L4 checksum field is valid only for TCP/UDP packets in Lancer
Signed-off-by: NPadmanabh Ratnakar <padmanabh.ratnakar@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NSathya Perla <sathya.perla@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NSubramanian Seetharaman <subbu.seetharaman@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Workaround added for Lancer in handling RX ERR completion received
when no RX buffers are posted is not needed.
Signed-off-by: NPadmanabh Ratnakar <padmanabh.ratnakar@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NSathya Perla <sathya.perla@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NSubramanian Seetharaman <subbu.seetharaman@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This elimiates a lot of pure overhead due to parameter
passing.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

fib_semantic_match() requires that if the type doesn't signal an
automatic error, it must be of type RTN_UNICAST, RTN_LOCAL,
RTN_BROADCAST, RTN_ANYCAST, or RTN_MULTICAST.

Checking this every route lookup is pointless work.

Instead validate it during route insertion, via fib_create_info().

Also, there was nothing making sure the type value was less than
RTN_MAX, so add that missing check while we're here.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This allows any caller to be prefaced by any specific
pr_fmt to better identify which device driver is using
this function inappropriately.

Add terminating newline.
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

When trying to associate a net_device with another net_device which
already exists, batman-adv assumes that this interface is a fully
initialized batman mesh interface without checking it. The behaviour
when accessing data behind netdev_priv of a random net_device is
undefined and potentially dangerous.
Reported-by: NLinus Lüssing <linus.luessing@ascom.ch>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NLinus Lüssing <linus.luessing@ascom.ch>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Batman-adv works with "hard interfaces" as well as "soft interfaces".
The new name should better make clear which kind of interfaces this
list stores.
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

It might be possible that 2 threads access the same data in the same
rcu grace period. The first thread calls call_rcu() to decrement the
refcount and free the data while the second thread increases the
refcount to use the data. To avoid this race condition all refcount
operations have to be atomic.
Reported-by: NSven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Note: The function compare_ether_addr() provided by the Linux kernel
requires aligned memory.
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

When printing the soft interface table the number of entries in the
softif neigh list are first being counted and a fitting buffer
allocated. After that the softif neigh list gets locked again and
the buffer printed - which has the following two issues:

For one thing, the softif neigh list might have grown when reacquiring
the rcu lock, which results in writing outside of the allocated buffer.
Furthermore 31 Bytes are not enough for printing an entry with a vid
of more than 2 digits.

The manual buffering is unnecessary, we can safely print to the seq
directly during the rcu_read_lock().
Signed-off-by: NLinus Lüssing <linus.luessing@ascom.ch>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

When unicast_send_skb() is increasing the orig_node's refcount another
thread might have been freeing this orig_node already. We need to
increase the refcount in the rcu read lock protected area to avoid that.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Lüssing <linus.luessing@ascom.ch>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

The rcu protected macros rcu_dereference() and rcu_assign_pointer()
for the bat_priv->curr_gw need to be used, as well as spin/rcu locking.

Otherwise we might end up using a curr_gw pointer pointing to already
freed memory.
Reported-by: NSven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Lüssing <linus.luessing@ascom.ch>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Batman-adv could receive several payload broadcasts at the same time
that would trigger access to the broadcast seqno sliding window to
determine whether this is a new broadcast or not. If these incoming
broadcasts are accessing the sliding window simultaneously it could
be left in an inconsistent state. Therefore it is necessary to make
sure this access is atomic.
Reported-by: NLinus Lüssing <linus.luessing@web.de>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Reported-by: NLinus Lüssing <linus.luessing@saxnet.de>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

It might be possible that 2 threads access the same data in the same
rcu grace period. The first thread calls call_rcu() to decrement the
refcount and free the data while the second thread increases the
refcount to use the data. To avoid this race condition all refcount
operations have to be atomic.
Reported-by: NSven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

It might be possible that 2 threads access the same data in the same
rcu grace period. The first thread calls call_rcu() to decrement the
refcount and free the data while the second thread increases the
refcount to use the data. To avoid this race condition all refcount
operations have to be atomic.
Reported-by: NSven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

It might be possible that 2 threads access the same data in the same
rcu grace period. The first thread calls call_rcu() to decrement the
refcount and free the data while the second thread increases the
refcount to use the data. To avoid this race condition all refcount
operations have to be atomic.
Reported-by: NSven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

It might be possible that 2 threads access the same data in the same
rcu grace period. The first thread calls call_rcu() to decrement the
refcount and free the data while the second thread increases the
refcount to use the data. To avoid this race condition all refcount
operations have to be atomic.
Reported-by: NSven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

bonding / alternating candidates need to be secured by rcu locks
as well. This patch therefore converts the bonding list
from a plain pointer list to a rcu securable lists and references
the bonding candidates.
Signed-off-by: NSimon Wunderlich <siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

hardif_disable_interface() calls purge_orig_ref() to immediately free
all neighbors associated with the interface that is going down.
purge_orig_neighbors() checked if the interface status is IF_INACTIVE
which is set to IF_NOT_IN_USE shortly before calling purge_orig_ref().
Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Signed-off-by: NMarek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

The only necessary parts are the src/dst addresses, the
interface indexes, the TOS, and the mark.

The rest is unnecessary bloat, which amounts to nearly
50 bytes on 64-bit.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

rt->rt_iif is only ever inspected on input routes, for example DCCP
uses this to populate a route lookup flow key when generating replies
to another packet.

Therefore, setting it to anything other than zero on output routes
makes no sense.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We know this is a new route object, so doing atomics and
stuff makes no sense at all.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We burn a lot of useless cycles, cpu store buffer traffic, and
memory operations memset()'ing the on-stack flow used to perform
output route lookups in __ip_route_output_key().

Only the first half of the flow object members even matter for
output route lookups in this context, specifically:

FIB rules matching cares about:

	dst, src, tos, iif, oif, mark

FIB trie lookup cares about:

	dst

FIB semantic match cares about:

	tos, scope, oif

Therefore only initialize these specific members and elide the
memset entirely.

On Niagara2 this kills about ~300 cycles from the output route
lookup path.

Likely, we can take things further, since all callers of output
route lookups essentially throw away the on-stack flow they use.
So they don't care if we use it as a scratch-pad to compute the
final flow key.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>

David noticed :

------------------
Eric, I was profiling the non-routing-cache case and something that
stuck out is the case of calling inet_getpeer() with create==0.

If an entry is not found, we have to redo the lookup under a spinlock
to make certain that a concurrent writer rebalancing the tree does
not "hide" an existing entry from us.

This makes the case of a create==0 lookup for a not-present entry
really expensive.  It is on the order of 600 cpu cycles on my
Niagara2.

I added a hack to not do the relookup under the lock when create==0
and it now costs less than 300 cycles.

This is now a pretty common operation with the way we handle COW'd
metrics, so I think it's definitely worth optimizing.
-----------------

One solution is to use a seqlock instead of a spinlock to protect struct
inet_peer_base.

After a failed avl tree lookup, we can easily detect if a writer did
some changes during our lookup. Taking the lock and redo the lookup is
only necessary in this case.

Note: Add one private rcu_deref_locked() macro to place in one spot the
access to spinlock included in seqlock.
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Merge branch 'for-davem' of ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-next-2.6