Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  3. 24 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 22 9月, 2006 2 次提交
  7. 21 9月, 2006 14 次提交
  9. 19 9月, 2006 4 次提交
  11. 17 9月, 2006 4 次提交
  13. 16 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 09 9月, 2006 2 次提交
    • T
      [PATCH] NFS: large non-page-aligned direct I/O clobbers memory · e9f7bee1
      由 Trond Myklebust 提交于 
      The logic in nfs_direct_read_schedule and nfs_direct_write_schedule can
allow data->npages to be one larger than rpages.  This causes a page
pointer to be written beyond the end of the pagevec in nfs_read_data (or
nfs_write_data).

Fix this by making nfs_(read|write)_alloc() calculate the size of the
pagevec array, and initialise data->npages.

Also get rid of the redundant argument to nfs_commit_alloc().
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      e9f7bee1
    • B
      [PATCH] ext3_getblk() should handle HOLE correctly · 3665d0e5
      由 Badari Pulavarty 提交于 
      It has been reported that ext3_getblk() is not doing the right thing and
triggering following WARN():

BUG: warning at fs/ext3/inode.c:1016/ext3_getblk()
 <c01c5140> ext3_getblk+0x98/0x2a6  <c03b2806> md_wakeup_thread+0x26/0x2a
 <c01c536d> ext3_bread+0x1f/0x88  <c01cedf9> ext3_quota_read+0x136/0x1ae
 <c018b683> v1_read_dqblk+0x61/0xac  <c0188f32> dquot_acquire+0xf6/0x107
 <c01ceaba> ext3_acquire_dquot+0x46/0x68  <c01897d4> dqget+0x155/0x1e7
 <c018a97b> dquot_transfer+0x3e0/0x3e9  <c016fe52> dput+0x23/0x13e
 <c01c7986> ext3_setattr+0xc3/0x240  <c0120f66> current_fs_time+0x52/0x6a
 <c017320e> notify_change+0x2bd/0x30d  <c0159246> chown_common+0x9c/0xc5
 <c02a222c> strncpy_from_user+0x3b/0x68  <c0167fe6> do_path_lookup+0xdf/0x266
 <c016841b> __user_walk_fd+0x44/0x5a  <c01592b9> sys_chown+0x4a/0x55
 <c015a43c> vfs_write+0xe7/0x13c  <c01695d4> sys_mkdir+0x1f/0x23
 <c0102a97> syscall_call+0x7/0xb

Looking at the code, it looks like it's not handle HOLE correctly.  It ends
up returning -EIO.  Here is the patch to fix it.

If we really want to be paranoid, we can allow return values 0 (HOLE), 1
(we asked for one block) and return -EIO for more than 1 block.  But I
really don't see a reason for doing it - all we need is the block# here.
(doesn't matter how many blocks are mapped).

ext3_get_blocks_handle() returns number of blocks it mapped.  It returns 0
in case of HOLE.  ext3_getblk() should handle HOLE properly (currently its
dumping warning stack and returning -EIO).
Signed-off-by: NBadari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      3665d0e5
  17. 07 9月, 2006 6 次提交
  19. 02 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  21. 30 8月, 2006 1 次提交
  23. 28 8月, 2006 3 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] /proc/meminfo: don't put spaces in names · f5ef68da
      由 Andrew Morton 提交于 
      None of the other /proc/meminfo lines have a space in the identifier.  This
post-2.6.17 addition has the potential to break existing parsers, so use an
underscore instead (like Committed_AS).

Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      f5ef68da
    • D
      [PATCH] fix up lockdep trace in fs/exec.c · 513627d7
      由 Dave Jones 提交于 
      This fixes the locking error noticed by lockdep:

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  ---------------------------------------------
  init/1 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&sighand->siglock){....}, at: [<c047a78a>] flush_old_exec+0x3ae/0x859

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&sighand->siglock){....}, at: [<c047a77a>] flush_old_exec+0x39e/0x859

  other info that might help us debug this:
  2 locks held by init/1:
   #0:  (tasklist_lock){..--}, at: [<c047a76a>] flush_old_exec+0x38e/0x859
   #1:  (&sighand->siglock){....}, at: [<c047a77a>] flush_old_exec+0x39e/0x859

  stack backtrace:
   [<c04051e1>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x54/0xfd
   [<c040579d>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
   [<c04058b6>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
   [<c043b33a>] __lock_acquire+0x773/0x997
   [<c043bacf>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6c
   [<c060630b>] _spin_lock+0x19/0x28
   [<c047a78a>] flush_old_exec+0x3ae/0x859
   [<c0498053>] load_elf_binary+0x4aa/0x1628
   [<c0479cab>] search_binary_handler+0xa7/0x24e
   [<c047b577>] do_execve+0x15b/0x1f9
   [<c04022b4>] sys_execve+0x29/0x4d
   [<c0403faf>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      513627d7
    • I
      [PATCH] lockdep: annotate reiserfs · 4df46240
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      reiserfs seems to have another locking level layer for the i_mutex due to the
xattrs-are-a-directory thing.
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      4df46240