- 12 5月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
The ext4_bg_has_super() function doesn't know about the new rules for where backup superblocks go on a sparse_super2 filesystem. Therefore, block bitmap initialization doesn't know that it shouldn't reserve space for backups in groups that are never going to contain backups. The result of this is e2fsck complaining about the block bitmap being incorrect (fortunately not in a way that results in cross-linked files), so fix the whole thing. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
On a filesystem with a 1k block size, the group descriptors live in block 2, not block 1. If the filesystem has bigalloc,meta_bg set, however, the calculation of the group descriptor table location does not take this into account and returns the wrong block number. Fix the calculation to return the correct value for this case. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Zhang Zhen 提交于
In ext4_xattr_set_handle() we have checked the xattr name's length. So we should also check it in ext4_xattr_get() to avoid unneeded lookup caused by invalid name. Signed-off-by: NZhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Namjae Jeon 提交于
When we perform a data integrity sync we tag all the dirty pages with PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE at start of ext4_da_writepages. Later we check for this tag in write_cache_pages_da and creates a struct mpage_da_data containing contiguously indexed pages tagged with this tag and sync these pages with a call to mpage_da_map_and_submit. This process is done in while loop until all the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE pages are synced. We also do journal start and stop in each iteration. journal_stop could initiate journal commit which would call ext4_writepage which in turn will call ext4_bio_write_page even for delayed OR unwritten buffers. When ext4_bio_write_page is called for such buffers, even though it does not sync them but it clears the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE of the corresponding page and hence these pages are also not synced by the currently running data integrity sync. We will end up with dirty pages although sync is completed. This could cause a potential data loss when the sync call is followed by a truncate_pagecache call, which is exactly the case in collapse_range. (It will cause generic/127 failure in xfstests) To avoid this issue, we can use set_page_writeback_keepwrite instead of set_page_writeback, which doesn't clear TOWRITE tag. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 22 4月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
BH can not be NULL at this point, ext4_read_dirblock() always return non null value, and we already have done all necessery checks. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
To avoid potential data races, use a spinlock which protects the raw (on-disk) inode. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Al Viro pointed out that locking for O_APPEND writes was problematic, since the location of the write isn't known until after we take the i_mutex, which impacts the ext4_unaligned_aio() and s_bitmap_maxbytes check. For O_APPEND always assume that the write is unaligned so call ext4_unwritten_wait(). And to solve the second problem, take the i_mutex earlier before we start the s_bitmap_maxbytes check. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This shouldn't change any logic flow; just delete duplicated code. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This commit doesn't actually change anything; it just moves code around in preparation for some code simplification work. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Copy generic_file_aio_write() into ext4_file_write(). This is part of a patch series which allows us to simplify ext4_file_write() and ext4_file_dio_write(), by calling __generic_file_aio_write() directly. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 21 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently in ext4 there is quite a mess when it comes to naming unwritten extents. Sometimes we call it uninitialized and sometimes we refer to it as unwritten. The right name for the extent which has been allocated but does not contain any written data is _unwritten_. Other file systems are using this name consistently, even the buffer head state refers to it as unwritten. We need to fix this confusion in ext4. This commit changes every reference to an uninitialized extent (meaning allocated but unwritten) to unwritten extent. This includes comments, function names and variable names. It even covers abbreviation of the word uninitialized (such as uninit) and some misspellings. This commit does not change any of the code paths at all. This has been confirmed by comparing md5sums of the assembly code of each object file after all the function names were stripped from it. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently EXT4_MAP_UNINIT is used in dioread_nolock case to mark the cases where we're using dioread_nolock and we're writing into either unallocated, or unwritten extent, because we need to make sure that any DIO write into that inode will wait for the extent conversion. However EXT4_MAP_UNINIT is not only entirely misleading name but also unnecessary because we can check for EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN in the dioread_nolock case instead. This commit removes EXT4_MAP_UNINIT flag. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 20 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Namjae Jeon 提交于
Once COLLAPSE RANGE is be disable for ext4 with bigalloc feature till finding root-cause of problem. It will be enable with fixing that regression of xfstest(generic 075 and 091) again. Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Namjae Jeon 提交于
When formatting with 1KB or 2KB(not aligned with PAGE SIZE) block size, xfstests generic/075 and 091 are failing. The offset supplied to function truncate_pagecache_range is block size aligned. In this function start offset is re-aligned to PAGE_SIZE by rounding_up to the next page boundary. Due to this rounding up, old data remains in the page cache when blocksize is less than page size and start offset is not aligned with page size. In case of collapse range, we need to align start offset to page size boundary by doing a round down operation instead of round up. Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 4月, 2014 8 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 jon ernst 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJon Ernst <jonernst07@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
There is a bug in ext4_ext_shift_path_extents() where if we actually manage to merge a extent we would skip shifting the next extent. This will result in in one extent in the extent tree not being properly shifted. This is causing failure in various xfstests tests using fsx or fsstress with collapse range support. It will also cause file system corruption which looks something like: e2fsck 1.42.9 (4-Feb-2014) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 20 has out of order extents (invalid logical block 3, physical block 492938, len 2) Clear? yes ... when running e2fsck. It's also very easily reproducible just by running fsx without any parameters. I can usually hit the problem within a minute. Fix it by increasing ex_start only if we're not merging the extent. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently in ext4_collapse_range() and ext4_punch_hole() we're discarding preallocation twice. Once before we attempt to do any changes and second time after we're done with the changes. While the second call to ext4_discard_preallocations() in ext4_punch_hole() case is not needed, we need to discard preallocation right after ext4_ext_remove_space() in collapse range case because in the case we had to restart a transaction in the middle of removing space we might have new preallocations created. Remove unneeded ext4_discard_preallocations() ext4_punch_hole() and move it to the better place in ext4_collapse_range() Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
We're already calling truncate_pagecache() before we attempt to do any actual job so there is not need to truncate pagecache once more using truncate_setsize() after we're finished. Remove truncate_setsize() and replace it just with i_size_write() note that we're holding appropriate locks. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently in ext4_collapse_range() when calling ext4_es_remove_extent() to remove status extents we're passing (EXT_MAX_BLOCKS - punch_start - 1) in order to remove all extents from start of the collapse range to the end of the file. However this is wrong because we might miss the possible extent covering the last block of the file. Fix it by removing the -1. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently we're passing -1 as lend argumnet for filemap_write_and_wait_range() which is wrong since lend is signed type so it would cause some confusion and we might not write_and_wait for the entire range we're expecting to write. Fix it by using LLONG_MAX instead. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
We should be using truncate_pagecache() instead of truncate_pagecache_range() in the collapse range because we're truncating page cache from offset to the end of file. truncate_pagecache() also get rid of the private COWed pages from the range because we're going to shift the end of the file. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 15 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Azat Khuzhin 提交于
With bigalloc enabled we must use EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP() instead of EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP() otherwise we will go beyond the allocated buffer. $ mount -t ext4 /dev/vde /vde [ 70.573993] EXT4-fs DEBUG (fs/ext4/mballoc.c, 2346): ext4_mb_alloc_groupinfo: [ 70.575174] allocated s_groupinfo array for 1 meta_bg's [ 70.576172] EXT4-fs DEBUG (fs/ext4/super.c, 2092): ext4_check_descriptors: [ 70.576972] Checking group descriptorsBUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88006ab56000 [ 72.463686] IP: [<ffffffff81394eb9>] __bitmap_weight+0x2a/0x7f [ 72.464168] PGD 295e067 PUD 2961067 PMD 7fa8e067 PTE 800000006ab56060 [ 72.464738] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 72.465139] Modules linked in: [ 72.465402] CPU: 1 PID: 3560 Comm: mount Tainted: G W 3.14.0-rc2-00069-ge57bce1 #60 [ 72.466079] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ 72.466505] task: ffff88007ce6c8a0 ti: ffff88006b7f0000 task.ti: ffff88006b7f0000 [ 72.466505] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81394eb9>] [<ffffffff81394eb9>] __bitmap_weight+0x2a/0x7f [ 72.466505] RSP: 0018:ffff88006b7f1c00 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 72.466505] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000050a RCX: 0000000000000040 [ 72.466505] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000080000 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 72.466505] RBP: ffff88006b7f1c28 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 72.466505] R10: 000000000000babe R11: 0000000000000400 R12: 0000000000080000 [ 72.466505] R13: 0000000000000200 R14: 0000000000002000 R15: ffff88006ab55000 [ 72.466505] FS: 00007f43ba1fa840(0000) GS:ffff88007f800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 72.466505] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 72.466505] CR2: ffff88006ab56000 CR3: 000000006b7e6000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 72.466505] Stack: [ 72.466505] ffff88006ab65000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000010000 [ 72.466505] ffff88006ab6f400 ffff88006b7f1c58 ffffffff81396bb8 0000000000010000 [ 72.466505] 0000000000000000 ffff88007b869a90 ffff88006a48a000 ffff88006b7f1c70 [ 72.466505] Call Trace: [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff81396bb8>] memweight+0x5f/0x8a [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff811c3b19>] ext4_count_free+0x13/0x21 [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff811c396c>] ext4_count_free_clusters+0xdb/0x171 [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff811e3bdd>] ext4_fill_super+0x117c/0x28ef [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff81391569>] ? vsnprintf+0x1c7/0x3f7 [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff8114d8dc>] mount_bdev+0x145/0x19c [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff811e2a61>] ? ext4_calculate_overhead+0x2a1/0x2a1 [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff811dab1d>] ext4_mount+0x15/0x17 [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff8114e3aa>] mount_fs+0x67/0x150 [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff811637ea>] vfs_kern_mount+0x64/0xde [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff81165d19>] do_mount+0x6fe/0x7f5 [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff81126cc8>] ? strndup_user+0x3a/0xd9 [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff8116604b>] SyS_mount+0x85/0xbe [ 72.466505] [<ffffffff81619e90>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 [ 72.466505] Code: c3 89 f0 b9 40 00 00 00 55 99 48 89 e5 41 57 f7 f9 41 56 49 89 ff 41 55 45 31 ed 41 54 41 89 f4 53 31 db 41 89 c6 45 39 ee 7e 10 <4b> 8b 3c ef 49 ff c5 e8 bf ff ff ff 01 c3 eb eb 31 c0 45 85 f6 [ 72.466505] RIP [<ffffffff81394eb9>] __bitmap_weight+0x2a/0x7f [ 72.466505] RSP <ffff88006b7f1c00> [ 72.466505] CR2: ffff88006ab56000 [ 72.466505] ---[ end trace 7d051a08ae138573 ]--- Killed Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Where are some places where logic guaranties us that extent we are searching exits, but this may not be true due to on-disk data corruption. If such corruption happens we must prevent possible null pointer dereferences. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Fix error handling by adding some. :-) Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 4月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 jon ernst 提交于
This fixes the following sparse warning: CHECK fs/ext4/mballoc.c fs/ext4/mballoc.c:5019:9: warning: context imbalance in 'ext4_trim_extent' - unexpected unlock Signed-off-by: N"Jon Ernst" <jonernst07@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Unfortunately, we weren't checking to make sure of this the inode was extent-based before attempt operate on it. Hilarity ensues. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
-
由 Zheng Liu 提交于
This commit tries to fix some byte order issues that is found by sparse check. $ make M=fs/ext4 C=2 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ ... CHECK fs/ext4/extents.c fs/ext4/extents.c:5232:41: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer fs/ext4/extents.c:5236:52: warning: bad assignment (-=) to restricted __le32 fs/ext4/extents.c:5258:45: warning: bad assignment (-=) to restricted __le32 fs/ext4/extents.c:5303:28: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer fs/ext4/extents.c:5318:18: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ext4/extents.c:5318:18: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] ex_start fs/ext4/extents.c:5318:18: got restricted __le32 [usertype] ee_block fs/ext4/extents.c:5319:24: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer fs/ext4/extents.c:5334:31: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) ... Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca> Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
We haven't taken i_mutex yet, so we need to use i_size_read(). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 12 4月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently some file system have IS_SWAPFILE check in their fallocate implementations and some do not. However we should really prevent any fallocate operation on swapfile so move the check to vfs and remove the redundant checks from the file systems fallocate implementations. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently in do_fallocate in collapse range case we're checking whether offset + len is not bigger than i_size. However there is nothing which would prevent i_size from changing so the check is pointless. It should be done in the file system itself and the file system needs to make sure that i_size is not going to change. The i_size check for the other fallocate modes are also done in the filesystems. As it is now we can easily crash the kernel by having two processes doing truncate and fallocate collapse range at the same time. This can be reproduced on ext4 and it is theoretically possible on xfs even though I was not able to trigger it with this simple test. This commit removes the check from do_fallocate and adds it to the file system. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Acked-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
All the checks IS_APPEND and IS_IMMUTABLE for the fallocate operation on the inode are done in vfs. No need to do this again in ext4. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 4月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The function ext4_update_i_disksize() is used in only one place, in the function mpage_map_and_submit_extent(). Move its code to simplify the code paths, and also move the call to ext4_mark_inode_dirty() into the i_data_sem's critical region, to be consistent with all of the other places where we update i_disksize. That way, we also keep the raw_inode's i_disksize protected, to avoid the following race: CPU #1 CPU #2 down_write(&i_data_sem) Modify i_disk_size up_write(&i_data_sem) down_write(&i_data_sem) Modify i_disk_size Copy i_disk_size to on-disk inode up_write(&i_data_sem) Copy i_disk_size to on-disk inode Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Younger Liu 提交于
Return ENOMEM rather than EIO when find_get_page() fails in ext4_mb_get_buddy_page_lock() and find_or_create_page() fails in ext4_mb_load_buddy(). Signed-off-by: NYounger Liu <younger.liucn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Namjae Jeon 提交于
When mounting ext4 with data=journal option, xfstest shared/002 and shared/004 are currently failing as checksum computed for testfile does not match with the checksum computed in other journal modes. In case of data=journal mode, a call to filemap_write_and_wait_range will not flush anything to disk as buffers are not marked dirty in write_end. In collapse range this call is followed by a call to truncate_pagecache_range. Due to this, when checksum is computed, a portion of file is re-read from disk which replace valid data with NULL bytes and hence the reason for the difference in checksum. Calling ext4_force_commit before filemap_write_and_wait_range solves the issue as it will mark the buffers dirty during commit transaction which can be later synced by a call to filemap_write_and_wait_range. Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 08 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The special handling of PF_MEMALLOC callers in ext4_write_inode() shouldn't be necessary as there shouldn't be any. Warn about it. Also update comment before the function as it seems somewhat outdated. (Changes modeled on an ext3 patch posted by Jan Kara to the linux-ext4 mailing list on Februaryt 28, 2014, which apparently never went into the ext3 tree.) Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
filemap_map_pages() is generic implementation of ->map_pages() for filesystems who uses page cache. It should be safe to use filemap_map_pages() for ->map_pages() if filesystem use filemap_fault() for ->fault(). Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Ning Qu <quning@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 4月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When heavily exercising xattr code the assertion that jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() shouldn't return error was triggered: WARNING: at /srv/autobuild-ceph/gitbuilder.git/build/fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1237 jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x1ba/0x260() CPU: 0 PID: 8877 Comm: ceph-osd Tainted: G W 3.10.0-ceph-00049-g68d04c9 #1 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R410/01V648, BIOS 1.6.3 02/07/2011 ffffffff81a1d3c8 ffff880214469928 ffffffff816311b0 ffff880214469968 ffffffff8103fae0 ffff880214469958 ffff880170a9dc30 ffff8802240fbe80 0000000000000000 ffff88020b366000 ffff8802256e7510 ffff880214469978 Call Trace: [<ffffffff816311b0>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [<ffffffff8103fae0>] warn_slowpath_common+0x70/0xa0 [<ffffffff8103fb2a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [<ffffffff81267c2a>] jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x1ba/0x260 [<ffffffff81245093>] __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0xa3/0x140 [<ffffffff812561f3>] ext4_xattr_release_block+0x103/0x1f0 [<ffffffff81256680>] ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1e0/0x910 [<ffffffff8125795b>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x38b/0x4a0 [<ffffffff810a319d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff81257b32>] ext4_xattr_set+0xc2/0x140 [<ffffffff81258547>] ext4_xattr_user_set+0x47/0x50 [<ffffffff811935ce>] generic_setxattr+0x6e/0x90 [<ffffffff81193ecb>] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x7b/0x1c0 [<ffffffff811940d4>] vfs_setxattr+0xc4/0xd0 [<ffffffff8119421e>] setxattr+0x13e/0x1e0 [<ffffffff811719c7>] ? __sb_start_write+0xe7/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8118f2e8>] ? mnt_want_write_file+0x28/0x60 [<ffffffff8118c65c>] ? fget_light+0x3c/0x130 [<ffffffff8118f2e8>] ? mnt_want_write_file+0x28/0x60 [<ffffffff8118f1f8>] ? __mnt_want_write+0x58/0x70 [<ffffffff811946be>] SyS_fsetxattr+0xbe/0x100 [<ffffffff816407c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b The reason for the warning is that buffer_head passed into jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() didn't have journal_head attached. This is caused by the following race of two ext4_xattr_release_block() calls: CPU1 CPU2 ext4_xattr_release_block() ext4_xattr_release_block() lock_buffer(bh); /* False */ if (BHDR(bh)->h_refcount == cpu_to_le32(1)) } else { le32_add_cpu(&BHDR(bh)->h_refcount, -1); unlock_buffer(bh); lock_buffer(bh); /* True */ if (BHDR(bh)->h_refcount == cpu_to_le32(1)) get_bh(bh); ext4_free_blocks() ... jbd2_journal_forget() jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() -> JH is gone error = ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block(handle, inode, bh); -> triggers the warning We fix the problem by moving ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block() under the buffer lock. Sadly this cannot be done in nojournal mode as that function can call sync_dirty_buffer() which would deadlock. Luckily in nojournal mode the race is harmless (we only dirty already freed buffer) and thus for nojournal mode we leave the dirtying outside of the buffer lock. Reported-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
ext4_end_bio() currently throws away the error that it receives. Chances are this is part of a spate of errors, one of which will end up getting the error returned to userspace somehow, but we shouldn't take that risk. Also print out the errno to aid in debug. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Azat Khuzhin 提交于
With EXT4FS_DEBUG ext4_count_free_clusters() will call ext4_read_block_bitmap() without s_group_info initialized, so we need to initialize multi-block allocator before. And dependencies that must be solved, to allow this: - multi-block allocator needs in group descriptors - need to install s_op before initializing multi-block allocator, because in ext4_mb_init_backend() new inode is created. - initialize number of group desc blocks (s_gdb_count) otherwise number of clusters returned by ext4_free_clusters_after_init() is not correct. (see ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa()) Here is the stack backtrace: (gdb) bt #0 ext4_get_group_info (group=0, sb=0xffff880079a10000) at ext4.h:2430 #1 ext4_validate_block_bitmap (sb=sb@entry=0xffff880079a10000, desc=desc@entry=0xffff880056510000, block_group=block_group@entry=0, bh=bh@entry=0xffff88007bf2b2d8) at balloc.c:358 #2 0xffffffff81232202 in ext4_wait_block_bitmap (sb=sb@entry=0xffff880079a10000, block_group=block_group@entry=0, bh=bh@entry=0xffff88007bf2b2d8) at balloc.c:476 #3 0xffffffff81232eaf in ext4_read_block_bitmap (sb=sb@entry=0xffff880079a10000, block_group=block_group@entry=0) at balloc.c:489 #4 0xffffffff81232fc0 in ext4_count_free_clusters (sb=sb@entry=0xffff880079a10000) at balloc.c:665 #5 0xffffffff81259ffa in ext4_check_descriptors (first_not_zeroed=<synthetic pointer>, sb=0xffff880079a10000) at super.c:2143 #6 ext4_fill_super (sb=sb@entry=0xffff880079a10000, data=<optimized out>, data@entry=0x0 <irq_stack_union>, silent=silent@entry=0) at super.c:3851 ... Signed-off-by: NAzat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-