1. 21 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • L
      sanitize <linux/prefetch.h> usage · 268bb0ce
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Commit e66eed65 ("list: remove prefetching from regular list
      iterators") removed the include of prefetch.h from list.h, which
      uncovered several cases that had apparently relied on that rather
      obscure header file dependency.
      
      So this fixes things up a bit, using
      
         grep -L linux/prefetch.h $(git grep -l '[^a-z_]prefetchw*(' -- '*.[ch]')
         grep -L 'prefetchw*(' $(git grep -l 'linux/prefetch.h' -- '*.[ch]')
      
      to guide us in finding files that either need <linux/prefetch.h>
      inclusion, or have it despite not needing it.
      
      There are more of them around (mostly network drivers), but this gets
      many core ones.
      Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      268bb0ce
  2. 20 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 08 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 06 5月, 2011 18 次提交
  5. 18 12月, 2010 5 次提交
    • P
      rcu: reduce __call_rcu()-induced contention on rcu_node structures · b52573d2
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      When the current __call_rcu() function was written, the expedited
      APIs did not exist.  The __call_rcu() implementation therefore went
      to great lengths to detect the end of old grace periods and to start
      new ones, all in the name of reducing grace-period latency.  Now the
      expedited APIs do exist, and the usage of __call_rcu() has increased
      considerably.  This commit therefore causes __call_rcu() to avoid
      worrying about grace periods unless there are a large number of
      RCU callbacks stacked up on the current CPU.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      b52573d2
    • P
      rcu: limit rcu_node leaf-level fanout · 0209f649
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      Some recent benchmarks have indicated possible lock contention on the
      leaf-level rcu_node locks.  This commit therefore limits the number of
      CPUs per leaf-level rcu_node structure to 16, in other words, there
      can be at most 16 rcu_data structures fanning into a given rcu_node
      structure.  Prior to this, the limit was 32 on 32-bit systems and 64 on
      64-bit systems.
      
      Note that the fanout of non-leaf rcu_node structures is unchanged.  The
      organization of accesses to the rcu_node tree is such that references
      to non-leaf rcu_node structures are much less frequent than to the
      leaf structures.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      0209f649
    • P
      rcu: fine-tune grace-period begin/end checks · 121dfc4b
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      Use the CPU's bit in rnp->qsmask to determine whether or not the CPU
      should try to report a quiescent state.  Handle overflow in the check
      for rdp->gpnum having fallen behind.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      121dfc4b
    • F
      rcu: Keep gpnum and completed fields synchronized · 5ff8e6f0
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      When a CPU that was in an extended quiescent state wakes
      up and catches up with grace periods that remote CPUs
      completed on its behalf, we update the completed field
      but not the gpnum that keeps a stale value of a backward
      grace period ID.
      
      Later, note_new_gpnum() will interpret the shift between
      the local CPU and the node grace period ID as some new grace
      period to handle and will then start to hunt quiescent state.
      
      But if every grace periods have already been completed, this
      interpretation becomes broken. And we'll be stuck in clusters
      of spurious softirqs because rcu_report_qs_rdp() will make
      this broken state run into infinite loop.
      
      The solution, as suggested by Lai Jiangshan, is to ensure that
      the gpnum and completed fields are well synchronized when we catch
      up with completed grace periods on their behalf by other cpus.
      This way we won't start noting spurious new grace periods.
      Suggested-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      5ff8e6f0
    • F
      rcu: Stop chasing QS if another CPU did it for us · 20377f32
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      When a CPU is idle and others CPUs handled its extended
      quiescent state to complete grace periods on its behalf,
      it will catch up with completed grace periods numbers
      when it wakes up.
      
      But at this point there might be no more grace period to
      complete, but still the woken CPU always keeps its stale
      qs_pending value and will then continue to chase quiescent
      states even if its not needed anymore.
      
      This results in clusters of spurious softirqs until a new
      real grace period is started. Because if we continue to
      chase quiescent states but we have completed every grace
      periods, rcu_report_qs_rdp() is puzzled and makes that
      state run into infinite loops.
      
      As suggested by Lai Jiangshan, just reset qs_pending if
      someone completed every grace periods on our behalf.
      Suggested-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      20377f32
  6. 17 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 30 11月, 2010 2 次提交
  8. 08 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 24 9月, 2010 1 次提交
    • P
      rcu: Add tracing data to support queueing models · 269dcc1c
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      The current tracing data is not sufficient to deduce the average time
      that a callback spends waiting for a grace period to end.  Add three
      per-CPU counters recording the number of callbacks invoked (ci), the
      number of callbacks orphaned (co), and the number of callbacks adopted
      (ca).  Given the existing callback queue length (ql), the average wait
      time in absence of CPU hotplug operations is ql/ci.  The units of wait
      time will be in terms of the duration over which ci was measured.
      
      In the presence of CPU hotplug operations, there is room for argument,
      but ql/(ci-co+ca) won't steer you too far wrong.
      
      Also fixes a typo called out by Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com>.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      269dcc1c
  10. 21 8月, 2010 2 次提交
  11. 20 8月, 2010 4 次提交
  12. 15 6月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      tree/tiny rcu: Add debug RCU head objects · 551d55a9
      Mathieu Desnoyers 提交于
      Helps finding racy users of call_rcu(), which results in hangs because list
      entries are overwritten and/or skipped.
      
      Changelog since v4:
      - Bissectability is now OK
      - Now generate a WARN_ON_ONCE() for non-initialized rcu_head passed to
        call_rcu(). Statically initialized objects are detected with
        object_is_static().
      - Rename rcu_head_init_on_stack to init_rcu_head_on_stack.
      - Remove init_rcu_head() completely.
      
      Changelog since v3:
      - Include comments from Lai Jiangshan
      
      This new patch version is based on the debugobjects with the newly introduced
      "active state" tracker.
      
      Non-initialized entries are all considered as "statically initialized". An
      activation fixup (triggered by call_rcu()) takes care of performing the debug
      object initialization without issuing any warning. Since we cannot increase the
      size of struct rcu_head, I don't see much room to put an identifier for
      statically initialized rcu_head structures. So for now, we have to live without
      "activation without explicit init" detection. But the main purpose of this debug
      option is to detect double-activations (double call_rcu() use of a rcu_head
      before the callback is executed), which is correctly addressed here.
      
      This also detects potential internal RCU callback corruption, which would cause
      the callbacks to be executed twice.
      Signed-off-by: NMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
      CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org
      CC: mingo@elte.hu
      CC: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
      CC: dipankar@in.ibm.com
      CC: josh@joshtriplett.org
      CC: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
      CC: niv@us.ibm.com
      CC: tglx@linutronix.de
      CC: peterz@infradead.org
      CC: rostedt@goodmis.org
      CC: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
      CC: dhowells@redhat.com
      CC: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
      CC: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
      551d55a9
  13. 12 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  14. 11 5月, 2010 1 次提交
    • P
      rcu: reduce the number of spurious RCU_SOFTIRQ invocations · d21670ac
      Paul E. McKenney 提交于
      Lai Jiangshan noted that up to 10% of the RCU_SOFTIRQ are spurious, and
      traced this down to the fact that the current grace-period machinery
      will uselessly raise RCU_SOFTIRQ when a given CPU needs to go through
      a quiescent state, but has not yet done so.  In this situation, there
      might well be nothing that RCU_SOFTIRQ can do, and the overhead can be
      worth worrying about in the ksoftirqd case.  This patch therefore avoids
      raising RCU_SOFTIRQ in this situation.
      
      Changes since v1 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/30/122 from Lai Jiangshan):
      
      o	Omit the rcu_qs_pending() prechecks, as they aren't that
      	much less expensive than the quiescent-state checks.
      
      o	Merge with the set_need_resched() patch that reduces IPIs.
      
      o	Add the new n_rp_report_qs field to the rcu_pending tracing output.
      
      o	Update the tracing documentation accordingly.
      Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      d21670ac