Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • B
      ACPICA: Major update for acpi_get_object_info external interface · 15b8dd53
      由 Bob Moore 提交于 
      Completed a major update for the acpi_get_object_info external interface.
Changes include:
 - Support for variable, unlimited length HID, UID, and CID strings
 - Support Processor objects the same as Devices (HID,UID,CID,ADR,STA, etc.)
 - Call the _SxW power methods on behalf of a device object
 - Determine if a device is a PCI root bridge
 - Change the ACPI_BUFFER parameter to ACPI_DEVICE_INFO.
These changes will require an update to all callers of this interface.
See the ACPICA Programmer Reference for details.

Also, update all invocations of acpi_get_object_info interface
Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      15b8dd53
  3. 16 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 11 6月, 2009 2 次提交
  7. 04 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      rfkill: rewrite · 19d337df
      由 Johannes Berg 提交于 
      This patch completely rewrites the rfkill core to address
the following deficiencies:

 * all rfkill drivers need to implement polling where necessary
   rather than having one central implementation

 * updating the rfkill state cannot be done from arbitrary
   contexts, forcing drivers to use schedule_work and requiring
   lots of code

 * rfkill drivers need to keep track of soft/hard blocked
   internally -- the core should do this

 * the rfkill API has many unexpected quirks, for example being
   asymmetric wrt. alloc/free and register/unregister

 * rfkill can call back into a driver from within a function the
   driver called -- this is prone to deadlocks and generally
   should be avoided

 * rfkill-input pointlessly is a separate module

 * drivers need to #ifdef rfkill functions (unless they want to
   depend on or select RFKILL) -- rfkill should provide inlines
   that do nothing if it isn't compiled in

 * the rfkill structure is not opaque -- drivers need to initialise
   it correctly (lots of sanity checking code required) -- instead
   force drivers to pass the right variables to rfkill_alloc()

 * the documentation is hard to read because it always assumes the
   reader is completely clueless and contains way TOO MANY CAPS

 * the rfkill code needlessly uses a lot of locks and atomic
   operations in locked sections

 * fix LED trigger to actually change the LED when the radio state
   changes -- this wasn't done before
Tested-by: NAlan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> [thinkpad]
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      19d337df
  9. 24 4月, 2009 5 次提交
  11. 23 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 08 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 04 4月, 2009 3 次提交
  17. 28 3月, 2009 14 次提交
  19. 16 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      Rationalize fasync return values · 60aa4924
      由 Jonathan Corbet 提交于 
      Most fasync implementations do something like:

     return fasync_helper(...);

But fasync_helper() will return a positive value at times - a feature used
in at least one place.  Thus, a number of other drivers do:

     err = fasync_helper(...);
     if (err < 0)
             return err;
     return 0;

In the interests of consistency and more concise code, it makes sense to
map positive return values onto zero where ->fasync() is called.

Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      60aa4924
  21. 19 12月, 2008 1 次提交
    • L
      create drivers/platform/x86/ from drivers/misc/ · 41b16dce
      由 Len Brown 提交于 
      Move x86 platform specific drivers from drivers/misc/
to a new home under drivers/platform/x86/.

The community has been maintaining x86 vendor-specific
platform specific drivers under /drivers/misc/ for a few years.
The oldest ones started life under drivers/acpi.
They moved out of drivers/acpi/ because they don't actually
implement the ACPI specification, but either simply
use ACPI, or implement vendor-specific ACPI extensions.

In the future we anticipate...
drivers/misc/ will go away.
other architectures will create drivers/platform/<arch>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      41b16dce
  23. 27 11月, 2008 2 次提交
  25. 08 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  27. 02 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      saner FASYNC handling on file close · 233e70f4
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      As it is, all instances of ->release() for files that have ->fasync()
need to remember to evict file from fasync lists; forgetting that
creates a hole and we actually have a bunch that *does* forget.

So let's keep our lives simple - let __fput() check FASYNC in
file->f_flags and call ->fasync() there if it's been set.  And lose that
crap in ->release() instances - leaving it there is still valid, but we
don't have to bother anymore.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      233e70f4
  29. 31 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  31. 28 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  33. 17 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  35. 03 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  37. 29 4月, 2008 1 次提交