- 19 2月, 2011 40 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
No users outside of core. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
No users outside of core. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
We need to maintain the flag for now in both fields status and istate. Add a CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_COMPAT switch to allow testing w/o the status one. Wrap the access to status IRQ_INPROGRESS in a inline which can be turned of with CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_COMPAT along with the define. There is no reason that anything outside of core looks at this. That needs some modifications, but we'll get there. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
No users outside of core. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
No need for a separate function in the core code. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
No users outside. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
No users outside of core Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The irq_desc.status field will either go away or renamed to settings. Anyway we need to maintain compatibility to avoid breaking the world and some more. While moving bits into the core, I need to avoid that I use any of the still existing IRQ_ bits in the core code by typos. So that file will hold the inline wrappers and some nasty CPP tricks to break the build when typoed. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
That field will contain internal state information which is not going to be exposed to anything outside the core code - except via accessor functions. I'm tired of everyone fiddling in irq_desc.status. core_internal_state__do_not_mess_with_it is clear enough, annoying to type and easy to grep for. Offenders will be tracked down and slapped with stinking trouts. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
All archs implement show_interrupts() in more or less the same way. That's tons of duplicated code with different bugs with no value. Implement a generic version and deprecate show_interrupts() Unfortunately we need some ifdeffery for !GENERIC_HARDIRQ archs. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Now that all core users are converted one layer can go. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
It's safe to drop the IRQ_INPROGRESS flag between action chain walks as we are protected by desc->lock. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Core code replacement for the ugly camel case. It contains all the code which is shared in all handlers. clear status flags set INPROGRESS flag unlock call action chain note_interrupt lock clr INPROGRESS flag Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
IRQ_MASKED is set in mask_ack_irq() anyway. Remove it from handle_edge_irq() to allow simpler ab^HHreuse of that function. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <20110202212551.918484270@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Handle IRQ_DISABLED consistent. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Now that everything uses the wrappers, we can remove the default functions. None of those functions is performance critical. That makes the IRQ_MASKED flag tracking fully consistent. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Create irq_disable/enable and use them to keep the flags consistent. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Aside of duplicated code some of the startup/shutdown sites do not handle the MASKED/DISABLED flags and the depth field at all. Move that to a helper function and take care of it there. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <20110202212551.787481468@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The if (chip->irq_shutdown) check will always evaluate to true, as we fill in chip->irq_shutdown with default_shutdown in irq_chip_set_defaults() if the chip does not provide its own function. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <20110202212551.667607458@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Soleley used in core code. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
With the chip.end() function gone we might run into a situation where a poll call runs and the real interrupt comes in, sees IRQ_INPROGRESS and disables the line. That might be a perfect working one, which will then be masked forever. So mark them polled while the poll runs. When the real handler sees IRQ_INPROGRESS it checks the poll flag and waits for the polling to complete. Add the necessary amount of sanity checks to it to avoid deadlocks. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
No point in running concurrent pollers which confuse each other by setting PENDING. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
There is no point in polling disabled lines. percpu does not make sense at all because we only poll on the cpu we're currently running on. Also polling per_cpu interrupts is racy as hell. The handler runs without locking so we might get a huge surprise. If the timer interrupt needs polling, then we wont get there anyway. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
try_one_irq() contains redundant code and lots of useless checks for shared interrupts. Check for shared before setting IRQ_INPROGRESS and then call handle_IRQ_event() while pending. Shorter version with the same functionality. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
We run all handlers with interrupts disabled and expect them not to enable them. Warn when we catch one who does. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
We cannot walk the action chain unlocked. Even if IRQ_INPROGRESS is set an action can be removed and we follow a null pointer. It's safe to take the lock there, because the code which removes the action will call synchronize_irq() which waits unlocked for IRQ_INPROGRESS going away. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Thread affinity is already set by setup_affinity(). Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
While rumaging through arch code I found that there are a few workarounds which deal with the fact that the initial affinity setting from request_irq() copies the mask into irq_data->affinity before the chip code is called. In the normal path we unconditionally copy the mask when the chip code returns 0. Copy after the code is called and add a return code IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY for the chip functions, which prevents the copy. That way we see the real mask when the chip function decided to truncate it further as some arches do. IRQ_SET_MASK_OK is 0, which is the current behaviour. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
If the affinity had been set by the user, then a later request_irq() will honour that setting. But online cpus can have changed. So apply the online mask and for this case as well. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
IRQ_NO_BALANCING is already checked in irq_can_set_affinity() above, no need to check it again. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
There is lot of #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ along with duplicated code in the irq core. Move the #ifdeffery into one place and cleanup the code so it's readable. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The irq namespace has become quite convoluted. My bad. Clean it up and deprecate the old functions. All new functions follow the scheme: irq number based: irq_set/get/xxx/_xxx(unsigned int irq, ...) irq_data based: irq_data_set/get/xxx/_xxx(struct irq_data *d, ....) irq_desc based: irq_desc_get_xxx(struct irq_desc *desc) Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
chips behind a slow bus cannot update the chip under desc->lock, but we miss the chip_buslock/chip_bus_sync_unlock() calls around the set type and set wake functions. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
We face more and more the requirement to expand nr_irqs at runtime. The reason are irq expanders which can not be detected in the early boot stage. So we speculate nr_irqs to have enough room. Further Xen needs extra irq numbers and we really want to avoid adding more "detection" code into the early boot. There is no real good reason why we need to limit nr_irqs at early boot. Allow the allocation code to expand nr_irqs. We have already 8k extra number space in the allocation bitmap, so lets use it. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-