1. 09 8月, 2014 10 次提交
  2. 07 8月, 2014 18 次提交
  3. 06 8月, 2014 4 次提交
    • C
      s390/locking: Reenable optimistic spinning · 36e7fdaa
      Christian Borntraeger 提交于
      commit 4badad35 (locking/mutex: Disable
      optimistic spinning on some architectures) fenced spinning for
      architectures without proper cmpxchg.
      There is no need to disable mutex spinning on s390, though:
      The instructions CS,CSG and friends provide the proper guarantees.
      (We dont implement cmpxchg with locks).
      Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      36e7fdaa
    • D
      sparc64: Fix up merge thinko. · 5b6ff9df
      David S. Miller 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5b6ff9df
    • T
      x86: MCE: Add raw_lock conversion again · ed5c41d3
      Thomas Gleixner 提交于
      Commit ea431643 ("x86/mce: Fix CMCI preemption bugs") breaks RT by
      the completely unrelated conversion of the cmci_discover_lock to a
      regular (non raw) spinlock.  This lock was annotated in commit
      59d958d2 ("locking, x86: mce: Annotate cmci_discover_lock as raw")
      with a proper explanation why.
      
      The argument for converting the lock back to a regular spinlock was:
      
       - it does percpu ops without disabling preemption. Preemption is not
         disabled due to the mistaken use of a raw spinlock.
      
      Which is complete nonsense.  The raw_spinlock is disabling preemption in
      the same way as a regular spinlock.  In mainline spinlock maps to
      raw_spinlock, in RT spinlock becomes a "sleeping" lock.
      
      raw_spinlock has on RT exactly the same semantics as in mainline.  And
      because this lock is taken in non preemptible context it must be raw on
      RT.
      
      Undo the locking brainfart.
      Reported-by: NClark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
      Reported-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ed5c41d3
    • T
      random: introduce getrandom(2) system call · c6e9d6f3
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      The getrandom(2) system call was requested by the LibreSSL Portable
      developers.  It is analoguous to the getentropy(2) system call in
      OpenBSD.
      
      The rationale of this system call is to provide resiliance against
      file descriptor exhaustion attacks, where the attacker consumes all
      available file descriptors, forcing the use of the fallback code where
      /dev/[u]random is not available.  Since the fallback code is often not
      well-tested, it is better to eliminate this potential failure mode
      entirely.
      
      The other feature provided by this new system call is the ability to
      request randomness from the /dev/urandom entropy pool, but to block
      until at least 128 bits of entropy has been accumulated in the
      /dev/urandom entropy pool.  Historically, the emphasis in the
      /dev/urandom development has been to ensure that urandom pool is
      initialized as quickly as possible after system boot, and preferably
      before the init scripts start execution.
      
      This is because changing /dev/urandom reads to block represents an
      interface change that could potentially break userspace which is not
      acceptable.  In practice, on most x86 desktop and server systems, in
      general the entropy pool can be initialized before it is needed (and
      in modern kernels, we will printk a warning message if not).  However,
      on an embedded system, this may not be the case.  And so with this new
      interface, we can provide the functionality of blocking until the
      urandom pool has been initialized.  Any userspace program which uses
      this new functionality must take care to assure that if it is used
      during the boot process, that it will not cause the init scripts or
      other portions of the system startup to hang indefinitely.
      
      SYNOPSIS
      	#include <linux/random.h>
      
      	int getrandom(void *buf, size_t buflen, unsigned int flags);
      
      DESCRIPTION
      	The system call getrandom() fills the buffer pointed to by buf
      	with up to buflen random bytes which can be used to seed user
      	space random number generators (i.e., DRBG's) or for other
      	cryptographic uses.  It should not be used for Monte Carlo
      	simulations or other programs/algorithms which are doing
      	probabilistic sampling.
      
      	If the GRND_RANDOM flags bit is set, then draw from the
      	/dev/random pool instead of the /dev/urandom pool.  The
      	/dev/random pool is limited based on the entropy that can be
      	obtained from environmental noise, so if there is insufficient
      	entropy, the requested number of bytes may not be returned.
      	If there is no entropy available at all, getrandom(2) will
      	either block, or return an error with errno set to EAGAIN if
      	the GRND_NONBLOCK bit is set in flags.
      
      	If the GRND_RANDOM bit is not set, then the /dev/urandom pool
      	will be used.  Unlike using read(2) to fetch data from
      	/dev/urandom, if the urandom pool has not been sufficiently
      	initialized, getrandom(2) will block (or return -1 with the
      	errno set to EAGAIN if the GRND_NONBLOCK bit is set in flags).
      
      	The getentropy(2) system call in OpenBSD can be emulated using
      	the following function:
      
                  int getentropy(void *buf, size_t buflen)
                  {
                          int     ret;
      
                          if (buflen > 256)
                                  goto failure;
                          ret = getrandom(buf, buflen, 0);
                          if (ret < 0)
                                  return ret;
                          if (ret == buflen)
                                  return 0;
                  failure:
                          errno = EIO;
                          return -1;
                  }
      
      RETURN VALUE
             On success, the number of bytes that was filled in the buf is
             returned.  This may not be all the bytes requested by the
             caller via buflen if insufficient entropy was present in the
             /dev/random pool, or if the system call was interrupted by a
             signal.
      
             On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately.
      
      ERRORS
      	EINVAL		An invalid flag was passed to getrandom(2)
      
      	EFAULT		buf is outside the accessible address space.
      
      	EAGAIN		The requested entropy was not available, and
      			getentropy(2) would have blocked if the
      			GRND_NONBLOCK flag was not set.
      
      	EINTR		While blocked waiting for entropy, the call was
      			interrupted by a signal handler; see the description
      			of how interrupted read(2) calls on "slow" devices
      			are handled with and without the SA_RESTART flag
      			in the signal(7) man page.
      
      NOTES
      	For small requests (buflen <= 256) getrandom(2) will not
      	return EINTR when reading from the urandom pool once the
      	entropy pool has been initialized, and it will return all of
      	the bytes that have been requested.  This is the recommended
      	way to use getrandom(2), and is designed for compatibility
      	with OpenBSD's getentropy() system call.
      
      	However, if you are using GRND_RANDOM, then getrandom(2) may
      	block until the entropy accounting determines that sufficient
      	environmental noise has been gathered such that getrandom(2)
      	will be operating as a NRBG instead of a DRBG for those people
      	who are working in the NIST SP 800-90 regime.  Since it may
      	block for a long time, these guarantees do *not* apply.  The
      	user may want to interrupt a hanging process using a signal,
      	so blocking until all of the requested bytes are returned
      	would be unfriendly.
      
      	For this reason, the user of getrandom(2) MUST always check
      	the return value, in case it returns some error, or if fewer
      	bytes than requested was returned.  In the case of
      	!GRND_RANDOM and small request, the latter should never
      	happen, but the careful userspace code (and all crypto code
      	should be careful) should check for this anyway!
      
      	Finally, unless you are doing long-term key generation (and
      	perhaps not even then), you probably shouldn't be using
      	GRND_RANDOM.  The cryptographic algorithms used for
      	/dev/urandom are quite conservative, and so should be
      	sufficient for all purposes.  The disadvantage of GRND_RANDOM
      	is that it can block, and the increased complexity required to
      	deal with partially fulfilled getrandom(2) requests.
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reviewed-by: NZach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>
      c6e9d6f3
  4. 05 8月, 2014 8 次提交