Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 6月, 2008 30 次提交
  3. 25 6月, 2008 2 次提交
  5. 19 6月, 2008 4 次提交
    • J
      x86, geode: add a VSA2 ID for General Software · ffe6e1da
      由 Jordan Crouse 提交于 
      General Software writes their own VSA2 module for their version
of the Geode BIOS, which returns a different ID then the standard
VSA2.  This was causing the framebuffer driver to break for most
GSW boards.
Signed-off-by: NJordan Crouse <jordan.crouse@amd.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-geode@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      ffe6e1da
    • B
      x86: use BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE on 32-bit · d3942cff
      由 Bernhard Walle 提交于 
      This patch uses the BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE for crashkernel reservation also for
i386 and prints a error message on failure.

The patch is still for 2.6.26 since it is only bug fixing. The unification
of reserve_crashkernel() between i386 and x86_64 should be done for 2.6.27.
Signed-off-by: NBernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      d3942cff
    • M
      x86, 32-bit: fix boot failure on TSC-less processors · df17b1d9
      由 Mikael Pettersson 提交于 
      Booting 2.6.26-rc6 on my 486 DX/4 fails with a "BUG: Int 6"
(invalid opcode) and a kernel halt immediately after the
kernel has been uncompressed. The BUG shows EIP pointing
to an rdtsc instruction in native_read_tsc(), invoked from
native_sched_clock().

(This error occurs so early that not even the serial console
can capture it.)

A bisection showed that this bug first occurs in 2.6.26-rc3-git7,
via commit 9ccc906c:

>x86: distangle user disabled TSC from unstable
>
>tsc_enabled is set to 0 from the command line switch "notsc" and from
>the mark_tsc_unstable code. Seperate those functionalities and replace
>tsc_enable with tsc_disable. This makes also the native_sched_clock()
>decision when to use TSC understandable.
>
>Preparatory patch to solve the sched_clock() issue on 32 bit.
>
>Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The core reason for this bug is that native_sched_clock() gets
called before tsc_init().

Before the commit above, tsc_32.c used a "tsc_enabled" variable
which defaulted to 0 == disabled, and which only got enabled late
in tsc_init(). Thus early calls to native_sched_clock() would skip
the TSC and use jiffies instead.

After the commit above, tsc_32.c uses a "tsc_disabled" variable
which defaults to 0, meaning that the TSC is Ok to use. Early calls
to native_sched_clock() now erroneously try to use the TSC on
!cpu_has_tsc processors, leading to invalid opcode exceptions.

My proposed fix is to initialise tsc_disabled to a "soft disabled"
state distinct from the hard disabled state set up by the "notsc"
kernel option. This fixes the native_sched_clock() problem. It also
allows tsc_init() to be simplified: instead of setting tsc_disabled = 1
on every error return, we just set tsc_disabled = 0 once when all
checks have succeeded.

I've verified that this lets my 486 boot again. I've also verified
that a Core2 machine still uses the TSC as clocksource after the patch.
Signed-off-by: NMikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      df17b1d9
    • S
      x86: fix NULL pointer deref in __switch_to · 75118a82
      由 Suresh Siddha 提交于 
      Patrick McHardy reported a crash:

> > I get this oops once a day, its apparently triggered by something
> > run by cron, but the process is a different one each time.
> >
> > Kernel is -git from yesterday shortly before the -rc6 release
> > (last commit is the usb-2.6 merge, the x86 patches are missing),
> > .config is attached.
> >
> > I'll retry with current -git, but the patches that have gone in
> > since I last updated don't look related.
> >
> > [62060.043009] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> > 000001ff
> > [62060.043009] IP: [<c0102a9b>] __switch_to+0x2f/0x118
> > [62060.043009] *pde = 00000000
> > [62060.043009] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT

Vegard Nossum analyzed it:

> This decodes to
>
>    0:   0f ae 00                fxsave (%eax)
>
> so it's related to the floating-point context. This is the exact
> location of the crash:
>
> $ addr2line -e arch/x86/kernel/process_32.o -i ab0
> include/asm/i387.h:232
> include/asm/i387.h:262
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c:595
>
> ...so it looks like prev_task->thread.xstate->fxsave has become NULL.
> Or maybe it never had any other value.

Somehow (as described below) TS_USEDFPU is set but the fpu is not
allocated or freed.

Another possible FPU pre-emption issue with the sleazy FPU optimization
which was benign before but not so anymore, with the dynamic FPU allocation
patch.

New task is getting exec'd and it is prempted at the below point.

flush_thread() {
	...
	/*
	* Forget coprocessor state..
	*/
	clear_fpu(tsk);
		<----- Preemption point
	clear_used_math();
	...
}

Now when it context switches in again, as the used_math() is still set
and fpu_counter can be > 5, we will do a math_state_restore() which sets
the task's TS_USEDFPU. After it continues from the above preemption point
it does clear_used_math() and much later free_thread_xstate().

Now, at the next context switch, it is quite possible that xstate is
null, used_math() is not set and TS_USEDFPU is still set. This will
trigger unlazy_fpu() causing kernel oops.

Fix this  by clearing tsk's fpu_counter before clearing task's fpu.
Reported-by: NPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      75118a82
  7. 13 6月, 2008 4 次提交
    • S
      provide rtc_cmos platform device · 1da2e3d6
      由 Stas Sergeev 提交于 
      Recently (around 2.6.25) I've noticed that RTC no longer works for me.  It
turned out this is because I use pnpacpi=off kernel option to work around
the parport_pc bugs.  I always did so, but RTC used to work fine in the
past, and now it have regressed.

The patch fixes the problem by creating the platform device for the RTC
when PNP is disabled.  This may also help running the PNP-enabled kernel
on an older PCs.
Signed-off-by: NStas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      1da2e3d6
    • V
      x86, lockdep: fix "WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2658 check_flags+0x4c/0x128()" · 4461145e
      由 Vegard Nossum 提交于 
      Alessandro Suardi reported:
> Recently upgraded my FC6 desktop to Fedora 9; with the
>  latest nautilus RPM updates my VNC session went nuts
>  with nautilus pegging the CPU for everything that breathed.
>
> I now reverted to an earlier nautilus package, but during
>  the peak CPU period my kernel spat this:
>
> [314185.623294] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [314185.623414] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2658 check_flags+0x4c/0x128()
> [314185.623514] Modules linked in: iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables
> sunrpc ipv6 fuse snd_via82xx snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_mpu401_uart
> snd_rawmidi via686a hwmon parport_pc sg parport uhci_hcd ehci_hcd
> [314185.623924] Pid: 12314, comm: nautilus Not tainted 2.6.26-rc5-git2 #4
> [314185.624021]  [<c0115b95>] warn_on_slowpath+0x41/0x7b
> [314185.624021]  [<c010de70>] ? do_page_fault+0x2c1/0x5fd
> [314185.624021]  [<c0128396>] ? up_read+0x16/0x28
> [314185.624021]  [<c010de70>] ? do_page_fault+0x2c1/0x5fd
> [314185.624021]  [<c012fa33>] ? __lock_acquire+0xbb4/0xbc3
> [314185.624021]  [<c012d0a0>] check_flags+0x4c/0x128
> [314185.624021]  [<c012fa73>] lock_acquire+0x31/0x7d
> [314185.624021]  [<c0128cf6>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x30/0x80
> [314185.624021]  [<c0128cc6>] ? __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x0/0x80
> [314185.624021]  [<c0128d52>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0xc/0xe
> [314185.624021]  [<c0128d81>] notify_die+0x2d/0x2f
> [314185.624021]  [<c01043b0>] do_int3+0x1f/0x4d
> [314185.624021]  [<c02f2d3b>] int3+0x27/0x2c
> [314185.624021]  =======================
> [314185.624021] ---[ end trace 1923f65a2d7bb246 ]---
> [314185.624021] possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
> [314185.624021] irq event stamp: 488879
> [314185.624021] hardirqs last  enabled at (488879): [<c0102d67>]
> restore_nocheck+0x12/0x15
> [314185.624021] hardirqs last disabled at (488878): [<c0102dca>]
> work_resched+0x19/0x30
> [314185.624021] softirqs last  enabled at (488876): [<c011a1ba>]
> __do_softirq+0xa6/0xac
> [314185.624021] softirqs last disabled at (488865): [<c010476e>]
> do_softirq+0x57/0xa6
>
> I didn't seem to find it with some googling, so here it is.
>
> I was incidentally ltracing that process to try and find out
>  what was gulping down that much CPU (sorry, no idea
>  whether ltrace and the WARNING happened at the same
>  time or which came first) and:

Yeah, this is extremely likely to be the source of the warning.

The warning should be harmless, however.

> Box is my trusty noname K7-800, 512MB RAM; if there's
>  anything else useful I might be able to provide, just ask.

It would be interesting to see where the int3 comes from.  Too bad,
lockdep doesn't provide the register dump. The stacktrace also doesn't
go further than the int3(), I wonder if this int3 came from userspace?
The ltrace readme says "software breakpoints, like gdb", so I guess
this is the case. Yep, seems like it.

This looks relevant:

| commit fb1dac90
| Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
| Date:   Wed Jan 16 09:51:59 2008 +0100
|
|     lockdep: more hardirq annotations for notify_die()

I'm attaching a similarly-looking patch for this case (DO_VM86_ERROR),
though I suspect it might be missing for the other cases
(DO_ERROR/DO_ERROR_INFO) as well.
Reported-by: NAlessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      4461145e
    • P
      x86: fix lockdep warning during suspend-to-ram · e32e58a9
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Andrew Morton wrote:

> I've been seeing the below for a long time during suspend-to-ram on the Vaio.
>
>
> PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
> PM: Preparing system for mem sleep
> Freezing user space processes ... <4>------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2658 check_flags+0x4c/0x127()
> Modules linked in: i915 drm ipw2200 sonypi ipv6 autofs4 hidp l2cap bluetooth sunrpc nf_conntrack_netbios_ns ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack xt_tcpudp iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables acpi_cpufreq nvram ohci1394 ieee1394 ehci_hcd uhci_hcd sg joydev snd_hda_intel snd_seq_dummy sr_mod snd_seq_oss cdrom snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss ieee80211 pcspkr ieee80211_crypt snd_pcm i2c_i801 snd_timer i2c_core ide_pci_generic piix snd soundcore snd_page_alloc button ext3 jbd ide_disk ide_core [last unloaded: ipw2200]
> Pid: 3250, comm: zsh Not tainted 2.6.26-rc5 #1
>  [<c011c5f5>] warn_on_slowpath+0x41/0x6d
>  [<c01080e6>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96
>  [<c013789c>] ? mark_held_locks+0x41/0x5c
>  [<c0315688>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x36/0x58
>  [<c0137a29>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xe6/0x10d
>  [<c0138637>] ? __lock_acquire+0xae3/0xb2b
>  [<c0313413>] ? schedule+0x39b/0x3b4
>  [<c0135596>] check_flags+0x4c/0x127
>  [<c01386b9>] lock_acquire+0x3a/0x86
>  [<c0315075>] _spin_lock+0x26/0x53
>  [<c0140660>] ? refrigerator+0x13/0xc3
>  [<c0140660>] refrigerator+0x13/0xc3
>  [<c012684a>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x3c/0x31e
>  [<c0102fe7>] do_notify_resume+0x91/0x6ee
>  [<c01359fd>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x50/0x56
>  [<c0315688>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x36/0x58
>  [<c0235d24>] ? read_chan+0x0/0x58c
>  [<c0137a29>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xe6/0x10d
>  [<c0315694>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x58
>  [<c0230afa>] ? tty_ldisc_deref+0x5c/0x63
>  [<c0233104>] ? tty_read+0x66/0x98
>  [<c014b3f0>] ? audit_syscall_exit+0x2aa/0x2c5
>  [<c0109430>] ? do_syscall_trace+0x6b/0x16f
>  [<c0103a9c>] work_notifysig+0x13/0x1b
>  =======================
> ---[ end trace 25b49fe59a25afa5 ]---
> possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
> irq event stamp: 58919
> hardirqs last  enabled at (58919): [<c0103afd>] syscall_exit_work+0x11/0x26

Joy - I so love entry.S

Best I can make of it:

syscall_exit_work
  resume_userspace
    DISABLE_INTERRUPTS
    (no TRACE_IRQS_OFF)
      work_pending
        work_notifysig
          do_notify_resume()
            do_signal()
              get_signal_to_deliver()
                try_to_freeze()
                  refrigerator()
                    task_lock() -> check_flags() -> BANG

The normal path is:

syscall_exit_work
  resume_userspace
    DISABLE_INTERRUPTS
    restore_all
      TRACE_IRQS_IRET
      iret

No idea why that would not warn..
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      e32e58a9
    • I
      Revert "x86: fix ioapic bug again" · 0b6a39f7
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      This reverts commit 6e908947.

Németh Márton reported:

| there is a problem in 2.6.26-rc3 which was not there in case of
| 2.6.25: the CPU wakes up ~90,000 times per sec instead of ~60 per sec.
|
| I also "git bisected" the problem, the result is:
|
| 6e908947 is first bad commit
| commit 6e908947
| Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| Date:   Fri Mar 21 14:32:36 2008 +0100
|
|     x86: fix ioapic bug again

the original problem is fixed by Maciej W. Rozycki in the tip/x86/apic
branch (confirmed by Márton), but those changes are too intrusive for
v2.6.26 so we'll go for the less intrusive (repeated) revert now.
Reported-and-bisected-by: NNémeth Márton <nm127@freemail.hu>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      0b6a39f7