1. 10 8月, 2010 3 次提交
    • C
      get rid of block_write_begin_newtrunc · 155130a4
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      Move the call to vmtruncate to get rid of accessive blocks to the callers
      in preparation of the new truncate sequence and rename the non-truncating
      version to block_write_begin.
      
      While we're at it also remove several unused arguments to block_write_begin.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      155130a4
    • C
      introduce __block_write_begin · 6e1db88d
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      Split up the block_write_begin implementation - __block_write_begin is a new
      trivial wrapper for block_prepare_write that always takes an already
      allocated page and can be either called from block_write_begin or filesystem
      code that already has a page allocated.  Remove the handling of already
      allocated pages from block_write_begin after switching all callers that
      do it to __block_write_begin.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      6e1db88d
    • C
      clean up write_begin usage for directories in pagecache · f4e420dc
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      For filesystem that implement directories in pagecache we call
      block_write_begin with an already allocated page for this code, while the
      normal regular file write path uses the default block_write_begin behaviour.
      
      Get rid of the __foofs_write_begin helper and opencode the normal write_begin
      call in foofs_write_begin, while adding a new foofs_prepare_chunk helper for
      the directory code.  The added benefit is that foofs_prepare_chunk has
      a much saner calling convention.
      
      Note that the interruptible flag passed into block_write_begin is always
      ignored if we already pass in a page (see next patch for details), and
      we never were doing truncations of exessive blocks for this case either so we
      can switch directly to block_write_begin_newtrunc.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      f4e420dc
  2. 30 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 28 5月, 2010 2 次提交
    • A
      fix fs/sysv s_dirt handling · 4c9002de
      Al Viro 提交于
      got broken on ->sync_fs() conversion a year ago, nobody noticed...
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      4c9002de
    • C
      rename the generic fsync implementations · 1b061d92
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      We don't name our generic fsync implementations very well currently.
      The no-op implementation for in-memory filesystems currently is called
      simple_sync_file which doesn't make too much sense to start with,
      the the generic one for simple filesystems is called simple_fsync
      which can lead to some confusion.
      
      This patch renames the generic file fsync method to generic_file_fsync
      to match the other generic_file_* routines it is supposed to be used
      with, and the no-op implementation to noop_fsync to make it obvious
      what to expect.  In addition add some documentation for both methods.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      1b061d92
  4. 22 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 15 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  6. 06 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 17 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  8. 12 6月, 2009 6 次提交
    • C
      sysv: add ->sync_fs · ad43ffde
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      Add a ->sync_fs method for data integrity syncs, and reimplement
      ->write_super ontop of it.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      ad43ffde
    • A
      05459ca8
    • C
      ->write_super lock_super pushdown · ebc1ac16
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      Push down lock_super into ->write_super instances and remove it from the
      caller.
      
      Following filesystem don't need ->s_lock in ->write_super and are skipped:
      
       * bfs, nilfs2 - no other uses of s_lock and have internal locks in
      	->write_super
       * ext2 - uses BKL in ext2_write_super and has internal calls without s_lock
       * reiserfs - no other uses of s_lock as has reiserfs_write_lock (BKL) in
       	->write_super
       * xfs - no other uses of s_lock and uses internal lock (buffer lock on
      	superblock buffer) to serialize ->write_super.  Also xfs_fs_write_super
      	is superflous and will go away in the next merge window
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      ebc1ac16
    • A
      Push lock_super() into the ->remount_fs() of filesystems that care about it · bbd6851a
      Al Viro 提交于
      Note that since we can't run into contention between remount_fs and write_super
      (due to exclusion on s_umount), we have to care only about filesystems that
      touch lock_super() on their own.  Out of those ext3, ext4, hpfs, sysv and ufs
      do need it; fat doesn't since its ->remount_fs() only accesses assign-once
      data (basically, it's "we have no atime on directories and only have atime on
      files for vfat; force nodiratime and possibly noatime into *flags").
      
      [folded a build fix from hch]
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      bbd6851a
    • C
      push BKL down into ->put_super · 6cfd0148
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller.  A couple of
      filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of
      s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs,
      hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment.  Most
      of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually.
      Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area.
      
      [AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are
      removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super()
      now]
      [AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt]
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      6cfd0148
    • C
      remove ->write_super call in generic_shutdown_super · 8c85e125
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      We just did a full fs writeout using sync_filesystem before, and if
      that's not enough for the filesystem it can perform it's own writeout
      in ->put_super, which many filesystems already do.
      
      Move a call to foofs_write_super into every foofs_put_super for now to
      guarantee identical behaviour until it's cleaned up by the individual
      filesystem maintainers.
      
      Exceptions:
      
       - affs already has identical copy & pasted code at the beginning of
         affs_put_super so no need to do it twice.
       - xfs does the right thing without it and I have changes pending for
         the xfs tree touching this are so I don't really need conflicts
         here..
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      8c85e125
  9. 03 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 28 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 22 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  12. 01 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 14 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  14. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 30 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  16. 08 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 17 10月, 2007 2 次提交
  18. 20 7月, 2007 1 次提交
    • P
      mm: Remove slab destructors from kmem_cache_create(). · 20c2df83
      Paul Mundt 提交于
      Slab destructors were no longer supported after Christoph's
      c59def9f change. They've been
      BUGs for both slab and slub, and slob never supported them
      either.
      
      This rips out support for the dtor pointer from kmem_cache_create()
      completely and fixes up every single callsite in the kernel (there were
      about 224, not including the slab allocator definitions themselves,
      or the documentation references).
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
      20c2df83
  19. 10 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  20. 17 5月, 2007 1 次提交
    • C
      Remove SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR · a35afb83
      Christoph Lameter 提交于
      SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR is always specified. No point in checking it.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
      Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      Cc: Steven French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      Cc: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>
      Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
      Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
      Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
      Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
      Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
      Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
      Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>
      Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz>
      Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a35afb83
  21. 09 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  22. 08 5月, 2007 2 次提交
    • C
      slab allocators: Remove SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL flag · 50953fe9
      Christoph Lameter 提交于
      I have never seen a use of SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL.  It is only supported by
      SLAB.
      
      I think its purpose was to have a callback after an object has been freed
      to verify that the state is the constructor state again?  The callback is
      performed before each freeing of an object.
      
      I would think that it is much easier to check the object state manually
      before the free.  That also places the check near the code object
      manipulation of the object.
      
      Also the SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL callback is only performed if the kernel was
      compiled with SLAB debugging on.  If there would be code in a constructor
      handling SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL then it would have to be conditional on
      SLAB_DEBUG otherwise it would just be dead code.  But there is no such code
      in the kernel.  I think SLUB_DEBUG_INITIAL is too problematic to make real
      use of, difficult to understand and there are easier ways to accomplish the
      same effect (i.e.  add debug code before kfree).
      
      There is a related flag SLAB_CTOR_VERIFY that is frequently checked to be
      clear in fs inode caches.  Remove the pointless checks (they would even be
      pointless without removeal of SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL) from the fs constructors.
      
      This is the last slab flag that SLUB did not support.  Remove the check for
      unimplemented flags from SLUB.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      50953fe9
    • N
      mm: make read_cache_page synchronous · 6fe6900e
      Nick Piggin 提交于
      Ensure pages are uptodate after returning from read_cache_page, which allows
      us to cut out most of the filesystem-internal PageUptodate calls.
      
      I didn't have a great look down the call chains, but this appears to fixes 7
      possible use-before uptodate in hfs, 2 in hfsplus, 1 in jfs, a few in
      ecryptfs, 1 in jffs2, and a possible cleared data overwritten with readpage in
      block2mtd.  All depending on whether the filler is async and/or can return
      with a !uptodate page.
      Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6fe6900e
  23. 13 2月, 2007 2 次提交
  24. 23 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  25. 09 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  26. 08 12月, 2006 3 次提交
  27. 12 10月, 2006 1 次提交