This reverts commit 6c4711b4.

That patch breaks mesh config comparison between beacons/probe reponses, so
every beacon from a mesh network would be added as a new bss. Since the
comparison has to be performed for every received beacon I believe it is best to
save the mesh config in a format easy to compare, rather than do a bunch of
unaligned accesses to compare field by field.
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This bug resulted in compilation error on 64bit machines.
Pointed out by Rami Rosen <roszenrami@gmail.com>.
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

Based on ancient patch by Mickael Hoerdt
<hoerdt@clarinet.u-strasbg.fr>, which is available at
<http://www-r2.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/dev/linux_ipv6_mforwarding/patch-linux-ipv6-mforwarding-0.1a>.
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

Based on ancient patch by Mickael Hoerdt
<hoerdt@clarinet.u-strasbg.fr>, which is available at
<http://www-r2.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/dev/linux_ipv6_mforwarding/patch-linux-ipv6-mforwarding-0.1a>.
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

We have been using __NET_IPV6_MAX for adjusting the size of array
for sysctl table, but it does not work any longer because of the
deprecation of NET_IPV6_xxx constants.  Let's use DEVCONF_MAX
instead.
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

Signed-off-by: NDenis V.Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Do this by replacing sock_create_kern with inet_ctl_sock_create.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

uc_ttl is initialized in inet(6)_create and never changed except
setsockopt ioctl. Remove this assignment.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Replace sock_create_kern with inet_ctl_sock_create.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This is a generic requirement, so make inet_ctl_sock_create namespace
aware and create a inet_ctl_sock_destroy wrapper around
sk_release_kernel.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

All upper protocol layers are already use sock internally.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

sk->sk_proc->(un)hash is noop right now, so the unification is correct.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This call is nothing common with INET connection sockets code. It
simply creates an unhashes kernel sockets for protocol messages.

Move the new call into af_inet.c after the rename.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This seems a purism as module can't be unloaded, but though if cleanup
method is present it should be correct and clean all staff created.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Replace dccp_v(4|6)_ctl_socket with sock to unify a code with TCP/ICMP.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Replace tcp_socket with tcp_sock. This is more effective (less
derefferences on fast paths). Additionally, the approach is unified to
one used in ICMP.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

Both are identical, let's create ipv6_chk_prefix() and use it
in both places.

Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

To protect PRL list, use ipip6_lock.
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

This patch updates the Linux the Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel Addressing
Protocol (ISATAP) implementation. It places the ISATAP potential router
list (PRL) in the kernel and adds three new private ioctls for PRL
management.

[Add several changes of structure name, constant names etc. - yoshfuji]
Signed-off-by: NFred L. Templin <fred.l.templin@boeing.com>
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

This may lead to situations, when each of two proc entries produce
data for the other's device.

Looks like a BUG, so this patch is for net-2.6. It will not apply to
net-2.6.26 since dev->nd_net access is replaced with dev_net(dev)
one.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

When we encounter an error while looking up the dst the second
time we need to drop the first dst.  This patch is pretty much
the same as the one for IPv4.
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

From RFC341:
A temporary address is created only if this calculated Preferred
Lifetime is greater than REGEN_ADVANCE time units.  In particular, an
implementation must not create a temporary address with a zero
Preferred Lifetime.
Signed-off-by: NBenoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org>
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

When receiving a prefix information from a routeur, only update the
lifetimes of the temporary address associated with that prefix.

Otherwise if one deprecated prefix is advertized, all your temporary
addresses will become deprecated.
Signed-off-by: NBenoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org>
Acked-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Lockdep warning will be trigged while rfcomm connection closing.

The locks taken in rfcomm_dev_add:
rfcomm_dev_lock --> d->lock

In __rfcomm_dlc_close:
d->lock --> rfcomm_dev_lock (in rfcomm_dev_state_change)

There's two way to fix it, one is in rfcomm_dev_add we first locking
d->lock then the rfcomm_dev_lock

The other (in this patch), remove the locking of d->lock for
rfcomm_dev_state_change because just locking "d->state = BT_CLOSED;"
is enough.

[  295.002046] =======================================================
[  295.002046] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[  295.002046] 2.6.25-rc7 #1
[  295.002046] -------------------------------------------------------
[  295.002046] krfcommd/2705 is trying to acquire lock:
[  295.002046]  (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}, at: [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] but task is already holding lock:
[  295.002046]  (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] -> #1 (&d->lock){--..}:
[  295.002046]        [<c0149b23>] check_prev_add+0xd3/0x200
[  295.002046]        [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
[  295.002046]        [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
[  295.002046]        [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
[  295.002046]        [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
[  295.002046]        [<c03d6b99>] _spin_lock+0x39/0x80
[  295.002046]        [<f89a01c0>] rfcomm_dev_add+0x240/0x360 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f89a047e>] rfcomm_create_dev+0x6e/0xe0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f89a0823>] rfcomm_dev_ioctl+0x33/0x60 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899facc>] rfcomm_sock_ioctl+0x2c/0x50 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<c0363d38>] sock_ioctl+0x118/0x240
[  295.002046]        [<c0194196>] vfs_ioctl+0x76/0x90
[  295.002046]        [<c0194446>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56/0x140
[  295.002046]        [<c0194569>] sys_ioctl+0x39/0x60
[  295.002046]        [<c0104faa>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[  295.002046]        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] -> #0 (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}:
[  295.002046]        [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200
[  295.002046]        [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
[  295.002046]        [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
[  295.002046]        [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
[  295.002046]        [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
[  295.002046]        [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80
[  295.002046]        [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0
[  295.002046]        [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
[  295.002046]        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] other info that might help us debug this:
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] 2 locks held by krfcommd/2705:
[  295.002046]  #0:  (rfcomm_mutex){--..}, at: [<f899e2eb>] rfcomm_run+0x7b/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  #1:  (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] stack backtrace:
[  295.002046] Pid: 2705, comm: krfcommd Not tainted 2.6.25-rc7 #1
[  295.002046]  [<c0128a38>] ? printk+0x18/0x20
[  295.002046]  [<c014927f>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x6f/0x80
[  295.002046]  [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200
[  295.002046]  [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
[  295.002046]  [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
[  295.002046]  [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
[  295.002046]  [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
[  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80
[  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c014abd9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb9/0x130
[  295.002046]  [<c03d6e89>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x70
[  295.002046]  [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c03d4559>] ? __sched_text_start+0x229/0x4c0
[  295.002046]  [<c0120000>] ? cpu_avg_load_per_task+0x20/0x30
[  295.002046]  [<f899e270>] ? rfcomm_run+0x0/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0
[  295.002046]  [<c013c130>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
[  295.002046]  [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
[  295.002046]  =======================
Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

'rfcomm connect' will trigger lockdep warnings which is caused by
locking diffrent kinds of bluetooth sockets at the same time.

So using sub-classes per AF_BLUETOOTH sub-type for lockdep.

Thanks for the hints from dave jones.

---
> From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:21:56 -0400
>
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: Pid: 3611, comm: obex-data-serve Not tainted 2.6.25-0.121.rc5.git4.fc9 #1
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [__lock_acquire+2287/3089] __lock_acquire+0x8ef/0xc11
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [sched_clock+8/11] ? sched_clock+0x8/0xb
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [lock_acquire+106/144] lock_acquire+0x6a/0x90
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [lock_sock_nested+182/198] lock_sock_nested+0xb6/0xc6
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [security_socket_post_create+22/27] ? security_socket_post_create+0x16/0x1b
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [__sock_create+388/472] ? __sock_create+0x184/0x1d8
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8bd9321>] l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [kernel_bind+10/13] kernel_bind+0xa/0xd
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8dad3d7>] rfcomm_dlc_open+0xc8/0x294 [rfcomm]
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [lock_sock_nested+187/198] ? lock_sock_nested+0xbb/0xc6
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8dae18c>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x8b/0xc2 [rfcomm]
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [sys_connect+96/125] sys_connect+0x60/0x7d
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [__lock_acquire+1370/3089] ? __lock_acquire+0x55a/0xc11
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [sys_socketcall+140/392] sys_socketcall+0x8c/0x188
> > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
---
Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

rose_release() doesn't release sockets properly, e.g. it skips
sock_orphan(), so OOPSes are triggered in sock_def_write_space(),
which was observed especially while ROSE skbs were kfreed from
ax25_frames_acked(). There is also sock_hold() and lock_sock() added -
similarly to ax25_release(). Thanks to Bernard Pidoux for substantial
help in debugging this problem.
Signed-off-by: NJarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: NBernard Pidoux <bpidoux@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This allows cleaner code when accesing bss->mesh_config components.
Signed-off-by: NLuis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NLuis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

...not only broadcast.
Signed-off-by: NLuis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NLuis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The bug shows up with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled. Pointed out by Andrew Morton.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NLuis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

A variable 'i' is being shadowed by another one, but the second
one can just be removed.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Vladimir Koutny <vlado@work.ksp.sk>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

When the IBSS code tries to flush the STA list, it does so in
an atomic context. Flushing isn't safe there, however, and
requires the RTNL, so we need to defer it to a workqueue.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>