- 03 6月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function ‘btrfs_create_uuid_tree’: fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3909:3: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long int’ [-Wformat=] btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, tree_root, ^ CC [M] fs/btrfs/ioctl.o fs/btrfs/ioctl.c: In function ‘create_subvol’: fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:549:3: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long int’ [-Wformat=] btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, PTR_ERR(new_root)); PTR_ERR returns long, but we're really using 'int' for the error codes everywhere so just set and use the local variable. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
When we shrink the usable size of a device (its total_bytes), we go over all the device extent items in the device tree and attempt to relocate the chunk of any device extent that goes beyond the new usable size for the device. We do that after setting the new usable size (total_bytes) in the device object, so that all new allocations (and reallocations) don't use areas of the device that go beyond the new (shorter) size. However we were not considering that before setting the new size in the device, pending chunks might have been created that use device extents that go beyond the new size, and those device extents are not yet in the device tree after we search the device tree - they are still attached to the list of new block group for some ongoing transaction handle, and they are only added to the device tree when the transaction handle is ended (via btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()). So check for pending chunks with device extents that go beyond the new size and if any exists, commit the current transaction and repeat the search in the device tree. Not doing this it would mean we would return success to user space while still having extents that go beyond the new size, and later user space could override those locations on the device while the fs still references them, causing all sorts of corruption and unexpected events. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 20 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If while setting a block group read-only we end up allocating a system chunk, through check_system_chunk(), we were not doing it while holding the chunk mutex which is a problem if a concurrent chunk allocation is happening, through do_chunk_alloc(), as it means both block groups can end up using the same logical addresses and physical regions in the device(s). So make sure we hold the chunk mutex. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.0+ Fixes: 2f081088 ("btrfs: delete chunk allocation attemp when setting block group ro") Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 26 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Forrest Liu 提交于
If device tree has hole, find_free_dev_extent() cannot find available address properly. The problem can be reproduce by following script. mntpath=/btrfs loopdev=/dev/loop0 filepath=/home/forrest/image umount $mntpath losetup -d $loopdev truncate --size 100g $filepath losetup $loopdev $filepath mkfs.btrfs -f $loopdev mount $loopdev $mntpath # make device tree with one big hole for i in `seq 1 1 100`; do fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/$i done sync for i in `seq 1 1 95`; do rm $mntpath/$i done sync # wait cleaner thread remove unused block group sleep 300 fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/aaa # failed to allocate new chunk fallocate -l 1g $mntpath/bbb Above script will make device tree with one big hole, and can only allocate just one chunk in a transaction, so failed to allocate new chunk for $mntpath/bbb item 8 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 2185232384) itemoff 15859 itemsize 48 dev extent chunk_tree 3 chunk objectid 256 chunk offset 106292051968 length 1073741824 item 9 key (1 DEV_EXTENT 104190705664) itemoff 15811 itemsize 48 dev extent chunk_tree 3 chunk objectid 256 chunk offset 103108575232 length 1073741824 Signed-off-by: NForrest Liu <forrestl@synology.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 13 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
It is another reason for NO_SPACE case. When we found enough free space in loop and saved them to max_hole_start/size before, and tail space contains pending extent, origional innocent max_hole_start/size are reset in retry. As a result, find_free_dev_extent() returns less space than it can, and cause NO_SPACE in user program. Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2015 9 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
1) We can safely use the function's 'i'. Fixes warning fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5257:7: warning: declaration of 'i' shadows a previous local fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4951:6: warning: shadowed declaration is here 2) A local variable duplicates name of an argument, we can use the value directly. Fixes warning fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5433:8: warning: declaration of 'length' shadows a parameter fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4935:27: warning: shadowed declaration is here Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
div_u64_rem expects u32 for divisior and reminder. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Switch to div_u64_rem that does type checking and has more obvious semantics than do_div. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The divisor is derived from nodesize or PAGE_SIZE, fits into 32bit type. Get rid of a few more do_div instances. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Convert kmalloc(nr * size, ..) to kmalloc_array that does additional overflow checks, the zeroing variant is kcalloc. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Cleanup, no special reason to do if (need_resched()) cond_resched(); Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
div_u64_rem expects u32 for divisior and reminder. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Switch to div_u64_rem that does type checking and has more obvious semantics than do_div. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The divisor is derived from nodesize or PAGE_SIZE, fits into 32bit type. Get rid of a few more do_div instances. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 20 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Since commit 8e5cfb55 (Btrfs: Make raid_map array be inlined in btrfs_bio structure), the raid map array is allocated along with the btrfs bio in alloc_btrfs_bio. The calculation used to decide how much we need to allocate was using the wrong parameter passed into the allocation function. The passed in real_stripes will be zero if a target replace operation is not currently running. We want to use total_stripes instead. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 17 2月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
The commit: 8dabb742 Btrfs: change core code of btrfs to support the device replace operations added the fs_info argument, but never used it - just remove it again. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
for() is obviously better in these code block, and remove noused init-value to reduce about 6 bytes binary size. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
There functions include unused chunk_tree argument from the begining, it is time to remove them and clean up relative code to prepare value of this argument in caller. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
There are some op tables that can be easily made const, similarly the sysfs feature and raid tables. This is motivated by PaX CONSTIFY plugin. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 15 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Btrfs will report NO_SPACE when we create and remove files for several times, and we can't write to filesystem until mount it again. Steps to reproduce: 1: Create a single-dev btrfs fs with default option 2: Write a file into it to take up most fs space 3: Delete above file 4: Wait about 100s to let chunk removed 5: goto 2 Script is like following: #!/bin/bash # Recommend 1.2G space, too large disk will make test slow DEV="/dev/sda16" MNT="/mnt/tmp" dev_size="$(lsblk -bn -o SIZE "$DEV")" || exit 2 file_size_m=$((dev_size * 75 / 100 / 1024 / 1024)) echo "Loop write ${file_size_m}M file on $((dev_size / 1024 / 1024))M dev" for ((i = 0; i < 10; i++)); do umount "$MNT" 2>/dev/null; done echo "mkfs $DEV" mkfs.btrfs -f "$DEV" >/dev/null || exit 2 echo "mount $DEV $MNT" mount "$DEV" "$MNT" || exit 2 for ((loop_i = 0; loop_i < 20; loop_i++)); do echo echo "loop $loop_i" echo "dd file..." cmd=(dd if=/dev/zero of="$MNT"/file0 bs=1M count="$file_size_m") "${cmd[@]}" 2>/dev/null || { # NO_SPACE error triggered echo "dd failed: ${cmd[*]}" exit 1 } echo "rm file..." rm -f "$MNT"/file0 || exit 2 for ((i = 0; i < 10; i++)); do df "$MNT" | tail -1 sleep 10 done done Reason: It is triggered by commit: 47ab2a6c which is used to remove empty block groups automatically, but the reason is not in that patch. Code before works well because btrfs don't need to create and delete chunks so many times with high complexity. Above bug is caused by many reason, any of them can trigger it. Reason1: When we remove some continuous chunks but leave other chunks after, these disk space should be used by chunk-recreating, but in current code, only first create will successed. Fixed by Forrest Liu <forrestl@synology.com> in: Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole Reason2: contains_pending_extent() return wrong value in calculation. Fixed by Forrest Liu <forrestl@synology.com> in: Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole Reason3: btrfs_check_data_free_space() try to commit transaction and retry allocating chunk when the first allocating failed, but space_info->full is set in first allocating, and prevent second allocating in retry. Fixed in this patch by clear space_info->full in commit transaction. Tested for severial times by above script. Changelog v3->v4: use light weight int instead of atomic_t to record have_remove_bgs in transaction, suggested by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Changelog v2->v3: v2 fixed the bug by adding more commit-transaction, but we only need to reclaim space when we are really have no space for new chunk, noticed by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Actually, our code already have this type of commit-and-retry, we only need to make it working with removed-bgs. v3 fixed the bug with above way. Changelog v1->v2: v1 will introduce a new bug when delete and create chunk in same disk space in same transaction, noticed by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> V2 fix this bug by commit transaction after remove block grops. Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Suggested-by: NFilipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Suggested-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 03 2月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Verify that the sys_array has enough bytes to read the next item. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
There's a pointer to buffer, integer offset and offset passed as pointer, try to find matching names for them. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 22 1月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
So we can check raid56 with: (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) instead of long: (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Corrent code use many kinds of "clever" way to determine operation target's raid type, as: raid_map != NULL or raid_map[MAX_NR] == RAID[56]_Q_STRIPE To make code easy to maintenance, this patch put raid type into bbio, and we can always get raid type from bbio with a "stupid" way. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
1: ref_count is simple than current RBIO_HOLD_BBIO_MAP_BIT flag to keep btrfs_bio's memory in raid56 recovery implement. 2: free function for bbio will make code clean and flexible, plus forced data type checking in compile. Changelog v1->v2: Rename following by David Sterba's suggestion: put_btrfs_bio() -> btrfs_put_bio() get_btrfs_bio() -> btrfs_get_bio() bbio->ref_count -> bbio->refs Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
It can make code more simple and clear, we need not care about free bbio and raid_map together. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
It can avoid complex calculation of real stripes in sort, moreover, we can clean up code of sorting tgtdev_map because it will be in order initially. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 17 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 13 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Finally it's clear that the requested blocksize is always equal to nodesize, with one exception, the superblock. Superblock has fixed size regardless of the metadata block size, but uses the same helpers to initialize sys array/chunk tree and to work with the chunk items. So it pretends to be an extent_buffer for a moment, btrfs_read_sys_array is full of special cases, we're adding one more. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 03 12月, 2014 7 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
On chunk allocation error (label "error_del_extent"), after adding the extent map to the tree and to the pending chunks list, we would leave decrementing the extent map's refcount by 2 instead of 3 (our allocation + tree reference + list reference). Also, on chunk/block group removal, if the block group was on the list pending_chunks we weren't decrementing the respective list reference. Detected by 'rmmod btrfs': [20770.105881] kmem_cache_destroy btrfs_extent_map: Slab cache still has objects [20770.106127] CPU: 2 PID: 11093 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G W L 3.17.0-rc5-btrfs-next-1+ #1 [20770.106128] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [20770.106130] 0000000000000000 ffff8800ba867eb8 ffffffff813e7a13 ffff8800a2e11040 [20770.106132] ffff8800ba867ed0 ffffffff81105d0c 0000000000000000 ffff8800ba867ee0 [20770.106134] ffffffffa035d65e ffff8800ba867ef0 ffffffffa03b0654 ffff8800ba867f78 [20770.106136] Call Trace: [20770.106142] [<ffffffff813e7a13>] dump_stack+0x45/0x56 [20770.106145] [<ffffffff81105d0c>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x4b/0x90 [20770.106164] [<ffffffffa035d65e>] extent_map_exit+0x1a/0x1c [btrfs] [20770.106176] [<ffffffffa03b0654>] exit_btrfs_fs+0x27/0x9d3 [btrfs] [20770.106179] [<ffffffff8109dc97>] SyS_delete_module+0x153/0x1c4 [20770.106182] [<ffffffff8121261b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3c [20770.106184] [<ffffffff813ebf52>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b This applies on top (depends on) of my previous patch titled: "Btrfs: fix race between fs trimming and block group remove/allocation" But the issue in fact was already present before that change, it only became easier to hit after Josef's 3.18 patch that added automatic removal of empty block groups. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
Our fs trim operation, which is completely transactionless (doesn't start or joins an existing transaction) consists of visiting all block groups and then for each one to iterate its free space entries and perform a discard operation against the space range represented by the free space entries. However before performing a discard, the corresponding free space entry is removed from the free space rbtree, and when the discard completes it is added back to the free space rbtree. If a block group remove operation happens while the discard is ongoing (or before it starts and after a free space entry is hidden), we end up not waiting for the discard to complete, remove the extent map that maps logical address to physical addresses and the corresponding chunk metadata from the the chunk and device trees. After that and before the discard completes, the current running transaction can finish and a new one start, allowing for new block groups that map to the same physical addresses to be allocated and written to. So fix this by keeping the extent map in memory until the discard completes so that the same physical addresses aren't reused before it completes. If the physical locations that are under a discard operation end up being used for a new metadata block group for example, and dirty metadata extents are written before the discard finishes (the VM might call writepages() of our btree inode's i_mapping for example, or an fsync log commit happens) we end up overwriting metadata with zeroes, which leads to errors from fsck like the following: checking extents Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0 Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0 Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0 Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0 Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0 read block failed check_tree_block owner ref check failed [833912832 16384] Errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation checking free space cache checking fs roots Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0 Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0 Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0 Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0 Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0 read block failed check_tree_block root 5 root dir 256 error root 5 inode 260 errors 2001, no inode item, link count wrong unresolved ref dir 256 index 0 namelen 8 name foobar_3 filetype 1 errors 6, no dir index, no inode ref root 5 inode 262 errors 2001, no inode item, link count wrong unresolved ref dir 256 index 0 namelen 8 name foobar_5 filetype 1 errors 6, no dir index, no inode ref root 5 inode 263 errors 2001, no inode item, link count wrong (...) Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The commit c404e0dc (Btrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing procedure of the device replace) fixed a use-after-free problem which happened when removing the source device at the end of device replace, but at that time, btrfs didn't support device replace on raid56, so we didn't fix the problem on the raid56 profile. Currently, we implemented device replace for raid56, so we need kick that problem out before we enable that function for raid56. The fix method is very simple, we just increase the bio per-cpu counter before we submit a raid56 io, and decrease the counter when the raid56 io ends. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The implementation is simple: - In order to avoid changing the code logic of btrfs_map_bio and RAID56, we add the stripes of the replace target devices at the end of the stripe array in btrfs bio, and we sort those target device stripes in the array. And we keep the number of the target device stripes in the btrfs bio. - Except write operation on RAID56, all the other operation don't take the target device stripes into account. - When we do write operation, we read the data from the common devices and calculate the parity. Then write the dirty data and new parity out, at this time, we will find the relative replace target stripes and wirte the relative data into it. Note: The function that copying old data on the source device to the target device was implemented in the past, it is similar to the other RAID type. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
This patch implement the RAID5/6 common data repair function, the implementation is similar to the scrub on the other RAID such as RAID1, the differentia is that we don't read the data from the mirror, we use the data repair function of RAID5/6. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
stripe_index's value was set again in latter line: stripe_index = 0; Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
bbio_ret in this condition is always !NULL because previous code already have a check-and-skip: 4908 if (!bbio_ret) 4909 goto out; Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 25 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The following lockdep warning is triggered during xfstests: [ 1702.980872] ========================================================= [ 1702.981181] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] [ 1702.981482] 3.18.0-rc1 #27 Not tainted [ 1702.981781] --------------------------------------------------------- [ 1702.982095] kswapd0/77 just changed the state of lock: [ 1702.982415] (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa03b0b51>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x41/0x1f0 [btrfs] [ 1702.982794] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past: [ 1702.983160] (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 1702.984675] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1702.985524] Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock [ 1702.986799] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 1702.987681] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1702.988137] ---- ---- [ 1702.988598] lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock); [ 1702.989069] local_irq_disable(); [ 1702.989534] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1702.990038] lock(&found->groups_sem); [ 1702.990494] <Interrupt> [ 1702.990938] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1702.991407] *** DEADLOCK *** It is because the btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() will call memory allocation with GFP_KERNEL, which may flush fs page cache to free space, waiting for it self to do the commit, causing the deadlock. To solve the problem, move btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() out of the dev_replace lock range, also involing split the btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev() function into remove and free parts. Now only btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev() is called in dev_replace lock range, and kobj_{add/rm} and btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev() are called out of the lock range. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 04 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fabian Frederick 提交于
bi_sector and bi_size moved to bi_iter since commit 4f024f37 ("block: Abstract out bvec iterator") Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
One problem that has plagued us is that a user will use up all of his space with data, remove a bunch of that data, and then try to create a bunch of small files and run out of space. This happens because all the chunks were allocated for data since the metadata requirements were so low. But now there's a bunch of empty data block groups and not enough metadata space to do anything. This patch solves this problem by automatically deleting empty block groups. If we notice the used count go down to 0 when deleting or on mount notice that a block group has a used count of 0 then we will queue it to be deleted. When the cleaner thread runs we will double check to make sure the block group is still empty and then we will delete it. This patch has the side effect of no longer having a bunch of BUG_ON()'s in the chunk delete code, which will be helpful for both this and relocate. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-