- 13 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
For pNFS direct writes, layout driver may dynamically allocate ds_cinfo.buckets. So we need to take care to free them when freeing dreq. Ideally this needs to be done inside layout driver where ds_cinfo.buckets are allocated. But buckets are attached to dreq and reused across LD IO iterations. So I feel it's OK to free them in the generic layer. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [v3.4+] Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
The SEEK operation is used when an application makes an lseek call with either the SEEK_HOLE or SEEK_DATA flags set. I fall back on nfs_file_llseek() if the server does not have SEEK support. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 25 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Currently asynchronous NFSv4 request will be retried with exponential timeout (from 1/10 to 15 seconds), but async requests will always use a 15second retry. Some "async" requests are really synchronous though. The async mechanism is used to allow the request to continue if the requesting process is killed. In those cases, an exponential retry is appropriate. For example, if two different clients both open a file and get a READ delegation, and one client then unlinks the file (while still holding an open file descriptor), that unlink will used the "silly-rename" handling which is async. The first rename will result in NFS4ERR_DELAY while the delegation is reclaimed from the other client. The rename will not be retried for 15 seconds, causing an unlink to take 15 seconds rather than 100msec. This patch only added exponential timeout for async unlink and async rename. Other async calls, such as 'close' are sometimes waited for so they might benefit from exponential timeout too. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 13 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The current GETDEVICELIST implementation is buggy in that it doesn't handle cursors correctly, and in that it returns an error if the server returns NFSERR_NOTSUPP. Given that there is no actual need for GETDEVICELIST, it has various issues and might get removed for NFSv4.2 stop using it in the blocklayout driver, and thus the Linux NFS client as whole. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Currently there is no XDR buffer space allocated for the per-layout driver layoutcommit payload, which leads to server buffer overflows in the blocklayout driver even under simple workloads. As we can't do per-layout sizes for XDR operations we'll have to splice a previously encoded list of pages into the XDR stream, similar to how we handle ACL buffers. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
Track lwb in nfs_commit_data so that we can use it to setup layoutcommit in commit_done callback. Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 13 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The current CB_COMPOUND handling code tries to compare the principal name of the request with the cl_hostname in the client. This is not guaranteed to ever work, particularly if the client happened to mount a CNAME of the server or a non-fqdn. Fix this by instead comparing the cr_principal string with the acceptor name that we get from gssd. In the event that gssd didn't send one down (i.e. it was too old), then we fall back to trying to use the cl_hostname as we do today. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 25 6月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
The refcounting on nfs_pgio_header was related to there being (possibly) more than one nfs_pgio_data. Now that nfs_pgio_data has been merged into nfs_pgio_header, there is no reason to do this ref counting. Just call the completion callback on nfs_pgio_release/nfs_pgio_error. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Remove duplicate writeverf structure from merge of nfs_pgio_header and nfs_pgio_data and remove writeverf related flags and logic to handle more than one RPC per nfs_pgio_header. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
struct nfs_pgio_data only exists as a member of nfs_pgio_header, but is passed around everywhere, because there used to be multiple _data structs per _header. Many of these functions then use the _data to find a pointer to the _header. This patch cleans this up by merging the nfs_pgio_data structure into nfs_pgio_header and passing nfs_pgio_header around instead. Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Rename "verf" to "writeverf" and "pages" to "page_array" to prepare for merge of nfs_pgio_data and nfs_pgio_header. Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
nfs_rw_header was used to allocate an nfs_pgio_header along with an nfs_pgio_data, because a _header would need at least one _data. Now there is only ever one nfs_pgio_data for each nfs_pgio_header -- move it to nfs_pgio_header and get rid of nfs_rw_header. Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2014 11 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Support direct requests that span multiple pnfs data servers by comparing nfs_pgio_header->verf to a cached verf in pnfs_commit_bucket. Continue to use dreq->verf if the MDS is used / non-pNFS. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Since the ability to split pages into subpage requests has been added, nfs_pgio_header->rpc_list only ever has one pgio data. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
The read and write paths do exactly the same thing for the rpc_prepare rpc_op. This patch combines them together into a single function. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
I create a new struct nfs_rw_ops to decide the differences between reads and writes. This struct will be set when initializing a new nfs_pgio_descriptor, and then passed on to the nfs_rw_header when a new header is allocated. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
The header had a pointer to the verifier that was set from the old write data struct. We don't need to keep the pointer around now that we have shared structures. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
The only difference is the write verifier field, but we can keep that for a little bit longer. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
At this point, the only difference between nfs_read_data and nfs_write_data is the write verifier. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Reads and writes have very similar results. This patch combines the two structs together with comments to show where the differing fields are used. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Reads and writes have very similar arguments. This patch combines them together and documents the few fields used only by write. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The read_pageio_init method is just a very convoluted way to grab the right nfs_pageio_ops vector. The vector to chose is not a choice of protocol version, but just a pNFS vs MDS I/O choice that can simply be done inside nfs_pageio_init_read based on the presence of a layout driver, and a new force_mds flag to the special case of falling back to MDS I/O on a pNFS-capable volume. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The write_pageio_init method is just a very convoluted way to grab the right nfs_pageio_ops vector. The vector to chose is not a choice of protocol version, but just a pNFS vs MDS I/O choice that can simply be done inside nfs_pageio_init_write based on the presence of a layout driver, and a new force_mds flag to the special case of falling back to MDS I/O on a pNFS-capable volume. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 18 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Now that nfs_rename uses the async infrastructure, we can remove this. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Tested-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The async rename code is currently "polluted" with some parts that are really just for sillyrenames. Add a new "complete" operation vector to the nfs_renamedata to separate out the stuff that just needs to be done for a sillyrename. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Tested-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 02 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
nfs4_release_lockowner needs to set the rpc_message reply to point to the nfs4_sequence_res in order to avoid another Oopsable situation in nfs41_assign_slot. Fixes: fbd4bfd1 (NFS: Add nfs4_sequence calls for RELEASE_LOCKOWNER) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.12+ Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 02 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
nfs41_wake_and_assign_slot() relies on the task->tk_msg.rpc_argp and task->tk_msg.rpc_resp always pointing to the session sequence arguments. nfs4_proc_open_confirm tries to pull a fast one by reusing the open sequence structure, thus causing corruption of the NFSv4 slot table. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.12+ Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 29 10月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
This patch adds support for multiple security options which can be specified using a colon-delimited list of security flavors (the same syntax as nfsd's exports file). This is useful, for instance, when NFSv4.x mounts cross SECINFO boundaries. With this patch a user can use "sec=krb5i,krb5p" to mount a remote filesystem using krb5i, but can still cross into krb5p-only exports. New mounts will try all security options before failing. NFSv4.x SECINFO results will be compared against the sec= flavors to find the first flavor in both lists or if no match is found will return -EPERM. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
When filling parsed_mount_data, store the parsed sec= mount option in the new struct nfs_auth_info and the chosen flavor in selected_flavor. This patch lays the groundwork for supporting multiple sec= options. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Introduce a mechanism for probing a server to determine if an FSID is present or absent. The on-the-wire compound is different between minor version 0 and 1. Minor version 0 appends a RENEW operation to identify which client ID is probing. Minor version 1 has a SEQUENCE operation in the compound which effectively carries the same information. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The nfs4_proc_fs_locations() function is invoked during referral processing to perform a GETATTR(fs_locations) on an object's parent directory in order to discover the target of the referral. It performs a LOOKUP in the compound, so the client needs to know the parent's file handle a priori. Unfortunately this function is not adequate for handling migration recovery. We need to probe fs_locations information on an FSID, but there's no parent directory available for many operations that can return NFS4ERR_MOVED. Another subtlety: recovering from NFS4ERR_LEASE_MOVED is a process of walking over a list of known FSIDs that reside on the server, and probing whether they have migrated. Once the server has detected that the client has probed all migrated file systems, it stops returning NFS4ERR_LEASE_MOVED. A minor version zero server needs to know what client ID is requesting fs_locations information so it can clear the flag that forces it to continue returning NFS4ERR_LEASE_MOVED. This flag is set per client ID and per FSID. However, the client ID is not an argument of either the PUTFH or GETATTR operations. Later minor versions have client ID information embedded in the compound's SEQUENCE operation. Therefore, by convention, minor version zero clients send a RENEW operation in the same compound as the GETATTR(fs_locations), since RENEW's one argument is a clientid4. This allows a minor version zero server to identify correctly the client that is probing for a migration. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 26 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Determine if we've created a new file by examining the directory change attribute and/or the O_EXCL flag. This fixes a regression when doing a non-exclusive create of a new file. If the FILE_CREATED flag is not set, the atomic_open() command will perform full file access permissions checks instead of just checking for MAY_OPEN. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 05 9月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
This is a minimal client side implementation of SP4_MACH_CRED. It will attempt to negotiate SP4_MACH_CRED iff the EXCHANGE_ID is using krb5i or krb5p auth. SP4_MACH_CRED will be used if the server supports the minimal operations: BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION EXCHANGE_ID CREATE_SESSION DESTROY_SESSION DESTROY_CLIENTID This patch only includes the EXCHANGE_ID negotiation code because the client will already use the machine cred for these operations. If the server doesn't support SP4_MACH_CRED or doesn't support the minimal operations, the exchange id will be resent with SP4_NONE. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When an NFSv4 client loses contact with the server it can lose any locks that it holds. Currently when it reconnects to the server it simply tries to reclaim those locks. This might succeed even though some other client has held and released a lock in the mean time. So the first client might think the file is unchanged, but it isn't. This isn't good. If, when recovery happens, the locks cannot be claimed because some other client still holds the lock, then we get a message in the kernel logs, but the client can still write. So two clients can both think they have a lock and can both write at the same time. This is equally not good. There was a patch a while ago http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/41917 which tried to address some of this, but it didn't seem to go anywhere. That patch would also send a signal to the process. That might be useful but for now this patch just causes writes to fail. For NFSv4 (unlike v2/v3) there is a strong link between the lock and the write request so we can fairly easily fail any IO of the lock is gone. While some applications might not expect this, it is still safer than allowing the write to succeed. Because this is a fairly big change in behaviour a module parameter, "recover_locks", is introduced which defaults to true (the current behaviour) but can be set to "false" to tell the client not to try to recover things that were lost. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 08 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 09 6月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Quigley 提交于
After looking at all of the nfsv4 operations the label structure has been added to the prototypes of the functions which can transmit label data. Signed-off-by: NMatthew N. Dodd <Matthew.Dodd@sparta.com> Signed-off-by: NMiguel Rodel Felipe <Rodel_FM@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NPhua Eu Gene <PHUA_Eu_Gene@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NKhin Mi Mi Aung <Mi_Mi_AUNG@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Steve Dickson 提交于
In order to mimic the way that NFSv4 ACLs are implemented we have created a structure to be used to pass label data up and down the call chain. This patch adds the new structure and new members to the required NFSv4 call structures. Signed-off-by: NMatthew N. Dodd <Matthew.Dodd@sparta.com> Signed-off-by: NMiguel Rodel Felipe <Rodel_FM@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NPhua Eu Gene <PHUA_Eu_Gene@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NKhin Mi Mi Aung <Mi_Mi_AUNG@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 David Quigley 提交于
This patch adds several new flags to allow the NFS client and server to determine if this attribute is supported and if it is being sent over the wire. Signed-off-by: NMatthew N. Dodd <Matthew.Dodd@sparta.com> Signed-off-by: NMiguel Rodel Felipe <Rodel_FM@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NPhua Eu Gene <PHUA_Eu_Gene@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NKhin Mi Mi Aung <Mi_Mi_AUNG@dsi.a-star.edu.sg> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that we use the same credential for layoutget, layoutcommit and layoutreturn. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The main reason for doing this is will be to allow for an asynchronous RPC mode that we can use for freeing lock stateids as per section 8.2.4 of RFC5661. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-