as being in a reserved region, while still avoiding any _new_ allocations in the reserved regions. It also makes for a simpler and more accurate resource tree. Example resource allocation from Jonathan Corbet, who has firmware that has an e820 reserved entry that covered a big range (e0000000-fed003ff), and that had various PCI resources in it set up by firmware. With old kernels, the reserved range would force us to re-allocate all pre-existing PCI resources, and his reserved range would end up looking like this: e0000000-fed003ff : reserved fec00000-fec00fff : IOAPIC 0 fed00000-fed003ff : HPET 0 where only the pre-allocated special regions (IOAPIC and HPET) were kept around. With 2.6.28-rc2, which uses 'reserve_region_with_split()', Jonathan's resource tree looked like this: e0000000-fe7fffff : reserved fe800000-fe8fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01 fe800000-fe8fffff : reserved fe900000-fe9d9aff : reserved fe9d9b00-fe9d9bff : 0000:00:1f.3 fe9d9b00-fe9d9bff : reserved fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : 0000:00:1a.7 fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : reserved fe9da000-fe9dafff : 0000:00:03.3 fe9da000-fe9dafff : reserved fe9db000-fe9dbfff : 0000:00:19.0 fe9db000-fe9dbfff : reserved fe9dc000-fe9dffff : 0000:00:1b.0 fe9dc000-fe9dffff : reserved fe9e0000-fe9fffff : 0000:00:19.0 fe9e0000-fe9fffff : reserved fea00000-fea7ffff : 0000:00:02.0 fea00000-fea7ffff : reserved fea80000-feafffff : 0000:00:02.1 fea80000-feafffff : reserved feb00000-febfffff : 0000:00:02.0 feb00000-febfffff : reserved fec00000-fed003ff : reserved fec00000-fec00fff : IOAPIC 0 fed00000-fed003ff : HPET 0 and because the reserved entry had been split and moved into the individual resources, and because it used the IORESOURCE_BUSY flag, the drivers that actually wanted to _use_ those resources couldn't actually attach to them: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: BAR 0: can't reserve mem region [0xfe9e0000-0xfe9fffff] HDA Intel 0000:00:1b.0: BAR 0: can't reserve mem region [0xfe9dc000-0xfe9dffff] with this patch, the resource tree instead becomes e0000000-fed003ff : reserved fe800000-fe8fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01 fe9d9b00-fe9d9bff : 0000:00:1f.3 fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : 0000:00:1a.7 fe9d9c00-fe9d9fff : ehci_hcd fe9da000-fe9dafff : 0000:00:03.3 fe9db000-fe9dbfff : 0000:00:19.0 fe9db000-fe9dbfff : e1000e fe9dc000-fe9dffff : 0000:00:1b.0 fe9dc000-fe9dffff : ICH HD audio fe9e0000-fe9fffff : 0000:00:19.0 fe9e0000-fe9fffff : e1000e fea00000-fea7ffff : 0000:00:02.0 fea80000-feafffff : 0000:00:02.1 feb00000-febfffff : 0000:00:02.0 fec00000-fec00fff : IOAPIC 0 fed00000-fed003ff : HPET 0 ie the one reserved region now ends up surrounding all the PCI resources that were allocated inside of it by firmware, and because it is not marked BUSY, drivers have no problem attaching to the pre-allocated resources. Reported-and-tested-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeremy Fitzhardinge 提交于
There's no good reason why a resource_size_t shouldn't just be a physical address, so simply redefine it in terms of phys_addr_t. Signed-off-by: NJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 10 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Prarit Bhargava 提交于
When using kdump modifying the e820 map is yielding strange results. For example starting with BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000100 - 0000000000093400 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0000000000093400 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000003fee0000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 000000003fee0000 - 000000003fef3000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: 000000003fef3000 - 000000003ff80000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: 000000003ff80000 - 0000000040000000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000ff000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) and booting with args memmap=exactmap memmap=640K@0K memmap=5228K@16384K memmap=125188K@22252K memmap=76K#1047424K memmap=564K#1047500K resulted in: user-defined physical RAM map: user: 0000000000000000 - 0000000000093400 (usable) user: 0000000000093400 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) user: 0000000000100000 - 000000003fee0000 (usable) user: 000000003fee0000 - 000000003fef3000 (ACPI data) user: 000000003fef3000 - 000000003ff80000 (ACPI NVS) user: 000000003ff80000 - 0000000040000000 (reserved) user: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved) user: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved) user: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) user: 00000000ff000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) But should have resulted in: user-defined physical RAM map: user: 0000000000000000 - 00000000000a0000 (usable) user: 0000000001000000 - 000000000151b000 (usable) user: 00000000015bb000 - 0000000008ffc000 (usable) user: 000000003fee0000 - 000000003ff80000 (ACPI data) This is happening because of an improper usage of strcmp() in the e820 parsing code. The strcmp() always returns !0 and never resets the value for e820.nr_map and returns an incorrect user-defined map. This patch fixes the problem. Signed-off-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 05 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
try to insert_resource second time, by expanding the resource... for case: e820 reserved entry is partially overlapped with bar res... hope it will never happen Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 04 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
this one replaces: | commit a2bd7274 | Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> | Date: Mon Aug 25 00:56:08 2008 -0700 | | x86: fix HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25, check hpet against BAR, v3 v2: insert e820 reserve resources before pnp_system_init v3: fix merging problem in tip/x86/core v4: address Linus's review about comments and condition in _late() Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-