- 10 4月, 2013 40 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
It's still an obsolete interface; don't introduce those in new drivers. However, it's saner than the ->proc_info() and commits after this one will convert the existing ->proc_info() users to it. The read side is ->show_info(seq_file *, struct Scsi_Host *); use seq_... for generating contents. The write side is ->write_info(struct Scsi_Host *, char *, int). Again, this is driven by procfs needs; we are going to kill ->write_proc() and ->read_proc() and this is the main obstacle to burying that piece of shit. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
It's a seriously rotten copy of parts of bp_mod.c; had been ifdefed out all along, lacks a bunch of declarations that would be needed if ifdef had been removed, all stuff in it is duplicated in bp_mod.c anyway... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Helper functions are often useful. So are local variables... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... especially in a racy way Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
->permission() of its own is a rudiment of sysctl imitation; normal procfs logics will do just fine here, no need to mess with ->proc_iops at all. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
this "hooks" scheme is pointless - just make file_operations non-static and consolidate initialiazation bits. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
racy and very overblown... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
All table entries either have non-NULL ->proc_file_fops or non-NULL child. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
proc_create() has shat upon fops argument when mode is S_IFDIR. Good thing, too, since fops passed to it is completely useless for any directory. Just use proc_mkdir(), damnit. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Sean MacLennan 提交于
The procfs debug code in rtl_debug.c is, ironically, very buggy: it lacks proper locking. Since the most useful part of the code (the stats) are available through more standard APIs, I think it is best to just delete the whole mess. Signed-off-by: NSean MacLennan <seanm@seanm.ca> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
proc_mkdir() is there for purpose... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Just have it pinned in dcache all along and let procfs ->kill_sb() drop it before kill_anon_super(). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
no need to search later - we know the card when we are creating procfs entries Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
filesystem module as whole is pinned down by its superblock, no need to have opened files on it to add anything to that. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
filesystem module as whole is pinned down by its superblock, no need to have opened files on it to add anything to that. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-