- 04 1月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
As DCCP needs to be called in the same spots. Now we have a member in inet_sock (is_icsk), set at sock creation time from struct inet_protosw->flags (if INET_PROTOSW_ICSK is set, like for TCP and DCCP) to see if a struct sock instance is a inet_connection_sock for places like the ones in ip_sockglue.c (v4 and v6) where we previously were looking if sk_type was SOCK_STREAM, that is insufficient because we now use the same code for DCCP, that has sk_type SOCK_DCCP. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Basically exports a similar set of functions as the one exported by the non-AF specific TCP code. In the process moved some non-AF specific code from dccp_v4_connect to dccp_connect_init and moved the checksum verification from dccp_invalid_packet to dccp_v4_rcv, so as to use it in dccp_v6_rcv too. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
And make the core DCCP code AF agnostic, just like TCP, now its time to work on net/dccp/ipv6.c, we are close to the end! Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 11月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
Here is a complimentary insurance policy for those feeling a bit insecure. You don't have to accept this. However, if you do, you can't blame me for it :) > 1) dccp_transmit_skb sets the owner for all packets except data packets. We can actually verify this by looking at pkt_type. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
While we're at it let's reorganise the set_owner_w calls a little so that: 1) dccp_transmit_skb sets the owner for all packets except data packets. 2) Add dccp_skb_entail to set owner for packets queued for retransmission. 3) Make dccp_transmit_skb static. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
-
- 28 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 21 10月, 2005 3 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
Turns out the problem has nothing to do with use-after-free or double-free. It's just that we're not clearing the CB area and DCCP unlike TCP uses a CB format that's incompatible with IP. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NIan McDonald <imcdnzl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
icmp_send doesn't use skb->sk at all so even if skb->sk has already been freed it can't cause crash there (it would've crashed somewhere else first, e.g., ip_queue_xmit). I found a double-free on an skb that could explain this though. dccp_sendmsg and dccp_write_xmit are a little confused as to what should free the packet when something goes wrong. Sometimes they both go for the ball and end up in each other's way. This patch makes dccp_write_xmit always free the packet no matter what. This makes sense since dccp_transmit_skb which in turn comes from the fact that ip_queue_xmit always frees the packet. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > One thing you can probably do for this bug is to mark data packets > explicitly somehow, perhaps in the SKB control block DCCP already > uses for other data. Put some boolean in there, set it true for > data packets. Then change the test in dccp_transmit_skb() as > appropriate to test the boolean flag instead of "skb_cloned(skb)". I agree. In fact we already have that flag, it's called skb->sk. So here is patch to test that instead of skb_cloned(). Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Acked-by: NIan McDonald <imcdnzl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
-
- 18 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Isolating it, that will be used when we introduce a CCID2 (TCP-Like) implementation. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
As discussed in the dccp@vger mailing list: Now applications have to use setsockopt(DCCP_SOCKOPT_SERVICE, service[s]), prior to calling listen() and connect(). An array of unsigned ints can be passed meaning that the listening sock accepts connection requests for several services. With this we can ditch struct sockaddr_dccp and use only sockaddr_in (and sockaddr_in6 in the future). Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
-
- 30 8月, 2005 10 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
This makes the send rate calculations behave way more closely to what is specified, with the jitter previously seen on x and x_recv disappearing completely on non lossy setups. This resembles the tcp_data_snd_check code, that possibly we'll end up using in DCCP as well, perhaps moving this code to inet_connection_sock. For now I'm doing the simplest implementation tho. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
This is not quite what I think we should have long term but improves performance for now, so lets use it till we get CCID3 working well, then we can think about using sk_write_queue, perhaps using some ideas from Juwen Lai's old stack for 2.4.20. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
So that we retransmit CLOSE/CLOSEREQ packets till they elicit an answer or we hit a timeout. Most of the machinery uses TCP approaches, this code has to be polished & audited, but this is better than we had before. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Also fix step 6 when receiving SYNC or SYNCACK packets, i.e. we were not using the updated swl. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Andrew Morton should be happy now 8) Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
This way it gets closer to the TCP flow, where congestion window checks are done, it seems we can map ccid_hc_tx_send_packet in dccp_write_xmit to tcp_snd_wnd_test in tcp_write_xmit, a CCID2 decision should just fit in here as well... Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yoshifumi Nishida 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYoshifumi Nishida <nishida@csl.sony.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Development to this point was done on a subversion repository at: http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/dccp-2.6/ This repository will be kept at this site for the foreseable future, so that interested parties can see the history of this code, attributions, etc. If I ever decide to take this offline I'll provide the full history at some other suitable place. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-