1. 15 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 14 10月, 2015 2 次提交
  3. 09 10月, 2015 3 次提交
  4. 08 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      i40e: stop VF rings · 0325fca7
      Mitch Williams 提交于
      Explicitly stop the rings belonging to each VF when disabling SR-IOV.
      Even though the VFs were gone, and the associated VSIs were removed, the
      rings were not stopped, and in some circumstances the hardware would
      continue to access the memory formerly used by the rings, causing memory
      corruption or DMAR errors, both of which would lead to general malaise
      of the kernel.
      
      To relieve this condition, explicitly stop all the rings associated with
      each VF before releasing its resources.
      
      Change-ID: I78c05d562c66e7b594b7e48d67860f49b3e5b6ec
      Signed-off-by: NMitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NAndrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
      0325fca7
  5. 30 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  6. 29 9月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      i40e: Fix for recursive RTNL lock during PROMISC change · 30e2561b
      Anjali Singhai 提交于
      The sync_vsi_filters function can be called directly under RTNL
      or through the timer subtask without one. This was causing a deadlock.
      
      If sync_vsi_filters is called from a thread which held the lock,
      and in another thread the PROMISC setting got changed we would
      be executing the PROMISC change in the thread which already held
      the lock alongside the other filter update. The PROMISC change
      requires a reset if we are on a VEB, which requires it to be called
      under RTNL.
      
      Earlier the driver would call reset for PROMISC change without
      checking if we were already under RTNL and would try to grab it
      causing a deadlock. This patch changes the flow to see if we are
      already under RTNL before trying to grab it.
      Signed-off-by: NAnjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKiran Patil <kiran.patil@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
      30e2561b
  7. 27 8月, 2015 3 次提交
  8. 06 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 23 7月, 2015 3 次提交
  10. 15 7月, 2015 4 次提交
  11. 05 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      i40e: start up in VEPA mode by default · fc60861e
      Anjali Singhai Jain 提交于
      The patch fixes a bug in the default configuration which
      prevented a software bridge loaded on the PF interface from
      working correctly because broadcast packets are incorrectly
      looped back.
      
      Fix the general case, by loading the driver in VEPA mode Until a
      VF or VMDq VSI is added. This way loopback on the Main VSI is
      turned off until needed and can resolve the issue of unnecessary
      reflection for users that do not have VF or VMDq VSIs setup.
      
      The driver must now coordinate the loopback setting for the Flow
      Director (FDIR) VSI to make sure it is in sync with the current
      VEB or VEPA mode setting.
      
      The user can still switch bridge modes from the bridge commands and
      choose to be in VEPA mode with VF VSIs. Because of hardware
      requirements, the call to switch to VEB mode when no VF/VMDqs are
      present will be rejected.
      
      NOTE: This patch uses BIT_ULL as that is preferred going forward,
      a followup patch in the lower priority queue to net-next will fix
      up the remaining 1 << usages.
      
      Change-ID: Ib121ddb18fe4b3c4f52e9deda6fcbeb9105683d1
      Signed-off-by: NAnjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NJim Young <james.m.young@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
      fc60861e
  12. 28 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 15 4月, 2015 4 次提交
  14. 03 4月, 2015 3 次提交
  15. 09 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  16. 07 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 05 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  18. 03 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 25 2月, 2015 1 次提交
    • N
      i40e: Add support for getlink, setlink ndo ops · 51616018
      Neerav Parikh 提交于
      Add support for bridge offload ndo_ops getlink and setlink to
      enable bridge hardware mode as per the mode set via IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE.
      The support is only enabled in case of a PF VSI and not available for
      any other VSI type.
      
      By default the i40e driver inserts a bridge as part of the bring-up
      when a FDIR type VSI and/or a FCoE VSI is created. This bridge is
      created in VEB mode by default i.e. after creating the bridge using
      "Add VEB" AQ command the loopback for the PF's default VSI is enabled.
      
      The patch adds capability where all the VSIs created as downlink to
      the bridge inherits the loopback property and enables loopback only
      if the uplink bridge is operating in VEB mode.
      Hence, there is no need to explicitly enable loopback as part of
      allocating resources for SR-IOV VFs and call to do that has been
      removed.
      
      In case a user-request is made either via "bridge" utility or using
      the bridge netlink interface that requires to change the hardware
      bridge mode then that would require a PF reset and rebuild of the
      switch hierarchy.
      
      Also update the copyright year.
      
      Change-ID: I4d78fc1c83158efda29ba7be92239b74f75d6d25
      Signed-off-by: NNeerav Parikh <neerav.parikh@intel.com>
      Tested-By: NJim Young <james.m.young@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
      51616018
  20. 24 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 09 2月, 2015 2 次提交
  22. 14 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  23. 06 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  24. 18 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • M
      i40e: re-enable VFLR interrupt sooner · c5c2f7c3
      Mitch Williams 提交于
      VF interrupt processing takes a looooong time, and it's possible that we
      could lose a VFLR event if it happens while we're processing a VFLR on
      another VF. This would leave the VF in a semi-permanent reset state,
      which would not be cleared until yet another VF experiences a VFLR.
      
      To correct this situation, we enable the VFLR interrupt cause before we
      begin processing any pending resets. This means that any VFLR that
      occurs during reset processing will generate another interrupt and this
      routine will get called again.
      
      This change may cause a spurious interrupt when multiple VFLRs occur
      very close together in time. If this happens, then this routine will be
      called again and it will detect no outstanding VFLR events and do
      nothing. No harm, no foul.
      
      Change-ID: Id0451f3e6e73a2cf6db1668296c71e129b59dc19
      Signed-off-by: NMitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
      c5c2f7c3