Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 09 8月, 2016 2 次提交
    • M
      drm/i915/dp: Revert "drm/i915/dp: fall back to 18 bpp when sink capability is unknown" · 196f954e
      由 Mario Kleiner 提交于 
      This reverts commit 013dd9e0
("drm/i915/dp: fall back to 18 bpp when sink capability is unknown")

This commit introduced a regression into stable kernels,
as it reduces output color depth to 6 bpc for any video
sink connected to a Displayport connector if that sink
doesn't report a specific color depth via EDID, or if
our EDID parser doesn't actually recognize the proper
bpc from EDID.

Affected are active DisplayPort->VGA converters and
active DisplayPort->DVI converters. Both should be
able to handle 8 bpc, but are degraded to 6 bpc with
this patch.

The reverted commit was meant to fix
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105331

A followup patch implements a fix for that specific bug,
which is caused by a faulty EDID of the affected DP panel
by adding a new EDID quirk for that panel.

DP 18 bpp fallback handling and other improvements to
DP sink bpc detection will be handled for future
kernels in a separate series of patches.

Please backport to stable.
Signed-off-by: NMario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      196f954e
    • M
      drm/edid: Add 6 bpc quirk for display AEO model 0. · e10aec65
      由 Mario Kleiner 提交于 
      Bugzilla https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105331
reports that the "AEO model 0" display is driven with 8 bpc
without dithering by default, which looks bad because that
panel is apparently a 6 bpc DP panel with faulty EDID.

A fix for this was made by commit 013dd9e0
("drm/i915/dp: fall back to 18 bpp when sink capability is unknown").

That commit triggers new regressions in precision for DP->DVI and
DP->VGA displays. A patch is out to revert that commit, but it will
revert video output for the AEO model 0 panel to 8 bpc without
dithering.

The EDID 1.3 of that panel, as decoded from the xrandr output
attached to that bugzilla bug report, is somewhat faulty, and beyond
other problems also sets the "DFP 1.x compliant TMDS" bit, which
according to DFP spec means to drive the panel with 8 bpc and
no dithering in absence of other colorimetry information.

Try to make the original bug reporter happy despite the
faulty EDID by adding a quirk to mark that panel as 6 bpc,
so 6 bpc output with dithering creates a nice picture.

Tested by injecting the edid from the fdo bug into a DP connector
via drm_kms_helper.edid_firmware and verifying the 6 bpc + dithering
is selected.

This patch should be backported to stable.
Signed-off-by: NMario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      e10aec65
  3. 08 8月, 2016 2 次提交
    • D
      drm: Paper over locking inversion after registration rework · 5c6c201c
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      drm_connector_register_all requires a few too many locks because our
connector_list locking is busted. Add another FIXME+hack to work
around this. This should address the below lockdep splat:

======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
4.7.0-rc5+ #524 Tainted: G           O
-------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u8:0/6 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120

but task is already holding lock:
 ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ac195>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}:
       [<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
       [<ffffffff819a55b4>] down_write+0x44/0x80
       [<ffffffff810abf91>] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x21/0xb0
       [<ffffffff814c7448>] fb_register_client+0x18/0x20
       [<ffffffff814c6c86>] backlight_device_register+0x136/0x260
       [<ffffffffa0127eb2>] intel_backlight_device_register+0xa2/0x160 [i915]
       [<ffffffffa00f46be>] intel_connector_register+0xe/0x10 [i915]
       [<ffffffffa0112bfb>] intel_dp_connector_register+0x1b/0x80 [i915]
       [<ffffffff8159dfea>] drm_connector_register+0x4a/0x80
       [<ffffffff8159fe44>] drm_connector_register_all+0x64/0xf0
       [<ffffffff815a2a64>] drm_modeset_register_all+0x174/0x1c0
       [<ffffffff81599b72>] drm_dev_register+0xc2/0xd0
       [<ffffffffa00621d7>] i915_driver_load+0x1547/0x2200 [i915]
       [<ffffffffa006d80f>] i915_pci_probe+0x4f/0x70 [i915]
       [<ffffffff814a2135>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
       [<ffffffff814a349b>] pci_device_probe+0xdb/0x130
       [<ffffffff815c07e3>] driver_probe_device+0x223/0x440
       [<ffffffff815c0ad5>] __driver_attach+0xd5/0x100
       [<ffffffff815be386>] bus_for_each_dev+0x66/0xa0
       [<ffffffff815c002e>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
       [<ffffffff815bf9be>] bus_add_driver+0x1ee/0x280
       [<ffffffff815c1810>] driver_register+0x60/0xe0
       [<ffffffff814a1a10>] __pci_register_driver+0x60/0x70
       [<ffffffffa01a905b>] i915_init+0x5b/0x62 [i915]
       [<ffffffff8100042d>] do_one_initcall+0x3d/0x150
       [<ffffffff811a935b>] do_init_module+0x5f/0x1d9
       [<ffffffff81124416>] load_module+0x20e6/0x27e0
       [<ffffffff81124d63>] SYSC_finit_module+0xc3/0xf0
       [<ffffffff81124dae>] SyS_finit_module+0xe/0x10
       [<ffffffff819a83a9>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac

-> #0 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}:
       [<ffffffff810df0ac>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1260
       [<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
       [<ffffffff819a3097>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0
       [<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
       [<ffffffff8158f79b>] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2b/0x80
       [<ffffffff8158f81d>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x50
       [<ffffffffa0105f7a>] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x60 [i915]
       [<ffffffff814c13c6>] fbcon_init+0x586/0x610
       [<ffffffff8154d16a>] visual_init+0xca/0x130
       [<ffffffff8154e611>] do_bind_con_driver+0x1c1/0x3a0
       [<ffffffff8154eaf6>] do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180
       [<ffffffff814bd3a7>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x57/0xb0
       [<ffffffff814c1e48>] fbcon_event_notify+0x658/0x750
       [<ffffffff810abcae>] notifier_call_chain+0x3e/0xb0
       [<ffffffff810ac1ad>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
       [<ffffffff810ac1e6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
       [<ffffffff814c748b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20
       [<ffffffff814c86b1>] register_framebuffer+0x251/0x330
       [<ffffffff8158fa9f>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x25f/0x3f0
       [<ffffffffa0106b48>] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915]
       [<ffffffff810adfd8>] async_run_entry_fn+0x48/0x150
       [<ffffffff810a3947>] process_one_work+0x1e7/0x750
       [<ffffffff810a3efb>] worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0
       [<ffffffff810aad4f>] kthread+0xef/0x110
       [<ffffffff819a85ef>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem);
                               lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
                               lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem);
  lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

6 locks held by kworker/u8:0/6:
 #0:  ("events_unbound"){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff810a38c9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x750
 #1:  ((&entry->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810a38c9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x750
 #2:  (registration_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c8487>] register_framebuffer+0x27/0x330
 #3:  (console_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c86ce>] register_framebuffer+0x26e/0x330
 #4:  (&fb_info->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814c78dd>] lock_fb_info+0x1d/0x40
 #5:  ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ac195>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70

stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Tainted: G           O    4.7.0-rc5+ #524
Hardware name: Intel Corp. Broxton P/NOTEBOOK, BIOS APLKRVPA.X64.0138.B33.1606250842 06/25/2016
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
 0000000000000000 ffff8800758577f0 ffffffff814507a5 ffffffff828b9900
 ffffffff828b9900 ffff880075857830 ffffffff810dc6fa ffff880075857880
 ffff88007584d688 0000000000000005 0000000000000006 ffff88007584d6b0
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff814507a5>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92
 [<ffffffff810dc6fa>] print_circular_bug+0x1aa/0x200
 [<ffffffff810df0ac>] __lock_acquire+0x10fc/0x1260
 [<ffffffff810df611>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0x200
 [<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
 [<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
 [<ffffffff819a3097>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x3c0
 [<ffffffff815afde0>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
 [<ffffffff810fa85f>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x7f/0x90
 [<ffffffff81208218>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x248/0x2b0
 [<ffffffff815afdc5>] ? drm_modeset_lock_all+0x25/0x120
 [<ffffffff815afde0>] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x40/0x120
 [<ffffffff8158f79b>] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x2b/0x80
 [<ffffffff8158f81d>] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x50
 [<ffffffffa0105f7a>] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x60 [i915]
 [<ffffffff814c13c6>] fbcon_init+0x586/0x610
 [<ffffffff8154d16a>] visual_init+0xca/0x130
 [<ffffffff8154e611>] do_bind_con_driver+0x1c1/0x3a0
 [<ffffffff8154eaf6>] do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180
 [<ffffffff814bd3a7>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x57/0xb0
 [<ffffffff814c1e48>] fbcon_event_notify+0x658/0x750
 [<ffffffff810abcae>] notifier_call_chain+0x3e/0xb0
 [<ffffffff810ac1ad>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
 [<ffffffff810ac1e6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
 [<ffffffff814c748b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20
 [<ffffffff814c86b1>] register_framebuffer+0x251/0x330
 [<ffffffff815b7e8d>] ? vga_switcheroo_client_fb_set+0x5d/0x70
 [<ffffffff8158fa9f>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x25f/0x3f0
 [<ffffffffa0106b48>] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915]
 [<ffffffff810adfd8>] async_run_entry_fn+0x48/0x150
 [<ffffffff810a3947>] process_one_work+0x1e7/0x750
 [<ffffffff810a38c9>] ? process_one_work+0x169/0x750
 [<ffffffff810a3efb>] worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0
 [<ffffffff810a3eb0>] ? process_one_work+0x750/0x750
 [<ffffffff810aad4f>] kthread+0xef/0x110
 [<ffffffff819a85ef>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
 [<ffffffff810aac60>] ? kthread_stop+0x2e0/0x2e0

v2: Rebase onto the right branch (hand-editing patches ftw) and add more
reporters.
Reported-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reported-by: NJiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      5c6c201c
    • L
      drm: rcar-du: Link HDMI encoder with bridge · 29986cc8
      由 Laurent Pinchart 提交于 
      The conversion of the rcar-du driver from the I2C slave encoder to the
DRM bridge API left the HDMI encoder's bridge pointer NULL, preventing
the bridge from being handled automatically by the DRM core. Fix it.

Fixes: 1d926114 ("drm: rcar-du: Remove i2c slave encoder interface for hdmi encoder")
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      29986cc8
  5. 06 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 04 8月, 2016 3 次提交
  9. 03 8月, 2016 7 次提交
  11. 01 8月, 2016 3 次提交
  13. 30 7月, 2016 22 次提交