1. 28 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • C
      Smack: IPv6 host labeling · 21abb1ec
      Casey Schaufler 提交于
      IPv6 appears to be (finally) coming of age with the
      influx of autonomous devices. In support of this, add
      the ability to associate a Smack label with IPv6 addresses.
      
      This patch also cleans up some of the conditional
      compilation associated with the introduction of
      secmark processing. It's now more obvious which bit
      of code goes with which feature.
      Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
      21abb1ec
  2. 03 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • R
      Smack: allow multiple labels in onlycap · c0d77c88
      Rafal Krypa 提交于
      Smack onlycap allows limiting of CAP_MAC_ADMIN and CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE to
      processes running with the configured label. But having single privileged
      label is not enough in some real use cases. On a complex system like Tizen,
      there maybe few programs that need to configure Smack policy in run-time
      and running them all with a single label is not always practical.
      This patch extends onlycap feature for multiple labels. They are configured
      in the same smackfs "onlycap" interface, separated by spaces.
      Signed-off-by: NRafal Krypa <r.krypa@samsung.com>
      c0d77c88
  3. 01 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  4. 12 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 21 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 20 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 27 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  8. 19 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 15 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • C
      Smack: allow for significantly longer Smack labels v4 · f7112e6c
      Casey Schaufler 提交于
      V4 updated to current linux-security#next
      Targeted for git://gitorious.org/smack-next/kernel.git
      
      Modern application runtime environments like to use
      naming schemes that are structured and generated without
      human intervention. Even though the Smack limit of 23
      characters for a label name is perfectly rational for
      human use there have been complaints that the limit is
      a problem in environments where names are composed from
      a set or sources, including vendor, author, distribution
      channel and application name. Names like
      
      	softwarehouse-pgwodehouse-coolappstore-mellowmuskrats
      
      are becoming harder to avoid. This patch introduces long
      label support in Smack. Labels are now limited to 255
      characters instead of the old 23.
      
      The primary reason for limiting the labels to 23 characters
      was so they could be directly contained in CIPSO category sets.
      This is still done were possible, but for labels that are too
      large a mapping is required. This is perfectly safe for communication
      that stays "on the box" and doesn't require much coordination
      between boxes beyond what would have been required to keep label
      names consistent.
      
      The bulk of this patch is in smackfs, adding and updating
      administrative interfaces. Because existing APIs can't be
      changed new ones that do much the same things as old ones
      have been introduced.
      
      The Smack specific CIPSO data representation has been removed
      and replaced with the data format used by netlabel. The CIPSO
      header is now computed when a label is imported rather than
      on use. This results in improved IP performance. The smack
      label is now allocated separately from the containing structure,
      allowing for larger strings.
      
      Four new /smack interfaces have been introduced as four
      of the old interfaces strictly required labels be specified
      in fixed length arrays.
      
      The access interface is supplemented with the check interface:
      	access  "Subject                 Object                  rwxat"
      	access2 "Subject Object rwaxt"
      
      The load interface is supplemented with the rules interface:
      	load   "Subject                 Object                  rwxat"
      	load2  "Subject Object rwaxt"
      
      The load-self interface is supplemented with the self-rules interface:
      	load-self   "Subject                 Object                  rwxat"
      	load-self2  "Subject Object rwaxt"
      
      The cipso interface is supplemented with the wire interface:
      	cipso  "Subject                  lvl cnt  c1  c2 ..."
      	cipso2 "Subject lvl cnt  c1  c2 ..."
      
      The old interfaces are maintained for compatibility.
      Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
      f7112e6c
  10. 07 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 20 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • R
      Create Documentation/security/, · d410fa4e
      Randy Dunlap 提交于
      move LSM-, credentials-, and keys-related files from Documentation/
        to Documentation/security/,
      add Documentation/security/00-INDEX, and
      update all occurrences of Documentation/<moved_file>
        to Documentation/security/<moved_file>.
      d410fa4e
  12. 23 4月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 14 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 28 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 06 2月, 2008 1 次提交
    • C
      Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel · e114e473
      Casey Schaufler 提交于
      Smack is the Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel.
      
      Smack implements mandatory access control (MAC) using labels
      attached to tasks and data containers, including files, SVIPC,
      and other tasks. Smack is a kernel based scheme that requires
      an absolute minimum of application support and a very small
      amount of configuration data.
      
      Smack uses extended attributes and
      provides a set of general mount options, borrowing technics used
      elsewhere. Smack uses netlabel for CIPSO labeling. Smack provides
      a pseudo-filesystem smackfs that is used for manipulation of
      system Smack attributes.
      
      The patch, patches for ls and sshd, a README, a startup script,
      and x86 binaries for ls and sshd are also available on
      
          http://www.schaufler-ca.com
      
      Development has been done using Fedora Core 7 in a virtual machine
      environment and on an old Sony laptop.
      
      Smack provides mandatory access controls based on the label attached
      to a task and the label attached to the object it is attempting to
      access. Smack labels are deliberately short (1-23 characters) text
      strings. Single character labels using special characters are reserved
      for system use. The only operation applied to Smack labels is equality
      comparison. No wildcards or expressions, regular or otherwise, are
      used. Smack labels are composed of printable characters and may not
      include "/".
      
      A file always gets the Smack label of the task that created it.
      
      Smack defines and uses these labels:
      
          "*" - pronounced "star"
          "_" - pronounced "floor"
          "^" - pronounced "hat"
          "?" - pronounced "huh"
      
      The access rules enforced by Smack are, in order:
      
      1. Any access requested by a task labeled "*" is denied.
      2. A read or execute access requested by a task labeled "^"
         is permitted.
      3. A read or execute access requested on an object labeled "_"
         is permitted.
      4. Any access requested on an object labeled "*" is permitted.
      5. Any access requested by a task on an object with the same
         label is permitted.
      6. Any access requested that is explicitly defined in the loaded
         rule set is permitted.
      7. Any other access is denied.
      
      Rules may be explicitly defined by writing subject,object,access
      triples to /smack/load.
      
      Smack rule sets can be easily defined that describe Bell&LaPadula
      sensitivity, Biba integrity, and a variety of interesting
      configurations. Smack rule sets can be modified on the fly to
      accommodate changes in the operating environment or even the time
      of day.
      
      Some practical use cases:
      
      Hierarchical levels. The less common of the two usual uses
      for MLS systems is to define hierarchical levels, often
      unclassified, confidential, secret, and so on. To set up smack
      to support this, these rules could be defined:
      
         C        Unclass rx
         S        C       rx
         S        Unclass rx
         TS       S       rx
         TS       C       rx
         TS       Unclass rx
      
      A TS process can read S, C, and Unclass data, but cannot write it.
      An S process can read C and Unclass. Note that specifying that
      TS can read S and S can read C does not imply TS can read C, it
      has to be explicitly stated.
      
      Non-hierarchical categories. This is the more common of the
      usual uses for an MLS system. Since the default rule is that a
      subject cannot access an object with a different label no
      access rules are required to implement compartmentalization.
      
      A case that the Bell & LaPadula policy does not allow is demonstrated
      with this Smack access rule:
      
      A case that Bell&LaPadula does not allow that Smack does:
      
          ESPN    ABC   r
          ABC     ESPN  r
      
      On my portable video device I have two applications, one that
      shows ABC programming and the other ESPN programming. ESPN wants
      to show me sport stories that show up as news, and ABC will
      only provide minimal information about a sports story if ESPN
      is covering it. Each side can look at the other's info, neither
      can change the other. Neither can see what FOX is up to, which
      is just as well all things considered.
      
      Another case that I especially like:
      
          SatData Guard   w
          Guard   Publish w
      
      A program running with the Guard label opens a UDP socket and
      accepts messages sent by a program running with a SatData label.
      The Guard program inspects the message to ensure it is wholesome
      and if it is sends it to a program running with the Publish label.
      This program then puts the information passed in an appropriate
      place. Note that the Guard program cannot write to a Publish
      file system object because file system semanitic require read as
      well as write.
      
      The four cases (categories, levels, mutual read, guardbox) here
      are all quite real, and problems I've been asked to solve over
      the years. The first two are easy to do with traditonal MLS systems
      while the last two you can't without invoking privilege, at least
      for a while.
      Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
      Cc: Joshua Brindle <method@manicmethod.com>
      Cc: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
      Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
      Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
      Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      Cc: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@gmail.com>
      Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      e114e473