Previously, we cached _PRT (PCI routing table, ACPI 5.0 sec 6.2.12)
contents and associated each _PRT entry with a PCI bus number.  The bus
number association means dependencies on PCI device enumeration and bus
number assignment, as well as on the PCI/ACPI binding process.

After 4f535093 ("PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible"),
these dependencies caused the IRQ issues reported by Peter:

    pci 0000:00:1e.0: PCI bridge to [bus 09] (subtractive decode)
    pci 0000:00:1e.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
    snd_ctxfi 0000:09:02.0: PCI INT A: no GSI - using ISA IRQ 5
    irq 18: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)

This patch removes _PRT caching.  Instead, we evaluate _PRT as needed
in the pci_enable_device() path.  This also removes the dependency on
PCI bus numbers: we can simply look at the _PRT associated with each
bridge as we walk upstream toward the root.

[bhelgaas: changelog]
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53561Reported-and-tested-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Suggested-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Commit 668192b6 "PCI: acpiphp: Move host bridge hotplug
to pci_root.c" has moved PCI host bridge hotplug logic from acpiphp
to pci_root, but there is still PCI host bridge hotplug related
dead code left in acpiphp. So remove those dead code.

Now companion ACPI devices are always created before corresponding
PCI devices. And the ACPI event handle_hotplug_event_bridge() will be
installed only if it has associated PCI device. So remove dead code to
handle bridge hot-adding in function handle_hotplug_event_bridge().
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

With commit 4f535093 "PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as
early as possible", companion ACPI devices should be created before
creating corresponding PCI devices, otherwise it will break the ACPI
PCI binding logic.

Without this patch, the /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../firmware_node symlink
is missing after hot-removing and hot-adding a device with acpiphp.
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Delete unused variable "rc" to fix build warning in drivers/pci/iov.c
Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

We want to put pci_dev structs in the device tree as soon as possible so
for_each_pci_dev() iteration will not miss them, but driver attachment
needs to be delayed until after pci_assign_unassigned_resources() to make
sure all devices have resources assigned first.

This patch moves device registering from pci_bus_add_devices() to
pci_device_add(), which happens earlier, leaving driver attachment in
pci_bus_add_devices().

It also removes unattached child bus handling in pci_bus_add_devices().
That's not needed because child bus via pci_add_new_bus() is already
in parent bus children list.

[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We want to add PCI devices to the device tree as early as possible but
delay attaching drivers.

device_add() adds a device to the device hierarchy and (via
device_attach()) attaches a matching driver and calls its .probe() method.
We want to separate adding the device to the hierarchy from attaching the
driver.

This patch does that by adding "match_driver" in struct pci_dev.  When
false, we return failure from pci_bus_match(), which makes device_attach()
believe there's no matching driver.

Later, we set "match_driver = true" and call device_attach() again, which
now attaches the driver and calls its .probe() method.

[bhelgaas: changelog, explicitly init dev->match_driver,
fold device_attach() call into pci_bus_add_device()]
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Could have root bus hot-added later and there may be slots that need
acpiphp.

The result returned by acpiphp_get_num_slots() is meaningless, because
the bridge the slots are under may be added after this function has been
called, so drop acpiphp_get_num_slots() and the code using it.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

acpi_install_notify_handler() could fail.  So check the exit status
and give a better debug info.
Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The acpiphp driver is confusing because it contains partial support for PCI
host bridge hotplug as well as support for hotplug of PCI devices.

This patch moves the host bridge hot-add support to pci_root.c and adds
hot-remove support in pci_root.c.

How to test it: if sci_emu patch is applied, find out root bus number to
ACPI root name mapping from dmesg or /sys.  To remove root bus:

  echo "\_SB.PCIB 3" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/sci_notify

To add back root bus:

  echo "\_SB.PCIB 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/sci_notify
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Will need to use it for PCI root bridge hotplug support, so rename
*acpiphp* to *acpi* and move to osc.c.  Also make kacpi_hotplug_wq static
after that.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

According to device model documentation, the way to create/destroy PCI
devices should be symmetric.  The rule is to either use
  1) device_register()/device_unregister()
or
  2) device_initialize()/device_add()/device_del()/put_device().

So change PCI core logic to follow the rule and get rid of the redundant
pci_dev_get()/pci_dev_put() pair.
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Function pci_get_dev_by_id() takes a reference on the pci_dev returned, so
pci_dev_present() should release the corresponding reference.
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Otherwise irq_desc for PCI bridge with hot-added IOAPIC may not be
allocated on the local node.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We can stop trying according to try_number now and do not need to use
root_bus checking as stop sign.

In extreme case we could need to reallocate resource for device just
under root bus.  For PCI root bus hot-add, we need to retry to assign
resources to PCI devices just under pci root bus.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When system support hotplug bridge with children hotplug slots, we need
to make sure that parent bridge get preallocated resource so later when
device is plugged into children slot, those children devices will get
resource allocated.

We do not meet this problem, because for PCIe hotplug card, when acpiphp
is used, pci_scan_bridge will set that for us when detect hotplug bit in
slot cap.
Reported-and-tested-by: NJason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NJason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the
invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is
unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called
by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next
invocations of it to do nothing.

For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use
acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it.  Additionally, rearrange the
code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the
acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

Should use acpi_device pointer directly instead of use handle and
get the device pointer again later.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Make acpi_bus_trim() work in analogy with acpi_bus_scan() and carry
out two passes such that ACPI drivers will be detached from device
nodes being removed in the first pass and the device nodes themselves
will be removed in the second pass.

For this purpose split the driver unregistration out of
acpi_bus_remove() into a new routine, acpi_bus_device_detach(), that
will be executed by acpi_bus_trim() in the additional first pass as
a post-order callback.

This is necessary, because some ACPI drivers' .remove() routines
unregister struct device objects associated with the ACPI device
nodes being removed and that needs to happen while the ACPI
device nodes are still around (for example, in case they need to be
used for power management or similar things at that time).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>

The current acpi_bus_trim() implementation is not really
straightforward and may be simplified significantly by using
acpi_walk_namespace() with acpi_bus_remove() as a post-order
callback.

Observe that acpi_bus_remove(), as called by acpi_bus_trim(), cannot
actually fail, because its first argument is guaranteed not to be
NULL thanks to the acpi_bus_get_device() check in acpi_bus_trim(),
so simply move the acpi_bus_get_device() check to acpi_bus_remove()
and use acpi_walk_namespace() to execute it for every device under
start->handle as a post-order callback.  The, run it directly for
start->handle itself.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>

All callers of acpi_bus_trim() pass 1 (true) as the second argument
of it, so remove that argument entirely and change acpi_bus_trim()
to always behave as though it were 1.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>

Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister(), type, which is
not used by that function.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>

Since device_attach() returns 1 on success (a driver has been bound
to the device), the check against its return value in
acpi_bus_device_attach() should modified to take that into accout.
Make it so.

[rjw: Subject and changelog.]
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Firmware may have assigned PCI BARs for hot-added devices, so reserve
those resources before trying to allocate more.

[bhelgaas: move empty weak definition here]
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Commit 805d410f (ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from
probing ACPI drivers) introduced an ACPI power resources management
regression, because it didn't ensure that the power resources
driver bind to the struct acpi_device objects corresponding
to power resources as soon as they were created.  As a result,
ACPI power management routines may attempt to access power resource
objects before they are ready to use.

To fix this problem, tell the acpi_add_single_object() in
acpi_bus_check_add() to probe the driver for objects of type
ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER.  This fix has been verified to work on
HP nx6325 where the problem was first observed.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Drop the .bind() and .unbind() that have no more users from
struct acpi_device_ops and remove all of the code referring to
them from drivers/acpi/scan.c.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Move the code related to _PRT setup and removal and to power
resources from acpi_pci_bind() and acpi_pci_unbind() to the .setup()
and .cleanup() callbacks in acpi_pci_bus and remove acpi_pci_bind()
and acpi_pci_unbind() that have no purpose any more.  Accordingly,
remove the code related to device .bind() and .unbind() operations
from the ACPI PCI root bridge driver.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Currently, the ACPI wakeup capability of PCI devices is set up
in two different places, partially in acpi_pci_bind() where
runtime wakeup is initialized and partially in
platform_pci_wakeup_init(), where system wakeup is initialized.
The cleanup is only done in acpi_pci_unbind() and it only covers
runtime wakeup.

Use the new .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks in struct acpi_bus_type
to consolidate that code and do the setup and the cleanup each in one
place.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Add two new callbacks,.setup() and .cleanup(), struct acpi_bus_type
and modify acpi_platform_notify() to call .setup() after executing
acpi_bind_one() successfully and acpi_platform_notify_remove() to
call .cleanup() before running acpi_unbind_one().  This will allow
the users of struct acpi_bus_type, PCI in particular, to specify
operations to be executed right after the given device has been
associated with a companion struct acpi_device and right before
it's going to be detached from that companion, respectively.

The main motivation is to be able to get rid of acpi_pci_bind()
and acpi_pci_unbind(), which are horrible horrible stuff.  [In short,
there are three problems with them: The way they populate the .bind()
and .unbind() callbacks of ACPI devices is rather less than
straightforward, they require special hotplug-specific paths to be
present in the ACPI namespace scanning code and by the time
acpi_pci_unbind() is called the PCI device object in question may
not exist any more.]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
the handle passed as the first argument.  Unfortunately, however,
this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
handle).

For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
useful for them.  The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
executed directly from acpi_scan_init().

Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
argument of acpi_bus_add().  Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

After the removal of the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() there is
no difference between the ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH and ACPI_BUS_ADD_START
add types, so the add_type field in struct acpi_device may be
replaced with a single flag.  Do that calling the flag match_driver.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

After the removal of acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() is not necessary any more,
so drop it and update acpi_bus_check_add() accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
redefine its header to match the body.  Update all of its callers as
necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
lines of code (Linus will like that).

Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
note to self to take care of that later).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

The ACPI PCI root bridge driver was the only ACPI driver implementing
the .start() callback, which isn't used by any ACPI drivers any more
now.

For this reason, acpi_start_single_object() has no purpose any more,
so remove it and all references to it.  Also remove
acpi_bus_start_device(), whose only purpose was to call
acpi_start_single_object().

Moreover, since after the removal of acpi_bus_start_device() the
only purpose of acpi_bus_start() remains to call
acpi_update_all_gpes(), move that into acpi_bus_add() and drop
acpi_bus_start() too, remove its header from acpi_bus.h and
update all of its former users accordingly.

This change was previously proposed in a different from by
Yinghai Lu.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Move the code from the ACPI PCI root bridge's .start() callback
routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), directly into acpi_pci_root_add()
and drop acpi_pci_root_start().

It is safe to do that, because it is now always guaranteed that
when struct pci_dev objects are created, their companion struct
acpi_device objects are already present, so it is not necessary to
wait for them to be created before calling pci_bus_add_devices().

This change was previously proposed in a different form by
Yinghai Lu.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

If acpi_bus_check_add() is called for a handle already having an
existing struct acpi_device object attached, it is not necessary to
check the type and status of the device correspondig to it, so
change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add() to avoid that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Notice that one member of struct acpi_bus_ops, acpi_op_add, is not
used anywhere any more and the relationship between its remaining
members, acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start, is such that it doesn't
make sense to set the latter without setting the former at the same
time.  Therefore, replace struct acpi_bus_ops with new a enum type,
enum acpi_bus_add_type, with three values, ACPI_BUS_ADD_BASIC,
ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH, ACPI_BUS_ADD_START, corresponding to
both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start unset, acpi_op_match set and
acpi_op_start unset, and both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start set,
respectively.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Objects of type struct acpi_bus_ops are currently used to pass
information between different parts of the ACPI namespace scanning
code, sometimes in quite convoluted ways.  It turns out that that
is not necessary in some cases, so simplify the code by reducing
the utilization of struct acpi_bus_ops objects where clearly
possible.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

The current ACPI namespace scanning code suggests that acpi_bus_add()
and acpi_bus_start() share some code.  In fact, however, they are
completely different code paths (except for the initial checks), so
refactor the code to make that distinction visibly clear.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Instead of running acpi_pci_root_init() from a separate subsys
initcall, call it directly from acpi_scan_init() before scanning the
ACPI namespace for the first time, so that the PCI root bridge
driver's .add() routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), is always run
before binding ACPI drivers or attaching "companion" device objects
to struct acpi_device objects below the root bridge's device node in
the ACPI namespace.

The first, simpler reason for doing this is that it makes the
situation during boot more similar to the situation during hotplug,
in which the ACPI PCI root bridge driver is always present.

The second reason is that acpi_pci_root_init() causes struct pci_dev
objects to be created for all PCI devices below the bridge and
these objects may be necessary for whatever is done with the other
ACPI device nodes in that namespace scope.  For example, devices
created by acpi_create_platform_device() sometimes may need to be
added to the device hierarchy as children of PCI bridges.  For this
purpose, however, the struct pci_dev objects representing those
bridges need to exist before the platform devices in question are
registered.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Split the ACPI namespace scanning for devices into two passes, such
that struct acpi_device objects are registerd in the first pass
without probing ACPI drivers and the drivers are probed against them
directly in the second pass.

There are two main reasons for doing that.

First, the ACPI PCI root bridge driver's .add() routine,
acpi_pci_root_add(), causes struct pci_dev objects to be created for
all PCI devices under the given root bridge.  Usually, there are
corresponding ACPI device nodes in the ACPI namespace for some of
those devices and therefore there should be "companion" struct
acpi_device objects to attach those struct pci_dev objects to.  These
struct acpi_device objects should exist when the corresponding
struct pci_dev objects are created, but that is only guaranteed
during boot and not during hotplug.  This leads to a number of
functional differences between the boot and the hotplug cases which
are not strictly necessary and make the code more complicated.

For example, this forces the ACPI PCI root bridge driver to defer the
registration of the just created struct pci_dev objects and to use a
special .start() callback routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), to make
sure that all of the "companion" struct acpi_device objects will be
present at PCI devices registration time during hotplug.

If those differences can be eliminated, we will be able to
consolidate the boot and hotplug code paths for the enumeration and
registration of PCI devices and to reduce the complexity of that
code quite a bit.

The second reason is that, in general, it should be possible to
resolve conflicts of resources assigned by the BIOS to different
devices represented by ACPI namespace nodes before any drivers bind
to them and before they are attached to "companion" objects
representing physical devices (such as struct pci_dev).  However, for
this purpose we first need to enumerate all ACPI device nodes in the
given namespace scope.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>